"They're wrong to tell us (women) we can't have it all!"
You can. But at what cost?
Life is full of trade-offs.
A woman can be married, have kids, and have a full time career that required years of education. My Mom did all those things.
But there was a cost.
Men face some of the same trade-offs thinking THEY can have it all, too. Full-time career, a
doting wife and kids (and at times, even a mistress on the side). Wives would take care of their husbands to the point of spoiling them so much, that men came to expect that treatment.
At first, men seemed reluctant to "allow" women to join the workforce. But they seemed to figure that there would be no problem...
as long as she continues to cater to him, keep the house and tend to the children.
She was often tired and anxious, self-admitting to not quite being the Mom she admitted to wanting to be at times. Towards retirement, her mental and physical health declined. She is so subdued now. Not the vivacious funny force of nature I remember her being.
Women were already under a tremendous amount of stress as traditional wives, and most of them did not work outside the home. And, they still are. It's one thing to be under stress as a working single mother, but as a working mother with a partner who either does not or HARDLY contributes to the day-to-day management of a house/childcare, it's even worse.
IShe wanted to give us opportunities and a good life so she worked to the bone to make it all happen and balance the priorities. But it was her the Mom herself being with me that I cared about, not the activities our family could afford.
Interestingly, two of the BIGGEST end-of-life regrets that people (yes, that's men AND women) have, is working too much and not spending enough time with their families.
What Im hearing today is that that all the risks and consequences are in the submissive homemaker's corner and not in the married career woman's corner.
Not even close to true.
And plenty of women will never put as much effort into balancing the needs of her family and a full time job as my Mom did.
And you know this...how?
Submissive homemakers risk being mistreated or cheated on by their husbands...just as every woman in an intimate relationship with a man (or even a woman) risks.
Not true. Studies have proven that abuse is MUCH
LESS likely to occur in marriages that are more
egalitarian than in male dominated marriages (a.k.a. "Traditional" marriages)
Her husband could pass away suddenly and face financial hardship and be in the same boat as nearly everyone in America right now.
No, not "nearly everyone in America right now."
But if a woman wants to have it all, she may end up like all the other women in my family... maxxed out on education and career with no marriage prospects or children as they get older. None of them claim to be happy with this. My cousin has vacationed all over the world with her own money and still wants a good man and children before she can't have them anymore.
Or, she may not.
Its hard to say who the delusions of feminism hurt more: women who are pushed to suppress their natural desires toward love and children for education and career only to find life getting harder and harder...
It's not that women are being pushed by feminism into some "unnatural" desire for women to want an education and career. The desire for an education/career isn't as tied to
biology as it is
psychology. In other words, it's what men and women are
cultured to believe
. Just because a woman has a uterus doesn't mean that biology is calling for her to use it. Same for men, only for men, it seems to be more tolerable in society that if a man doesn't have a desire for children, it's not THAT big of a deal.
Even Christ said (paraphrasing) that not EVERYONE would marry (and consequently, produce children). He made no distinction between men and women about that.
or men who are genuinely trying to adapt to modern times only to get disrespected, hurt, and abused anyway because the benefits of "equality" only go in one direction.
Again, this isn't true. Care to demonstrate HOW?