bbyrd009
Groper
- Nov 30, 2016
- 33,943
- 12,082
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States Minor Outlying Islands
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
If this is so, I apologize for putting on you something that was not yours. I was going according to posted words. I don't know all of the answers to every thing nor all of the background information on which everyone's answers are based. LOL, sometimes I forget myself where I first received something that I believe.Hi Amadeus,
First off it was not Marymog "who concluded that the verse in Matthew 18:20 was referring to church discipline". It was Jesus who was referring to Church discipline.
Thank you for your explanation of the basis for your response.IN CONTEXT Jesus was telling the Apostles if there is a disagreement amongst church members they are to take their disagreement to the church leaders and the church leaders have the final authority to decide who should be treated as a pagan/tax collector or what is to be bound in heaven and on earth. That is why he told the Apostles; Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven. 19 Again, truly I tell you, if two of you agree on earth about anything you ask, it will be done for you by my Father in heaven. 20 For where two or three are gathered in my name, I am there among them.
You apparently do not understand what I meant nor what I believe Jesus intended as a more important meaning to the expression translated in English as "in my name". Two or three people really "in His name" will never disagree while they are "in His name". People may say that they are "in His name" and perhaps they will even believe it, but that does not make it so. God always knows.Your theory is that the YOU in Jesus statement is any 2 or 3 Christians gathered in His name. That theory is not sustainable or logical!! If it was what are we to do when 2 or 3 Christians are gathered in His name and they disagree with 2 or 3 other Christians gathered in His name??? Logically BOTH groups decision can NOT be bound in heaven and on earth. Therefore your theory is not sustainable!!!
I would never have said that.In Scripture the witnesses against Naboth were called scoundrals, worthless men, wicked men (1 Kings 21:13) soooo how do you come up with the conclusion that they were led by the Holy Spirit?
No, when we are praying alone He may well be there, but the whole idea of the Body of Christ is that it does not consist of only one part, but many [Read I Cor 12... espec. verses 12-20]. The two or three is used to indicate a multiplier of things in scripture, especially perhaps with regard to the power and finality of things coming from God. There are many examples but I will give you a few:I do not understand your theory that Matthew 18:20 is "relating rather to how we should always gather together in groups of not less than 2 or 3 in worship or prayer "in His name" to assure that He would also be present with us." Your theory suggest that He is not "present with us" if we are worshiping Him or praying to Him while alone.
Mary
I don't get to decide and I did not say that I did. I speak from my own experience.. whether or not you or anyone else accept it. As to Catholics I tried vin all my years as an active Catholic to stay on the Lord's side as best I could. I failed miserably at times, but regularly went to the priest in confession and took Holy Communion. While no one else in my home went to mass, I went to mass several times a week. I saw what everyone else was not doing and I saw my own need, in spite of my best efforts, to confess my sins again and again. God did call me to a better place and it was not in a church setting, because all of those in their own different or similar ways missed it as badly as had the Catholics in my experience.You sound very judgmental when you say that YOU get to decide WHO is regularly walking in His name![]()
You sound very judgmental when you say that YOU get to decide WHO is regularly walking in His name![]()
I dont attend church, the wheat and the tares, the sheep and the goats, they will both grow together, but Christ will separate the two.Hopefully the church you attend is blessed with many non Christian in attendance. The church worships, but it also evangelizes and that is impossible if there are no non Christians.
A sinner is evil??? Sooooo YOU are evil???Disagree.
Completely and utterly NOT TRUE. If it where true we would not have THOUSANDS of different denominations with disagreeing doctrines.Two or three people really "in His name" will never disagree while they are "in His name".
Well that makes at least 2 of you.A sinner is evil??? Sooooo YOU are evil???
Curious Mary
The FACT is that you did decide when you said "Unfortunately few Catholics in my experience regularly walk in His name."I don't get to decide and I did not say that I did.
Hi troll,It is actually you who has been judgemental in every single post you have put on this forum.
It's not Amadeus who's judgemental.
And I believe it is because of you that several people don't post here anymore and
have moved on to other Christian forums because they are fed up with you and a few other ones.
Go ahead, call me a troll again, as you have done before.
Good bye Marymog.
The unsaved? Absolutely. They are not righteous in any way.A sinner is evil??? Sooooo YOU are evil???
Curious Mary
Which is unbiblical.I dont attend church,
I said that just because one is a sinner that does not make one evil.The unsaved? Absolutely. They are not righteous in any way.
Forsake not the assembling of yourselves together.No it is not. So much ignorance.
Do you know what we call church is? It is the assembling of the saints together. You are forsaking that by not going to church. In fact, you hate the church, you have made that quite clear.What has that to do with Church, do you know where JEsus assembled, on the Hill tops, in the valleys, on the beach, around a fire, even in the bars,
Luk 7:33 For John the Baptist came neither eating bread nor drinking wine; and ye say, He hath a devil.
Luk 7:34 The Son of man is come eating and drinking; and ye say, Behold a gluttonous man, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners!
Luk 7:35 But wisdom is justified of all her children.
Although supposedly a reader and a teacher still you do not understand what I wrote? The thousands of churches with disagreeing doctrines you mention exist due to people not really willing to pay the price to get "in His name" and stay there. The problem is not in the Catholic Church alone. It is in people of probably every church setting as well as those outside of churches...Completely and utterly NOT TRUE. If it where true we would not have THOUSANDS of different denominations with disagreeing doctrines.
Your logic makes zero sense.
Thank you for your time.
Church , saints,Do you know what we call church is? It is the assembling of the saints together. You are forsaking that by not going to church. In fact, you hate the church, you have made that quite clear.
I only know what God has shown me! You want to focus on the words I said about Catholics. The problem is NOT a specifically Catholic one.The FACT is that you did decide when you said "Unfortunately few Catholics in my experience regularly walk in His name."
From YOUR experience YOU have decided that few Catholics walk in His name. That means that YOU have ALSO decide who walks in His name. ;)
Mary