Randy Kluth
Well-Known Member
I apologize. You're right--it was 7 days later, after Noah entered the ark, that the Flood began. Does that make your point then because there was a 7 day interval? You decide:Bad point. Noah was shut in the ark 6 days before the flood.
Gen 7.6 Noah was six hundred years old when the floodwaters came on the earth. 7 And Noah and his sons and his wife and his sons’ wives entered the ark to escape the waters of the flood. 8 Pairs of clean and unclean animals, of birds and of all creatures that move along the ground, 9 male and female, came to Noah and entered the ark, as God had commanded Noah. 10 And after the seven days the floodwaters came on the earth.
11 In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, on the seventeenth day of the second month—on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens were opened.
So I was not right--it wasn't the exact same day that Noah entered the ark that the wicked were destroyed. It was 7 days later.
I don't think it makes your point either way, same day or same year. You claim that there is a 7 year or a 3.5 year gap. This is a zero year gap!
7 days does suggest a gap, but hardly "pretribulational!" How does 7 days in the ark translate into escape from the tribulation of the Flood?
The Flood didn't even begin until the 17th day of the 2nd month of the 600th year of Noah! That's when the Tribulation began, and that's when Noah escaped--that very same day!
So defective argument on my part, but still a good point, I think?