We're talking about Russell, not the JW's. This is a JW book.
This is not a prediction, this is chronology. He isn't saying "THE millennium" started in 1872. but that "Bible Chronology points to October 1872 as the beginning of the seventh thousand years, or Millennium."
That book was written by J.F. Rutherford
Yes, in his last edition before he died he changed it to 1915.
"In view of this strong Bible evidence concerning the Times of the Gentiles, we consider it an established truth that the final end of the kingdoms of this world, and the full establishment of the Kingdom of God, will be accomplished near the end of A.D. 1915."
That of course did not pan out the way he believed. In the 1916 FOREWORDS, his last edition, he would write on pages iii and iv
This Volume sets forth, what its author has been preaching for over forty years, that the "Times of the Gentiles" chronologically ended in the fall of A.D. 1914. The expression, "Times of the Gentiles," in Bible usage signifies the years, or period of time, in which the Gentile nations of the world were to be permitted to have control, following the taking away of the typical kingdom from natural Israel, and filling the hiatus between that event and the establishment of God's Kingdom in the hands of Messiah – "whose right it is."
Ezekiel 21:27
We could not, of course, know in 1889, whether the date 1914, so clearly marked in the Bible as the end of the Gentile lease of power or permission to rule the world, would mean that they would be fully out of power at that time, or whether, their lease expiring, their eviction would begin. The latter we perceive to be the Lord's program; and promptly in August, 1914, the Gentile kingdoms referred to in the prophecy began the present great struggle, which, according to the Bible, will culminate in the complete overthrow of all human government, opening the way for the full establishment of the Kingdom of God's dear Son.
We are not able to see behind the veil; we are not able to know the things progressing under the direction of our glorious Lord and the members of His Church already glorified. Our thought is that somehow the Lord is taking a hand in the affairs of the world now as He did not do in times past.
Now notice what he states below:
The author acknowledges that in this book he presents the thought that the Lord's saints might expect to be with Him in glory at the ending of the Gentile Times. This was a natural mistake to fall into, but the Lord overruled it for the blessing of His people. The thought that the Church would all be gathered to glory before October, 1914, certainly did have a very stimulating and sanctifying effect upon thousands, all of whom accordingly can praise the Lord – even for the mistake. Many, indeed, can express themselves as being thankful to the Lord that the culmination of the Church's hopes was not reached at the time we expected; and that we, as the Lord's people, have further opportunities of perfecting holiness and of being participators with our Master in the further presentation of His Message to His people.
Our mistake was evidently not in respect to the ending of the Times of the Gentiles; we drew a false conclusion, however, not authorized by the Word of the Lord. We saw in the Bible certain parallels between the Jewish Age and the Gospel Age. We should have noted that these parallels follow the nominal systems to destruction in both cases, and do not indicate the time of the glorification of the New Creation.
He doesn't deny he said it, or try to weasel his way out of it. He admits to it, unlike the Society of today who deny they said something and or blame it on some over zealous Witnesses
That was a Witness publication, not Russell's.
This was not written by Russell despite its claims that it was. The Revelation portion was written by Clayton Woodworth.
Rutherford wrote
Millions.
Russell had nothing to do with Beth Sarim, that was Rutherford.
Again, don't confuse Russell with the Witnesses.
It's always good to go straight to the source, instead of what some website states. I always go to the actual source, I need to prove it to myself before I tell someone, "they said this and that"