FHII
Well-Known Member
- Apr 9, 2011
- 4,833
- 2,500
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
Well I,ve been in this debate several times and haven't seen evidence that anyone listens to facts, so what's one more time?
1. Three days and three nights: This is not a Jewish figure of speech or idiom, as commonly claimed. John Calvin is the earliest theologian I have read to make this claim (though I haven't read all the great theologians' works). But it is not backed by Biblical history or any other history. In fact, Jewish practices in fasting show it to be the opposite. A three day and three night fast will indeed be 72 hours and never less.
The same cannot be said for "three days". That can be vague, and there is no difference in the way western culture uses the term. There are instances in the Bible where "three days" was less than 72 hours; the same cannot be said with the phrase "three days and three nights".
So, if it were merely 3 days, the Friday Crucifixion and Sunday Resurrection would work, even though its roughly only 39 hours. But it doesn't work with "three days and three nights". Even IF a partial day and partial night can be counted, it would have to be at least 50 hours.
I believe it was a full 72 hours due to the Jewish understanding through fasting, as well as other things that will be brought up later.
Key points:
1. The belief that "3 days and 3 nights" is an idiom is false.
2. True understanding of the phrase is 72 hours, though it can be argued down to 50 hours.
1. Three days and three nights: This is not a Jewish figure of speech or idiom, as commonly claimed. John Calvin is the earliest theologian I have read to make this claim (though I haven't read all the great theologians' works). But it is not backed by Biblical history or any other history. In fact, Jewish practices in fasting show it to be the opposite. A three day and three night fast will indeed be 72 hours and never less.
The same cannot be said for "three days". That can be vague, and there is no difference in the way western culture uses the term. There are instances in the Bible where "three days" was less than 72 hours; the same cannot be said with the phrase "three days and three nights".
So, if it were merely 3 days, the Friday Crucifixion and Sunday Resurrection would work, even though its roughly only 39 hours. But it doesn't work with "three days and three nights". Even IF a partial day and partial night can be counted, it would have to be at least 50 hours.
I believe it was a full 72 hours due to the Jewish understanding through fasting, as well as other things that will be brought up later.
Key points:
1. The belief that "3 days and 3 nights" is an idiom is false.
2. True understanding of the phrase is 72 hours, though it can be argued down to 50 hours.