Please don’t get give verses that really don’t tell me what you think. Because people interpret the verses differently so it doesn’t tell me anything about what you are saying. Surely you have a formed perspective from the overall word of what you think it’s says? Otherwise you wouldn’t have started this thread as if something bugs you about what others believe or say concerning the first resurrection..whether it is physical or spiritual?
I’ll answer. I think the first resurrection was physical. A type, a foreshadowing of The second resurrection which is Spiritual. Same as the stone rolled away, removed from covering the tomb. First physical. The second His removing(destroying) the covering of the heart, in removing (destroying)the vail cast over the people.
What do you think?
The reason I started this thread is because of what the Amils believe about Rev. 20:4-6 concerning
the first resurrection as is described there in Rev. 20:4-6.
Revelation 20:4-6
King James Version
4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were
beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and
they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished.
This is the first resurrection.
6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in
the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.”
Now the Amils believe
the first resurrection mentioned above is describing Jesus’ resurrection, not the resurrection of the
physically dead in Christ
at the last day.
Now in order to partake in
the first resurrection “at the last day“we must be born again of the Holy Spirit. But Amils believe being born again
spiritually IS this
first resurrection mentioned in Rev 20:4-6. Which is also why they believe this thousand years mentioned in Rev. 20:4-6
started already with the resurrection of Jesus.
So that gives you the context of why I asked the question in the OP.
So the question is, is Rev. 20:4-6 describing Jesus’ resurrection, or is it describing the resurrection of
the dead in Christ?
Is it describing people being born again
spiritually over thousands of years. Or is it showing those who were already born again of the Spirit being
physically resurrected at
the last day and being given new immortal
bodies?
I believe it is the latter.