Wick Stick
Well-Known Member
The one doesn't necessarily preclude the other.then the jew is no longer under law. he is under grace.
Are you exempt from the laws of... Ohio... because you are under grace?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The one doesn't necessarily preclude the other.then the jew is no longer under law. he is under grace.
That's one way of saying it. I see it as a claim to authority. Basically, "I have the same standing as David."Yes. A very interesting exchange recorded in the gospel account.
Appears to me that the "David and his companions" comment was a self-incriminating example.
The Pharisees had only seen the disciples picking grain. (not Jesus)
And the inference was, if you didn't have a problem with David, you shouldn't have a problem with us.
It's another reference to Isaiah...And the punchline was over the top. Jesus declared himself Lord of the Sabbath.
Would have liked to see the look on the faces of the Pharisees when he made that declaration.
[
Agree.That's one way of saying it. I see it as a claim to authority. Basically, "I have the same standing as David."
Under grace, I could not be charged under any law in Ohio.The one doesn't necessarily preclude the other.
Are you exempt from the laws of... Ohio... because you are under grace?
Are you not under grace? I suspect Ohio may still charge you if you commit a crime...Under grace, I could not be charged under any law in Ohio.
thats what being under grace means.
it does not mean that they are no longer sins, it means you can not be charged
They willAre you not under grace? I suspect Ohio may still charge you if you commit a crime...
I think there is a clear difference between law and THE law in the Bible.Are you not under grace? I suspect Ohio may still charge you if you commit a crime...
It depends somewhat on who and where you are. The answer is different if one is Jewish in the 1st century than it is for an American hillbilly in the 21st century. :)I think there is a clear difference between law and THE law in the Bible.
In fact, I see clear differences between "the law", the Law, God's law, and Christ's law.
Four different things. None having to do with the laws of human government.
Although there is overlap in all these terms. But it helps to separate them out for discussion.
Us? That was written to the 1st church at Rome. Although "we" are also not under the law... unless you're an Orthodox Jew.The Apostle Paul informed us that we are not "under the law".
(the law God gave to the Israelites alone through Moses)
He also told us we are responsible to earthly kings that
"do not bear the sword for no reason". - Romans 13:4
So clearly not promoting "lawlessness" on a grand scale.
Are you quite sure "the law" was given only to the Israelites? It would seem that some people had it earlier than that. Abel, Noah, and others offered animal sacrifices before Moses. Melchizedek took a tithe from Abraham. Jethro seems to have trained Moses in priestcraft and given him a fair portion of what would become The Law. And half the world was already keeping a Sabbath.I see a progression in history of when these laws came into play.
God's law > "the law" > the Law > Christ's law
- God's law: The law of human conscience
- "the law": the law God gave to the Israelites alone through Moses
- the Law: The books of the law that contain "the law".
- Christ's law: The law/commands that Christ gave us, or highlighted.
Observations about the law, the Law, God's law, Christ's law - four different things
- What's the difference between the law and the Law? (capital L) - What's the difference between the law and God's law? - What's the difference between the law, God's law, and Christ's law? The law, the Law, God's law, Christ's law; four different things. Agree, or disagree? Points...www.christianityboard.com
[
Good question.Are you quite sure "the law" was given only to the Israelites?
How did you arrive at that conclusion?And half the world was already keeping a Sabbath.
half the world was already keeping a Sabbath.
Archaeology... well, reading about it anyway.How did you arrive at that conclusion?
The parenthetical in verse 20 (blue) is not in my Bible?Here's another scripture that drove my observations about
the difference between "the law", God's law and Christ's law.
1 Corinthians 9:20-22 NIV
To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews.
To those under the law I became like one under the law
(though I myself am not under the law),
so as to win those under the law.
21 To those not having the law I became
like one not having the law
(though I am not free from God’s law
but am under Christ’s law),
so as to win those not having the law.
22 To the weak I became weak, to win the weak.
I have become all things to all people so that
by all possible means I might save some.
[
Are you saying that they observed a day of rest?Archaeology... well, reading about it anyway.
The Amorites (you remember those guys from the Bible) were the first to create a calendar that utilized 7-day weeks. Archaeological evidence shows that they were using it in the 3rd millennium BC... that's over a thousand years before Moses lived. They spread it to Babylon and the rest of Accad (northern Mesopotamia). A wikipedia article to start the rabbit-hole:
The Code of Hammurabi (a king of Babylon ca. 1800BC) is considered the most notable example of a pre-Moses code of law. It turns out that it contains laws similar to most of the 10 commandments. An article comparing the two here:Pentecontad calendar - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
![]()
The Code of Hammurabi V. The 10 Commandments
The code of Hammurabi was written somewhere between 1792-1750 BC. We cannot be sure exactly when Hammurabi penned his law code. In comparison, Moses wrote the ten commandments somewhere around the…theologyarchaeology.wordpress.com
It's very similar to Biblical Sabbath. Yes, there's a rest day, and the idea of "holiness" and prohibitions on doing certain things. More wikipedia...Are you saying that they observed a day of rest?
I think Sabbath is more involved than that. Was there a preparation day?
Deuteronomy 5:15 NIV
Remember that you were slaves in Egypt and that the Lord your God
brought you out of there with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm.
Therefore the Lord your God has commanded you to observe the Sabbath day.
- Exodus 31:13
“Say to the Israelites, ‘You must observe my Sabbaths.
This will be a sign between me and you for the generations to come,
so you may know that I am the Lord, who makes you holy.
- Ezekiel 20:12
Also I gave them my Sabbaths as a sign between us,
so they would know that I the Lord made them holy.
- Ezekiel 20:20
Keep my Sabbaths holy, that they may be a sign between us.
Then you will know that I am the Lord your God.”
[
I found a footnote in my Bible that says that bit isn't in all manuscripts. So apparently it's only in some Bibles. :shrug:
Capitalization wasn't invented til the 3rd century AD... meaning none of the original books of the Bible had it.This is curious. Note the capitalization of the word "Law" in the Greek interlinear in these two verses.
View attachment 52404
View attachment 52405
The capitalization of "Law" indicates a reference to the BOOKS of the Law, not the laws themselves. IMHO
So the reading would be as follows.
To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews.
To those under the books of the Law I became like one under the law
(though I myself am not under the law), so as to win those under the law.
21 To those not having the books of the Law I became like one
not having the books of the Law
though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law),
so as to win those not having the books of the Law.
Interesting.
[
Yes.Capitalization wasn't invented til the 3rd century AD... meaning none of the original books of the Bible had it.
I'm guessing it wasn't a "holy day" honoring YHWH.It's very similar to Biblical Sabbath. Yes, there's a rest day, and the idea of "holiness" and prohibitions on doing certain things. More wikipedia...
Counting from the new moon, the Babylonians celebrated the 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th as "holy-days", also called "evil days" (meaning "unsuitable" for prohibited activities). On these days officials were prohibited from various activities and common men were forbidden to "make a wish", and at least the 28th was known as a "rest-day".
Frankly, I think most historians would conclude that the Hebrew week and Sabbath were borrowed from the Amorites. We know from the Dead Sea Scrolls that the Jewish Essenes in the 1st century were STILL using a form of their calendar.
Not by that name, but...I'm guessing it wasn't a "holy day" honoring YHWH.
[