Did you know that Jesus is called Yahweh? Can you tell me where that is found?
Jesus isn’t Yahweh. Yahweh is his God. What passage, or passages, are you alluding to?
Did you know Moses is called “God”?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Did you know that Jesus is called Yahweh? Can you tell me where that is found?
Did you know that Jesus is called Yahweh?
The quote does not prove your contention at all. What am I not understanding from your viewpoint?OK, I will change my belief. Thank you for straightening me out. I gave a stupid reply for such a comment.
Yes, G, G, and G comprise the Godhead, each member has the title God by virtue of their intrinsic Honor, Attributes, Names, Deeds, and Seat (the Throne).You wrote “G, G, and G”. Is that not “God, God and God”? Is it not your belief that ”G,G, and G” is the Godhead?
Yes, G, G, and G comprise the Godhead, each member has the title God by virtue of their intrinsic Honor, Attributes, Names, Deeds, and Seat (the Throne).
Ok, give me the reference to Moses being called God. Next I will give you the reference to Jesus being Yahweh.Jesus isn’t Yahweh. Yahweh is his God. What passage, or passages, are you alluding to?
Did you know Moses is called “God”?
Ok, give me the reference to Moses being called God. Next I will give you the reference to Jesus being Yahweh.
Just in case you are referring to Ex. 7.1.
"I have made you a god to Pharaoh" means that God is appointing Moses to act as a representative with divine authority in front of Pharaoh, essentially giving Moses the power to speak and act on God's behalf, even though Moses is not a god himself; this is primarily found in the Bible in Exodus 7:1, where God tells Moses that he will be like a god to Pharaoh, meaning he will be able to perform miracles and deliver God's messages to the Egyptian ruler with the power of a deity in Pharaoh's eyes.
33 seconds of your time @KUWN. That’s all it will take for you to hear this trinitarian scholar (Dr. Ben Witherington, III) support my assertion that Jesus isn’t Yahweh.
Do you understand how he can say this and still be a trinitarian?
***
Matthias, I believe if you listen to this again, you will hear what he means by Jesus is not Yahweh. He states it clearly.
Not anywhere.Did you know that Jesus is called Yahweh? Can you tell me where that is found?
Ok, give me the reference to Moses being called God. Next I will give you the reference to Jesus being Yahweh.
Just in case you are referring to Ex. 7.1.
"I have made you a god to Pharaoh" means that God is appointing Moses to act as a representative with divine authority in front of Pharaoh, essentially giving Moses the power to speak and act on God's behalf, even though Moses is not a god himself; this is primarily found in the Bible in Exodus 7:1, where God tells Moses that he will be like a god to Pharaoh, meaning he will be able to perform miracles and deliver God's messages to the Egyptian ruler with the power of a deity in Pharaoh's eyes.
Not anywhere.
Did you know that Jesus is called Yahweh?
I think you know as well as I that your response has nothing relevant with my post. The two passages I put together is air tight and the only reason someone will wiggle out of it, is if you ignore the implication of these two verses. Do away with the literal method of interpretation. You should have seen that. If your spiritual interpretations are correct, then my position fails. The issue is which interpretation method will you use. If this is suppose to be a literal interpretation then you are wrong. So, I am betting on the Literal interpretation method.“We are not to suppose that the apostles identified Christ with Jehovah; there were passages which made this impossible, for instance, Ps. CX.1; … .”
(Charles Bigg, International Critical Commentary, 1 Peter, p. 99)
![]()
The International Critical Commentary Complete : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
The complete Public Domain commentaries of the International Critical Commentary (ICC)archive.org
”Of David. A Psalm. A declaration of Yahweh to my lord, ‘Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies your footstool.’”
(Psalm 110:1, LEB)
In this prophetic oracle, Yahweh is speaking to someone, an unnamed person, who isn’t Yahweh.
In the New Testament we are told who this person is that Yahweh was speaking to -> Jesus of Nazareth.
Yahweh is one person. Jesus of Nazareth is a different person.
The AMP is a little misleading but still helpful in confirming the distinction between Yahweh and Jesus:
”A Psalm of David. The LORD (Father) says to my Lord (the Messiah, His Son), ‘Sit at My right hand Until I make Your enemies a footstool for Your feet [subjugating them into complete submission].’”
***
Charles Bigg - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Jesus is Yahweh
Isa 45.23
“I have sworn [an oath] by Myself,
The word is gone out of My mouth in righteousness
And shall not return,
That to Me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear [allegiance].
I (Yahweh) sworn an oath by Myself (Yahweh).
So, nothing too controversial here.
Philip 2.10,11
10 so that at the name of Jesus every knee shall bow, to those who are in heaven and on earth and under the earth, 11 and that every tongue will confess and openly acknowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord (Yahweh), to the glory of God the Father.
The verse that speaks of Yahweh in the OT, applies this verse to Jesus Christ is Lord (Yahweh)
I think you know as well as I that your response has nothing relevant with my post.
The two passages I put together is air tight and the only reason someone will wiggle out of it, is if you ignore the implication of these two verses. Do away with the literal method of interpretation. You should have seen that. If your spiritual interpretations are correct, then my position fails.
The issue is which interpretation method will you use. If this is suppose to be a literal interpretation then you are wrong. So, I am betting on the Literal interpretation method.
“We are not to suppose that the apostles identified Christ with Jehovah; there were passages which made this impossible, for instance, Ps. CX.1; … .”
(Charles Bigg, International Critical Commentary, 1 Peter, p. 99)
![]()
The International Critical Commentary Complete : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
The complete Public Domain commentaries of the International Critical Commentary (ICC)archive.org
”Of David. A Psalm. A declaration of Yahweh to my lord, ‘Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies your footstool.’”
(Psalm 110:1, LEB)
It is different than the old rule of no discussion being permitted at all. Now the discussions are permitted, but they must be in support of the close handed issues explicitly in the SOF.The policy was changed on February 25, 2025. Christians aren’t supposed to discuss the Trinity with other Christians. Christians are allowed to discuss the Trinity with those who are not registered as “Christian”, but only in forums which are not designated “Christians Only”.