No Pre-TB
Well-Known Member
Like I said, if you can find it, I will believe it. I have no problems humbling myself and learning something new. But I have never seen it.The antichrist is an enemy of God and Christ. It doesn't matter what exact things he will say. Denial of the Father and Son is only one small part of the AC puzzle.
John penned 4 verses on antichrists.
1. Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.
2. For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
3. And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
4. Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.
Christ said in Matthew 24,
For many will come in My name, claiming, 'I am the Christ,' and will deceive many.
None of these can say without a doubt that the man of sin, denies Christ, that Jesus came in the flesh and that he is not from God.
Now, Jesus also did say in Matthew 24,
For false Christs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders that would deceive even the elect, if that were possible.
Obviously, the False Prophet is one of these that works miracles. But I don't see any context that 100% links him to be Antichrist. As I stated a few posts back, maybe he will harbor that spirit. It is very possible. I don't understand why people want him to have that title so badly when we know he is called the man of sin or the man of lawlessness and the horn speaking great things. But he has to have those attributes and I cannot find it in 66 books.
Now, I agree that some historians thought that the man of sin was THE Antichrist. Their writings tell us that. People believe many things, but I prefer to tread safely with the word of God. If it doesn't say it and it's a grey area, don't use it. Otherwise, where do we draw the line on things? Whatever people think goes regardless of if it's found or not. This is the same issue with Pre-TB.
So, I have seen no evidence that the man of sin is an Antichrist and should be called such, but it is possible that he will be an Antichrist. We just don't know.
Edit: Is a Fake Christ or a Fake Prophet the same as an Anti Christ or an Anti Prophet? Or is a Fake Christian the same as Anti Christian?
Last edited: