After looking into Universalism a bit more, I should apologize to you for being so critical, as it has reminded me of my beliefs on Annihilationism, and how they're also technically heretical today since the mass majority of Christians don't believe in it. However, I still think Annihilationism is true as it makes the most sense biblically, as well as morally. Let me try to present an argument for it:
"And the smoke of their torment will rise for ever and ever. There will be no rest day or night for those who worship the beast and its image, or for anyone who receives the mark of its name." - Revelation 14:11
Hell is a place where you are utterly destroyed. It's referred to as the second death. They will not enter into God's rest. Their sin will be punished for all eternity. If the punishment for their sin could end, then it means they could be forgiven and universalism is true. But just because their sins are punished forever does not mean they will be alive forever. It's like giving someone an indefinite prison sentence.
Also
"Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life." - Matthew 25:46
So they do not have eternal life. This means they have eternal death. Eternal punishment. To never be restored. Being separated from the creator and sustainer of all life means you will wither up and die. They will cease to exist.
"If you do not remain in me, you are like a branch that is thrown away and withers; such branches are picked up, thrown into the fire and burned." - John 15:6
A lot of people believe it's eternal conscious torment. But nowhere does it say they will be conscious or alive. It always says they will be dead, and their punishment will last forever. It's like giving someone an indefinite prison sentence. That doesn't mean they're going to be alive forever, quite the opposite is implied when it says they do not have eternal life. How can you exist forever without eternal life?
So really there are 3 options:
- Hell is a place of eternal conscious torment, where people suffer indefinitely in complete agony
- Hell is a place of temporary correction through torment and flames
- Hell is a place where even the soul is destroyed completely
The problem with 1 is God would need to sustain and keep people alive (which is unbiblical, as he will no longer sustain those in hell) just to continually torture their consciousness. It also seems immoral, but it is possible we're missing something, so whether it's moral or not isn't the primary issue. The primary issue is it seems to be unbiblical.
The problem with 2 is God is essentially coercing/forcing people to love him, and it ignores the many verses that say hell is eternal. It also implies that people can only enter heaven because they're good, when the truth is we will only enter heaven because of Jesus' sacrifice for us, regardless of what we do. People who accept his love will naturally be reformed. But they're not going to heaven because they were reformed.
Therefore, 3 seems to be the only logical conclusion, because people who don't want to be with God won't be forced to be with him. And it aligns up with what the Bible says:
"Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can in hell." - Matthew 10:8
If both your body and soul are destroyed, what's left of you? Nothing but the smoke that continually rises. If their punishment ended after their soul was destroyed, then God could forgive them and give them eternal life.
This doctrine of eternal conscious torment has driven many away from Christ. Satan often tries to paint God in an immoral way by twisting the scriptures. It is one of the primary reasons people reject the Bible today, as they often ask "how could a loving God allow me to suffer for all eternity?"
Perhaps he will, and it is up to him to decide what is right, but the fact this doctrine is driving so many away, appears to be unbiblical, and appears to be immoral may in fact mean it is wrong.
However, one could also argue that people merely use it as an excuse to reject Jesus, and they're making God in their own image by deciding what they think God should do. But they are still without excuse. I am of the belief that God will save everyone he can save, so long as it doesn't interfere with their free will. So "eternal conscious torment" is not a real reason to reject Jesus, whether it is true or not.