We were discussing limited atonement in another thread, but I feel like this particular point is slightly off topic from the specific doctrine and is more about an example from the Bible about how limited atonement itself cannot be true.
The example I would like to focus on, at least initially, is that of Judas Iscariot who was hand chosen by Jesus (Luke 6:12-16) and given to Jesus by the Father (John 6:70-71, John 17:12) which would mean that Judas was of the supposed elect that were given to Jesus prayed for in John 17:9. Please feel free to add any other examples of limited atonement failing or if you think I am flat-out wrong please explain why. Thank you.
So I will simply repeat the argument I made:
The example I would like to focus on, at least initially, is that of Judas Iscariot who was hand chosen by Jesus (Luke 6:12-16) and given to Jesus by the Father (John 6:70-71, John 17:12) which would mean that Judas was of the supposed elect that were given to Jesus prayed for in John 17:9. Please feel free to add any other examples of limited atonement failing or if you think I am flat-out wrong please explain why. Thank you.
So I will simply repeat the argument I made:
Judas is one of the Twelve, mentioned in Matthew 10:1-4. He has been specifically granted authority to cast out demons and to heal the sick just like the apostles and that authority was specifically mentioned by Jesus himself, totally to other believers in another part according to Mark 16:17. Such confirms Judas had been an authentic follower of Christ, assigned with the same function and authority as the other believers by the beginning.
In Matthew 19:27-29, Jesus makes a promise to the Twelve, which includes Judas, that they will sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel, and will receive eternal life-a promise that becomes incomprehensible on the presumption that Judas was never saved.
Even in John 17:12, Jesus refers to Judas as "the son of destruction" who was "lost", implying that there was a time when he was considered one of those preserved and protected disciples before his betrayal. The terms of loss presuppose prior possession; one cannot lose that which he never had.
Thus it has been said in the Bible that Judas was a believer that fell away from grace in fulfilment of prophecy, but was not predestined from the very beginning to damnation.
This has the full correspondence with the wider biblical teaching about apostasy (see Hebrews 6:4-6 and 2 Peter 2:20-22) and strikes down the claim about Judas being only a false disciple.
The attempt to nullify the initial salvation of Judas amounts to avoidance of the clear scriptures of the Bible and balances across the warning which the scriptures pose against true believers falling away from Christ.
This proves that there is no way limited atonement may be true according to scripture.