The Biblical Basis for Catholic Distinctives

[Marymog]

Very few Catholics can have a serious discussion about Spiritual things...

We are the ones who are always serious.....you are the one who is always funny with your OPINOINS!

 

[Taken]

We are the ones who are always serious.....you are the one who is always funny with your OPINOINS!

LOL, more silly peewee nonsense.

 

[Marymog]

LOL, more silly peewee nonsense.

You said that "very few" Catholic's are serious. Soooooo how do YOU decide which ones are serious? What is your criteria?

serious mary

 

[Taken]

You said that "very few" Catholic's are serious. Soooooo how do YOU decide which ones are serious? What is your criteria?

serious mary

Scriptural Knowledge and applicability thereof.

 

[BreadOfLife]

@Enoch111 ~ Have you found any Scriptural testament of Peter in Rome?

Since the Bible isn't the only historical reference - the better question is:
Have either of you found ANY testimony from ANYONE in the first few centuries that Pater wasa NOT in Rome?

 

[BreadOfLife]

anti-Catholics . . .

Yes - anti-Catholics.
They're the onrd who can't articulate a valid argument - so they make upo lies instead . . .

 

[Marymog]

Scriptural Knowledge and applicability thereof.

R I G H T!! So YOU decide with your carnal mind if they have "Scriptural Knowledge" and YOU decide if they have applied it "applicably"!!

F A S C I N A T I N G!

 

[Taken]

Since the Bible isn't the only historical reference - the better question is:

Since the Bible IS sufficient for Spiritual Knowledge Verification, my question was sufficient.

 

[Taken]

Yes - anti-Catholics.

So says the anti-Protestant, as if it matters.

 

[Taken]

R I G H T!! So YOU decide with your carnal mind if they have "Scriptural Knowledge" and YOU decide if they have applied it "applicably"!!

F A S C I N A T I N G!

LOL you’re fascinated ... funny.
What IS IN Scripture and what IS NOT IN Scripture is quite elementary.

 

[Marymog]

So says the anti-Protestant, as if it matters.

The teaching of The Catholic Church isn't "anti-Protestant". For you see the teaching of The Church came 1st AND THEN the multiple ever changing teachings of Protestantism came 2nd. So what came first CAN'T be anti-Protestantism since it was the original teaching which means that what came 2nd (the multiple, ever splintering) is "anti" (against)!

Use logic kiddo...

 

[Marymog]

LOL you’re fascinated ... funny.
What IS IN Scripture and what IS NOT IN Scripture is quite elementary.

Lol....your response has NOTHING to do with what criteria you use. Even an elementary age child can figure that out....

Mary

 

[Taken]

The teaching of The Catholic Church isn't "anti-Protestant". For you see the teaching of The Church came 1st AND THEN the multiple ever changing teachings of Protestantism came 2nd. So what came first CAN'T be anti-Protestantism since it was the original teaching which means that what came 2nd (the multiple, ever splintering) is "anti" (against)!

Use logic kiddo...

LOL...point is, no one cares about Catholics whining “anti-Catholic”! It’s laughable every time a Catholic boo hoos about “anti-Catholic”.

Use the Facts....The Church is IN a man, It’s Jesus’ Church! Built on the Rock who IS Christ....Duh!

 

[Taken]

Use logic kiddo...

LOL...Logic for spiritual things....

 

[BreadOfLife]

Since the Bible IS sufficient for Spiritual Knowledge Verification, my question was sufficient.

Where dors the Bible make this claim for itself?

2 Tim. 3:16
All Scripture is breathed out by God and PROFITABLE for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness

It's "Profitable" or "Useful" - but NOY sufficient as our SOLE Authority on doctrine OR history.
Besides - Peter being is Rome is a matter of HISTORY and not necessarily Scripture - so your point is moot.

 

[Marymog]

LOL...point is, no one cares about Catholics whining “anti-Catholic”! It’s laughable every time a Catholic boo hoos about “anti-Catholic”.

Use the Facts....The Church is IN a man, It’s Jesus’ Church! Built on the Rock who IS Christ....Duh!

Well, once again you can't come up with a defense of how what you said was wrong (not logical). Do you ever get tired of being wrong? I'm not tired of pointing it out.

Use the Facts and stop making things up....Scripture DOES NOT say The Church is IN a man....that is the silliest thing you have said thus far. And you have said some pretty silly things....

It's laughable that you say that no one cares about Catholics whining “anti-Catholic” but then you show that you do care because you keep commenting on it.

You are F A S C I N A T I N G!!

 

[Taken]

Where dors the Bible make this claim for itself?

2 Tim. 3:16
All Scripture is breathed out by God and PROFITABLE for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness

It's "Profitable" or "Useful" - but NOY sufficient as our SOLE Authority on doctrine OR history.
[/QUOTE]

I said Scripture IS SUFFICIENT for Spiritual KNOWLEDGE.
Throughly furnished IS SUFFICIENT.

2 Tim 3:
[14] But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them;
[15] And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
[16] All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
[17] That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.

I Don’t CARE that you deviate and get your Spiritual Knowledge outside of Scripture.
It is well documented every time you Speak Against the Holy Scriptures.
You will bear your own burden for what you choose to do.

 

[Taken]

Use the Facts and stop making things up....Scripture DOES NOT say The Church is IN a man....that is the silliest thing you have said thus far. And you have said some pretty silly things....

I was suspect, but now KNOW that does NOT APPLY to YOU...
But you can read, what DOES APPLY to me.


1 Cor 3:
[9] For we are labourers together with God: ye are God's husbandry, ye are God's building.
[16] Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?
[17] If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.

 

[Taken]

It's laughable that you say that no one cares about Catholics whining “anti-Catholic” but then you show that you do care because you keep commenting on it.

You are F A S C I N A T I N G!!

Seems even the simplest terms have you confounded.
Laughing at your anti-catholic whining is not Caring!

 

[BreadOfLife]

I said Scripture IS SUFFICIENT for Spiritual KNOWLEDGE.
Throughly furnished IS SUFFICIENT.

2 Tim 3:
[14] But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them;
[15] And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
[16] All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
[17] That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.

"Thoroughly furnished unto good works" is NOT the same as "sussifient for spiritual knowledge".
It's PROFITABLE/USEFUL for doctrine, reproof, correction or instruction.

Learn how to properly divide Scripture.
It's NOT up for grabs . . .

I Don’t CARE that you deviate and get your Spiritual Knowledge outside of Scripture.

It is well documented every time you Speak Against the Holy Scriptures.
You will bear your own burden for what you choose to do.

"Spiritualk knowledge"??

This was a question about Peter being in Rome, which is an HISTORICAL matter and NOT necessarily a Scriptural one.
Pay attention.