theophilus
Well-Known Member
- Nov 13, 2012
- 432
- 363
- 63
- 84
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
You're right. I am going to ignore this. :)just feel free to ignore this ok, since youre going to anyway i guess
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You're right. I am going to ignore this. :)just feel free to ignore this ok, since youre going to anyway i guess
? hopefully salt that has not lost its flavor !and dont get the wrong impression ok, i am a pillar of salt i guess lol
hi just a question i know you are not talking to me but i want to ask something about this
but what about the word of christ he know your works that is why if you do not repent and change your ways... he might abandoned you
don't you think the way you thought it is naturally renewing of mind might not think you think it is and is just fooling you? to mislead you? because a wolf can disguised as a sheep
It's like this:Still not sure what is off with saying God is able to overcome the rich man’s attachment to his possessions.
That's not what I said. I said you don't use one verse on a subject to interpret multiple verses on the same subject.What makes you conclude Jesus' Mark 16:16 words are an interruption?
I thought is was the great commission.
All the rest of the baptism verses must compliment it.
Fact is, there was only one remedy to remit sins.well but you cant actually respond to my post, eh
so go with that then, i have no objection whatsoever ok, i dont even blame you
yes, the apostles were complete idiots, who did not even know what spirit they were of, right
Weapon of Choice
Do you practice pitting verses against each other like the other anti baptismalists do?That's not what I said. I said you don't use one verse on a subject to interpret multiple verses on the same subject.
I think you meant no one is supposed to do that, right ?That's not what I said. I said you don't use one verse on a subject to interpret multiple verses on the same subject.
No, I look at what the weight of scripture supports. And as I said, even the verses that mention baptism don't state that it saves.Do you practice pitting verses against each other like the other anti baptismalists do?
The true teachings available in very few places,No, I look at what the weight of scripture supports. And as I said, even the verses that mention baptism don't state that it saves.
Fact is, all anti baptismalists pit baptism verses against verses they find that speak of salvation, instead of harmonizing them to work together.No, I look at what the weight of scripture supports. And as I said, even the verses that mention baptism don't state that it saves.
Their sins....The true teachings available in very few places,
if you can find them - all fully and totally Scriptural,
show how and when and what immersion saves someone from. (as the Bible says , simply look and see in the Bible)
GOOD TRUTH! (though I don't see the reference if you don't print it out/text in the post)especially since water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ is for the remission of sins per Acts 2:38.
Yes, "Their sins"Their sins....
38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
i think the point is being overlooked, but ty, and have a good day okFact is, there was only one remedy to remit sins.
You inadvertently teach the Apostles died as sinners and went to hell because they cared not to be baptized themselves.
You, my friend, teach unscriptural gibberish.
Easier today - they can relax and fall into the twilitgh zoon, the internutty internet....i think the point is being overlooked, but ty, and have a good day ok
he who digs a pit for others to fall into ends up in it himself
It's like this:
all men sin.
The APOSTLES WERE SHOCKED at Jesus' Own Word: about how hard it is for a "rich"(in ENGLISH) man to enter heaven.
THEY SAW and KNEW JESUS,,, (okay, sorry for the caps...) ...
they saw and knew jesus, and they exlaimed to jesus: HOW THEN can we, YOUR OWN apostles, be saved... ?!?!
paraphrased: Jesus Answer: you cannot. ! ! (surprised.... don't give up) ...
You cannot be saved if you trust yourself.
In fact, if you think you have it made, or can make it, you have already failed.
(if you trust your Heavenly Father for Salvation, IT IS DONE ALREADy - already accomplished) ...
Anyone who wants to be my disciple must give up everything and follow ME (JESUS).
Now then - if man did not have to repent, to give up his possessions as well as his sin,
then
everyone would be saved....
QUOTE="VictoryinJesus, post: 800095, member: 7369"]Thank you. That makes sense. For me it is not about the passage or being right about the rich man there. It is the what is impossible with men, all things are possible with God. It is when I (personally) start adding exceptions there in the ‘all things are possible with God.’ doubt comes in, double minded, worry, fear...the moment that seed is planted of exceptions in the ‘all things are possible with God.’ I’m in trouble. Was thinking about it more while going to sleep last night. Thought of Job and jobs possessions and what God said to job. But dropping it. Your explanation helped.[/QUOTE
Remember that if Job lived today, ever since the rich man in NT,
Job also would have to give up Job's possessions, all of them,
to follow Jesus.
See the examples in ACTS, and in the book Foxes Book of Martyrs (free online).
Don't try to define/ excuse/ hold on to anything - not even old thoughts, beliefs from a childhood, beliefs from any church or group, worldly treasures even of gold or silver.The giving up all is not so easily defined (imo). For instance, although one can give all their goods to feed the poor, even their body to be burned they can still lack one thing. As He said to that rich man ‘one thing thou still lack’.