Search results

There is no argument. Paul commanded it, therefore it's required.

I use, Bibleworks for language Study and most General study. I also have Wordsearch/Logos, and occasionally use Scripture for all.

Lying? Seriously? That's an awesome exegesis of the text.

That's a interesting reply considering you hold to the doctrine of Modalism. Again, the issue is how people understand the word God. It's a title. If I said, the President, Americans would think of the American president. Would Mexicans think of the American president or the Mexican president...

Jesus didn't declare Himself equal with the Father. Nor is He the Father manifested in flesh. Paul said that no one has seen nor can see the Father. Therefore Jesus cannot be the Father. 14 That thou keep this commandment without spot, unrebukeable, until the appearing of our Lord Jesus...

That's not my description, that's the standard Trinitarian understanding. Personally, I think they're both wrong. The apostle Paul states plainly to the Corinthians, that there is one God the Father. Jesus said that the Father was the only true God. Paul said that the Father is the only...

I believe this is Modalism, not Trinitarianism. Trinitarianism says there is one God in three persons, not one God who manifests Himself as different persons.

Modalism is the idea that there is one being called God who manifests himself as the Father, Son, or Holy Spirit depending on the the need. In other words, at one time He may manifest Himself as the Father and at another the Son. It appears from you statement above that you see the Father and...

Sounds like Modalism.

I see why you got banned on the other forum.

Jesus, The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels. 40 As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world. (Matt. 13:39-40 KJV) The apostles, And as he sat upon the mount of...

I did post Scripture. I posted Scripture where Jesus spoke of the end of the aion. I posted Scripture where the apostles spoke of the end of the aion. And, I posted Scripture where Paul spoke of the end of the aion. But, if you don't accept the words of Jesus, the apostles, and Paul, surely...

Again, aion doesn't mean forever. I have to assume you've chosen to believe your English translators rather than Jesus, the apostles, and Paul.

As I've shown, aion cannot mean everlasting. The fire isn't everlasting. I've shown this from both the grammar, that aion doesn't mean everlasting and from Scripture, showing that the place you claim is everlasting fire, will one day be made holy to the Lord. No one said the OT overrules the...

I already gave you Scripture, you ignored it. This passage says the fire is not quenched. The meaning of quench is to extinguish. It means to put out. It doesn't mean the fire won't go out. It simply means no one will put it out. However, what we see here is not souls or spirits suffering...

No, I quoted that translation to show you the proper translation, not disprove eternal torment. It's Jesus, the apostles, and Paul that disprove eternal torment. As you've conveniently neglected to address the evidence that flatly refutes your understanding of the passages and it refutes the...

So, you just ignored it all, huh? Jesus, the apostles, and Paul all say it ends. And, it's the same word here. If it can't mean eternal or everlasting there, it can't here either.

I notice you didn't post YLT. But it doesn't matter if you have 10,000 English translations. Jesus said the aion would end. Thus aion is not eternal or forever. But, I'll bet you'll choose your translations over what Jesus said. Jesus, The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is For...

Well, firstly, you don't know me. So, you don't know what I'm qualified for. Secondly, I'm not rewriting anything. I'm simply telling you what the Greek text means. But if you'd prefer to look silly in front of everyone have at it. and the Devil, who is leading them astray, was cast into the...