We are discussing Dan 9. Not romans 11..
Nice try
We are discussing Daniel 9 and related scriptures. You are the one who thinks Daniel 9 has something to do with the salvation of all Israel, so it is you who brought Romans 11 into the discussion, not me.
yet you follow their belief.
LOL. No, I do not. When all you can do is constantly make false claims like this the way you do, you know you have nothing to offer of substance.
Nope. I am doing the same thing I did in Dan 9, I am taking it in context If you read the first 5 verses. The context is the nation of Israel.
The context of Romans 9:6-8 is the contrasting of two Israels with one being the nation of Israel. Paul very specifically indicated that being part of the other Israel has absolutely nothing to do with where a person physically descended from. But, you don't want to deal with Romans 9:6-8 since it contradicts your beliefs.
Actually no he did not. But believe what you want
I don't need your permission to believe what I want.
Said the proud person who can not discuss anything.
LOL. I have been discussing things with you in many posts now. But, I can't discuss anything? You are a comedian. How can I take you seriously when you say ridiculous things like this?
There you go again stuck on a few verses.
A few verses that completely contradict your beliefs. No wonder you want to try to minimize them.
Again, Neither jew or gentile…
I am not spiritual israel. I am a child of God.
That's who Paul said make up spiritual Israel: the children of God. If only you actually read Romans 9:6-8 carefully, you would see that.
Romans 9:6 It is not as though God’s word had failed. For not all who are descended from
Israel are
Israel. 7 Nor because they are
his descendants are they all
Abraham’s children. On the contrary, “It is through Isaac that
your offspring will be reckoned.” 8 In other words, it is not
the children by physical descent who are
God’s children, but it is
the children of the promise who are regarded as
Abraham’s offspring.
I color coded this to make it easier for you to see the contrast that Paul made between the two Israels. National Israel is in blue and Spiritual Israel is in red.
National Israel are Abraham's physical descendants. Paul said they are "the children by physical descent". They are not part of the Israel of which not all who are physically descended from Israel are part.
Spiritual Israel are Abraham's spiritual descendants (children, offspring). They are reckoned through Isaac and are children of the promise, as all believers are (see Galatians 4:28). They are "God's children".
Only doctrinal bias can prevent someone from seeing the contrast between the two Israels that Paul made here. Being part of spiritual Israel is not dependent whatsoever on who or where someone descends from. Instead, it requires being a child of God and of the promise. In Galatians 3:26-29 Paul makes it clear that those who belong to Christ are the children of God and of the promise and are Abraham's spiritual seed.
israel (the nation) was cut off because of unbelief
Wrong. Individual Israelites were cut off because of unbelief. There were a remnant who believed, so you can't say the entire nation was cut off. That is absolutely false.
If we (gentiles as a group) fall into unbelief, we will be cut off too.
Do you not understand that the word "we" is sometimes not used to refer to something that only applies to everyone collectively, but rather is used to refer to something that applies to everyone individually? We will not be cut off because of the unbelief of other Gentiles. That is nonsense! Being grafted into the olive tree is analogous to being saved. How can you not know that? If you're a Calvinist, then that would explain it since that would mean you don't think someone can lose their faith. You need to ask God for wisdom about this (James 1:5-7).
Its funny, with the fall of the church, we are witnessing this today
I should have known you do not agree with eternal security.
Are you a Calvinist? Do you ignore warnings given to believers like this:
Hebrews 3:12
See to it, brothers and sisters, that none of you has a sinful, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God. 13 But
encourage one another daily, as long as it is called “Today,” so that none of you may be hardened by sin’s deceitfulness. 14
We have come to share in Christ, if indeed we hold our original conviction firmly to the very end.
In this passage Paul (I believe he wrote Hebrews) addresses his "brothers and sisters" in Christ and warns them about turning "away from the living God". The very thing that you think can't happen. Your belief makes warnings like this meaningless.
The OY gives a much better understanding when you take it into context.
You can;t force the narrative
I addressed them many times,, Just not the way you agree.
That is a lie. You did not address the scriptures I gave to support my view of Daniel 9:24 at all. You just responded by saying I should read Daniel 9:1-23 and blah blah blah. Anything but addressing those scriptures and how they relate to Daniel 9:24.
You have yet to address lev 26, and the OT prophecy of Israel being restored.
Stop being the hypocrite.
I'll do that as soon as you address the scriptures I quoted in support of my understanding of Daniel 9:24. I'm not holding my breath. One thing you should note, though. The NT sheds light on the OT, not the other way around. When you can't support your doctrine with NT scripture, other than blatantly taking it out of context like you do, then you know that your understanding of those OT scriptures has to be flawed.