Search results

While I do not like Calvinism and I have debated against it in the past, this is not the discussion of this thread, my friends. Please start another thread if you want to debate Calvinism.

This false theory in Textual Criticism cannot be emphasized enough. Modern scholars say, A Scribe Was More Likely to Add to the Text Than to Subtract: Explanation: This principle suggests that scribes, when copying manuscripts, were more inclined to add content to the text rather than remove...

To all: I am still looking for somebody to debate on YouTube via Nick Sayers channel in defending the KJV. If you know of anyone who is qualified and competent on the basics on this issue, please do not hesitate to reach out to me. May the Lord Jesus Christ bless you all.

Further discussion on this has been done and the witnesses do not favor the Lockman foundation. Check out this thread here for the discussion. https://purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/s-franklin-logsdon-the-correction-of-a-david-cloud-error-on-his-excellent-testimony.218/

Right, that is true, but I don’t believe they will learn truth by you on this topic. You are speaking against the truth on actual sources. It takes a man to admit he is wrong. I have done so many times when a person shows me an article or source that is reliable that proves me wrong on certain...

By this statement itself, it just shows that you have no clue to the actual sources themselves. It is like you just arrived on planet Earth. Please do your own homework on the sources I provided and get back to me. Right now you lost all credibility.

Listen to Logsdon’s audio testimony. Either they are lying or Frank Logsdon is lying. Well, I think that if Logsdon was afraid that he was in trouble with the Lord for altering God’s Word, it would not really help him to say that. It would be just as equally bad to lie. So the motivation in...

This statement does not really mean anything unless you can back it up. But that’s all you got, right? Just empty claims and statements. I have backed up my claims and you just ignore them.

The Nestle and Aland is used for most Modern English Bibles. In the world of Modern Textual Criticism: the Nestle and Aland is a critical apparatus of the New Testament in Greek that compiles the latest manuscript discoveries in an effort to reconstruct a lost text (because they do not believe...

Ah, so now who is weaving the web of conspiracy theories? There is no reputable documentation or credible evidence suggesting that Dr. Frank Logsdon scammed people out of money. If such claims exist, they are likely rumors or misinformation rather than established facts. If you’ve encountered...

Anyone can read the quotes that are from Modern scholarship I provided to you proving that my statement was correct in that the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus manuscripts are relied upon heavily in the Nestle and Aland 28th edition. So you are the one who is promoting a conspiracy theory by not...

I am saying that while they did use other manuscripts in the Nestle and Aland 28 (NA28), they primarily rely heavily upon the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus for the NA28. The NA28 is used for Modern Translations such as the NIV, ESV, CSB, NASB, etcetera. I gave you the quotes by Modern scholars...

Dr. Frank Logsdon, the chairman of the New American Standard translation committee, became an avid advocate of the King James Bible. He renounced his own translation methods. He renounced his own Bible that he was the chairman of and he became an avid advocate of the King James Bible. He said...

Of course the NASB creators is going to cook up conspiracy theories against the KJV because it is competition. They wouldn’t make any money if they said the KJV was great and awesome. You have to think of people’s motives in this.

So why would all the other Modern scholars say that the Nestle and Aland is based primarily on the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus? I gave you quotes and you are not even believing those quotes now? This website that praises the NASB as the best goes into the origin of the NASB and talks about how the...

I believe the two Alexandrian ships that Paul traveled on is prophetic of Vaticanus and Sinaiticus. Vaticanus and Sinaiticus are of the Alexandrian text-type. While this is not always the indication that a manuscript may come from Alexandria, Egypt, I believe this is the case for Vaticanus and...

Rather than my trying to explain it again, I believe it is best to let the quotes of others tell what I have been trying to express. Please keep in mind that these are not KJV-only sources, either. GotQuestions.org: "Codex Sinaiticus, also known as 'Aleph' (the Hebrew letter א)... has been...

Look. I told you there are manuscripts that are used but they are not used as heavily as Vaticanus and Sinaiticus. So you are saying that Vaticanus and Sinaiticus are used for the NA28 and the Modern Bibles but they are not the two primary or main ones used? Is that what you are saying? If...

Actually, the debate challenge if you read the OP was supposed to be on YouTube via Nick Sayers channel. The thread is just a discussion, and not a formal debate that selects people on two opposing side with a moderator. There have been formal debates on the KJV topic before on Christian...

First, I asked you what are the oldest and best manuscripts, and you dodged the question. Are you not talking about Vaticanus and Sinaiticus? This is generally the two major manuscripts that is defended in Modern Scholarship since Westcott and Hort. The Vaticanus and Sinaiticus manuscripts...