Strength and Honor: Triumphing over Feminism

[TLHKAJ]

 

[Mink57]

Sis, the elites did plan 9/11. My mother and I were shown this way back around 1981/1982. We both were under the MK Ultra projects and we were shown (by our programmers /handlers) this was the plan back when I was about age 9 or 10.

I began having recurring nightmares about that in January of 2001 ...of us being shown planes crashing into highrises, into buildings, into a field... fires, death, chaos. It wasn't a premonition. It was memories of what we were shown... I was a child in those nightmares. Somehow, as the year turned to 2001, my mind began to release those memories.

I'm not disputing that. The dispute is about whether or not a man named "Nick" Rockefeller is even related to THE Rockefellers and whether or not THE Rockefellers wanted women in the workforce in order to generate more tax revenue.

The Rockefellers who established the Rockefeller Foundation were a HIGHLY philanthropic family. And yes, they DID donate money to Women's Lib causes. They did not seek to "break up" families.

 

[TLHKAJ]

I'm not disputing that. The dispute is about whether or not a man named "Nick" Rockefeller is even related to THE Rockefellers and whether or not THE Rockefellers wanted women in the workforce in order to generate more tax revenue.

The Rockefellers who established the Rockefeller Foundation were a HIGHLY philanthropic family. And yes, they DID donate money to Women's Lib causes. They did not seek to "break up" families.

Sister, they are not good people. They are near the top of the human ladder that runs the world. Funding things to meet their evil goals is their top priority. They are experts on human psychology. I believe they purposed the women's movements to start out innocently and then to steer and influence at least some sects in certain directions....thus, you have the extremes within the movement that you mentioned before.

These people ("elites") have very long term goals. They'll plan something decades or even centuries in advance. They most often succeed to a large degree. I'm just sharing what I know from experience.

 

[Mink57]

Sister, they are not good people. They are near the top of the human ladder that runs the world. Funding things to meet their evil goals is their top priority. They are experts on human psychology. I believe they purposed the women's movements to start out innocently and then to steer and influence at least some sects in certain directions....thus, you have the extremes within the movement that you mentioned before.

These people ("elites") have very long term goals. They'll plan something decades or even centuries in advance. They most often succeed to a large degree. I'm just sharing what I know from experience.

We may be at cross purposes here. But I DO want to address the bolded.

There are probably many "-isms" and many causes that started out "innocently"...and evolved (or DEvolved) into something more sinister. The INCEL community comes to mind. The woman who started this cause didn't hate men. She simply wanted to provide an arena to talk about and discuss the desire to be in a relationship with others who desire the same thing. Once she gave her site to a stranger, it took off into a new direction...filled with men who hate women for not 'giving' them the sex they thought (and still think) they deserve.

Social scientists, anthropologists, archeologists, etc. have pointed to patriarchy as something that wasn't ALWAYS historical. And while patriarchy may have started out as 'innocent', it certainly isn't that way today.

Various writers, both male and female have spoken on women's rights since well before the feminist movement in the 1800's. The first wave of feminism then didn't begin in a vacuum. The unfair treatment of women has existed from before the bible was even written. However, it was also a cultural thing. The women of Greece in ancient times for example, did not have the same rights as the women of Egypt. And some philosophers (such as Plato) wondered why.

More to say about this in a bit....

 

[Wynona]

@Naomanos. Here is Aaron Russo talking about the interview and what was said.

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=523285913505881

 

[Wrangler]

Sister, they are not good people. They are near the top of the human ladder that runs the world. Funding things to meet their evil goals is their top priority.

I’m so grateful that you realize that!

Manipulation seems friendly, like they’re doing you a favor.

 

[Naomanos]

@Naomanos. Here is Aaron Russo talking about the interview and what was said.

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=523285913505881

Thank you, but it all seems a little too convenient to me.

It is something I will have to research more.

 

[TLHKAJ]

We may be at cross purposes here. But I DO want to address the bolded.

There are probably many "-isms" and many causes that started out "innocently"...and evolved (or DEvolved) into something more sinister. The INCEL community comes to mind. The woman who started this cause didn't hate men. She simply wanted to provide an arena to talk about and discuss the desire to be in a relationship with others who desire the same thing. Once she gave her site to a stranger, it took off into a new direction...filled with men who hate women for not 'giving' them the sex they thought (and still think) they deserve.

Social scientists, anthropologists, archeologists, etc. have pointed to patriarchy as something that wasn't ALWAYS historical. And while patriarchy may have started out as 'innocent', it certainly isn't that way today.

Various writers, both male and female have spoken on women's rights since well before the feminist movement in the 1800's. The first wave of feminism then didn't begin in a vacuum. The unfair treatment of women has existed from before the bible was even written. However, it was also a cultural thing. The women of Greece in ancient times for example, did not have the same rights as the women of Egypt. And some philosophers (such as Plato) wondered why.

More to say about this in a bit....

I understand what you're talking about. A lot of businesses and organizations end up this way ...starting out as honorable, and being taken over or infiltrated by people with other agendas.

And if we take an honest look at scripture, it was never God's plan for women to be treated as second class. Woman was created because Adam was alone and God said that wasn't good ...so He made him a helpmeet. She wasn't his servant or subordinate. She was alongside him to help him. It was a result of the fall that things went downhill.

 

[Wrangler]

Candace Owen on Snow White’s star, Rachel Zegler … She blasted the dream women have of meeting a charming prince, falling in love and living happily ever after.

She advocates for women to be the prince, be the man and fight bad guys with swords. In short, the goal of feminists is to be men, that there’s nothing special about being a woman. It doesn’t seem like women are winning with feminism.

Wow!

 

[TLHKAJ]

She advocates for women to be the prince, be the man and fight bad guys with swords. In short, the goal of feminists is to be men, that there’s nothing special about being a woman. It doesn’t seem like women are winning with feminism.

This is the part I cannot go with. I don't know why any woman would want to be a prince, or a man ... except there must be some wounding somewhere that brought on some walls and bitterness. I admit, I have had times when I wanted to fight the bad guys with swords (figuratively). But I would fight like a girl (woman) ...not like a man. lol

I have faced down grown men where it came to my children. (If you're a mama just minding your own business with your children - some being teenage daughters - and a grungy man starts staring at your girls.... that doesn't fly!! I stared him down and he knew I meant business. He stopped gawking at my girls. Or your son is fighting the battle of his life and a man decides he wants to come to your house and start drama ....not gonna happen!! Or a young man is coming to your daughter's window at night ....after he got my drift, he was scared to come back!! Yeah, I'll fight the bad guys ...like a mama bear!!)

 

[Wrangler]

This is the part I cannot go with. I don't know why any woman would want to be a prince, or a man ... except there must be some wounding somewhere that brought on some walls and bitterness.

Feminism in a nutshell.

Bitterness begets bitterness. For instance, bitter feminists want to be treated equally. So, men treat women like men - in not helping them open doors, carry their bags, or come to their rescue when accosted by criminals in the street. Then feminists are bitter about the lack of accommodation, they've come to expect from our man-hating society.

Their bitterness in being treated like a man, in not being accommodated, is so severe, there are many tik Tok vids where they complain about it. They blame men - for giving them exactly what they said they wanted. The blame "the world." But they find a way not to blame feminism or their bitterness.

 

[TLHKAJ]

Feminism in a nutshell.

Bitterness begets bitterness. For instance, bitter feminists want to be treated equally. So, men treat women like men - in not helping them open doors, carry their bags, or come to their rescue when accosted by criminals in the street. Then feminists are bitter about the lack of accommodation, they've come to expect from our man-hating society.

Their bitterness in being treated like a man, in not being accommodated, is so severe, there are many tik Tok vids where they complain about it. They blame men - for giving them exactly what they said they wanted. The blame "the world." But they find a way not to blame feminism or their bitterness.

There is a difference in equality and being the same. Women are equal with men in value and should have rights and choices. (Don't read more into that than I am saying.) But women are not men ...we are different, obviously. And we have roles we are better at than men (and vice versa). But our differences do mot mean we are not equal.

I'm equal in value to a man. But I am not a man, and don't want to be a man. I am disgusted when men aren't men. Men who try to assert themselves over a woman or talk down to a woman just because she is a woman ...are not men.

A woman doesn't have to submit to every man ...only her own husband. And he is the not to dominate her ...but to love her as Christ loved the Church and gave Himself for it.

Malachi 2:13-17
[13]And this have ye done again, covering the altar of the LORD with tears, with weeping, and with crying out, insomuch that he regardeth not the offering any more, or receiveth it with good will at your hand.
[14]Yet ye say, Wherefore? Because the LORD hath been witness between thee and the wife of thy youth, against whom thou hast dealt treacherously: yet is she thy companion, and the wife of thy covenant.
[15]And did not he make one? Yet had he the residue of the spirit. And wherefore one? That he might seek a godly seed. Therefore take heed to your spirit, and let none deal treacherously against the wife of his youth.
[16]For the LORD, the God of Israel, saith that he hateth putting away: for one covereth violence with his garment, saith the LORD of hosts: therefore take heed to your spirit, that ye deal not treacherously.
[17]Ye have wearied the LORD with your words. Yet ye say, Wherein have we wearied him? When ye say, Every one that doeth evil is good in the sight of the LORD, and he delighteth in them; or, Where is the God of judgment?

1 Peter 3:7
[7]Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered.

A man who is hateful, dishonoring, mean, and abusive to his wife is not a true Christian ...God will not even hear his prayers. He dies, however, hear the prayers of his wife who is covering the altar with tears, weeping, and crying out.

Look into scripture and see how Jesus was a servant. He was a king, but He washed His disciples' feet. He was God in the flesh, but He humbled Himself.

Love....
1 Corinthians 13:4-13
[4]Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up,
[5]Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil;
[6]Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth;
[7]Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.
[8]Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.
[9]For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.
[10]But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.
[11]When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.
[12]For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
[13]And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.

 

[Wrangler]

But our differences do mot mean we are not equal.

Having differences mean not being equal. LOL. What would being unequal mean?

I'm equal in value to a man.

Value is a secondary concept. Always it must be understood, of value to WHOM and for WHAT?

Men and women are equally valued by God. Sadly, we are not equal under the law as statistics show that women get shorter sentences for committing the same crimes as men. There is female privilege everywhere, despite cries of male privilege. This short vid reveals this.

One woman complains that it is not fair that due to nature, men age better than women.

 

[TLHKAJ]

Having differences mean not being equal. LOL.

So you believe a woman is not of the same value. I strongly disagree. We are all of equal value as children of God and Abraham's seed by faith in Jesus Christ.

Galatians 3:26-29
[26]For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
[27]For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
[28]There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
[29]And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Where in scripture is a man spoken of as having worth in this manner? I could say that women have a higher worth.

Proverbs 31:10
[10]Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies.

But it really isn't the point. We are all of equal value in God's eyes. It took the same precious, priceless blood of Jesus to save women as it does to save men.

 

[TLHKAJ]

Value is a secondary concept. Always it must be understood, of value to WHOM and for WHAT?

Value to GOD!! Value as being created in God's image, and joint heirs with Christ in God.

Men obviously skew and distort things. But it isn't the same in God's eyes. In God's kingdom, elevation comes after humility, and glorification comes after suffering.

Romans 8:14-17
[14]For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.
[15]For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.
[16]The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God:
[17]And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together.

 

[Wrangler]

So you believe a woman is not of the same value. I strongly disagree.

I don't know how you got that from what I wrote.

Value is a secondary concept. Always it must be understood, of value to WHOM and for WHAT?

Men and women are equally valued by God.

Can't you agree that if you want to increase the population, women are more valuable than men? An island with a population of 10:1 men will not prosper as well as an island of 1:10 men. It is bizarre to me the rage that feminists have in their indispensable value of bringing forth the next generation to prevent the human species from going extinct.

It seems like an out of control ego and oddly hateful those who rage against their most valuable attribute.

And likewise, if you have hard, physical labor to do, can't you agree men are more valuable than women?

I've said this many times in this thread. The absurdity of the feminist movement's fight for "equality" is seen in the fact that all human cultures throughout human history value women more than men. It is not undervaluing women that explains why they did not die by the millions in battlefields over the centuries but instead, were put first in life boats. This is female privilege, which is most clearly seen in matters of life and death. Feminists take for granted their privilege and rage against male privilege but do not strife to make men equal in matters of life and death. This reveals the evil nature of feminism.

 

[amigo de christo]

Velcum to sie digital order . that is why they were very busy getting even the third world countries into a data base .
They dont do as they do for humanity
THEY cry loudly we do this for the poor , for the sociall outcast , for the deprived
so we can all have equality , social equity
BUT HEED NOT their lips . THEY DO THIS and decieve the people
for only one reason . THEMSELVES .

 

[TLHKAJ]

Can't you agree that if you want to increase the population, women are more valuable than men? An island with a population of 10:1 men will not prosper as well as an island of 1:10 men.

I'm not a fan of polygamy. lol

But I do see what you're saying...

 

[Mink57]

Feminism in a nutshell.

Bitterness begets bitterness. For instance, bitter feminists want to be treated equally. So, men treat women like men - in not helping them open doors, carry their bags, or come to their rescue when accosted by criminals in the street. Then feminists are bitter about the lack of accommodation, they've come to expect from our man-hating society.

Pretty interesting how you say that "men treat women like men." How does ANY man know WHO is a "bitter feminist" and who isn't?
I hold doors open for both men and women because it's the polite thing to do. And if a man holds a door open for me, I simply smile and say, "Thank you!" However, if a man holds a door open for me, I do NOT 'owe' him my phone number or a 'date'. It does not give him license to comment on my body as I'm walking past him or to pat me on the rear.

Their bitterness in being treated like a man, in not being accommodated, is so severe, there are many tik Tok vids where they complain about it. They blame men - for giving them exactly what they said they wanted. The blame "the world." But they find a way not to blame feminism or their bitterness.

Wrangler....you really, REALLY need to get OFF of social media and into the REAL world.

 

[Wrangler]

Pretty interesting how you say that "men treat women like men." How does ANY man know WHO is a "bitter feminist" and who isn't?

By definition, if you’re a feminist, you’re bitter. Self awareness is not a high attribute of the entitled.