Spiritual Israelite
Well-Known Member
I don't think that and never said that.So why do you think it was a mystery that some Jews were saved and some weren’t? Shouldn’t it have been obvious that that was the case?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I don't think that and never said that.So why do you think it was a mystery that some Jews were saved and some weren’t? Shouldn’t it have been obvious that that was the case?
No, I did not. You have very poor reading comprehension skills. I'm saying that the mystery was that Israel would be blinded in part, not just back then in Paul's day, but also all the way up until the fullness of the Gentiles comes in, which I believe has not yet occurred. It wasn't a mystery that some Jews were saved and some were not. I'm not saying that. Please read what I say more carefully.But that’s not what SI was talking about, he said the mystery was a fraction of Jews were saved and the other fraction were not saved, they were blinded.
So in this case, God divinely made ALL Jews blinded before the cross, and allowed some to see Him and accept Him as their Messiah after the resurrection, but still keep many Jews “blinded” for another 2000 years… so, if they are still divinely blinded, then that is not their fault and “ALL Israel will be saved after He removes their blindness.
And that might indicate that God would save His people who kept the faith in worshipping the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, but we’re divinely kept blinded to Jesus- in this manner it might fit the term “blinded in part.”
I don’t know if the above was clear enough to comment on, but I hope some might cut through the confusion and offer their opinion.
Thank you for your response. This is such a difficult “mystery.”This is my understanding about the meaning of those verses.
Here’s what seems to be kinda off kilter here. If Paul meant Israel will always and forever be blind in part then why even say “that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in”?
Well take Ephesians 3:9 for example
And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:
Here mystery is something that was hid from the beginning.
That is so good! So the same reasons they failed to preach the One true God to the world (before the cross), pride and selfulness, continues to be a barrier to recognizing Jesus as their Messiah?Because Israel in blindness believed that salvation was exclusively for the Jews. Paul speaking to Israel and to us is basically saying, not so fast! Salvation if for whosoever is of faith, whether they are Jew or Gentile. And in fact the blindness in part to Israel of the flesh shall continue until the seventh angel begins to sound that time shall be no longer because that is when the last Gentile to be saved shall be saved. (Mystery finished Rev 10:7) The mystery hidden of Old, and now revealed through Christ is that the Kingdom of God is not limited to any one nation of the world. Whosoever throughout the world that hears the Gospel proclaimed and believes through the power of the Holy Spirit are all part of the same ONE body of faith, called "the Israel of God." Not for Jews only, but for ALL people of faith in Christ.
Since the advent of Christ, Israel is no different than any other nation of the world. Every single nation upon the earth has the same blindness in part. Because there is no nation in the world where every living soul within that nation has been saved.
The mystery is that it is only a small remnant of the once elect nation of physical Israel that are now God's elect. The overwhelming majority are totally blind. They're ignorant. They do not get it. They reject Christ and the cross-work and therefore reject God and eternal life. They belong to the damned. They are unredeemed. They are of their father the devil.The blindness in part is seen in 2 Corinthians 3:13-16.
13 And not as Moses, which put a vail over his face, that the children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is abolished: 14 But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done away in Christ. 15 But even unto this day, when Moses is read, the vail is upon their heart. 16 Nevertheless when it shall turn to the Lord, the vail shall be taken away.
This blindness ended when the old covenant vanished, and Hebrews 8:13 said it was ready to vanish away, and that was at the time Hebrews was written.
To understand the fullness of the Gentiles, which coincides with the times of the Gentiles, it really needs to be looked at beginning with the times of the Jews.
The Jewish kingdom began at Sinai, when the Shekinah glory dwelt in the Tabernacle and later in Solomon's Temple. This was when the times of the Jews started, time was not based on how old the earth was but based on the reigns of the Jewish leaders at the time.
For example 1 Kings 16:8 In the twenty and sixth year of Asa king of Judah began Elah the son of Baasha to reign over Israel in Tirzah, two years.
Time is based on who is ruling which was an extension of the authority of God. When the Babylonian captivity occurred the Shekinah glory departed the temple and the times of the Jews ended.
After the times of the Jews, Daniel gives us the images of the reigning Gentile powers on earth as animals, which one day would end. The times of the Gentiles started with Babylon and the last act that the Gentiles were prophesied to perform was the sacking of Jerusalem in Daniel 9:26-27, this happened in 70AD. We see the statements such as the fullness of the Gentiles or times of the Gentiles be fulfilled because the Gentiles didn’t fully complete all that they were prophesied to do when Romans was written. Luke 21:22 For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled. The times of the Gentiles came in when the fullness or completion of all things prophesied for them occurred.
We have now come to mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels. Jesus is now reigning and the Shekinah glory is in New Jerusalem as seen in Revelation 21:22-23.
It is interesting to note that the words IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD is sometimes used when expressing a date, nobody says IN THE YEAR OF THE GENTILES.
In Romans 11:2-4 Paul uses the example of Elias and the seven thousand men that hadn’t bowed the knee to show that at that time a similar situation was happening where there was a remnant according to the election of grace. I don’t think that was a mystery, it was a reoccurring event.The mystery is that it is only a small remnant of the once elect nation of physical Israel that are now God's elect. The overwhelming majority are totally blind. They're ignorant. They do not get it. They reject Christ and the cross-work and therefore reject God and eternal life. They belong to the damned. They are unredeemed. They are of their father the devil.
Yes, in Ephesians 3:1-6 Paul says it was a mystery that the nations be fellow-heirs and of the same body and partakers of His promise.And equally, and amazingly, a people who were previously blind, ignorant, and in darkness, have now been enlightened by the glorious Gospel of Christ and have now been integrated into the good olive tree, to be God's elect today to be one with the great Patriarchs, Moses and the prophets, and all the redeemed from thebeginningoftime.
This was a great mystery to Israel.
It doesn't matter what you and I think. Christ and the NT writers were always cutting across the in-built racial pride of the Jews trusting in their own flesh. In the OT there was obvious favoritism. That went in the NT era. That is what many never got.In Romans 11:2-4 Paul uses the example of Elias and the seven thousand men that hadn’t bowed the knee to show that at that time a similar situation was happening where there was a remnant according to the election of grace. I don’t think that was a mystery, it was a reoccurring event.
In the old covenant or contract if you will, God had obligations and the Jews had obligations. If a Jew didn’t perform their obligations then it was not a mystery that their relationship with God was broken.
Yes, in Ephesians 3:1-6 Paul says it was a mystery that the nations be fellow-heirs and of the same body and partakers of His promise.
However I don’t think that’s was the mystery Paul is referring to in Romans 11:25. I can see how, at first glance, it can be said that the Jews were partially blinded because they didn’t see the mystery that the Gospel would go to the Gentiles. Peter was obviously clueless to this until his vision, and even after he went to the house of Cornelius it seems he still struggled with the idea.
But at some point it was accepted by many as there was a discussion about the Gentiles and an agreement was made that different burdens were placed on the Gentiles than the Jews in Acts 15.
So, if partial blindness was the Gospel going to the Gentiles then the blindness started being removed with Peter, which would mean the statement “blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in” isn’t accurate as blindness in part only remained for a brief period of time while the fullness of the Gentiles didn’t come in.
Ok, I agree with what you’re saying but maybe I view the covenants a little differently.It doesn't matter what you and I think. Christ and the NT writers were always cutting across the in-built racial pride of the Jews trusting in their own flesh. In the NT there was obvious favoritism. That went in the NT era. That is what many never got.
Jesus said, in John 10:1, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.” He then goes on to explain, “I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture” (John 10:9).
Favor with God can come only through Jesus Christ. He is heaven’s only means of access to God. Acts 4:12 says, “Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.”
This is God’s only way to heaven. Christ is the center-point of salvation. We therefore see that Christ alone is our only way of access to heaven. There is no alternative arrangement pertaining to race or any other distinction. 1 Corinthians 3:11 states, “For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ.”
Of course, Christ is the Rock that the believer stands on. He is the only spiritual foundation for man. Men either build their house upon that Rock or build it upon sand. Sand is self! A house properly built upon the Rock stands firm in the midst of the storm but the house built upon the sand falls apart. 1 Timothy 2:5-6 expressly states, “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time”
This couldn’t be any clearer! There is no Plan B. There is no back-doors into heaven. There is no alternative salvation. There is no other means of man gaining favor with God! There is no other way to become a child of God. There is no other path to be God’s one of God’s elect.
John the Baptist proclaimed in John 3:36, “He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.”
There is nothing vague, ambiguous or complicated here. God only sees those in Christ and those not in Christ. There is also no room for fence-sitting here. If a Jew or Gentile (in the Old Testament or the New Testament) loves the Messiah Christ He is one of God's chosen, if he doesn't he is under the wrath of God. Simple!!! Basically: accept Jesus and God accepts you, reject Him and God rejects you.
Jesus said in John 5:23b-24, “He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him. Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.”
Ok, what does this mean? Simple: those Jews and Gentiles that don’t accept Christ, don’t accept the Father. Christ-rejecting Jews and Gentiles are therefore under condemnation and are of their father the devil.
I John 2:22-23 solemnly asks, “Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ (or Messiah)? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.”
Q. Does Israel overwhelmingly deny “that Jesus is the Christ” or Messiah?
A. Absolutely. Therefore, Judaism without Christ is a counterfeit religion. It is apostate! Any belief that denies Christ His rightful place as man's sole Redeemer is destined for destruction. Anyone that rejects Christ (1) is antichrist, (2) belongs to Satan, (3) is part of the kingdom of darkness and is (4) bound for the Lake of Fire.
1 John 5:12: “He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.”
The teaching of Scripture couldn’t be plainer: Jews who do recognize Christ as Messiah are saved. Jews who do not recognize Christ as Messiah are lost. The only chosen people that God knows and accepts are those that accept His Son. The rest are of their father the devil.
2 John 1:9: “Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.”
If a sinner refuses Christ, he refuses the Father. This couldn’t be clearer in Scripture.
Jesus said in Luke 9:48, “whosoever shall receive me receiveth him that sent me.”
So, those that reject Jesus, reject salvation. Those that reject Jesus, reject the Father. Those that reject Jesus, are children of the devil. This is seen throughout the inspired New Testament account.
Jesus said in Matthew 11:6: “blessed is he, whosoever shall not be offended in me.”
We don’t need to speculate about what natural Israel currently thinks of Christ.
Jesus said in Matthew 12:30, “He that is not with me is against me.”
There is no neutrality with this Jesus. There is no room for fence-sitting when it comes to Him. You are either for Him or against Him.
Jesus said in John 15:23, “He that hateth me hateth my Father also.”
God does not separate His elect up, He unites them together in Christ. In fact, there is nothing more unbiblical in this new covenant period than trying to divide up the people of God on the grounds of ethnicity. That is spiritual apartheid and runs completely to the New Testament plan of God to bring Jew and Gentile together equally in Christ. The whole mission of Jesus Christ in introducing the new covenant was to unite Jew and Gentile in salvation. Nothing could be clearer in the New Testament!
The old covenent required the Jews to obey and honor the Levitical ceremonies, sacrifices, offerings, etc. It they kept His laws and commands, their sin would be forgiven - until the next Day of Atonement.Ok, I agree with what you’re saying but maybe I view the covenants a little differently.
The old covenant required both God and Israel to perform obligations or tasks according to the covenant (agreement). Israel didn’t or really couldn’t perform their end of the agreement, which made the old covenant ultimately unachievable.
The new covenant is a one sided covenant in which God or Jesus performs the tasks that make the covenant achievable and He did complete those tasks.
When it comes to free will vs election, the old covenant which required our free will to satisfy its terms, shows the complete failure of our free will and that our free will is not reliable.
After the cross the burden of the old covenant was still being observed by the Jews, while the Gentiles had a different burden, this seemed good to the Holy Spirit in Acts 15:28. Since the old covenant required a persons free will, this is at least part of the vail that or blindness that was happening during the first century.
The new covenant went into force after Jesus was crucified yet many thousands of Jews remained zealous for the law while believing in Jesus according to Acts 21:20.The old covenent required the Jews to obey and honor the Levitical ceremonies, sacrifices, offerings, etc. It they kept His laws and commands, their sin would be forgiven - until the next Day of Atonement.
The new covenant requires the Jews and Gentiles to also accept the One true God but if they believe in Jesus, then He will send His Holy Spirit to give us unlimited power to succeed in His ways. But whether it is the old or the new covenant, we still must make that choice to believie and accept the One true God.... He has given us better way to accomplish salvation. Everything has moved from the external to the internal, from the corporate to the individual, from the external Shekinah Glory to the internal Holy Spirit.....
Well, they have been keeping God’s laws, commandments and Levitical ceremonies and practices for 1500 years. And when reading the time after the cross, is was quite difficult for them to understand what was “done away” with and what may be kept.The new covenant went into force after Jesus was crucified yet many thousands of Jews remained zealous for the law while believing in Jesus according to Acts 21:20.
What are your thoughts on why the Jews maintained the old covenant burdens, while the Gentiles were not under those burdens, which seemed good to the Holy Spirit in Acts 15:28-29?
Ok, that difficulty in understanding that the ceremonies were done away with can be considered blindness. Partial blindness could be considered believing in Jesus but continuing the ceremonial practices due to a lack of understanding.Well, they have been keeping God’s laws, commandments and Levitical ceremonies and practices for 1500 years. And when reading the time after the cross, is was quite difficult for them to understand what was “done away” with and what may be kept.
Now many Christians today contend the “law” (the 10 Commandments) were also “done away” with…. Not just the ceremonial practices and commands. So, it is not difficult to see just how much confusion there was among them… There was no set of rules telling them what would continue and what was done away with.
The moral laws were never designed to be “done away” with or “fulfilled” by Jesus. But the ceremonial laws and practices were a type and shadow of the coming Messiah. The Temple, the Sanctuary, the offerings and sacrifices pointed to the Messiah. They all were completely destroyed by the Babylonians, but God would restore everything before He arrived on the first day or the 70th week. It is because they were never allowed to be “permanently” destroyed- but they were to be “permanently” fulfilled by the Messiah. God’s 10 commandments can never be destroyed, but will remain until the end of time.
The new covenant went into force after Jesus was crucified yet many thousands of Jews remained zealous for the law while believing in Jesus according to Acts 21:20.
What are your thoughts on why the Jews maintained the old covenant burdens, while the Gentiles were not under those burdens, which seemed good to the Holy Spirit in Acts 15:28-29?
Do you think the old covenant vanished or do you think it is still around and hasn’t vanished yet?The Laws continues to be a stumbling stone for Orthodox Jews still now. Which is indeed very sad since according to Scripture, before the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD, the new covenant made the first covenant old, and ready to vanish away.
Oh my. Their disobedience has led to mercy for us Gentiles; think about what this partial blindness has done. They may also receive mercy for their disobedience on account of God's mercy to us. We are not told how that's going to play out for individuals; we are told to use this as a guide to our mindset. And we are told very specifically in verse 20 not to become arrogant, which historically we have violated all too many times.
Do you think the old covenant vanished or do you think it is still around and hasn’t vanished yet?
Well, how can partial blindness be talking about full blindness on only a part of the Jews?It has vanished for all who turn to Christ for everlasting life. Why would one turn again to the repetitive Old Covenant after Christ the true High Priest has come and fulfilled all that the Law demanded?