Christianity is essentially admitting you are God without admitting you are God

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Skovand

Active Member
Jul 13, 2022
580
205
43
Alabama
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
When I hear someone say Moses is a fictional character, it causes me to wonder if they might also say Jesus is a fictional character.

Casting doubt on the historical figure of Moses undermines and casts doubt on the historical figure of Jesus.
Well once you get then chance to dig into the historicity of Moses you can compare it to the historicity of Jesus. You can compare it to the historcity of David, Elijah, Esther and so on.

But when someone is talking to you about Moses, don’t worry about what they think about Jesus, David and so on. It’s just the proper way to be respectful. Pursue one line of thought. You’ll have your hands full with just the historicity of Moses.

What I think is that you realized you don’t have any reason to believe in Moses other than you believe Jesus did and nonsense verses that you think indicate that and so you went with it. You realized you don’t have an actual historical foundation for your beliefs. It seems like anymore, and so you move the goal post to Jesus. If I say yes I believe in Jesus you’ll then try to argue from the verses, if I say no you’ll just write me off as a someone who does not believe in the Bible at all.

But what’s important, is that you’re able to defend your position, and answer questions honestly regardless of my stances. What I can assure you is that my beliefs on one story or person/character in the Bible is unrelated to the next.
 

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,473
13,535
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
Well once you get then chance to dig into the historicity of Moses you can compare it to the historicity of Jesus. You can compare it to the historcity of David, Elijah, Esther and so on.

Do you really think I haven’t?

But when someone is talking to you about Moses, don’t worry about what they think about Jesus, David and so on. It’s just the proper way to be respectful. Pursue one line of thought. You’ll have your hands full with just the historicity of Moses.

I appreciate your advice but I can’t in good conscience follow it.

What I think is that you realized you don’t have any reason to believe in Moses other than you believe Jesus did and nonsense verses that you think indicate that and so you went with it.

That’s helpful. I do have reason to believe in Moses other than believing in Jesus. I don’t acknowledge that the Bible contains any nonsense verses. Would you provide a few examples of verses which you think are nonsense, and briefly comment on why you believe them to be nonsense?

You realized you don’t have an actual historical foundation for your beliefs. It seems like anymore, and so you move the goal post to Jesus. If I say yes I believe in Jesus you’ll then try to argue from the verses, if I say no you’ll just write me off as a someone who does not believe in the Bible at all.

You don’t know what I’ll do. I’m not even sure at the moment what I’d do.

But what’s important, is that you’re able to defend your position, and answer questions honestly regardless of my stances.

I agree.

What I can assure you is that my beliefs on one story or person/character in the Bible is unrelated to the next.

Thanks. Mine isn’t. That would account for some of the differences between us.

How was your meal? Did you not watch the movie? Have you already called your fiancee?
 

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
4,051
2,600
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Something happened to me when I did.



Debating the Trinity has never made much sense to me. The Catholic Church in the 4th century defined what the Trinity is and what the consequences are for worshipping or not worshipping the Triune God.
Somehow I don't think God intended for things to be so complicated.
Someone asked "What must I do to be saved?" and the answer was pretty simple
 
  • Like
Reactions: talons and Matthias

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,473
13,535
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
Somehow I don't think God intended for things to be so complicated.
Someone asked "What must I do to be saved?" and the answer was pretty simple

I’m thinking along those lines as well, and have been since I listened to a long ago delivered sermon titled “The Hinting God”. The trinitarian pastor who preached it caused me to think deeply about the premise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RLT63

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
4,051
2,600
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Well. I’ve reached the end of how much time I am willing to spend on this subject. If you are curious, I highly suggest looking at 20-30 different biblical scholars from all races, denominations and nations and see what you turn up. I spent 8 months just studying about Moses several years ago. Then look at what 20-30 historians have written about Moses. That’s how I study.

I find a subject or person I’m interested in and read thousands of pages and listen to hundreds of hours of discussions on them. I look at those who accept it blindly, those who have spent decades researching it and land on various positions. I look at information that’s still in journals by emailing biblical scholars and sometimes I even have to hire a translator to communicate or interpret something for me.

Then I develop what I think is most likely. Normally down to 2-3 possibilities and share all three. Like I do with conditional immortality and universalism.
What did Jesus believe about Moses?
 

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,473
13,535
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
What did Jesus believe about Moses?

I was going to ask him that too. I didn’t because he said in post #106, “We don’t know exactly what Jesus believed.”

He still might offer speculation about what Jesus believed. I’m just not big on speculation.

Given what he has said, he might logically say that when Jesus read what Moses wrote (or the Pentateuch), he was reading fiction.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: talons and RLT63

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
4,051
2,600
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I was going to ask him that too. I didn’t because he said in post #106, “We don’t know exactly what Jesus believed.”

He still might offer speculation about what Jesus believed. I’m just not big on speculation.

Given what he has said, he might logically say that when Jesus read what Moses wrote (or the Pentateuch), he was reading fiction.
I have wondered at times if the story of Noah is literal but I have never had those thoughts about Moses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matthias

Skovand

Active Member
Jul 13, 2022
580
205
43
Alabama
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Do you really think I haven’t?



I appreciate your advice but I can’t in good conscience follow it.



That’s helpful. I do have reason to believe in Moses other than believing in Jesus. I don’t acknowledge that the Bible contains any nonsense verses. Would you provide a few examples of verses which you think are nonsense, and briefly comment on why you believe them to be nonsense?



You don’t know what I’ll do. I’m not even sure at the moment what I’d do.



I agree.



Thanks. Mine isn’t. That would account for some of the differences between us.

How was your meal? Did you not watch the movie? Have you already called your fiancee?
I’m quite confident you’ve not spent any significant time digging into the historicity of Moses based off of numerous responses.

What does good or bad conscience have to do with what I mentioned about staying on a single topic? As for the rest it’s pointless. I’ll know to pick up this conversation when the responses warrants a certain level of work.

Nonsense verses is just a term used to describe a type of nonsensical argument where someone uses loop arguments. A is true because B is true and B is true because A is true.

Anyone who wants to hop into a discussion with me I can only suggest read what was already written, and answer those same questions. I’m not going down other rabbit holes. I don’t have time for it. Don’t care about it. That’s saved for when I’m talking with kids.

I don’t even remember what this discussion begin as. But at each push, the conversations goal was moved. Finally I stopped it at Moses.

Here is the questions I’m waiting to be answered. Really it’s just one.

1. What’s the historical evidence for Moses that’s outside of the Bible, and not from a century later. So citing a Jewish author talking about Moses 600 years ago.

Once you do, if you ever do that, then we have a place to start.
 

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
4,051
2,600
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
There is little archaeological evidence of Moses, the biblical figure. However, some scholars believe that a Moses-like figure may have existed in the 13th century BCE. Here are some other things to consider:

  • Egyptian name "Moses"
    The name "Moses" is mentioned in ancient Egyptian literature.

    • Egyptianisms in the Torah
      The Torah contains Egyptianisms that suggest the author was familiar with Egyptian culture.
    • A New Kingdom Period Egyptian individual
      Some believe that a New Kingdom Period Egyptian individual closely parallels the biblical account of Moses.
    • Dating of Egyptian history
      Some scholars believe that the dates of Egyptian history should be reduced by centuries, which could bring the 12th dynasty down to the time of Moses.
    • Circumstantial evidence
      Some believe that there is circumstantial evidence in the 12th dynasty to support the Biblical records.
The story of Moses has inspired many historical events and situations, including:

    • The flight of early American settlers from Europe to America
    • The situation of African Americans suffering under slavery and racial oppression
    • South American Liberation theology
 

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,473
13,535
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
I’m quite confident you’ve not spent any significant time digging into the historicity of Moses based off of numerous responses.

Can you be specific about which responses you’re referring to? What threads are they found in?

What does good or bad conscience have to do with what I mentioned about staying on a single topic?

I’m a Jewish monotheist. It’s impossible for me to separate Jesus from Moses.

As for the rest it’s pointless.

I wouldn’t have asked if it were pointless.

I’ll know to pick up this conversation when the responses warrants a certain level of work.

You’re losing your audience.

Nonsense verses is just a term used to describe a type of nonsensical argument where someone uses loop arguments.

A term you apparently made up.

A is true because B is true and B is true because A is true.

I haven’t made that argument.

Anyone who wants to hop into a discussion with me I can only suggest read what was already written, and answer those same questions.

What happens when someone does that and their answers don’t agree with yours?

I’m not going down other rabbit holes. I don’t have time for it. Don’t care about it. That’s saved for when I’m talking with kids.

The connection between Moses and Jesus isn’t a rabbit hole.

I don’t even remember what this discussion begin as. But at each push, the conversations goal was moved.

My goal for the conversation hasn’t moved.

Finally I stopped it at Moses.

Then it ceased to be a true conversation. You’ve assumed the role of moderator in addition to participant.

Here is the questions I’m waiting to be answered. Really it’s just one.

1. What’s the historical evidence for Moses that’s outside of the Bible, and not from a century later. So citing a Jewish author talking about Moses 600 years ago.

Once you do, if you ever do that, then we have a place to start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RLT63

talons

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2024
565
917
93
Alabama
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
There quite simply is no concrete evidence that can be verified by skeptics who test the statements. Can’t do it with Thor, Yahweh, Satan, Baal, El, Vishnu and so on. Can’t prove ghosts, magic, curses, or that Muhammad saw an angel, that the Mormon guy saw an angel or that Jesus rose form the dead. You can’t test the supernatural and so you can’t prove or disprove it. You can just choose to have faith.
Proof in a Christian's own life . It is a supernatural event when the convicting power of the Holy Spirit starts working on you and drawing you to seek forgiveness of your sins . It is a supernatural event when you take Jesus as your Savior , a change takes place , your thoughts and actions will change . Now that you have Jesus as your savior you also have the Holy Spirit as a Helper and Comforter , having the Holy Spirit reside in you is another supernatural event . I had one more supernatural event occur before I left the spot where I was born again , I was given the Gift of Tongues (much to my surprise!) . Sure a Christian has faith but they will also know the God of the bible is Who he says He is !
The test of the supernatural , is God real in your life ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RLT63

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,473
13,535
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
I’m a omnistic Christian. I think Vishnu is the same god as Yahweh and that they are the same god as El and they are the same god as Ahura Mazdā , Kaze-no-kami, Odin and so on.

I spoke recently to someone else on the forum about the importance of knowing our audience. This is something I needed to know about you. My only regret is that I didn’t see it earlier.

I think even in the new faiths that won’t for a million years on some planet we don’t even know about, I think that god is the same too. I think Buddhism, Shintoism, Paganism, Christianity and so on all can guide someone to Jesus Christ. So for me the trinity is far too small of a concept to cage god in. I think atheism can lead someone to Christ in the next life because even in atheism you can be drove to committing acts of love and justice. I think the belief that out of billions of years and billions of planets god chose to only speak to one group of beings a few thousand years ago is ridiculous.

I think the word has become flesh a thousand times and will become flesh a thousand more times including in forms that don’t even exist yet .

Thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: talons

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
4,051
2,600
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I spoke recently to someone else on the forum about the importance of knowing our audience. This is something I needed to know about you. My only regret is that I didn’t see it earlier.



Thanks.
Wow
 

Skovand

Active Member
Jul 13, 2022
580
205
43
Alabama
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
There is little archaeological evidence of Moses, the biblical figure. However, some scholars believe that a Moses-like figure may have existed in the 13th century BCE. Here are some other things to consider:

  • Egyptian name "Moses"
    The name "Moses" is mentioned in ancient Egyptian literature.

    • Egyptianisms in the Torah
      The Torah contains Egyptianisms that suggest the author was familiar with Egyptian culture.
    • A New Kingdom Period Egyptian individual
      Some believe that a New Kingdom Period Egyptian individual closely parallels the biblical account of Moses.
    • Dating of Egyptian history
      Some scholars believe that the dates of Egyptian history should be reduced by centuries, which could bring the 12th dynasty down to the time of Moses.
    • Circumstantial evidence
      Some believe that there is circumstantial evidence in the 12th dynasty to support the Biblical records.
The story of Moses has inspired many historical events and situations, including:

    • The flight of early American settlers from Europe to America
    • The situation of African Americans suffering under slavery and racial oppression
    • South American Liberation theology
So this is a start. Some scholars believe there was a Moses like figure. Moses like means not exactly Moses. So when we look at the evidence for this Moses like figure what do we see?

So far there seems to be two things that may lead somewhere .

1. There are people named Moses. Moses is an Egyptian name, not a Jewish name.

2. The story shows evidence of understanding the Egyptian culture.

That’a fairly ambiguous.

Within literature one thing to realize is that we can trade tropes and stories. Take the story of Moses being placed in a reed basket. Well before we see a story of a Jewish Moses passing around we see a few other stories. One is from the Hittite community.


In this story babies are placed in reed baskets with tar and sent down rivers where gods collected them and raised them up.

Later on we see the Hittites conquering the Babylonians before both were assimilated into the Assyrian empire of Mesopotamia,

Then we see a story about a man named Sagon who was sent down a river in a reed basket and he became a king. At this point we still see no stories of a Jewish Moses. But the Assyrians conquering them in exile. Then the Jews lest centuries later and suddenly we now have a story of a man named Moses.

We also see in the Westcar Papyrus , which predates the story exodus, mentioning a Canaanite prophet splitting water with a jewel.

So then we have to ask, was the Egyptian influence on the Bible from a man who escaped Egyptian culture or was it simply post exile data.

We can look at things like the exodus in the wilderness. Around a million men and women, wandering in the desert would leave archeological evidence. Pottery, bones, and so on. But there is none.

So we see older stories than the Jewish stories by different cultures with different people doing parallel things and we see these stories show up suddenly in Jewish writings post exile. With no evidence to support it .

So RTL you mentioned there are some writings that mentions Moses outside of the biblical writings. What specifically is mentioning him?

I ask because often someone who has never studied something, will type in a question and then copy and paste the first thing that shows up as if it’s evidence.

Now Matt.
Why do I think you’ve not dived into the historicity of Moses is because you seemingly lack any info about it. You back peddle and change goal posts. You don’t cite a single source.

So let’s say I’m wrong and you’ve studied the historicity of Moses outside of biblical literature or centuries later. What are they? Who are the historians, the Egyptologist, the scholars and so on whose work you went over?

Yes it’s a rabbit hole to change goal posts from the existence of Moses to the existence of Jesus. Then to are unrelated. Let’s say Moses did exist. He existed independently of Jesus for several thousands years.

But if you just presumed Moses was real, and you presumed everyone thought Moses was real, and then for the first time you hear someone thinks Moses is fake and what you do is change goal posts and copy and paste the first thing from a search, without even knowing what those things mean, then it seems like all you have is presumptions and not something developed off of research.

Which is why you don’t seem to be aware of jargon and think I’m just creating it. A simple google search would even show that nonsense verse is a term and that term is used in many ways to describe nonsense literature. When using these terms within a conversation like this the suprasegmentals is not focused on emotional utterances outside of language mechanics but on how circular logic is being employed.

So as someone who did not just hear this yesterday, but years ago, and read 4-5 books on this subject years ago, and as someone who listened to 3 lectures on this, and have looked into several related matters throughout the last ten years, it’s just very obvious by what someone says and does not say alluding to their work in this matter.
 

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,473
13,535
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
What happens when someone admits that the Trinity is not the Messiah’s God?

A person whose God isn’t the Trinity isn’t a trinitarian. The Messiah’s God is only one person, the Father.

What should happen when someone admits that the Trinity is not the Messiah's God is the person realizes that Jesus himself isn’t a trinitarian. If that happens, then what happens next?
 
Last edited:

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
4,051
2,600
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
So this is a start. Some scholars believe there was a Moses like figure. Moses like means not exactly Moses. So when we look at the evidence for this Moses like figure what do we see?

So far there seems to be two things that may lead somewhere .

1. There are people named Moses. Moses is an Egyptian name, not a Jewish name.

2. The story shows evidence of understanding the Egyptian culture.

That’a fairly ambiguous.

Within literature one thing to realize is that we can trade tropes and stories. Take the story of Moses being placed in a reed basket. Well before we see a story of a Jewish Moses passing around we see a few other stories. One is from the Hittite community.


In this story babies are placed in reed baskets with tar and sent down rivers where gods collected them and raised them up.

Later on we see the Hittites conquering the Babylonians before both were assimilated into the Assyrian empire of Mesopotamia,

Then we see a story about a man named Sagon who was sent down a river in a reed basket and he became a king. At this point we still see no stories of a Jewish Moses. But the Assyrians conquering them in exile. Then the Jews lest centuries later and suddenly we now have a story of a man named Moses.

We also see in the Westcar Papyrus , which predates the story exodus, mentioning a Canaanite prophet splitting water with a jewel.

So then we have to ask, was the Egyptian influence on the Bible from a man who escaped Egyptian culture or was it simply post exile data.

We can look at things like the exodus in the wilderness. Around a million men and women, wandering in the desert would leave archeological evidence. Pottery, bones, and so on. But there is none.

So we see older stories than the Jewish stories by different cultures with different people doing parallel things and we see these stories show up suddenly in Jewish writings post exile. With no evidence to support it .

So RTL you mentioned there are some writings that mentions Moses outside of the biblical writings. What specifically is mentioning him?

I ask because often someone who has never studied something, will type in a question and then copy and paste the first thing that shows up as if it’s evidence.

Now Matt.
Why do I think you’ve not dived into the historicity of Moses is because you seemingly lack any info about it. You back peddle and change goal posts. You don’t cite a single source.

So let’s say I’m wrong and you’ve studied the historicity of Moses outside of biblical literature or centuries later. What are they? Who are the historians, the Egyptologist, the scholars and so on whose work you went over?

Yes it’s a rabbit hole to change goal posts from the existence of Moses to the existence of Jesus. Then to are unrelated. Let’s say Moses did exist. He existed independently of Jesus for several thousands years.

But if you just presumed Moses was real, and you presumed everyone thought Moses was real, and then for the first time you hear someone thinks Moses is fake and what you do is change goal posts and copy and paste the first thing from a search, without even knowing what those things mean, then it seems like all you have is presumptions and not something developed off of research.

Which is why you don’t seem to be aware of jargon and think I’m just creating it. A simple google search would even show that nonsense verse is a term and that term is used in many ways to describe nonsense literature. When using these terms within a conversation like this the suprasegmentals is not focused on emotional utterances outside of language mechanics but on how circular logic is being employed.

So as someone who did not just hear this yesterday, but years ago, and read 4-5 books on this subject years ago, and as someone who listened to 3 lectures on this, and have looked into several related matters throughout the last ten years, it’s just very obvious by what someone says and does not say alluding to their work in this matter.
I’m not questioning that you have thoroughly studied the subject and are quite knowledgeable about the history of Moses ( or lack thereof)
Here is a brief article about why one may believe that he was a real person
https://www.afrankvoice.com/blog/was-moses-real#:~:text=There%20is%20a%20fairly%20widespread,is%20different%2C%20and%20here's%20why.
 
Last edited:

amigo de christo

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2020
29,886
50,655
113
53
San angelo
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
But if you have a God, then you are God because only God could know about God. God is outside of space and time, you are not. So if you claim to know God and have a God, then you are implying you are God.

Someone who is born in sin cannot know God because they’re limited and mentally handicapped. Being born in sin automatically makes you useless and powerless. You have no value, you have no credit…because God takes all of it instead. You’re basically just a ‘nothing‘. So how can a ‘nothing’ born in sin say anything about something else which is perfect and infallible? You can never be saved, you really don’t know anything…because you’re broken right from the start. You’re already set up for failure. That’s being born in sin
sounds like confuscious aka confusion has a strong hold on you my friend .
JESUS reveals the FATHER unto us . What a odd statement you make my friend .
GOD reveals himself THROUGH THE SON and the SON reveals the FATHER unto all who do believe .
Confuscious also says what might seem as a partial truth .
Man who stands on pot to pee is high on pot . while its true he is high on the pot
and perhaps can be true that some who do so are high ON POT , this may not always be the case .
BUT THIS I DO KNOW
those who twist scripture unto their own destruction and speak contrary to it , DO NOT KNOW GOD or have the LOVE OF GOD
within them . that I DO KNOW .
 

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,473
13,535
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
A person whose God isn’t the Trinity isn’t a trinitarian. The Messiah’s God is only one person, the Father.

What should happen when someone admits that the Trinity is not the Messiah's God is the person realizes that Jesus himself isn’t a trinitarian. If that happens, then what happens next?

Most often, nothing.

Jesus is a Jew and his God (Yahweh) is his Father. A biblical fact that typically doesn’t move the needle for trinitarians. Why?