Psalm 22

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Jay Ross

Well-Known Member
Jun 20, 2011
7,951
2,980
113
QLD
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
All translations have strengths and weaknesses. The LXX is no exception. Caution is warranted with every translation.

Matthew and the early church believed the verse in question in the LXX was translated correctly by the Jewish scholars. Do you agree or disagree with Matthew and the early church? Do you believe, as they did, in the virgin birth of the Messiah?

Perhaps the following will explain my position: -

1725416780470.png

The LXX English and Greek text of this same verse states this: -

1725418368146.png

And in Matthew 1:23 it states this in the Greek text with the Strong definitions/meaning of the Hebrew Root words given: -

1725418494814.png

The consistent message is that Mary was a young woman, a virgin, which defined her character before God.

Now in my answer above I have not answered your question as to what I believe is true with regards to the virgin birth of Christ, but my opinion or belief, is, I believe, not in question.

@Eliyahu613 on his part is probably using the Jewish playbook to counter Christians and as such he may not be stating what he genuinely believes or has questioned whether the provided information in that playbook is actually true.

At present Jews worldwide are still rebelling against God and not repenting of their continual idolatrous worship, even during this present time.

Shalom
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matthias

Eliyahu613

Member
Apr 14, 2020
338
57
28
106
Judea
Faith
Other Faith
Country
Israel
What is your evidence that Jews living in Judea in the 1st century were unable to read Hebrew?

What language were the scrolls used in synagogues written in?

When Jesus read from the scrolls, what language was he reading?
Bs"d

What percentage of the people could read in those days you think?

Besides that, Hebrew was not the going language, so most didn't speak it, and the vast majority couldn't read it.

Only the rabbis could read it, and they were not going to convert to Christianity.
 

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,546
13,640
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
Bs"d

What percentage of the people could read in those days you think?

Besides that, Hebrew was not the going language, so most didn't speak it, and the vast majority couldn't read it.


Only the rabbis could read it, and they were not going to convert to Christianity.

False in New Testament times. (False also in modern times.)
 

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,546
13,640
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
“In the middle of the second century AD, as Christians began to turn away from oral tradition towards a faith incorporated in written texts, they were faced with the momentous decision as to whether they should adopt the Septuagint, which was, after all, a purely Jewish text, as one of their own sacred writings.

( Charles Freeman, A.D. 381, p. 43)

Bold is mine @PanInVietnam.
 

PanInVietnam

New Member
Jun 14, 2024
53
20
8
50
Hanoi
Faith
Other Faith
Country
Viet Nam
if one could read Hebrew, why would one read greek? The point is in hebrew text says "young" nothing else matters. Personally if Matthew didnt quote from Isaiah 7:14, just stands alone applied to Mary, will have much less dispute.
 

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,546
13,640
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
if one could read Hebrew, why would one read greek?

The Jewish scholars who translated the Hebrew into Greek were obviously able to read Hebrew. They translated the Hebrew scriptures into Greek for the benefit of Jews living in the diaspora who were no longer able to read Hebrew. The Jews in the diaspora were hellenized; they read Greek, not Hebrew.

The point is in hebrew text says "young" nothing else matters.

The Jewish translators understood that “young” meant “virgin” in the text. The Septuagint was used by the Jews for hundreds of years before Jesus was conceived by his “young / virgin” mother. There was no outcry among them about the text as rendered in the Septuagint.

Personally if Matthew didnt quote from Isaiah 7:14 …

Matthew did quote from Isaiah 7:14. That’s an historical fact that cannot be changed.

… just stands alone applied to Mary, will have much less dispute.

That’s not so. This issue aside, the unbelieving Jews will do everything they can to try to persuade you that Jesus (himself a Jew) is not the Messiah. The believing Jews will do everything they can to persuade you that Jesus is the Messiah.

When you read the New Testament you will find that Matthew is not the only writer who documents the supernatural begetting of Jesus in the womb of his mother.

Jesus is the Messiah, the only begotten Son of the God of Israel.

Most Jews have not and will not read the New Testament. I urge you, just as I would urge them, to read it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johann

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,546
13,640
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
There is an enormous amount of discussion about Isaiah 7:14 in both Jewish and Christian circles. This one caught my attention due to the alignment of atheism with the argument of unbelieving Jews.

This is from a Christian source. It addresses the two critical questions that both Jews and Christians have to answer: 1) Did Isaiah really speak of a virgin, or simply of a young woman? 2) How could the birth of Christ serve as a sign to Ahaz?

 

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,546
13,640
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
”We saw that the Targum Jonathan clearly makes Isaiah 9:5-6 messianic. Then, by the fact that 7:14 speaks of the same child _ since both texts are part of the Book of Immanuel _ 7:14 must also be messianic. We saw that the Jews once, e.g. Hillel, did consider 7:14 messianic, but gave it up to deter Christians from using 7:14 as messianic. So the fact that the targum does not mark 7:14 as such is readily explained by the distortion later introduced into the targums by the Jews who wanted to keep Christians from using them _ a fact admitted by several major modern Jewish scholars.”