Who is the AntiChrist? (Identifying Him)

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

ewq1938

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2015
7,298
1,454
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It's a deadly, and in some translations, mortal wound that is healed. And remember, it's about as close toa resurrection as Satan can counterfeit. But the parallel is certainly there.

It has nothing to do with satan, not directly. A sword means war and the heads are mountains which means land. What it means is theer is a very serious war somewhere in there world that leaves the area and it's people greatly harmed. The mountain/land of Japan had two major deadly wounds in the forms of nuclear bombs and those healed over time. It's all symbology, and no death occurred and no resurrection. It's the damages of war that happened and then healed.



It's not past tense from when John is writing, but past tense from the position from which he is viewing

No, the Greek tense proves the wound had happened already before the beast rose up.



some translations, says the mountains are kings... Kingdoms...

Based on bad manuscripts. The heads are not related to the 7-8 consecutive kings. The beast cannot rise with all 7 heads if 5-6 heads/kings are already fallen in the past. The consecutive 7 kings of Rev 17 are not the 7 heads. I6t'ds literally impossible and there are manuscripts that do not make that error.
 

MatthewG

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2021
16,575
5,513
113
34
Fyffe
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Not all. The Revelation was definitely written in the 90's.

Christians living during 70 AD, as well as the church fathers, believed the Second Coming was a future event.

The oldest extra-Biblical Christian document known to exist is a document called The Didache. It was written around 80 AD and was cited by many of the church fathers like the Christian historian Eusebius so its early existence is well documented.

In addition to the Didache, early church fathers like…

• Papias

• Clement of Rome

• Ignatius

• Polycarp

• and Justin Martyr

…wrote of a future Second Coming.

The Book of Revelation was written in approximately 95 AD, long after the events of A.D. 70.

For the Preterist view to work, the Book of Revelation has to have been written sometime prior to A.D. 70, so they changed the date of the book.

But there is compelling evidence in the writings of the church fathers that the Book of Revelation was written approximately 25 years after the events surrounding the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70.

Consider Irenaeus. He lived from A.D. 120–202. He was the bishop in the city of Lyons in modern day France and grew up in Smyrna, one of the cities where the Book of Revelation was first circulated (Rev. 2:8). He was a disciple of Polycarp, who was a disciple of the apostle John - the author of Revelation!

Let that sink in...Polycarp was a disciple of the apostle John - the author of the Book of Revelation - and Irenaeus was a disciple of Polycarp. If anyone knew when the Book of Revelation was penned, it would have been Polycarp or Irenaeus!

In Irenaeus’s work titled, Against Heresies (13:18), he tells us when John had his apocalyptic vision. He says…

“We will not, however, incur the risk of pronouncing positively as to the name of Antichrist; for if it were necessary that his name should be distinctly revealed in this present time, it would have been announced by him [the apostle John] who beheld the apocalyptic vision.

Irenaeus (AD 120-202) believed that the “Antichrist” had still not been revealed. Well, that throws a wrench in the preteristic viewpoint. Why? Preterists, including Hank Hanegraaff, believe that the first century Nero was the Antichrist but that’s not what Irenaeus thought! Notice when Irenaeus says John had his apocalyptic vision…

"...For that was seen not very long time since, but almost in our day, towards the end of Domitian’s reign."

Irenaeus says John had his “apocalyptic vision (the things he writes about in the Book of Revelation) towards the end of Domitian’s reign."

Domitian was a Roman Emperor near the end of the first century and his reign didn't begin until A.D. 81 and ended with his assassination on September 18th, A.D. 96!

Irenaeus places the date of the authorship of the Book of Revelation sometime around 95 AD towards the END of Domitian’s reign, long after the events of A.D. 70 and the destruction of Jerusalem. This statement by Irenaeus is devastating to the preterist position.

Here are some others who affirmed the very same thing…

Clement of Alexandria, (who lived from about A.D. 150 to 215) also testified to a post A.D. 70 date for the writing of the Book of Revelation. He mentions that John was exiled to the isle of Patmos until after the death of the tyrant - another reference to Domitian who died in 96 AD.

Another source for a post A.D. 70 completion date for the Book of Revelation is Victorinus.

Victorinus was an early church bishop who suffered martyrdom around A.D. 304. He said in his commentary on the Book of Revelation, that John had his vision of the apocalypse while "he was in the island of Patmos, condemned to the mines by Caesar Domitian."

Another early church source is Eusebius…

Eusebius lived from A.D. 260 – 340. He is known as "the father of church history," due to his classic work Ecclesiastical History. Several times in his writings he also dates the Book of Revelation to the reign of Domitian.

In addition to these men, there was Jerome.

Jerome, the one who translated the Scriptures into Latin (The Vulgate), lived from 340 to 419. He states clearly in two places, that John was banished under Domitian, and that that is when he wrote the Book of Revelation.

These statements from some of the greatest, most reliable names in early church history. They build a compelling case that the Book of Revelation was written many years after A.D. 70 and the events surrounding the destruction of Jerusalem.
All debatable (the dating of bible letters). It's by faith that we even believe God exists, and he pleased by that.


Thank you for sharing what you have.
 

Mr E

Well-Known Member
Aug 17, 2022
3,637
2,613
113
San Diego
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Not all. The Revelation was definitely written in the 90's.

Christians living during 70 AD, as well as the church fathers, believed the Second Coming was a future event.

The oldest extra-Biblical Christian document known to exist is a document called The Didache. It was written around 80 AD and was cited by many of the church fathers like the Christian historian Eusebius so its early existence is well documented.

In addition to the Didache, early church fathers like…

• Papias

• Clement of Rome

• Ignatius

• Polycarp

• and Justin Martyr

…wrote of a future Second Coming.

The Book of Revelation was written in approximately 95 AD, long after the events of A.D. 70.

For the Preterist view to work, the Book of Revelation has to have been written sometime prior to A.D. 70, so they changed the date of the book.

But there is compelling evidence in the writings of the church fathers that the Book of Revelation was written approximately 25 years after the events surrounding the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70.

Consider Irenaeus. He lived from A.D. 120–202. He was the bishop in the city of Lyons in modern day France and grew up in Smyrna, one of the cities where the Book of Revelation was first circulated (Rev. 2:8). He was a disciple of Polycarp, who was a disciple of the apostle John - the author of Revelation!

Let that sink in...Polycarp was a disciple of the apostle John - the author of the Book of Revelation - and Irenaeus was a disciple of Polycarp. If anyone knew when the Book of Revelation was penned, it would have been Polycarp or Irenaeus!

In Irenaeus’s work titled, Against Heresies (13:18), he tells us when John had his apocalyptic vision. He says…

“We will not, however, incur the risk of pronouncing positively as to the name of Antichrist; for if it were necessary that his name should be distinctly revealed in this present time, it would have been announced by him [the apostle John] who beheld the apocalyptic vision.

Irenaeus (AD 120-202) believed that the “Antichrist” had still not been revealed. Well, that throws a wrench in the preteristic viewpoint. Why? Preterists, including Hank Hanegraaff, believe that the first century Nero was the Antichrist but that’s not what Irenaeus thought! Notice when Irenaeus says John had his apocalyptic vision…

"...For that was seen not very long time since, but almost in our day, towards the end of Domitian’s reign."

Irenaeus says John had his “apocalyptic vision (the things he writes about in the Book of Revelation) towards the end of Domitian’s reign."

Domitian was a Roman Emperor near the end of the first century and his reign didn't begin until A.D. 81 and ended with his assassination on September 18th, A.D. 96!

Irenaeus places the date of the authorship of the Book of Revelation sometime around 95 AD towards the END of Domitian’s reign, long after the events of A.D. 70 and the destruction of Jerusalem. This statement by Irenaeus is devastating to the preterist position.

Here are some others who affirmed the very same thing…

Clement of Alexandria, (who lived from about A.D. 150 to 215) also testified to a post A.D. 70 date for the writing of the Book of Revelation. He mentions that John was exiled to the isle of Patmos until after the death of the tyrant - another reference to Domitian who died in 96 AD.

Another source for a post A.D. 70 completion date for the Book of Revelation is Victorinus.

Victorinus was an early church bishop who suffered martyrdom around A.D. 304. He said in his commentary on the Book of Revelation, that John had his vision of the apocalypse while "he was in the island of Patmos, condemned to the mines by Caesar Domitian."

Another early church source is Eusebius…

Eusebius lived from A.D. 260 – 340. He is known as "the father of church history," due to his classic work Ecclesiastical History. Several times in his writings he also dates the Book of Revelation to the reign of Domitian.

In addition to these men, there was Jerome.

Jerome, the one who translated the Scriptures into Latin (The Vulgate), lived from 340 to 419. He states clearly in two places, that John was banished under Domitian, and that that is when he wrote the Book of Revelation.

These statements from some of the greatest, most reliable names in early church history. They build a compelling case that the Book of Revelation was written many years after A.D. 70 and the events surrounding the destruction of Jerusalem.

Hello Jim,

It's interesting to note that there was already debate about the date of writing in those early centuries. Perhaps you aren't familiar with that debate, or perhaps you are purposely leaving out important details in an attempt to bolster your personal beliefs.
 

Mr E

Well-Known Member
Aug 17, 2022
3,637
2,613
113
San Diego
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
There was the beginnings of a good discussion on this subject at christianforums.com where one member put forward the idea that King Charles III is this 'anti-christ' figure. The premise comes from a book written by a fellow who goes by the name of Tim Cohen (a pen name) and the book is called 'The AntiChrist and a Cup of Tea.' He gets the idea from a failed prognosticator and false prophet called Monte Judah.
 

Father Jim

New Member
Oct 20, 2023
24
11
8
Northeast USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
"A" king of the North is the Antichrist.
I think you're correct. The King of the North is likely some Iranian figure who unites a coalition of nations to take out Israel. The King of the South is likely a Saidi coalition. Both of these will likely form in the near future.
 

Father Jim

New Member
Oct 20, 2023
24
11
8
Northeast USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Hello Jim,

It's interesting to note that there was already debate about the date of writing in those early centuries. Perhaps you aren't familiar with that debate, or perhaps you are purposely leaving out important details in an attempt to bolster your personal beliefs.
Why don't you fill us all in on those important details!
 

Mr E

Well-Known Member
Aug 17, 2022
3,637
2,613
113
San Diego
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Why don't you fill us all in on those important details!

How about you first clarify-- are you simply unaware of arguments against your premise, or are you purposely omitting mention of them?
 

amigo de christo

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2020
29,933
50,699
113
53
San angelo
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The Antichrist isn't an individual, but a series of leaders over one institution... The institution is Roman through and through.
That instiution has invaded every realm known or called to be as christain . That institution
has taken power over even the presidents aka kings of this world .
IT has even influenced the false religions to join as one under its all inclusive lie from the dragon .
JOHN was at war with this spirit of ANTI CHRIST way way way back in even his days .
IT has not slept , IT HAS BEEN and now has morphed up and has infiltrated every known fiber of society and churches too .
WHO IS this anti christ i speak off . Firstly there are many anti christs arleady
and anti christ is HE who denies JESUS is the CHRIST . SO yeah ALL INCLUSIVE IS OF ANTI CHRIST .
teaching a lie lie lie that other religoins serve the same GOD we do , THEY DENY that folks need to BELIEVE JESUS IS THE CHRIST .
SO GUESS WHO that lie is coming from . ANTI CHRIST .
THIS IS that which is of ANTI CHRIST , which you heard should come , EVEN NOW ITS IN THE WORLD . ITS BEEN HERE .
ITS BEEN since even the days of the apostels and it has been working the mystery of inquity for a very long time .
NOW under total reprobation of minds the world and its religoins are merging more and more AS ONE
to UNIFY as one PEOPLE ONE TRIBE ONE WORLD under THE BEAST . TIS ALL COMING TO A HEAD . ITS
climatic end hour IS UPON THE WORLD and most folks thinks its love . And its of GOD . ITS NEITHER
ITS OF ANTI CHRIST , of the dragon who DESIRED and desires to be AS GOD . and this lamb WONT SIT
at the table of her sold out false lovey do unity unity unity , non correcting sin , fake love junk hole PEROID .
I made my choice braklite . DONT you dare weep for me no matter how hated i become
dont even shed a tear if they one day soon come for me and kill me . WEEP RATHER FOR THE LOST SOULS
UNDER THE WHORES ALL INCLUSIVE LIE . cause THAT END IS GONNA BE FAR WORSE than anything man can do to us .
THE LAKE OF FIRE . OH its real barney if even false lovey do all incluisivits try and say it aint .
WE JUST must get busy pointing to JESUS and ALLLLLLL sound BIBLE , yah i said BIBLE DOCTRINE . FAST TOO
cause the delusion is taking captive many and many will be damned .
 

ewq1938

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2015
7,298
1,454
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
"A" king of the North is the Antichrist.


No, the kings of the south and north fight against the one most believe is the AC, in that chapter.

Dan 11:37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.
Dan 11:38 But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces: and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.
Dan 11:39 Thus shall he do in the most strong holds with a strange god, whom he shall acknowledge and increase with glory: and he shall cause them to rule over many, and shall divide the land for gain.
Dan 11:40 And at the time of the end shall the king of the south push at him: and the king of the north shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over.

Most believe verses 37-39 speak of the AC. The kings of the south and north come against "him" so the king of the north is not the AC.
 

ewq1938

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2015
7,298
1,454
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The Antichrist isn't an individual, but a series of leaders over one institution... The institution is Roman through and through.

No, that's all wrong. There are many ACs and not from one institution. And there is a final Ac that is singular which you know about but deny due to your theological bias.

1Jn_2:18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.
 

Father Jim

New Member
Oct 20, 2023
24
11
8
Northeast USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
If people would do a little unbiased homework they wouldn't misunderstand such simple verses.

1John 2:18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that (THE) antichrist (Singular)shall come, even now are there many antichrists; (plural) whereby we know that it is the last time.

That verse has one word for antichrist that is singular, the other plural, and it wasn't translated correctly in the KJV. The verse actually reads in the Greek interlinear like this...

Little boys and girls, it is the last hour and according as ye hear that THE "instead-anointed" (antichrist) is coming and now many instead anointeds have become.....

Another blunder similar to this one is the 'thousand years' mentioned in Revelation 20 where 1,000 years is mentioned 6 times. When the article THE is used it implies a 'specific' (thing). In this case a literal 1,000 years. And in 1 John - a literal anti-Christ.

Over a dozen bible translations use the word 'the' (anti-Christ) in the translation of 1 John 2:18. Like the NIV does...

"Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come. This is how we know it is the last hour."

I would actually interpret this verse like this, "Many antichrist have come, and the antichrist is coming, that's how you will know it's the last hour."

The translations that omit the word THE do so mistakenly and really do a disservice to the understanding of the verse. The 1611 translators omitted it BUT the article IS in the interlinear. As simple as dropping the word 'THE' usually isn't something that changes things very much, but in this case, and with this argument it does. In every aspect I study this, I never walk away believing this is only a plurality of anti-Christ, i.e. "many anti-Christ. Especially when personal pronouns are used to describe this man elsewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davy

Brakelite

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2020
9,899
7,170
113
Melbourne
brakelite.wordpress.com
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
In Revelation 13 we have the following description of what Bible scholars for centuries have recognized as being a vivid revelation of the dreaded "Antichrist" , the leopard like beast, with feet of a bear, and the mouth of a lion.

1 ¶ And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.

God describes this beast as a leopard. We are brought back to Daniel in this depiction, to chapter 7 where the Grecian empire is also described as a leopard. God is not haphazard with his prophetic pictures. There are depths to understand, and nuances to be seen that reveal the identity, and true nature of the powers thus depicted. This is why God gave so much information regarding Antichrist. He did not want us to be deceived, nor to misunderstand what He was warning us about. He gave such detail that there would be no mistake, no error on our part for our lives depend on our part to clearly understand the issues.

Thus the beast of Revelation 13 is likened to the ancient Grecian empire. Remember, beasts are not individuals. They are political powers, nations, or empires. Beasts throughout the scripture are depicted in every prophecy without exception as being a political power or nation. Thus the Antichrist is not an individual, but a political power or civil or secular power, but having a religious face, for it enforces worship according to its own character and beliefs.


The hallmark or character of Greece is eloquently described by Paul in his address to the Athenians on Mars Hill.

Acts 17:16 ¶ Now while Paul waited for them at Athens, his spirit was stirred in him, when he saw the city wholly given to idolatry.
17 Therefore disputed he in the synagogue with the Jews, and with the devout persons, and in the market daily with them that met with him.
18 Then certain philosophers of the Epicureans, and of the Stoicks, encountered him. And some said, What will this babbler say? other some, He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange gods: because he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection.
19 And they took him, and brought him unto Areopagus, saying, May we know what this new doctrine, whereof thou speakest, is?
20 For thou bringest certain strange things to our ears: we would know therefore what these things mean.
21 (For all the Athenians and strangers which were there spent their time in nothing else, but either to tell, or to hear some new thing.)
22 ¶ Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars’ hill, and said, Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious.

Idolatry, superstition, philosophy were the hallmarks of Grecian religious devotion. Thus these things according to the prophetic picture, would characterize the religion of the Antichrist. But the prophetic picture goes deeper than that. The leopard also has certain characteristics and natural qualities that would characterize and be seen in the Antichrist power. The leopards hunting instincts are subtly different from many cats. Firstly though, like all predators, the leopard preys on other beasts. Thus the Antichrist power would prey on other powers. (Remember the 'little horn of Daniel 7 that grew up to uproot 3 other horns?....another depiction of this same leopard power) It would seek to devour other political entities...other nations. Revelation clearly reveals this. It has global ambitions. And all the world would wonder after the beast. Wonder in this sense is in admiration. The people of the world will love this power. They will say who can make war with her? The beast has so much apparent attractiveness that it is thought ridiculous to oppose it. Greece was just like this. Alexander the Great was renowned for his astute military prowess. And everywhere Greece went, their culture, their belief systems, their philosophies, were assimilated into the local culture and religious practice. Palestine was no exception, to the point where the Greek language was the chief language that the NT was written in, even after many decades of Roman influence. Even Christianity itself was not immune to accepting Greek philosophy and beliefs and co-mingling them with the truth thus distorting the gospel even to this day. The teachings of Plato and Aristotle are still accepted and taught by priests and pastors, both Catholic and Protestant, to this day.

There is more to the leopard however. His hunting style is almost unique. He is a beast that rather than chasing his prey all over the countryside like other predators such as the cheetah, prefers to lie in wait and in hiding until his prey is within easy reach, will then stalk stealthily and strike suddenly, and with the least effort.

The leopard is a watcher. An observer. Camouflaged well, it lies in hiding until its prey is an easy target.

Jer 5:6 Wherefore a lion out of the forest shall slay them, and a wolf of the evenings shall spoil them, a leopard shall watch over their cities: every one that goeth out thence shall be torn in pieces: because their transgressions are many, and their backslidings are increased.

Ho 13:7 Therefore I will be unto them as a lion: as a leopard by the way will I observe them:

The Antichrist therefore is just like that. An observer. Patience is the hallmark of its nature. He would far prefer to lie patiently in wait until circumstances allow for an easy take-over, than expend lots of energy too early and be discovered and lose his opportunity. This is precisely why Revelation 13 is so focused on deception, and why Jesus so often warned of false Christs, false prophets, of those who would deceive and lead away if possible even the 'elect'. The Antichrist is therefore not an open enemy to Christianity. In fact, like Judas, the son of perdition, he would betray Christ with a kiss! He would not be an open enemy of Christ, but in accordance to the base meaning of the word 'anti' (see Strongs #473) would stand in the room of Christ, replacing Christ in the minds and hearts of the world. Therefore the Antichrist power is a counterfeit Christian power. A Christian power that has superstition, idolatry, philosophy, and patience as the hallmarks of her character. But also the ambition and desire for global dominion.
Does this ring a bell with anyone?

Which brings me to the thrust of this post. For the leopard beast of Revelation 13 has been around for a long long time. While having inherited several characteristics of the Babylonian (Lion----Daniel 7:4), Persian (bear----Daniel 7:5), and Roman (terrible beast----Danel 7:7,8) powers and being a composite of them, the beast coming out of the sea (see Rev.17:15) is in appearance most like Greece (leopard---Danel 7:6). And the leopard, after centuries of patiently waiting her opportunity for global dominion, is now astir. She, through deception, the vain philosophy of man, idolatry and superstition, has already captivated the minds and hearts of billions of people worldwide. She now sees her opportunity to deceive the rest of the world, for her prey she recognizes is now weak, leaderless, has already succumbed to division and is asleep and thus blind to her presence and true nature. In fact, many of those leaders, at her request, are returning to "Mother". The wayward fathers are coming home.

The second beast of Revelation, the beast or power that leads the world to surrender to the leopard, is now ripe for the plucking. She does not recognize the danger as she once did. She no longer sees the leopard as an enemy, but as a friend. She believes the leopard has changed. That she no longer seeks political dominion, but rather, in her own words, seeks social justice and social equity. That she is now working for the "common good". She has deceived the nations into believing that there is a fundamental change in her very nature. And all the world today wonders after her!!!

The kings of the world send diplomats to her steps in order to receive council and advice. Even kings, presidents, and world rulers meet with her in friendliness and fawning admiration. But....

Jer 13:23 Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.

To be continued...
 

Brakelite

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2020
9,899
7,170
113
Melbourne
brakelite.wordpress.com
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Continued....

No longer does the Protestant church teach nor even believe as the reformers at the cost of their lives, warned about. Today's professed followers of Christ trample upon centuries of shed blood of martyrs who died at the hands of this evil. With their own blood they wrote across the pages of history that the Roman Catholic edifice, that counterfeit Christian church/state union that is awash with superstition, philosophy, man-made doctrines and dogmas, idolatry and blasphemy, and persecutors of all who oppose her, is indeed the Antichrist of the Bible. The power that would make war with the saints, and to overcome them: the power that would have eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things. The power that shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: the power that would reveal itself after a falling away as the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, (the church) shewing himself that he is God.

(See Daniel 7, 2Thess.2)



The Protestant church of today is no longer Protestant. God's watchmen are blind: they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber. (Isa 56:10).



Not that long ago the leader of the Antichrist power arose from his hiding place...he sees his prey, the Protestant church of America, as being easy meat. For they are asleep and ignorant of his devices. He stood before the nation's leaders and rulers and lawmakers and they remained silent. They welcomed this son of perdition, and believed his lies and refused to warn their people of the danger. More so, they even went so far as to encourage their people to follow this beast, to surrender their landmarks of truth, and once again accept the superstitious idolatry of this pagan counterfeiter of the true faith. And the leopard is winning his prey. For the United States of America will eventually lead the world into submission to the papal power.



Revelation 13:11 ¶ And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; (the USA) and he had two horns like a lamb, (Protestantism and republicanism...a religion without a pope, and a nation without a king) and he spake as a dragon. (Who could deny the change in character recently in US presidential undemocratic law-making, particularly through COVID, but it is going to get worse. Ever hear of PROJECT 2025)?

12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, (the RCC) and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast,(by legislating doctrines and moral imperatives and mandates the reflect the desires and wishes of Rome) whose deadly wound was healed. (Received it's mortal wound in 1798, at which time it ceased to have political influence, but the healing began in 1929 with the re-establishment of the union of church and state)

13 And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,(a false Pentecost)

14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they (Note the democratic lobbying here, seeking the approval and support of the people... Through elections coming next year) should make an image to the beast, (church/state union... PROJECT 2025) which had the wound by a sword, and did live.

15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak (through legislative power), and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.

FB_IMG_1601399042011.jpg

This image is a repetition of the mediaeval persecuting power of the papacy, only on a global scale.

"And ye shall be hated of all nations for My name's sake"
 

ewq1938

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2015
7,298
1,454
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The antichrist is not an individual ... it is a system.

Not one time is any antichrist a system. They are always individuals, with one final singular one to come.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davy

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
13,434
2,790
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
There is a certain power the anti-Christ has, to resurrect sin. We must be cautious that we do not mistake who the anti-Christ is, if he is going to resurrect our sin in the process. It would be sad, if people thought they knew who the anti-Christ was, but only ended up sinning more!
Yeah, and not only sinning more, but making the mistake of bowing to the Antichrist in place of our Lord Jesus Christ Who comes later.

The coming Antichrist, a false-Messiah, will be the devil himself, though as fantastic as that sounds. In Rev.12:3-4 we are shown about the "red dragon". The Rev.12:9 verse reveals the title of "dragon" is simply another name for Satan.

In those Rev.12:3-4 verses is revealed the previous beast kingdom that Satan rebelled with in the old world when he first coveted God's throne, wanting to be GOD. It even shows that old beast kingdom only had "seven crowns" instead of the "ten crowns" version of Rev.13:1 for the end of this world. We are also shown that Satan drew a third of the angels ("stars") back in the old world then into rebellion with him.

My point?:
Wake up brethren. Satan is coming to earth again as king over this one-world beast kingdom being setup in our times for the end of this world. That is why Lord Jesus warned he will work supernatural "great signs and wonders" that if possible would deceive even His very elect. That means, Satan will appear with the image of 'man', ON EARTH. We will see him. And God showed in Ezekiel 28 that He created Satan the 'full pattern' of beauty. So forget his appearing with red flannel underwear, goatee, and a pitch fork.

I know this matter is super far... away... from what is being taught in today's Churches about the Antichrist and the great tribulation. Yet this is exactly what God's written Word is revealing for the end. The problem many have is simply thinking it is too fantastic to believe.

Since Jesus' 1st coming, the majority of the world have slowly been fed "Age of Reason" type Leftist ideas and taught to treat Biblical miracles as superstition. Miracles that have happened that defy scientific explanation are simply passed off as fantasy and conjecture. Man's education systems teach us to believe miracles and angels are not possible, and even try to categorize those do believe they are real as nuts.

This is why when Satan as the coming Antichrist-false-Messiah appears in Jerusalem, working the "great signs and wonders", and raining fire down from heaven on earth in the sight of men, it will change even the attitudes of the atheists! They will be deceived by those miracles Satan will work on earth also.

Already with governments today starting to admit there actually does exist some kind unidentified aerial phenomena going on, it reveals the supernatural events prophesied in God's Word for the end are just around the corner.
 
Last edited: