Search results

I read a few sentences. How do I know birds evolved after terrestrial tetrapods? Cause I graduated middle school. again, I’m not reject god or the Bible. I’m simply and only rejecting your interpretation of the Bible.

so I read the first few sentence and stopped and read the last one. so that’s not my opinion. Science is here to observe and study and teach about the natural world. It has zero to do with the supernatural. The point of science is not to disprove god. That’s stupid. There are over a million...

No one is accepting evolution, definitely not the majority, in order to not look foolish to their peers. The overwhelming majority of scientists, again over 99.99% of the 8,000,000 scientists accept it because it’s by far the best theory out there. YEC , OEC and ID are not even theories. There...

Evolutionary creationist are not separating El from creation. We are saying genesis is not a scientifically or historically based book. It’s a myth. It’s mythology. It’s ancient Jewish mythology. So in the same way you say days are not literal it’s metaphorical or symbolism for eras, we simply...

I don’t know which one you are out of the handful I’m taking to. What I’m going to do is spend 10-15 minutes a day or so and respond to handful of comments and dedicate a hour or so one day a week to dig in deeper. I’ve not read a bulk of the recent comments. I read until I get to something...

the thing though is that modern science is not here to disprove religious, supernatural or faith based concepts. It’s here to explore, analyze and explain the natural world. so evolution is not anti god. Evolution is anti Yahweh or Christianity. The issue is that young earth / old earth...

Here’s one response to how fossilized forests are formed. https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/fs_media/fs_document/gallatin-petrified-forest.pdf

Again…. Just pick up a 7th grade earth science book. I only skimmed the post. But I’m not responding to anymore middle school questions by people who are supposed to be experts.

Again, just google it. It’s literally that easy. You can google thousands of papers by geologists on this. It’s not some secret info. It’s like 7th grade earth science.

The book of Job is considered fiction by the bulk of scholarship. Also, I prefer to stay on the subject of geology and evolutionary botany. We can make another thread about dinosaurs, dragons and unicorns and discuss job there though.

that’s not a issue. The geological layers are not a failed hypothesis. It’s supported by all data. Landmass flipping is common. i suggest checking out this podcast. Nick Zentner

I think you may be confusing theory for individual facts. A theory is based off of many facts. Evolution is based off of thousands of facts. instead of me explaining eye evolution, which is very easy. It’s one of the easiest organs to explains the natural history of. I’ll drop two links...

I think he got it from the fact that the overwhelming majority of people who believe things like young earth creationism, old earth creationism, intelligent design and flat earth are predominantly Christians and Muslims. Even though the majority of Christians accept evolution and science in...

Actually a large portion of people who accept evolution are Christians. In America 1/3rd of evolution accepting scientists are Christians.

In the superimposed geological layers we notice that as green algae became terrestrial that different plants begin to evolve. We see the chemical signatures and even cooler, we see the basal forms diverging as morphology showcases speciation.

Are y’all aware that Dr. Mary is a Christian who believes in evolution and one of the things she’s found most frustrating is young earth creationist lying about what her findings actually mean? That her findings actually further supports evolution. "Soft Tissue" in Dinosaur Bones: What Does...

I think it’s just that there comes a time where those who don’t understand it and think they found some big flaw, just become unimportant. You’ll drop a few moments of your life talking to them, but you’re just not interested in explaining it to everyone. for example what is a missing link to...

Well thank you. If it comes up, I look forward to discussing these things in other places that is appropriate. But yes, intelligent design, young earth creationism, old earth creationism and flat earth all belongs in the same pseudoscientific bubble.

Well best luck to you. Much love,

Well it’s good that you’re interested in evolution. A good place to start is that aging is not speciation.