Taken
Well-Known Member
having an Advocate doesnt mean you dont still sin….
Requiring an Advocate (Expressly Jesus), means you SILL SIN.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
having an Advocate doesnt mean you dont still sin….
The very point I made earlier... ↓↓↓“ Doing what is right” does not mean a life of Sinless perfection .
And we're not talking about sinless perfection here.
That's not the only will of God for the believer, lol. Besides, willingly living in habitual, purposeful sin day after day just like you did before you (supposedly) got born again is not what "BELIEVE on the ONE that He sent" looks like. That person's life shows they have not satisfied God's will in regard to 'believing on the one that he sent', let alone satisfying God's will in regard to how to live.If one does “ the Will Of God” how could he NOT be “ doing what is right “ .....so the Vital question becomes, “What is the Will Of God? “ .....Jesus Himself provided the answer—-“The Will Of God is to BELEVE on the ONE that He sent”.
I think it was BB.You have quote marks....but those are your words.
Where is a OSAS believer saying that?
Red herring!
I didn't say Eve was "only deceived," as in did not sin. I said, only Eve was deceived, as opposed to Adam. To clarify, she did not deliberately disobey God, but she surely did sin. But Adam's disobedience was what plunged the world into sin. So, what you way about me is in error. And this is certainly not the first time for that... :)Pinseeker teaches Adam sinned Eve was only deceived. This is Error, Both Adam and Eve sinned
Sure. See above. But even this does not say that Eve sinned, actually. She did, but she fell into sin, as in became dead in her sin with Adam. Again, she did sin, but even this verse in 1 Timothy, written by Paul, does not say she committed a sin, per se. She became dead in her sin, took on the same sinful nature that Adam did, in Genesis 3.1Timothy 2:14, -And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into sin. The both committed sin.
so are you saying you no longer sin???
Not surprised.Sorry, I don’t see how that is possible.
Everybody learns from somebody, right BH? So, the same to you.I believe you learned OSAS from those who taught you this and so that is the lens you have chosen to look at the Bible through.
And they would be wrong.I am aware that some OSAS Proponents believe there are consequences to sin, but these consequences are minor...
That they are. But the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.For the wages of sin is death.
Nope. Not in any way. With all due respect, BH, that's a stupid thing to say.OSAS folk are defending sin because if the Bible teaches that the wages of sin is death (and it does), and the OSAS Proponent is saying that is not the case in the fact that they say they can sin and still be saved, then they are defending evil or sin.
Yes it certainly does, but it also says, quite clearly that there's a Way to avoid having to pay those wages.if the Bible teaches that the wages of sin is death (and it does)
Nope. Not at all.... and the OSAS Proponent is saying that is not the case in the fact that they say they can sin and still be saved, then they are defending evil or sin.
Sure, but you forgot that little comma after "Christ Jesus." The rest of the verse is an appositive (a phrase follows another noun or noun phrase in apposition to it; that is, it provides information that further identifies or defines it). And this appositive phrase refers to those in Christ Jesus. They walk after the Spirit and not in the flesh because they are in Christ Jesus.Oh, and by the way, when you quote Romans 8:1, read it in the King James Bible. It will give you the full version of that verse. It says there is no condemnation to those in Christ Jesus who walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit.
I agree! No "OSASer" worth his or her salt thinks otherwise.So you cannot walk after sin or the flesh otherwise you are under the condemnation.
Absolutely. Again, no "OSASer" worth his or her salt thinks otherwise.For John 3:19-21 talks about the Condemnation further. John 3:20 says all who do evil hate the light. The light is the real Jesus of the Bible...
BH, this fate ~ the second death ~ is God's condemnation. Those who are in Christ Jesus, having been born again of the Spirit, may still, in this life, experience dire consequences for sin. But they will not be condemned by God, because He, because of his mercy and compassion, His grace, has placed that person in Christ Jesus. If He were to condemn the person in this way after having given him new life in the Spirit and placing him in Christ, God would actually be condemning Christ. Perish that thought....and not false OSAS version that teaches that there is no real dire consequences (with the Lake of Fire) involving one’s sin.
Sure. Absolutely.Adam passed on two things to his descendants.
#1. Physical death (for most).
#2. Sin nature (in being children of wrath that can only be broken by being born again by Jesus).
Good.PinSeeker: Adam was not deceived. As Paul tells us in 2 Corinthians 11:3, the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning." Adam could have helped her from her being deceived but did not. I am not saying Eve did not sin, because she, like Adam, heard God's words of Genesis 2:17 also. But Adam was not deceived. There is nothing in the text of Genesis 3 to say Adam was "convinced" by Eve. He merely willingly took the fruit and ate. He actively disobeyed God. He was not deceived.
Yes, I forgot about this other verse. So I was incorrect by my words on that point. I am willing to admit when I wrong when faced with Scripture. So I would agree with you on this point.
If/when it happens, I will. :)But seeing I am willing to admit when I am wrong in light of God’s Word, I don’t believe you can do that.
I respect your opinion.For you cannot read all of Scripture and also believe in OSAS.
Again, I respect your opinions. There are all sorts of folks out there who believe all kinds of things, right? :)One has to slice and dice Scripture to make OSAS work. Plus, in OSAS: It’s enticing to think that a person can sin and still be saved. Who does not want to have an easy way of salvation with doing nothing for God and in justifying sin in this life with also getting the keys to Heaven? But that does not sound like the narrow way that Jesus talked about. I have not interviewed all OSAS Proponents on the planet and their view of what Satan was selling in the Garden to Eve. I am sure I will get all kinds of views. But I have posted about 62,000 posts approximately over the past 12 years on various different Christian forums, and I remember having many discussions on the false teaching of OSAS, and I have refuted (using the Bible) their lame attempts at re-writing Scripture. In my many discussions with OSAS folk: I understand there are two different types of OSAS Christians. Note: I used to think there were 3 categories of OSAS type believers, but now I believe there are only 2. There is Hyper Grace OSAS which teaches that a believer can sin as much as they want and live like the devil and be saved all because they have a belief alone in Jesus as their Savior. I have even talked with a believer in person who admitted to me that they could mow down a crowd of people with a sub machine gun and they would be saved while they did so (hypothetically speaking of course). Then there is the OSAS Lite Version which says they don’t practice sin (Whatever that means), and yet they cannot stop sinning this side of Heaven based on a false misunderstanding on 1 John 1:8. Many of them believe that any acts of righteousness are filthy rags according to an incorrect view of Isaiah 64:6. Again, this is still a license to sin and do evil because the Bible talks about how we were servants to sin (or slaves to sin) as a part of our past life (Romans 6:20). Believers are now slaves to righteousness (Romans 6:18). Galatians 5:24 says they that are Christ’s have crucified the affections and lusts. So even the OSAS Lite folk are defending sin. For I have not run into any OSAS believers who hold to a view of Sinless Perfectionism in order for OSAS to be true. Anyways, when I confronted OSAS folks about Satan’s lie in the Garden, they think that his deception (to break God’s command and not die) does not apply to New Covenant believers.
1993
What happened in Job’s case then?
This is a complete vain speech by Charles Stanley! for Christians can expect hardships even in holy living!!
“Beloved, think it not strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you, as though some strange thing happened unto you: But rejoice, inasmuch as ye are partakers of Christ's sufferings; that, when his glory shall be revealed, ye may be glad also with exceeding joy.” (1 Peter 4:12-13)
More baloney from Once Saved Always Saved teachers who give incorrect advice on why not to sin!
The pure biblical reason to stop sinning is so that YOU DO NOT GET THROWN ONTO THE LAKE OF FIRE!!!
1981
Peter had not believed in the resurrection yet (Christ wasn’t even executed yet) so salvation wasn’t even in play yet.
First, it may surprise you that I believe in “Original Sin” (Not the Calvinistic version). I believe “Original Sin” is essentially saying that sin and or the sin nature has tainted humanity after Adam's fall. Ephesians 2:3 says we are by nature children of wrath
1 Corinthians 15:22 says “For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.” But the fallen nature that comes from Adam
Not surprised.
Everybody learns from somebody, right BH? So, the same to you.
Bible Highlighter said:I am aware that some OSAS Proponents believe there are consequences to sin, but these consequences are minor...
You said:And they would be wrong.
Bible Highlighter said:For the wages of sin is death.
You said:That they are. But the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Bible Highlighter said:OSAS folk are defending sin because if the Bible teaches that the wages of sin is death (and it does), and the OSAS Proponent is saying that is not the case in the fact that they say they can sin and still be saved, then they are defending evil or sin.
You said:Nope. Not in any way. With all due respect, BH, that's a stupid thing to say.
Bible Highlighter said:if the Bible teaches that the wages of sin is death (and it does)
You said:Yes it certainly does, but it also says, quite clearly that there's a Way to avoid having to pay those wages.
Bible Highlighter said:... and the OSAS Proponent is saying that is not the case in the fact that they say they can sin and still be saved, then they are defending evil or sin.
You said:Nope. Not at all.
Sure, but you forgot that little comma after "Christ Jesus." The rest of the verse is an appositive, that refers to those in Christ Jesus. They walk after the Spirit and not in the flesh because they are in Christ Jesus.
Bible Highlighter said:So you cannot walk after sin or the flesh otherwise you are under the condemnation.
You said:I agree! No "OSASer" worth his or her salt thinks otherwise.
Bible Highlighter said:...and not false OSAS version that teaches that there is no real dire consequences (with the Lake of Fire) involving one’s sin.
You said:BH, this fate ~ the second death ~ is God's condemnation. Those who are in Christ Jesus, having been born again of the Spirit, may still, in this life, experience dire consequences for sin. But they will not be condemned by God, because He, because of his mercy and compassion, His grace, has placed that person in Christ Jesus. If He were to condemn the person in this way after having given him new life in the Spirit and placing him in Christ, God would actually be condemning Christ. Perish that thought.
Bible Highlighter said:But seeing I am willing to admit when I am wrong in light of God’s Word, I don’t believe you can do that.
You said:If/when it happens, I will. :)
Bible Highlighter said:For you cannot read all of Scripture and also believe in OSAS.
You said:I respect your opinion.
You said:Grace and peace to you.
I didn't say Eve was "only deceived," as in did not sin. I said, only Eve was deceived, as opposed to Adam. To clarify, she did not deliberately disobey God, but she surely did sin. But Adam's disobedience was what plunged the world into sin. So, what you way about me is in error. And this is certainly not the first time for that..
Sure. See above. But even this does not say that Eve sinned, actually
I think it was BB.
Matthew 25:31-46 shows us that God will be boasting about our righteous works, not us:.
"35For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’" Matthew 25:35-36So, no danger of the righteous boasting about their righteous works. The danger is in us not having any righteous works for the Lord to boast about.
Give me the scripture, that teaches Jesus' gospel is to ask God to be saved?
Did you ask by prayer?
Also if God is directly keeping you from unbelief, then God is at fault every time you fall short and sin against Him.
You are not responsible for your actions.
You think God is responsible for your actions.
You might be a calvinist and not know it.
Excellent work!
OSAS believers can claim all they want that this false doctrine does not lead one into depravity.
The real world proves otherwise.
Bible Highlighter go to biblehub and look at the Greek for the word nature in Ephesians 2:3,
Thayer in His Greek lexicon says the word nature is defined as born nature.
But, but, this Greek word has multiple meanings.
Thayer goes on to define "nature" as:
"A mode of feeling and acting which by long habit has become nature.
Paul is not teaching a born in sin nature.
Paul is teaching they by nature of habit are sinful.
Ephesians 2:3,
-among whom also we all conducted ourselves in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind and were by nature(long habit) children of wrath, just as the others.
Not born with a sin nature, habitulized into a sinful lifestyle.
These gentiles were said not to have a sin nature,
Romans 2:14,
-for when Gentiles who do not have the law, by nature do the things in the law(obey Gods law) these although not having law, are a law to themselves.
Where is these gentiles totally depraved sin nature?
They are obeying Gods law!
Their nature is not sinful!
Next verse you quoted,
No, no, no
We do not inherit a fallen nature from Adam.
We create our own nature by the choices in life we make.
1Corinthians 15:22,
-for in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive.
What did we all inherit as a cause of Adam's sin according to this verse?
Answer: Physical death.
We only suffer the consequences of Adam's sin. Not his sin transferred to us!
The consequence of Adams sin is physical death.
That is what all recieve as a consequence of Adam's sin.
Sin is never transferred from one individual to another.
But the consequences of my Dads sin can effect generations of his family to come.
Smoking is sinfull.
If dad smokes and son dies of long cancer by second hand smoke.
The fathers sin was not accounted to the son.
The consequences of the fathers sin was "inherited" by his son.
If Adam and Eve had not sinned against God. They would have physically lived forever.
Their sin caused them and as a consequence every man to die physically.
Paul is speaking of the immorality of man.
Just look at the verses preceding verse 22,
Verse 21.,
-for since by man(Adam) came death,
-by man(Jesus) also came the ressurection of the dead.
Clearly you can see that Adam is physical death.
Jesus is ressurected from a dead physical body to life.
The ressurection of the dead, is not spiritual death but physical dead bodies being ressurected to life.
Sorry to say this, but I think this kind of belief is not just unbiblical but shameful, careless and dirty in its entire content. Imagine a person who thinks he was already saved and destined to heaven no matter what he will do, whether he do evil or not. Remember what happened in LA Fitness Gym in Pennsylvania on August 4, 2009? When a man named George Sodini fired 50 rounds into an aerobic class before turning the gun on himself. The shooting resulted four deaths (including Sodini himself) and nine injured. George Sodini was a member of the Tetelestai Church where he sat quietly for many years, listening to the deceptions of his preacher. Talking about the pastor of his Church, Sodini wrote in his blog dated Dec. 31, 2008,
“this guy” (Alan “Rick” Knapp) “teaches (and convinced me) you can commit mass murder then still go to heaven. Ask him.“
And in a post dated August 3, 2009, Sodini said;
“Maybe soon, I will see God and Jesus. At least that is what I was told. Eternal life does NOT depend on works. If it did, we will all be in hell. Christ paid for every sin, so how can I or you be judged by GOD for a sin when the penalty was already paid. People judge but that does not matter. I was reading the Bible and The Integrity of God beginning yesterday, because soon I will see them.”
Hmmmmm....maybe my OSAS Doctrine is Wrong....surely a Saved man could not do these things and continue to be Saved anymore than a man that “ rapes and murders 1000 times a day”can still be Saved, as Martin Luther proposed.....maybe I’ll take a well- deserved break for a while and rethink things....maybe....
In the meantime, I know how a man can do ALL of these things and even MUCH WORSE and “ Get Away With It !”
“ How?” You ask? Simple.....all I have to do is borrow a page from your OWN ” playbook”.......How ironic that you never see it.....I can commit the most atrocious evils and just do whatever I want to do.....as long as I REPENT of those or any other Wicked Sins before I die, I’m “ good to go”......
The End Result Of “YOUR” Confused Doctrine is no different from mine....A man can be Saved even after sinning all that he wants....just choose one of the two options....the result is the same...personally, since receiving my New Heart , I don’t WANT to Sin..... it’s all part of being a “ New Creation”....
The murderer in question was no more a Christian than Putin or Castro .....That King Of wickedness , Putin went to “ church “ on Easter and Fidel always maintained that “ he “ was a Christian ...
Hogwash! They and this mass murderer may have had a stupid “ head” knowledge about what Christianity was.....he apparently knew all the right words....but I would bet my bottom dollar that he was never “ born again”......Theoretically, If he really “was” a born again Believer , I think God would have struck him dead before he committed his terrible act....God struck dead a lot of people who did far less....