Hobie
Well-Known Member
But it doesn't help either..None of that refutes anything that I posted
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
But it doesn't help either..None of that refutes anything that I posted
memory problems brother, friendWhat do you mean what did I post? You referenced me. Why?
That is putting your pre-conceived idea into the text, it means what says, and repeats it in many other text.For those who are in Christ Jesus, the Bible stipulates: "To be absent from the body is to present with the Lord." 2 Corinthians 5:8.
That is, there is a separation of body and spirit where the spirit goes to heaven to be with the Lord. while his body returns to the dust to await resurrection on the last day.
On the other hand, those NOT in Christ Jesus, their body, soul, and spirit will return to the dust. We read in Psalms 115:16-18
16 The heaven, [even] the heavens, [are] the LORD’S: but the earth hath he given to the children of men.
17 The dead (spiritually dead) praise not the LORD, neither any that go down into silence.
18 But we will bless the LORD from this time forth and for evermore. Praise the LORD.
To God Be The Glory
Well you have good company, if one really looks on the belief of soul-sleep we find this view has been held throughout church history. The early church held to this at the time of the apostles as it was the original Christian teaching and later theological arguments based on this belief were also used to contest the Roman Catholic doctrine of purgatory and masses for the dead. The Ana-Baptists believed in this in the 1500's. Martin Luther has many quotes that point to his belief in it and was among one of the more notable advocates of conditional immortality. On October 31, 1517, Luther posted his famous Theses on the church door in Wittenberg.That might be the way you explain it....but how does the Bible explain it? I though it was the Bible that gave us our beliefs?
Have I not provided enough scripture for you? Do you need more? I can understand why it is hard to get your head around what the Bible says....but you have to understand that immortality of the soul is not a Bible teaching. It is just a perpetuation of the lie satan told the woman in Eden.
It was the sudden death of my father that got me searching for the truth about what happens to the dead....
I figured that if he had gone to heaven, how could he be happy when we were miserable, missing him...so how could he not be missing us? How can heaven be a happy place if people are snatched away from the people they love?
It felt so wrong that the platitudes offered by my church just made me angry. Where was the Bible? No one mentioned what the Bible had to say about it. I wanted to know why death felt so bad when it was supposed to be a happy time for the person who had left.
If you have lost anyone close in death, sat with them when they breathed their last breath, you understand the finality of death.
The comfort comes in knowing that death is not as final as it appears.....resurrection is assured because Jesus' sacrifice has rescued them from being held prisoner by it. Nothing can harm them...they are in the safest place imaginable.
Well. Scripture may be quoted.Clearly its what we are being given from the scriptures, not some deviation or private interpretation...
More Scripture, but still no "soul sleep" nor "soul sleeping".And even in the New Testament we see more of the same:
Okay, good. This is better.....And we see clearly is laid out in 1 Corinthians as the sleeping saints are raised at the resurrection...
1 Corinthians 15
Everywhere it says the dead will sleep or lay sleeping in the dust or grave..Well. Scripture may be quoted.
Was quote "soul sleep" or even "soul sleeping" found in Scripture ?
More Scripture, but still no "soul sleep" nor "soul sleeping".
Okay, good. This is better.....
who were the people you are quoting? I am guessing many of us don't know who they are.Here is something I came across on Martin Luther..
However, the best known advocate of soul sleep was Martin Luther (1483–1546). [Froom 1966, p. 74: “Archdeacon Blackburne's incisive summation of Luther's position was this: ‘Luther espoused the doctrine of the sleep of the soul, upon a Scripture foundation, and then he made use of it as a confutation of purgatory and Saint worship, and continued in that belief to the last moment of his life.]
In writing on Ecclesiastes, Luther says:
Salomon judgeth that the dead are a sleepe, and feele nothing at all. For the dead lye there accompting neyther dayes nor yeares, but when they are awoken, they shall seeme to have slept scarce one minute. [Martin Luther, "An Exposition of Salomon's Booke, called Ecclesiastes or the Preacher" (translation 1573)]
Elsewhere Luther states: As soon as thy eyes have closed shalt thou be woken, a thousand years shall be as if thou hadst slept but a little half hour. Just as at night we hear the clock strike and know not how long we have slept, so too, and how much more, are in death a thousand years soon past. Before a man should turn round, he is already a fair angel.[Luther, Martin, "WA", 37.191.]
Here is more from my buddy Amo of others...
The 17th Century
Richard or Robert Overton, scholar, soldier and pamphletier, published in 1643, Man's Mortality, in which the title page reads:
"A Treatise wherein `T is proved, both theologically and Philosophically. That as whole man sinned, so whole man died; contrary to the common distinction of Soul and Body: And that the present going of the Soul into heaven or hell, is a meer Fiction. And that at the Resurrection is the beginning of our immortality; and then actual Condemnation and Salvation, and not before." [R. Overton, Man's Mortality, 1643]
John Milton (1608-1674), was a well known or even the greatest of the sacred poets. Milton taught the totally unconscious sleep of man in death until the coming of Christ and resurrection, and wrote: "Inasmuch as the whole man uniformly said to consist of body, and soul (whatever may be the distinct provinces of these divisions), I will show, that in death, first, the whole man, and
secondly, each component part,
suffers privation of life. ... The grave is the common guardian of all till the day of judgment." [John Milton, Treatise of Christian Doctrine, Vol. 1, ch. 13.]
George Wither (1588-1667), contended for conditional immortality in which the soul is asleep in death.[Produced an English translation of Nemesius, early Bishop of Emesa, 1636.]
John Jackson (1686-1763), was the Rector of Rossington school and wrote several titles in which he confutes and condemns the doctrine of eternal torment.[John Jackson, A Dissertation on Matter and Spirit, 1735.;]
John Canne (1590-1667) was a pastor of the Broadmead Baptist Church in Bristol and printer of R. Overton's work and held essentially the same view as Overton.[John Canne, Reference Bible, 1682.]
Archbishop John Tillotson (1630-1694) of Canterbury states
"I do not find that the doctrine of the immortality of the soul is anywhere expressly delivered in Scripture, but taken for granted." [John Tillotson, Works, 1683.]
Dr. Isaac Barrow (1630-1677), professor of Greek at Cambridge University maintained that eternal life is conditional and believed in the final destruction of the wicked.[Isaac Barrow, `Duration of Future Punishment' in Works.]
Dr. William Coward (1657-1725) was a practicing physician in London. He states
"Second thoughts concerning the human soul, demonstrating the notion of human soul, as believed to be a Spiritual and Immortal Substance, united to a Human Body, to be plain Heathenish Invention, and not Consonant to the principles of Philosophy, Reason or Religion." [Wm. Coward, A Survey of the Search After Souls, ca. 1702.]
Henry Layton (1670-1706) was a member of the Anglican Faith and the author of 12 books on conditionalism in which he contends that
"... during life, we live and move in Christ; and when we die we rest and sleep in Him, in expectation of being raised at His second coming. [Henry Layton, Arguments and Replies, in dispute concerning the nature of the soul, 1703]
Joseph Nicol Scott M.D. (1703-1769) was also a minister who assisted his father, Thomas Scott and maintained that
"... life is for the righteous only, with destruction for the wicked." [Joseph N. Scott, Sermons Preached in Defence of All Religion, 1743.]
Bishop Edmund Law (1703-1787) was the master of St. Peter's College, archdeacon of Staffordshire and bishop of Carlisle. He challenged the doctrine of a conscious intermediate state; held death to be a sleep, a negation of all life, thought, or action - a state of rest, silence and oblivion. [Edmund Law, Considerations on ... the Theory of Religion, 1749.' The State of the Dead, 1765, See Appendix.]
Dr. William Whiston (1667-1752) was a Baptist theologian and professor of mathematics at Cambridge University and
"... denied the doctrine of eternal torment and held that the wicked would be totally destroyed." [William Whiston, The Eternity of Hell-Torments Considered, 1740.]
Dr. William Thomson (1819-1890) was the archbishop of York. He wrote:
"Life to the godles must be the beginning of destruction since nothing but God and that which pleases Him can permanently exist." [William Thomson, The Thought of Death, Bampton Lecture, 1862.]
Dr. Edward White (1819-1887) was a Congregationalist pastor at St. Paul's Chapel and chairman of the Congregational Union. For over forty years he was a leading advocate of conditional immortality [Edward White, Life in Christ, 1846]. In 1883 he made it known:
"I steadfastly maintain, after 40 years of study of the matter, that it is the notion of the infliction of a torment in body and soul that shall be absolutely endless, which alone gives a foot of standing ground to Ingersol in America, or Bradlaugh in England. I believe more firmly than ever that it is a doctrine as contrary to every line of the Bible as it is contrary to every moral instinct of humanity." [Introduction to J. H. Pettingell's The Unspeakable Gift, 1884, p. 22.]
In the following year he adds:
"The Old Testament is consistent throughout with the belief of eternal life of the servants of God, and of the eternal destruction of the wicked. And it is consistent, when taken in its simple sense with no other belief ..."
"The Gospels and Epistles with equal pertinacity adhere almost uniformly to language respecting the doom of the unsaved which taken in its simple sense, teaches, as does the Old Testament, that they shall die, perish, be destroyed, not see life, but suffer destruction, everlasting destruction, `destruction,' says Christ, `of body and soul in Gehenna.' [J.H. Pettingell, Homiletic Monthly (England), march, 1885.]
Archbishop Richard Whately (1787-1863) was archbishop of Dublin, Ireland and a professor at Oxford and principal. He taught the final destruction of the wicked and believed "The wicked are never spoken of as being kept alive, but as forfeiting life." [ Richard Whitley, A View of the Scriptural Revelations Concerning a Future State.]
Dr. Robert W. Dale (1829-1895) was a Congregationalist pastor of Carr's Lane Church in Birmingham. He was editor of The Congregationalist magazine; chairman of the `Congregational Union of England and Wales'; and president of the `First International Council of Congregational Churches in 1891'. He announced his acceptance of conditionalism in a paper before the Congregational Union of 1874.
"Eternal life, as I believe, is the inheritance of those who are in Christ. Those who are not in Him will die the Second Death from which there will be no resurrection ...
I am not conscious that they [the positions of Conditionalism] have at all impaired the authority in my teaching of any of the great central doctrines of the Christian faith.
The doctrine of the Trinity remains untouched; and
the doctrine of the incarnation, and
the doctrine of the atonement in its evangelical sense, and
the doctrine of justification by faith, and
the doctrine of judgment by works, and
the doctrine of regeneration
have received, I believe, from these conclusions a new and intenser illustration." [Freer's `Edward White', His Life and Work, 1902, pp. 354-355.]
Frederick W. Farrar (1831-1903) was the canon of Westminster Abbey and the dean of Canterbury. he denounced the
"... dogma of endless, conscious suffering and could not find a single text in all Scripture that, when fairly interpreted, teaches the common views about endless torment." [ Frederick Farrar, Eternal Hope, 1877]
William E. Gladstone (1809-1898) was a British Prime Minister and Theologian. In a searching criticism of Bishop Butler's Analogy and its defense of innate immortality, Gladstone contended:
"[It is only] from the time of Origen that we are to regard the idea of natural, as opposed to that of Christian, immortality as beginning to gain a firm foothold in the Christian Church." [William E. Gladstone, Studies Subsidiary to the Works of Bishop Butler, (1896 ed.), p. 184.]
So its a belief that has been held by many Christian scholars and ministers and preachers since the Reformation and in the Early Church before the Greek pagan beliefs entered in..
start quoting people we know.and even more...
Dr. R. F. Weymouth (1822-1902) was the headmaster of Mill Hill School and translator of New Testament in Modern Speech. He said:
"My mind fails to conceive a grosser misrepresentation of language than when five or six of the strongest words which the Greek tongue possesses, signifying to destroy or destruction, are explained to mean `maintaining an everlasting but wretched existence.' To translate black as white is nothing to this." [Edward White in Life in Christ, (1878), p. 365.]
In his book in a note on 1.Corinthians 15:18 he says:
"By `perish' the Apostle here apparently means `pass out of existence'."
On Hebrews 9:28 we read:
"The use in the N.T. of such words as `death', `destruction', `fire', `perish', to describe Future Retribution, point to the likelihood of fearful anguish, followed by extinction of being, as the doom which awaits those who by persistent rejection of the Saviour prove themselves utterly, and therefore irremediably bad." {Ibid.,]
On Revelation 14:11:
"There is nothing in this verse that necessarily implies an eternity of suffering. In a similar way the word `punishment' or `correction' in Matthew 25:46 gives itself no indication of time."
On Revelation 20:10:
"The Lake of fire implying awful pain and complete, irremediable ruin and destruction." [Ibid.,]
Dr. Lyman Abbott (1835-1922) was a Congregationlist pastor and editor of Christian Union and The Outlook. He wrote:
"Outside of the walls of Jerusalem, in the valley of Gehenna, was kept perpetually burning a fire, on which the offal of the city was thrown to be destroyed. This is the hell fire of the New Testament. Christ warns his auditors that persistence in sin will make them offal to be cast out from the holy city, to be destroyed. The worm that dieth not was the worm devouring the carcasses, and is equally clearly a symbol not of torture but of destruction." [Lyman Abbott, That Unknown Country, 1889.]
"The notion that the final punishment of sin is continuance in sin and suffering is also based in part on, what seems to me, a false philosophy of man. This philosophy is that man is by nature immortal. The conviction has grown on me, that according to the teaching of both of science and Scripture, man is by nature an animal, and like all other animals mortal; that immortality belongs only to the spiritual life; and that spiritual life is possible only in communion and contact with God; that, in short, immortality was not conferred upon the race in creation whether it would or not, but is conferred in redemption, upon all those of the race who choose life and immortality through Jesus Christ our Lord." [Ibid., ]
Dr. Edward Beecher (1803-1895) was a Congregationalist theologian and president of Illinois College. He stated:
"If [the Bible] does not recognize, nay, it expressly denies the natural and inherent immortality of the soul. It assures us that God only hath immortality. (1.Timothy 6:16). By this we understand that He has immortality in the highest sense - that is, inherent immortality. All existence besides Himself He created, and He upholds. Men are not, as Plato taught, self-existent, eternal beings, immortal in their very nature. ... There is no inherent immortality of the soul as such. What God created He sustains in being, and can annihilate at will." [Edward Beecher, Doctrine of Scriptural Retribution, p. 58.]
Lets look....start quoting people we know.
But at least I've heard of Beecher, if only because of his more famous brother Henry and sister Harriet. Piece of trivia my mind latched onto from a course on US Cultural History I took in college.I have no interest in reading him,
![]()
EDWARD BEECHER - HISTORY OF OPINIONS ON THE SCRIPTURAL DOCTRINE OF RETRIBUTION
At this time there are at least four positions assumed as to the destinies of the wicked : 1. That they are to be ultimately annihilated. 2. That they are to be ultimately restored to holiness and happiness. 3. That their punishment is endless. 4.www.academia.edu