Walking by faith is not "works".
"Works" is "a righteousness of my own"; walking in faith is God's righteousness (Ro 1:17; 14:5,23).
"I was abundant in labors above them all, yet, not I, but the grace with me."
"I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me."
"[Christ] came and preached peace to you who were far away and peace to those who were near."
Since walking in faith is not "a righteousness of my own", but God's, justification thereby is "grace" not "works".
Faith is counted as righteousness--but it is God's righteousness we enter.
Jeremiah 23:6 says one of Jesus's Names will be "God Is Our Righteousness".
So, walking by faith fulfills the Law, and is justification by God's righteousness (Ro 2:6-16,26,27; 8:4).
Also, the believer who does not walk in faith is "condemned" (Ro 14:23).
When the Galatians believed a false Gospel of "works", what was Paul's solution?
Was it "believe in Christ alone"? No.
Instead, he instructs them to serve one another by faith working through love.
So, it's obvious Paul didn't believe in "faith alone", but "walking in faith" also.
Then, what's the difference between being under Law and serving others by faith?
Doesn't the Law also tell you to love your neighbor?
The Law directs attention to self, Grace directs attention to Christ.
The Law directs attention to self to condemn self's sinfulness.
Looking to the Law/self is turning from Christ; looking to Christ is turning from the Law/self.
Grace : "For through the law I died to the law so that I might live to God."
Law : "You who are trying to be justified by the law have been severed from Christ..."
Whose righteousness you have depends on who you behold/trust--self or Christ.
To serve others by faith Christ authors differs from Law, therefore.
Consider : Paul "anathematizes" preachers of Circumcision (Ga 5:11).
However, he had Timothy circumcised, yet was not an "accursed" false teacher.
Why? Because Paul did it "because of the Jews in the region".
Paul was serving the Jews, trying to open a door leading to their salvation.
Paul abode with Christ, and sought to bring others to Christ.
Paul's circumcising Timothy proceeded from Christ for the Jews' salvation.
Paul focused on God, and sought to prove God's goodness, not self.
Paul loved God, not himself, because God loved him first.
Thus, what makes something a "work", one's own righteousness, is who performs it.
Walking by faith is God performing the righteousness to reveal Himself.
"Yet not I but the grace with me."
Walking in faith is looking to Christ, not self--God's righteousness, not our works.
Therefore, again, justification by walking in faith is "grace" not "works".
James taught so.
Paul calls marriage or celibacy "each man's gift".
So, a man's marrying or celibacy is his walking in faith, his "gift" of grace.
Walking in faith is "the gift of righteousness"--not our works, but God's.
So, Ro 2 can say "doers of the Law will be justified" without violating "justified by grace".
The Gentile believers who walk in God's righteousness by grace are "doers of the Law".
They will be justified--walking by faith is not a righteousness of one's own, but God's.
"New Perspectivists" argue "works" refers to Jewish laws (eg, circumcision).
"We're not justified by Jewish practices," is their interpretation of "not by works".
That doesn't work : Ro 3 "by works of Law comes the knowledge of sin".
Yet : Ro 7:7 the fact that coveting is sinful becomes known by the Law.
So, "works of Law" encompasses the entirety of the Law's commands.
Not just unique laws to Jews (eg, circumcision)--all of the Law's demands.
Then how can we be justified by being "doers of the Law"?
Because the works that justify come from God, as a gift, for His glory, not self.
That's the difference--God's righteousness or man's righteousness.
"Works" is man's righteousness, grace through faith is God's righteousness.
So, yes, we are justified, as James says, by walking in faith--it's not a contradiction of "grace not works".
Paul uses "works" technically.
It seems James is correcting people who've misunderstood Paul.
It seems James uses "works" in a less technical way.
"Works" is "a righteousness of my own"; walking in faith is God's righteousness (Ro 1:17; 14:5,23).
"I was abundant in labors above them all, yet, not I, but the grace with me."
"I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me."
"[Christ] came and preached peace to you who were far away and peace to those who were near."
Since walking in faith is not "a righteousness of my own", but God's, justification thereby is "grace" not "works".
Faith is counted as righteousness--but it is God's righteousness we enter.
Jeremiah 23:6 says one of Jesus's Names will be "God Is Our Righteousness".
So, walking by faith fulfills the Law, and is justification by God's righteousness (Ro 2:6-16,26,27; 8:4).
Also, the believer who does not walk in faith is "condemned" (Ro 14:23).
When the Galatians believed a false Gospel of "works", what was Paul's solution?
Was it "believe in Christ alone"? No.
Instead, he instructs them to serve one another by faith working through love.
So, it's obvious Paul didn't believe in "faith alone", but "walking in faith" also.
Then, what's the difference between being under Law and serving others by faith?
Doesn't the Law also tell you to love your neighbor?
The Law directs attention to self, Grace directs attention to Christ.
The Law directs attention to self to condemn self's sinfulness.
Looking to the Law/self is turning from Christ; looking to Christ is turning from the Law/self.
Grace : "For through the law I died to the law so that I might live to God."
Law : "You who are trying to be justified by the law have been severed from Christ..."
Whose righteousness you have depends on who you behold/trust--self or Christ.
To serve others by faith Christ authors differs from Law, therefore.
Consider : Paul "anathematizes" preachers of Circumcision (Ga 5:11).
However, he had Timothy circumcised, yet was not an "accursed" false teacher.
Why? Because Paul did it "because of the Jews in the region".
Paul was serving the Jews, trying to open a door leading to their salvation.
Paul abode with Christ, and sought to bring others to Christ.
Paul's circumcising Timothy proceeded from Christ for the Jews' salvation.
Paul focused on God, and sought to prove God's goodness, not self.
Paul loved God, not himself, because God loved him first.
Thus, what makes something a "work", one's own righteousness, is who performs it.
Walking by faith is God performing the righteousness to reveal Himself.
"Yet not I but the grace with me."
Walking in faith is looking to Christ, not self--God's righteousness, not our works.
Therefore, again, justification by walking in faith is "grace" not "works".
James taught so.
Paul calls marriage or celibacy "each man's gift".
So, a man's marrying or celibacy is his walking in faith, his "gift" of grace.
Walking in faith is "the gift of righteousness"--not our works, but God's.
So, Ro 2 can say "doers of the Law will be justified" without violating "justified by grace".
The Gentile believers who walk in God's righteousness by grace are "doers of the Law".
They will be justified--walking by faith is not a righteousness of one's own, but God's.
"New Perspectivists" argue "works" refers to Jewish laws (eg, circumcision).
"We're not justified by Jewish practices," is their interpretation of "not by works".
That doesn't work : Ro 3 "by works of Law comes the knowledge of sin".
Yet : Ro 7:7 the fact that coveting is sinful becomes known by the Law.
So, "works of Law" encompasses the entirety of the Law's commands.
Not just unique laws to Jews (eg, circumcision)--all of the Law's demands.
Then how can we be justified by being "doers of the Law"?
Because the works that justify come from God, as a gift, for His glory, not self.
That's the difference--God's righteousness or man's righteousness.
"Works" is man's righteousness, grace through faith is God's righteousness.
So, yes, we are justified, as James says, by walking in faith--it's not a contradiction of "grace not works".
Paul uses "works" technically.
It seems James is correcting people who've misunderstood Paul.
It seems James uses "works" in a less technical way.
Last edited: