David in NJ
Well-Known Member
Ready - Set - Let's GoYes…do you want to get into that specifically?
Ready when you are….
Since God the FATHER cannot have sin in His Presence, who was the mediator between God and man BEFORE Jesus???
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Ready - Set - Let's GoYes…do you want to get into that specifically?
Ready when you are….
Here's one worth considering. (we probably already have)
Colossians 2:9-10 NIV
For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form,
10 and in Christ you have been brought to fullness.
He is the head over every power and authority.
[
In case you missed it.theotés: Deity, Godhead, Divine Nature, i. e. the state of being God
Excellent!View attachment 53779
theotés: Deity, Godhead, Divine Nature, i. e. the state of being God
View attachment 53780
[
Naysayers will say Christ was spiritually possessed.View attachment 53779
theotés: Deity, Godhead, Divine Nature, i. e. the state of being God
View attachment 53780
[
Was it Moses?Ready - Set - Let's Go
Since God the FATHER cannot have sin in His Presence, who was the mediator between God and man BEFORE Jesus???
Since God was not able to have direct contact with sinful humans, it is apparent that Jesus in his position as “the son of God” was always “the logos” “from the beginning” as it states in John 1:1. He just hasn’t always been known as “Jesus” which is the name he was given at his human birth. As we can see from the scriptures, Jesus has many roles and each one comes with a title or name. He even speaks of another “new name in Philippians 2:9…Ready - Set - Let's Go
Since God the FATHER cannot have sin in His Presence, who was the mediator between God and man BEFORE Jesus???
ExcellentSince God was not able to have direct contact with sinful humans, it is apparent that Jesus in his position as “the son of God” was always “the logos” “from the beginning” as it states in John 1:1. He just hasn’t always been known as “Jesus” which is the name he was given at his human birth. As we can see from the scriptures, Jesus has many roles and each one comes with a title or name. He even speaks of another “new name in Philippians 2:9…
”For this very reason, God exalted him to a superior position and kindly gave him the name that is above every other name”……how do you give Jesus a name that is higher that what he already has if he is God?
Rev 3:12 also mentions a “new name”.
His title ”logos” can mean “one who speaks God’s words”…or a “spokesman”…so in those instances where God sent his angel to speak for him, it was likely always the one he appointed in many roles…..he is a spokesman, a representative, a teacher, a redeemer, and a mediator.
Yes!!!Excellent
Therefore it was the Word who was the Lord who appeared and spoke to Moses.
It's a subject that brings out the uglies in people. So, I rather abstain from that discussion.God discussed it in Genesis, the OT Prophets, the Gospel, the Apostles Letters and Revelation.
As I've said before, it's a subject that brings out the uglies in people. So, I rather abstain from that discussion. I know what I believe and why, and can readily defend my beliefs, but too often, people start throwing insults and I rather not subject myself to that.Can’t say I blame you.
i understandIt's a subject that brings out the uglies in people. So, I rather abstain from that discussion.
I'm not going to deal with your crazies today Eternally - your pride is plainly evident.Once again, Even in my version of the word. if something is missing in a text or ir something is say in the NASB but not in the KJV. then I would see in the bible I use, and the logos bible software I use that it is in the text.
the fact it is missing this leads me to believe that it most likely was not added.
Also. please note. THIS IS Not the only proof of the trinity.
again, You disagree, thats fine, Stop attacking a brother and calling him a liar. You have already claimed it is your mission to defeat what you do not agree with. hence you are a biased communicator in this discussion. No matter what is said, You will be biased to defeat anything that may possibly go towards a fact that Jesus is God (I am not even going to use the word trinity anymore. to me people are fighting a doctrine. And when this happens. any real discussion is next to impossible.
Thats okI'm not going to deal with your crazies today Eternally - your pride is plainly evident.
F2F
Yesterday, despite all the clear and concise exegesis, the only response from one member was, "You put up a good case." Let me ask you, Wrangler: how is it that a member can be shown the truth repeatedly, yet continue to present more verses as if they prove their point?@face2face, see? Just like I said. They claim mountains of support exist while ignoring the trinity is not in the Bible.
No, sorry I do not hold that belief at all since no Scripture calls Jesus Yahweh…ever.
He was the voice of the burning bush and the leader of Israel through the wilderness.Excellent
Therefore it was the Word who was the Lord who appeared and spoke to Moses.
The spirit of antichrist denies that Christ came in the flesh.Naysayers will say Christ was spiritually possessed.