Earburner
Well-Known Member
Hell is the grave! So, yes they do.Babies do not go to Hell, NEVER!
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Hell is the grave! So, yes they do.Babies do not go to Hell, NEVER!
Babies are the issue here, not you. Nor are we talking about babies who grow up.where did I say without Christ I would live forever?
Babies go to Hell? That's not a Christian belief! That sounds more like something from Satan.Hell is the grave! So, yes they do.
So to you, Hell is an underworld or off world place of eternal existence with torment forever?Babies go to Hell? That's not a Christian belief! That sounds more like something from Satan.
You are misunderstanding what he's saying. He said babies go to the grave. That is the genuine original meaning of the word hell/Sheol. What happens beyond and outside of that physical biblical truth is another matter.Babies go to Hell? That's not a Christian belief! That sounds more like something from Satan.
Haven't you read the NT? We are warned several times about the "everlasting fire".So to you, Hell is an underworld or off world place of eternal existence with torment forever?
I thought he said "Hell". Hell is not the grave. It's the everlasting fire that Jesus warned us all.You are misunderstanding what he's saying. He said babies go to the grave. That is the genuine original meaning of the word hell/Sheol. What happens beyond and outside of that physical biblical truth is another matter.
The question of eternal torment... Salvation of babies... Etc etc is a conversation that can not be incontrovertibly settled. One thing is for certain. No man, woman, or child, is naturally immortal. A merciful God may simply not resurrect babies. They simply stay dead. Or, He may not.
Yes, that is my point. For babies who have died, none of us can speak truthfully of how God extends His Grace upon them and grant them eternal life. We can only hope that He does, but if not, that I accept and understand also.You are misunderstanding what he's saying. He said babies go to the grave. That is the genuine original meaning of the word hell/Sheol. What happens beyond and outside of that physical biblical truth is another matter.
The question of eternal torment... Salvation of babies... Etc etc is a conversation that can not be incontrovertibly settled. One thing is for certain. No man, woman, or child, is naturally immortal. A merciful God may simply not resurrect babies. They simply stay dead. Or, He may not.
No, only God is an everlasting, all consuming fire.I thought he said "Hell". Hell is not the grave. It's the everlasting fire that Jesus warned us all.
Gen.2[7] And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground [earth], and breathed [oxygenated air] into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.FIRST AND SECOND RESURRECTION, FIRST AND SECOND DEATH
The above, most clearly what Paul speaks of in Ephesians 2:4-10, Peter in 1 Peter 1:3-5, and John in Revelation 20:4-6, is is the first resurrection, and it is spiritual, and specific only to God's elect. The second resurrection is general and very much physical; as Jesus says in John 5:28-29, "all who are in the tombs will hear His voice and come out, those who have done good to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil to the resurrection of judgment."
The first death is very much physical, and appointed to all without exception ~ general. The second death is experienced only by those not in Christ Jesus at His execution of the final Judgment, and is spiritual in nature ~ spiritual destruction, complete ruin and loss of any hope of salvation. It is not a loss of existence or consciousness, but a removal from the presence of Jesus and an entering into a place completely devoid of God's grace and only consisting of His judgment, which, again, has been finally and permanently rendered by Jesus.
The first and second resurrections (the first is spiritual and specific to believers in this life, the second is physical and general and at the end of this age) are complete reversals of the first and second deaths (the first is physical and general in this life, the second is spiritual and specific to unbelievers at the end of this age). All are states of being. The symmetry is unmistakable.
Your analogy doesn't reach the ultimate conclusion, which is death.ETERNAL PUNISHMENT
It was said a few posts back that, "The punishment of death is everlasting, forever. The punishing of death is temporary, until death is achieved. 'Punishment' is in the KJV NT scriptures. 'Punishing' is not." Yes, I certainly agree; certainly, the final punishment for sin, the second death, does last forever, for all of eternity. But two related things ~ punishment and judgment ~ seem conflated in this statement. One follows the other; punishment follows judgment. The eternal punishment for sin should be thought of in the same sort of light ~ although on a much higher (eternal, of eternity) plane, of course ~ as state-ordered (temporal; of or relating to earthly life) life imprisonment without possibility of parole. To continue this analogy, the effect, or result, of the final Judgment will forever and eternal, but the execution of the Judgment itself will once and for all and final, just as, temporally speaking, the life-imprisonment sentence handed down by the judge at the conclusion of the trial.
No, that's not the basis at all, Earburner. I've been clear that the immediate basis for understanding that man is eternal ~ future only, of course, not past ~ is Genesis 1:26-27 (emphasis mine)... "Then God said, 'Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.' So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them."Gen.2[7] And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground [earth], and breathed [oxygenated air] into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
If you think that Adam was given an eternal soul on the basis of believing that the breath of life is an eternal soul, then you are going have to include all air breathing animals, as having been given eternal souls also. Gen. 7[22] All in whose nostrils was the breath of life [oxygenated air], of all that was in the dry land, died.
LOL! No offense intended, Earburner, but that's just nonsense. I was very careful to say that "eternal punishment for sin should be thought of in the same sort of light ~ although on a much higher (eternal, of eternity) plane, of course ~ as state-ordered (temporal; of or relating to earthly life) life imprisonment without possibility of parole." The primary thing it was meant to show was it's lasting nature... without end, not temporary or even momentary. But there is a death in it, too; in a very real sense, in life imprisonment, the prisoner does not live a full, free life in any sense and for all practical purposes does not have life and is dead to the world; it is a death.Your analogy doesn't reach the ultimate conclusion, which is death.
You're playing with words and artificially manufacturing a point that is just not there. The punishment for the crime committed is life imprisonment, not physical death. But the imprisonment is a taking away of freedom and in a real sense life itself and therefore the administering of a death, which is what I essentially said above. So I do like, at least somewhat, your "whereby" statement... that "the freedom of one's natural life is strictly contained" ~ in this way, it is a death.Sure a person can be imprisoned for life, being a form of punish-ing, but eventually during the torment of imprisonment, whereby the freedom of one's natural life is strictly contained, they are only waiting for the natural form of punish-ment of death to come. In essence, the punish-ing for death stops, but the punish-ment of death is eternal.
In John 3:18, there are two judgments by God.No, that's not the basis at all, Earburner. I've been clear that the immediate basis for understanding that man is eternal ~ future only, of course, not past ~ is Genesis 1:26-27 (emphasis mine)... "Then God said, 'Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.' So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them."
LOL! No offense intended, Earburner, but that's just nonsense. I was very careful to say that "eternal punishment for sin should be thought of in the same sort of light ~ although on a much higher (eternal, of eternity) plane, of course ~ as state-ordered (temporal; of or relating to earthly life) life imprisonment without possibility of parole." The primary thing it was meant to show was it's lasting nature... without end, not temporary or even momentary. But there is a death in it, too; in a very real sense, in life imprisonment, the prisoner does not live a full, free life in any sense and for all practical purposes does not have life and is dead to the world; it is a death.
You're playing with words and artificially manufacturing a point that is just not there. The punishment for the crime committed is life imprisonment, not physical death. But the imprisonment is a taking away of freedom and in a real sense life itself and therefore the administering of a death, which is what I essentially said above. So I do like, at least somewhat, your "whereby" statement... that "the freedom of one's natural life is strictly contained" ~ in this way, it is a death.
The analogy was only meant to help us to better understand the second death. No, we can't really compare on a one-to-one basis the temporal and the eternal, but we can ~ if we don't just close our eyes :) ~ understand, at least in basic terms, eternal things by likening them to temporal, earthly things. It's a bit like learning about life through sports; there are many life lessons in sports. Obviously, I'm a golfer, and there is a plethora of life lessons that can be drawn from the game of golf. Likewise, again, we can understand at least in basic terms eternal things by likening them on some level to temporal things. Jesus Himself does this quite often, in the form of parables. But to draw an analogy to what you're doing here, someone could have heard His parable about, say, the wheat and the tares and say, "Well, good grief, Jesus, people are people! How can you compare them to grain or weeds, which are just plants?!", but... that would not be wise. :)
I think you're just being obstinate, Earburner. You've decided what you believe, and said, essentially, "By golly, come hell or high water, I'm just gonna make it fit!" :) I'm... kind of hackin' atcha; sorry... :)
Grace and peace to you.
In a certain way, that could be correct; the term judgment is used in more than one way in the Bible, and is understood in different ways. God issues judgments all through the Bible, and for different reasons, but these judgments are never a good thing. On the other hand, Jesus, upon His return, will render the one final Judgment. To the latter, as you well know, I'm sure ~ how many times have I pointed this out? I've lost count, now ~ Jesus Himself says, "Do not marvel at this, for an hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice and come out, those who have done good to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil to the resurrection of judgment." (John 5:28-29, emphasis mine). These are the two resurrections, actually the two very different outcomes of the one Judgment, the event in which Jesus separates the weeds from the wheat (Matthew 13:24-29), those on His left from those on His right (Matthew 25:31-46). Now, you may actually mean this, but as to your assertion above. the first is a judgment, and those receiving it will be under it forever, but the second is a blessing, the removal of all judgment forever.In John 3:18, there are two judgments by God. The first judgment was for eternal death. The second judgment was for eternal life.
LOL! Not doing that... :) Yeah, it is definitely a very clear and stark contrast, even "black and white"... I certainly agree with that.Why it is that you want to paint a Grey line between them is beyond me, when it's clearly either black or white.
No, the first judgment of death has been looming over us for many millennia. There never was any other choice, until the second judgment of the Gift of eternal life was made available to us, through the obedience of Jesus.These are the two resurrections, actually the two very different outcomes of the one Judgment, the event in which Jesus separates the weeds from the wheat (Matthew 13:24-29), those on His left from those on His right (Matthew 25:31-46).
Gen.2[7] And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground [earth], and breathed [oxygenated air] into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
If you think that Adam was given an eternal soul on the basis of believing that the breath of life is an eternal soul, then you are going have to include all air breathing animals, as having been given eternal souls also. Gen. 7[22] All in whose nostrils was the breath of life [oxygenated air], of all that was in the dry land, died.
Where does it say that God breathed "a living soul" into Adam. "The Breath of life" is not a living soul, but if it is, then the animals have it also. Genesis 2:7, 6:17, 7:15,22. Is that what you want to say?Where does it say that he breathed a living soul into animals? It only says that about the creation of man. There is the distinction. That proves you wrong from the very verse you quoted.