Unitarianism vs Trinitarianism

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,470
13,534
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
It's not going to be effective on someone who has their mind made up to believe otherwise.

I’ve already told you that I disagree with that kind of thinking, so it should be obvious to you that I’m talking about something else. You’re missing something simple in your approach. You’re making a common mistake; a mistake that isn’t bound by a person’s theological beliefs.
 

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
18,228
7,599
113
56
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I didn’t ask you if you saw anything wrong with the article. I asked you if you understood why the approach you’re taking isn’t effective.

And I think you asked him 3 times.

It's not going to be effective on someone who has their mind made up to believe otherwise.
He won't respond to it. (He may 'reply' but it'll be a non-responsive reply). It's the same with not answering my question of pointing out that Jesus said he has a God who is the only true God. That's good enough for me. Why is it not good enough for you?

It is a blind spot, akin to their ignorning the question of rejection criteria; what set of words would qualify as evidence against the trinity? They just cannot bring their mind to go there. Therefore, they have no rejection criteria. This makes their argument Circular. Their inevitable response is to repeat their mantra, as @RLT63 did here. Often, they attack any who do not share their mystical dualism as lacking. Sad, really.
 

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
18,228
7,599
113
56
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
4,046
2,598
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
And I think you asked him 3 times.


He won't respond to it. (He may 'reply' but it'll be a non-responsive reply). It's the same with not answering my question of pointing out that Jesus said he has a God who is the only true God. That's good enough for me. Why is it not good enough for you?

It is a blind spot, akin to their ignorning the question of rejection criteria; what set of words would qualify as evidence against the trinity? They just cannot bring their mind to go there. Therefore, they have no rejection criteria. This makes their argument Circular. Their inevitable response is to repeat their mantra, as @RLT63 did here. Often, they attack any who do not share their mystical dualism as lacking. Sad, really.
Thank you for the analysis. I didn't know psychology was your profession.
 

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,470
13,534
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
And I think you asked him 3 times.


He won't respond to it. (He may 'reply' but it'll be a non-responsive reply). It's the same with not answering my question of pointing out that Jesus said he has a God who is the only true God. That's good enough for me. Why is it not good enough for you?

It is a blind spot, akin to their ignorning the question of rejection criteria; what set of words would qualify as evidence against the trinity? They just cannot bring their mind to go there. Therefore, they have no rejection criteria. This makes their argument Circular. Their inevitable response is to repeat their mantra, as @RLT63 did here. Often, they attack any who do not share their mystical dualism as lacking. Sad, really.

The mistake is a common one and unrelated to theology. The assistance I was offering was also generic in nature. I won’t pursue that any further. He’s obviously happy with the approach and I can sleep with a clear conscience, knowing that I offered to help.

As for the trinitarian content, that’s easily dealt with, especially by an ex-trinitarian. It’s my old playbook.
 

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
4,046
2,598
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The mistake is a common one and unrelated to theology. The assistance I was offering was also generic in nature. I won’t pursue it any further.

As for the trinitarian content, that’s easily dealt with, especially by an ex-trinitarian. It’s my old playbook.
Would you like to share your advice with me?
 

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
4,046
2,598
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I’ve already told you that I disagree with that kind of thinking, so it should be obvious to you that I’m talking about something else. You’re missing something simple in your approach. You’re making a common mistake; a mistake that isn’t bound by a person’s theological beliefs.
Okay. If you would like to explain I would be grateful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matthias

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,470
13,534
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
Would you like to share your advice with me?

Sure. I wouldn’t have mentioned it if I didn’t.

It’s simple. Every preaching class I’ve taken (and I had to take more of them than I wanted to in order to graduate) harps on it: Information overload. (I always got marked down for it on sermons graded by the professors.)

You’re trying to convey a large amount of information to a targeted audience with (1) a short attention span, and (2) on a subject which few have any interest in knowing about in detail.

My advice (which has nothing at all to to do with your content): Keep your posts short and invite conversation. People don’t come to on-line discussion forums to listen to lectures.

***

I only read a couple of lines in your post, and I’m very keen on the subject!

Rule of thumb: Posts which get read and responded to are posts which are short.

Insight: Posts which contain massive amounts of information convey a subtle message, sometimes intentional and sometimes unintentional: I’m not interested in discussing it (whatever “it” is) with you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wrangler

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
4,046
2,598
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Nonsense is not comprehensible. Not much of a mystery, square circles and all that.

Regarding uniqueness, that might appeal to the ignorant. Those who know history know 3in1 is strong in paganism, predating Christianity by Millenia.
How Ancient Trinitarian Gods Influenced Adoption of the Trinity
Is Trinity a pagan concept?
Do you know the history of your own beliefs?
 

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
4,046
2,598
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Sure. I wouldn’t have mentioned it if I didn’t.

It’s simple. Every preaching class I’ve taken (and I had to take more of them than I wanted to in order to graduate) harps on it: Information overload. (I always got marked down for it on sermons graded by the professors.)

You’re trying to convey a large amount of information to a targeted audience with (1) a short attention span, and (2) on a subject which few have any interest in knowing about in detail.

My advice (which has nothing at all to to do with your content): Keep your posts short and invite conversation. People don’t come to on-line discussion forums to listen to lectures.

***

I only read a couple of lines in your post, and I’m very keen on the subject!

Rule of thumb: Posts which get read and responded to are posts which are short.

Insight: Posts which contain massive amounts of information convey a subtle message, sometimes intentional and sometimes unintentional: I’m not interested in discussing it (whatever “it” is) with you.
Sure. I wouldn’t have mentioned it if I didn’t.

It’s simple. Every preaching class I’ve taken (and I had to take more of them than I wanted to in order to graduate) harps on it: Information overload. (I always got marked down for it on sermons graded by the professors.)

You’re trying to convey a large amount of information to a targeted audience with (1) a short attention span, and (2) on a subject which few have any interest in knowing about in detail.

My advice (which has nothing at all to to do with your content): Keep your posts short and invite conversation. People don’t come to on-line discussion forums to listen to lectures.

***

I only read a couple of lines in your post, and I’m very keen on the subject!

Rule of thumb: Posts which get read and responded to are posts which are short.

Insight: Posts which contain massive amounts of information convey a subtle message, sometimes intentional and sometimes unintentional: I’m not interested in discussing it (whatever “it” is) with you.
Sounds like my formula for sermons; If you can't be brilliant be brief. I aimed for both but finishing on time took priority.
 

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,470
13,534
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
Sounds like my formula for sermons; If you can't be brilliant be brief. I aimed for both but finishing on time took priority.

KISS - Keep It Simple Saints (a lesson stressed by one of my preaching class professors.)

I don’t deliver sermons on discussion forums. Brilliant or not, no one would read them.
 

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,470
13,534
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
Preaching class: limit your sermon to 3 points and no more than 30 minutes, max. (Less is better.) Mix in stories to keep the attention of the audience.

Discussion forum: ditch the sermon.

My preaching method: Dialogue preaching (my professors hated the method; my congregation(s) loved it.)
 

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
18,228
7,599
113
56
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
My advice (which has nothing at all to to do with your content): Keep your posts short and invite conversation.
I do this all the time. Many times I respond to multi-paragraph exposes my exploring one thought at a time.

It necessarily makes my post count high but the readability of each post is also very good.

Great advice. And as you said, independent of theology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matthias

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,470
13,534
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
The Trinity is Christianity’s most unique, defining, incomprehensible, and awesome mystery. It is the revelation of who our Almighty Creator actually is—not just a god, but an infinite Being existing in eternity as three co-equal, infinite Persons, consubstantial yet distinct. The origin of the doctrine of the Trinity is the Bible, although the word Trinity is not used in the Bible.

As all orthodox Christians agree, the doctrine of the Trinity holds that God is one essence but three Persons; God has one nature, but three centers of consciousness; God is only one What, but three Whos. Some unbelievers mistakenly call this a contradiction. Rather, the doctrine of the Trinity is a mystery revealed by God in His Word. A contradiction would be to claim that God has only one nature but also three natures, or that He is only one Person but also three Persons.

From the very beginning of the church, Christians have understood the mystery of the Trinity, even before they began using the term Trinity.

For example, the first Christians knew the Son was the Creator (John 1:1–2), the “I Am” of the Old Testament (Exodus 3:14; John 8:58), equal to the Father (John 14:9), and the Judge of all the earth (Genesis 18:25; John 5:22), who is to be worshiped as only God is allowed to be (Deuteronomy 6:13; Luke 4:8; Matthew 14:33).

The first Christians knew the Holy Spirit was a separate Person with His own thoughts and will (John 16:13), who intercedes for us with God (Romans 8:27), proving He is a distinct Person from God the Father—since intercession requires at least two parties (no one intercedes with himself). Furthermore, a human can be forgiven for blaspheming God the Son, but not for blaspheming God the Holy Spirit (Matthew 12:32).

New Testament writers mention all three Persons of the Trinity together numerous times (e.g., Romans 1:4; 15:30; 2 Corinthians 13:14; Ephesians 1:13–14; 1 Thessalonians 1:3–6). The early believers knew that the Father and the Son sent the third Person of the Trinity, the Holy Spirit—“another counselor”—to live in our hearts (John 14:16–17, 26; 16:7). These mysteries were accepted fully by the early church as revealed truth, yet without the label of “the Holy Trinity.”

The Old Testament gave glimpses of the Trinity, and no passage of Scripture contradicts the doctrine. For example, in Genesis 1:26 God says in the plural, “Let us make mankind in our image.” God declares that He was completely alone when He created everything, stretching out the heavens and spreading out the earth “by myself” (Isaiah 44:24). Yet Jesus was the instrument of God’s creation (John 1:1–3; Colossians 1:16), in the company of the Holy Spirit who was hovering over the primordial waters (Genesis 1:2). Only the doctrine of the Trinity can explain it all.

The Torah hinted at the idea of God existing in multiple Persons and predicted His coming in the flesh. The Old Testament is filled with references to a coming world ruler (Genesis 49:10) to be born in Bethlehem (Micah 5:2), who was not only God’s Son (Isaiah 9:6) but a Messiah who would be God in the flesh (Isaiah 7:14; Zechariah 2:8–11). But the Jews were looking for—and, under Roman occupation, desperately hoping for—a triumphant, conquering Messiah, not a lowly, suffering Servant (Isaiah 53). Israel failed to recognize the Son of God due to His ordinariness (Isaiah 53:2; Matthew 13:54–58; John 10:33), and they killed Him (Zechariah 12:10; Acts 2:36).

In the years after the death of the last apostle, John, there were many attempts by Christian theologians to define and explain God to the church. Explanations of spiritual reality to earthly beings will always fall short; some teachers’ explanations were a bit off, while others sank into heresy. The errors put forward in post-apostolic times ranged from Jesus being all God and only appearing to be human (Docetism), to His being created rather than eternal (Adoptionism, Arianism, and others), to there being three separate gods in the same family (Tritheism), to the one God playing three different roles at different times (Modalism, Monarchianism).

As no religion can exist without knowing who or what its followers worship, there was a great need to define God in a way that all followers of Christianity would agree upon as “official” or orthodox doctrine. And, if Jesus were not God, all Christians were heretics for worshiping a created being.

It seems that the church father Tertullian (AD 160–225) was the first to apply the term Trinity to God. Tertullian uses the term in Against Praxeus, written in 213 to explain and defend the Trinity against the teaching of his contemporary Praxeus, who espoused the Monarchian heresy. From there, we can jump forward over a century of church discussion, schisms, and debate to the Council of Nicea in 325, when the Trinity was finally confirmed as official church doctrine.

A final observation. Theology is the attempt by flawed humans to understand the words of the Bible, just as science is the attempt by flawed humans to understand the facts of nature. All the facts of nature are true, just as all the original words of the Bible are true. But humans are limited and make lots of mistakes, as history continually shows. So, where there is error or disagreement in science or theology, both disciplines have methods of correction. The history of the early church reveals that many sincere Christian believers “got it wrong” when it came to defining God’s nature (a great lesson on the need for humility). But, through a careful study of God’s Word, the church was finally able to articulate what the Bible clearly teaches and what they knew to be true—God exists as an eternal Trinity.

If I wanted the post to be read and the information considered - I presume that you do - I would select a single point and quote it, providing a link to the article. I might add a couple of sentences of my own - my commentary - on the point which I quoted.

Rinse and repeat (for other points in the article.)
 

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
4,046
2,598
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Preaching class: limit your sermon to 3 points and no more than 30 minutes, max. (Less is better.) Mix in stories to keep the attention of the audience.

Discussion forum: ditch the sermon.

My preaching method: Dialogue preaching (my professors hated the method; my congregation(s) loved it.)
I recorded my Sermons and timed them at first to make sure I didn't go over. After a while I knew how many pages would fill the time.
 

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,470
13,534
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
It seems that the church father Tertullian (AD 160–225) was the first to apply the term Trinity to God. Tertullian uses the term in Against Praxeus, written in 213 to explain and defend the Trinity against the teaching of his contemporary Praxeus, who espoused the Monarchian heresy. From there, we can jump forward over a century of church discussion, schisms, and debate to the Council of Nicea in 325, when the Trinity was finally confirmed as official church doctrine.

One point made in the article. This really captures my attention, it won’t capture the attention of most. I’ve been reading Tertullian for the past three months. At this time, I’ve read either 20 or 21 of his writings, including Against Praxeas - the specific work identified by your author.

Have you read Tertullian? Has your target audience read Tertullian?

Tertullian didn’t write to defend the Trinity, as your author asserts. What he wrote undermines orthodox trinitarianism. Tertullian is closer - much closer - to Arius than he is to orthodoxy. Your author neglected to tell us that. Your audience wouldn’t know it if your audience hasn’t read Tertullian.

The Trinity requires co-existence and co-equality of persons. Tertullian is opposed to both.
 

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,470
13,534
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
I recorded my Sermons and timed them at first to make sure I didn't go over. After a while I knew how many pages would fill the time.

I never preached a sermon using notes, and that drove my preaching class professors up the wall. (I was required to have notes and submit a copy of them to the professors before I gave the sermons in class. I went to the podium and delivered the sermons without them. I was the only one who did.)

I never timed or recorded them beforehand. With Dialogue Preaching it’s unnecessary and irrelevant. I had no pages to fill the time with.
 

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,470
13,534
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
“There was a time when the Son did not exist” - Tertullian

Why didn’t your source tell us that @RLT63?
 

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
4,046
2,598
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
One point made in the article. This really captures my attention, it won’t capture the attention of most. I’ve been reading Tertullian for the past three months. At this time, I’ve read either 20 or 21 of his writings, including Against Praxeas - the specific work identified by your author.

Have you read Tertullian? Has your target audience read Tertullian?

Tertullian didn’t write to defend the Trinity, as your author asserts. What he wrote undermines orthodox trinitarianism. Tertullian is closer - much closer - to Arius than he is to orthodoxy. Your author neglected to tell us that. Your audience wouldn’t know it if your audience hasn’t read Tertullian.

The Trinity requires co-existence and co-equality of persons. Tertullian is opposed to both.
Interesting. My study has become focused on the NET Bible and all the notes provided. I'm studying John right now. I have read some of the Didache and excerpts from the early Church fathers but not nearly as extensive as you have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matthias

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
4,046
2,598
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I never preached a sermon using notes, and that drove my preaching class professors up the wall. (I was required to have notes and submit a copy of them to the professors before I gave the sermons in class. I went to the podium and delivered the sermons without them. I was the only one who did.)

I never timed or recorded them beforehand. With Dialogue Preaching it’s unnecessary and irrelevant. I had no pages to fill the time with.
I had it memorized but didn't feel comfortable without the whole thing written out and with me. Teaching the Youth Group was the only place I sometimes didn't use notes. At one time with the Youth Group I would play excerpts from popular movies and work that into a lesson. That went over well with the kids.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matthias
Status
Not open for further replies.