Well that’s not going to fly. You asked me if I read verse 14 back into the prologue and said you don’t read it back to the prologue. I see you’ve amended that now though, and said something, somewhere, about…the “word” being incarnated. And now you say it is the same word used in Vss 1 and 14.
I haven’t amended anything. I’ve always said it’s the same word.
So…in the beginning was the “it?”
Is that what the Geneva Bible says?
And the “it” was with God. And the “it” was God. And the “it” was incarnated/made flesh and the “it” made His home among us and the “it” is the Son of God.
You just painted yourself into some sort of corner where first, you say you don’t read it back into Johns “prologue,” then you say it’s the same word as is used in verse 1 …
He, Jesus, is what the Father’s logos became when it, not he, became incarnate. As I said quite clearly, I connect the incarnation of the word with the begetting, conception and birth of Jesus.
…so you actually DO read it back to vs 1, which leads to this: in the beginning was the word, and the word was with God, and the word was God and the word was incarnated/became flesh/the Son of God.
I don’t read the Son back into vs. 1. The Son isn’t in v. 1. John is speaking about the Father and what existed with him - in his mind, in his thought, in his spirit, in his plan and purpose - before the creation of the heavens and the earth. John begins his Gospel by first directing his readers’ attention back to the Genesis creation. His point: the God who created the heavens and the earth (his God and the Messiah’s God) is creating the new creation, which begins with and in Jesus of Nazareth. What had been with the Father from before the Genesis creation, foreknown to him, existing in mind before he spoke it into existence, included the new creation. John’s announcement - what the Father had in mind concerning the new creation, what he had planned and promised, was being brought into existence.
The heavens and the earth didn’t literally exist before the Father brought them into being. They existed notionally with him. Jesus of Nazareth didn’t literally exist before the Father brought him into being. He existed notionally with the Father.
Jesus of Nazareth himself is the beginning of the new creation planned and promised by the Father.
That’s Jewish monotheism.
*
After what you said in post #346, why are you still speaking with me? Why are you still posting in this section of the forum?
I’m glad that you are and I’m pleased to have a conversation with you.
As you are someone who doesn’t believe the Holy Spirit is a third person, you belong here. So why does it make you feel “yucky” to be here?