Speaking in Tongues a Cessationist View

[bbyrd009]

Well I've heard of people going into countries to teach not knowing the native language and being able to either learn the language very quick or be able to communicate clearly. To me that is a gift.

stay in one house while you are there and eat what they feed you, and you'll find out right quick
I guess

 

[Jeff Wiebe]

1 Corinthians 14:22 KJV
[22] Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which believe.

They are for a sign yes. Any unbeliever would see it as just that. A sign of the Holy Spirit giving someone the ability to teach in an unknown language.

 

[Dave L]

What unfounded ideas? "No interp needed" or "interp needed and being chided?"

You cannot determine what scripture says unless you compare it with other scripture.

 

[Dave L]

Well I've heard of people going into countries to teach not knowing the native language and being able to either learn the language very quick or be able to communicate clearly. To me that is a gift.

This is not biblical tongues. Not even close. Tongues were not human languages. They were heavenly languages when interpreted became human languages.

 

[Jeff Wiebe]

stay in one house while you are there and eat what they feed you, and you'll find out right quick
I guess

Learning to communicate for food is very different than being able to teach the Gospel.

 

[Waiting on him]

Isaiah 28:11-12 KJV
[11] For with stammering lips and another tongue will he speak to this people. [12] To whom he said, This is the rest wherewith ye may cause the weary to rest; and this is the refreshing: yet they would not hear.

Tecarta BibleThey were for a sign to the Jews. See what he tells us here.

Matthew 6:7 KJV
[7] But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do : for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.

Tecarta BibleVain repetition means to stammer or stutter. That’s what we hear today.

 

[bbyrd009]

You cannot determine what scripture says unless you compare it with other scripture.

now is your chance dave, what is your refute for conflating xeno and gloss

 

[bbyrd009]

Learning to communicate for food is very different than being able to teach the Gospel.

so you say, but I suggest that learning to communicate period is not the worst goal, and maybe a worthy step on the path to the other?

 

[Dave L]

now is your chance dave, what is your refute for conflating xeno and gloss

Did you know what you were saying when speaking in tongues? If not, it wasn't tongues but mindless babbling.

 

[Jeff Wiebe]

This is not biblical tongues. Not even close. Tongues were not human languages. They were heavenly languages when interpreted became human languages.

God gave each person the ability to understand in his and her language. The outpouring on Pentecost is not the same as Paul describes to the Corinthians. Were there interpreters at Pentecost? No, everyone understood without interpretation. Paul said to the Corinthians an interpreter must be present. Different kind of tongues. If God wants you to teach, you will, no matter the language.

 

[Dave L]

God gave each person the ability to understand in his and her language. The outpouring on Pentecost is not the same as Paul describes to the Corinthians. Were there interpreters at Pentecost? No, everyone understood without interpretation. Paul said to the Corinthians an interpreter must be present. Different kind of tongues. If God wants you to teach, you will, no matter the language.

But tongues ceased with the Apostles who passed the gifts around through their hands.

 

[bbyrd009]

you should maybe stop saying that until you are sure

Did you know what you were saying when speaking in tongues? If not, it wasn't tongues but mindless babbling.

well again Dave, we are restricted to only the Tongues that we can see with yur two little peepers see, and imo doing that first got me to here. Man's sense and God's nonsense surely sounds fam? We have a perfectly logical reaction to glosssololia imo dave, me too, but they are as central and alive today as the Tower of Babel ok, the xenoglossy that we have dismissed also bc we cannot see it with your eyes included

 

[Dave L]

you should maybe stop saying that until you are surewell again Dave, we are restricted to only the Tongues that we can see with yur two little peepers see, and imo doing that first got me to here. Man's sense and God's nonsense surely sounds fam? We have a perfectly logical reaction to glosssololia imo dave, me too, but they are as central and alive today as the Tower of Babel ok, the xenoglossy that we have dismissed also bc we cannot see it with your eyes included

So you were a mindless babbler?

 

[bbyrd009]

So you were a mindless babbler?

according to man's sense certainly...
Dave, you aren't even asking the right questions bro, and if we need to review God's nonsense this is prolly a great place.

All NT is OT based right, where's Speaking in Tongues OT dave?
Anyone

 

[Dave L]

Dave, you aren't even asking the right questions bro, and if we need to review God's nonsense this is prolly a great place.

All NT is OT based right, where's Speaking in Tongues OT dave?
Anyone?

It was not needed. Tongues became instrumental in writing the NT.

 

[bbyrd009]

It was not needed. Tongues became instrumental in writing the NT.

;)

So Dave you have an OT back for every Scriptural concept you can name, but you don't think Tongues is in there anywhere

 

[bbyrd009]

;)

So Dave you have an OT back for every Scriptural concept you can name, but you don't think Tongues is in there anywhere. So a New Thing

 

[Dave L]

Please show where.

 

[bbyrd009]

Please show where.

It's a riddle dave, with a payoff, and your answer will be better than my answer ok.
So you pls show me where

 

[Dave L]

It's a riddle dave, with a payoff, and your answer will be better than my answer ok.
So you pls show me where

Tongues in the OT were symbols of foreign occupation and exile. But the gift was for the writing of the NT and a sign of the looming destruction of Jerusalem.