Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You just might be surprised.
But at least, I am a fellow Christian and what I believe my task is; to promote the Prophetic Word as it is Written in a modern, accredited translation.
This often results in people making vehement objections, as the true understanding of scripture often conflicts with their well entrenched beliefs. Either that, or my posts are simply ignored, as being incomprehensible to those locked into fables and false teachings.
For example; your favourite doctrine of AMillenniumism, simply does not conform to what Revelation 20 actually does say and messes up Gods 7000 year Plan for mankind.
Where in the Bible teaches "Gods 7000 year Plan for mankind"? You seem to make it up as you go.
I have proved the 7000 year Plan of God several times here and elsewhere. People like you are locked into your delusions and will only realize these Bible truths, as they take place.Where in the Bible teaches "Gods 7000 year Plan for mankind"? You seem to make it up as you go.
Rev 16:8 The Fourth Angel poured out his Bowl upon the sun......And making claims that Revelation 16:8-9 is about the sun going to literally scorch the Earth without spiritual understanding what the Lord is talking about here. Yeah his are nothing but fables and false interpretations.
True. This is his pattern. He makes it up as he goes.And making claims that Revelation 16:8-9 is about the sun going to literally scorch the Earth without spiritual understanding what the Lord is talking about here. Yeah his are nothing but fables and false interpretations.
You have proved nothing apart from you are an expert at avoidance.I have proved the 7000 year Plan of God several times here and elsewhere. People like you are locked into your delusions and will only realize these Bible truths, as they take place.
Rev 16:8 The Fourth Angel poured out his Bowl upon the sun......
A literal sun, with literal effects. Why must you spiritualize it?
Rev 16:8 The Fourth Angel poured out his Bowl upon the sun......
A literal sun, with literal effects. Why must you spiritualize it?
How do you think that 1 Thessalonians 5:2 supports pretrib? It doesn't support pre-trib whatsoever. The day of the Lord will result in the destruction by fire of the heavens and the earth and will not be followed by a 7 year time period of tribulation as pre-tribs imagine.I vote to give pretrib a decent ressurection.
For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. - 1 Thessalonians 5:2
So, you have no interest in interpreting scripture with scripture. You don't care if you interpret one verse in such a way that contradicts other verses. In other verses when Paul refers to the temple of God it is always in reference to the church, but somehow 2 Thess 2:4 is an exception to that? How could a future physical temple possibly be considered the temple of God? In order to be the temple of God it would have to be a temple that God Himself considers to be His temple. Paul didn't call it the fake temple of God. God would never consider any future physical temple to be His temple. That contradicts scripture. His days of dwelling in man-made temples are over.This load of repeatedly repeated bumf, does not in any way preclude the building of a new Temple in Jerusalem. As is definitely and plainly Prophesied.
The word rapture refers to us being caught up to meet Christ in the air and does not refer to the changing of our bodies that will occur at that time. The rapture is not a mystery. Also, the mystery referenced in 1 Corinthians 15:52 was revealed by Paul. It was something that was previously a mystery that Paul revealed in that verse. There's no reason to act as if it's still a mystery to us. The mystery was that not everyone would die and that our bodies will all be changed to be made immortal. Is that still a mystery to you now? It shouldn't be. Paul revealed it.I have been reading these threads.Scripture points to what we call the Trinity and Rapture as mysteries
1. Trinity... And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. - 1 Timothy 3:16
2. Rapture - Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed - 1 Corinthians 15:52
I would think that these topics will remain mysteries while we all are still alive and on planet earth. Even if we come up with an opinion we should be honest and admit that we are not really sure.
I wouldn't want to develop an opinion on these mysteries and condemn the rest of the Christian faith as heretics for not going along with my mindset.
It is you who fails to see or understand the scriptures which plainly state the building of a new Temple and the re-establishment of the offerings and sacrifices in it. Isaiah 56:1-8, Ezekiel 40 to 46, +So, you have no interest in interpreting scripture with scripture. You don't care if you interpret one verse in such a way that contradicts other verses. In other verses when Paul refers to the temple of God it is always in reference to the church, but somehow 2 Thess 2:4 is an exception to that? How could a future physical temple possibly be considered the temple of God? In order to be the temple of God it would have to be a temple that God Himself considers to be His temple. Paul didn't call it the fake temple of God. God would never consider any future physical temple to be His temple. That contradicts scripture. His days of dwelling in man-made temples are over.
It is you who fails to see or understand the scriptures which plainly state the building of a new Temple and the re-establishment of the offerings and sacrifices in it. Isaiah 56:1-8, Ezekiel 40 to 46, +
Your 'no Temple' belief cannot be right as that makes Daniel 9:27 and 2 Thess 2:4, to be impossible.
Daniel 9:27 was fulfilled more than 1900 years ago. The OT temple (sanctuary) was destroyed in 70 AD. Daniel 9:26.It is you who fails to see or understand the scriptures which plainly state the building of a new Temple and the re-establishment of the offerings and sacrifices in it. Isaiah 56:1-8, Ezekiel 40 to 46, +
Your 'no Temple' belief cannot be right as that makes Daniel 9:27 and 2 Thess 2:4, to be impossible.
That is a wrong assumption. The Second Temple, Ezra 6:3-5, does not comply with the Third Temple, as Ezekiel 40 to 46, describes.As clearly shown, Ezekiel Chapter 43 showed the temple "Pattern" to the House of Israel in the Babylonian Captivity
The temple seen in Ezekiel Chapters 40-46 is nothing more than the 2nd Zerubbabel Temple built 536BC after the Babylonian Captivity, where animal sacrifice for "Sin" was was instructed by "God", prior to the shed blood of Jesus Christ on Calvary, don't be deceived
You two, seem to have no qualms about denying plain scriptures, such as Isaiah 56:1-8, Ezekiel 20:40-31 and other Prophesies which prove there will be a new Temple. Remember; God does not change - we will again make thank offerings and sacrifices for inadvertent sims.The NT descriptions of the Temple of God as the believer in Christ, collectively His Church, are Scripture's last and final words defining and clarifying the meaning of the Temple.
God has no qualms about transcending His OT temporal temple with a glorious NT edifice, His Church, being built by His Son since His First Coming. Matthew 16:18; Ephesians 2:19-22; Ephesians 5:27; 1 Peter 2:5You two, seem to have no qualms about denying plain scriptures, such as Isaiah 56:1-8, Ezekiel 20:40-31 and other Prophesies which prove there will be a new Temple. Remember; God does not change - we will again make thank offerings and sacrifices for inadvertent sims.
Where does scripture say the present Spiritual Temple of the Christian peoples, will be permanent?God has no qualms about transcending His OT temporal temple with a glorious NT edifice, His Church, being built by His Son since His First Coming. Matthew 16:18; Ephesians 2:19-22; Ephesians 5:27; 1 Peter 2:5
Remember that His Son is the mediator of a better covenant established upon better promises through one sacrifice. Hebrews 8:6; Hebrews 9:12,26,28.
That's an unassailable change for the better.
We will make nothing, because He has made it all.
Agree. Premils like him have no problem with believing that even though Jesus established the better (new) covenant with His shed blood long ago, God will inexplicably make things regress to the inferior (old) covenant again in the future. It's just utter nonsense and a complete insult to the work of Christ on the cross almost 2,000 years ago.God has no qualms about transcending His OT temporal temple with a glorious NT edifice, His Church, being built by His Son since His First Coming. Matthew 16:18; Ephesians 2:19-22; Ephesians 5:27; 1 Peter 2:5
Remember that His Son is the mediator of a better covenant established upon better promises through one sacrifice. Hebrews 8:6; Hebrews 9:12,26,28.
That's an unassailable change for the better.
We will make nothing, because He has made it all.
You didn't address what I said in my post at all. I will assume that is because you have no answer for what I said and you will just believe what you want to believe whether you can support it with scripture or not. It's not reasonable whatsoever that 2 Thess 2:4 is talking about a physical temple and I gave evidence to back that up.It is you who fails to see or understand the scriptures which plainly state the building of a new Temple and the re-establishment of the offerings and sacrifices in it. Isaiah 56:1-8, Ezekiel 40 to 46, +
Your 'no Temple' belief cannot be right as that makes Daniel 9:27 and 2 Thess 2:4, to be impossible.
There is no answer to this.You didn't address what I said in my post at all. I will assume that is because you have no answer for what I said and you will just believe what you want to believe whether you can support it with scripture or not. It's not reasonable whatsoever that 2 Thess 2:4 is talking about a physical temple and I gave evidence to back that up.
Daniel 9:27 relates to the second temple and it was destroyed long ago just as Jesus said it would be when referencing that prophecy (Matthew 24:1-2,15-21). And, if you cared about interpreting scripture with scripture, you would acknowledge that any time Paul referred to the temple of God in other scripture, it was always in relation to either our bodies or to the collective body of Christ (the church). But, you don't care about interpreting 2 Thess 2:4 in such a way that doesn't contradict other scripture, so you make it say whatever you want it to say.
Right…..There is no answer to this.