Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so a 1000 yr reign on this earth is false

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

WPM

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2022
8,578
4,215
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You fail at English. The text simply says that David knew God would raise Christ to sit on his throne ( an earthly throne that was never ruling in heaven) and that he foresaw the resurrection that would accomplish this. It said nothing about some imaginary throne of David located in heaven. David's throne is well documented and we know precisely where he reigned/
No. That's what you would like it to say. The text speaks for itself. It forbids your position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spiritual Israelite

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,810
4,478
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
How can there be a prolonged period of time after the last or final day? How can there be a prolonged period of time after time (or chronos) shall be no longer? How can there be an age in-between this age and the age to come when Scripture only recognizes a 2-age framework?
There can't be, of course. But, Premills won't acknowledge that. They have to make up things found nowhere in scripture to keep their false doctrine afloat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WPM

WPM

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2022
8,578
4,215
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
What Steven saw was Christ sitting at the right hand of the Father as He reigned on HIS throne

A clear reference to David's throne that Christ will occupy in the millenium

The key of David is not the same thing as the throne. You left out this part:
Isa 22:20 And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will call my servant Eliakim the son of Hilkiah:
Eliakim was given the key of David but not the throne.


I have show that the key of David is not the same as the throne. Jesus does not currently occupy the throne of David. He sits down with the Father on the Father's throne:
Rv 3:21
To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.
There is zero mention of your supposed future millennium. You know that. All you can do with text after text, is force it into the sacred text. That just about sums up Premil.

I notice you never address Amil posts. You just divert with your own extra-biblical avoidance.

The key of David describes the Davidic authority Christ now exercises over true Israel - His elect.
 

WPM

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2022
8,578
4,215
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You imagine an interpretation and force it into the text. The text just means that David foresaw the messiah resurrected and sitting on his throne. Since we know the exact extent of David's throne, which doesn't include a heavenly kingdom, we know this is a future reference to the millenial reign. A future kingdom that we (despite your insistence it is now) We are not to know the time of. This is what is irrefutable.

Ac 1:7 It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.

Hate to bust your bubble but this means your position that the kingdom is now...as an imaginary contrivance!

<MIC DROP>
Your fight is with Scripture, not Amils. You have no answer for the Book.
 

WPM

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2022
8,578
4,215
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
What I get from you is since you believe Peter was only for the Jews, then Peter is not authoritative for gentile believers, and you can just ignore anything he spoke or wrote as none of it applies to gentiles. Don't bother reading, or believing any of it applies to you. I suppose that explains why you ignore the Day of the Lord references to an earthly and heavenly destruction as that is only for jews. And then also the same with Hebrews. Logically or you are inconsistent, for you the New Covenant is only for Jews and not gentiles.
Exactly. To de-program that would take more time and effort than what we could expend on these forums. Sometimes people just want to believe error.

The same guy denies the deity of Christ. He should not be allowed on a Christian forum.
 
Last edited:

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,810
4,478
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Yes, isn't it obvious? You speak of Christ ruling over his spiritual subjects and so you should. But don't ignore Paul's word that Christ will rule over the nations after he returns, defeating his enemies.
I wanted to be sure of what you believe before making my point so that I didn't waste time making a straw man argument. I'm sure you can appreciate that?

The disciples approached Jesus burdened with a series of misconceptions regarding what the future held for them and their world. In the context of the Olivet Discourse, Jesus took the opportunity to gently correct their misunderstandings, carefully unraveling the tangled web of their beliefs. To truly grasp the weight of their inquiry, we must immerse ourselves in their perspective as individuals living in the first century, during a time when Jesus walked among them. Their questions were shaped by the cultural and historical context of their lives, filled with hopes and fears that colored their expectations of what was to come.
You don't have to explain things like this to me. You're not talking to someone who just became a Christian yesterday.

The shocking announcement that the temple would face complete demolition served as Jesus’s initial words in his effort to correct the misconceptions held by his followers about his imminent rise to power. This revelation was a jarring departure from the expectations many had harbored. Traditionally, the grand "sign" of his arrival as a king would involve a majestic entrance, marked by his riding into the city on a powerful war horse and making a striking entrance through the revered east gate of the temple.

In light of this unexpected news, his disciples were filled with confusion and concern, questioning what a celebrated arrival could possibly look like without the temple looming as a symbol of their faith and identity. In their minds, the presence of the temple was essential to his "coming," as it heralded an end to the prolonged period of foreign occupation that had plagued Israel throughout its history. The temple was not merely a building; it was a cornerstone of their hopes for liberation and a new age of glory.

Jesus was going to suffer and die. The temple would be destroyed. And there would be a great delay between his leaving and his return. All is not lost, however, because eventually, the Lord will restore the fortunes of Israel, and Jesus will finally enter Jerusalem as her triumphant king.
All these words and you still didn't answer my question. If you look at the other accounts of the Olivet Discourse in Mark 13 and Luke 21 and see how the disciples questions are worded there, you can see that His coming and the end of the age are not specifically referenced in those accounts. So, it is not likely that they actually asked specifically about His coming and the end of the age in those exact words, but Matthew paraphrased His words to show that Jesus's answers to their questions would not just be related to the destruction of the temple buildings but also to His future coming and the end of the age. At that time I'm sure that the disciples would have assumed that His second coming would coincide with the destruction of the temple buildings, but it did not.

In the Olivet Discourse, Jesus referenced both His coming and the end of the age in terms of His coming occurring at the end of the age rather than the end of the age coming 1,000+ years later after His second coming as you believe.

I assume you would agree with me that what He said in the following passage relates to things that happen just before His second coming?

Matthew 24:9 “Then you will be handed over to be persecuted and put to death, and you will be hated by all nations because of me. 10 At that time many will turn away from the faith and will betray and hate each other, 11 and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. 12 Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold, 13 but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved. 14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.

This is where Jesus addresses the reference to "the end of the age" by pointing out things that will happen just before the end of the age while also pointing out that "the one who stands firm to the end" of the age "will be saved" and that the gospel will be preached in the whole world "and then the end" of the age "will come".

Would you agree that Jesus was relating "the end" to His second coming there? Would you agree that He was saying that once the gospel is preached in the whole world then He will come again and that will mark the end of the age? If so, then read this passage again in that light...

Matthew 13:40 “As the weeds are pulled up and burned in the fire, so it will be at the end of the age. 41 The Son of Man will send out his angels, and they will weed out of his kingdom everything that causes sin and all who do evil. 42 They will throw them into the blazing furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. 43 Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Whoever has ears, let them hear.

Jesus was saying here that at the end of the age, which is when He will return "Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father". Which means when He comes that is when He will hand over the kingdom to the Father as Paul wrote about in 1 Corinthians 15:22-24.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,810
4,478
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I see you haven't studied the passage. Peter addresses his letter to the Jewish diaspora, being the Apostle to the Jews as Paul has said.
I see that YOU haven't studied the passage. Tell me, what other entity but the church is a spiritual house with Jesus as its cornerstone?

1 Peter 2:5 Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ. 6 Wherefore also it is contained in the scripture, Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious: and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded. 7 Unto you therefore which believe he is precious: but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner, 8 And a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also they were appointed. 9 But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light;

Peter was addressing those who he said were "built up a spiritual house" with Jesus as its "chief corner stone". That is a description of the church. Paul described it similarly here...

Ephesians 2:19 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God; 20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone; 21 In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord: 22 In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scott Downey

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,810
4,478
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I see no Biblical evidence to support your contention that a soul can be killed.
Where did I make that contention? That has nothing to do with what I was saying whatsoever. Trying to explain spiritual things to someone as carnal as you is a futile endeavor.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,810
4,478
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You are blending two distinct yet interconnected concepts. God made a profound promise to David, assuring him that his son would not remain in the grave to endure the decay that follows death. This promise held significant implications, as it also meant that Jesus would ultimately take his place on David's throne, fulfilling a divine plan that intertwines resurrection and royal lineage.

But Peter never meant to say that Jesus's resurrection was the sum and substance of his sitting on David's throne. Jesus didn't sit on David's throne after he was resurrected. He sat next to the Father's throne, at his right hand. When Jesus returns, he will sit on David's throne.
Peter said that David prophesied that God told him that He will RAISE UP Christ to sit on his (David's) throne and said he was prophesying about Jesus being RAISED UP from the dead.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,810
4,478
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You fail at English. The text simply says that David knew God would raise Christ to sit on his throne ( an earthly throne that was never ruling in heaven) and that he foresaw the resurrection that would accomplish this. It said nothing about some imaginary throne of David located in heaven. David's throne is well documented and we know precisely where he reigned/
You fail at understanding scripture. You fail at accepting what Peter taught in Acts 2:29-36. You fail at heeding what Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 2:9-16 and you interpret scripture like the natural man instead of relying on the Holy Spirit for understanding. We can only speak to you like the carnal babe in Christ that you are.

1 Corinthians 3:1 And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ. 2 I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.
 

CadyandZoe

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2020
7,679
2,628
113
Phoenix
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
No. That's what you would like it to say. The text speaks for itself. It forbids your position.
If the text speaks for itself, why did you write an entire page explanation filled with colors and bold lettering?
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,810
4,478
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Some of it has come to pass. I reminded you about 1948, when God brought Israel back to the land to reestablish the nation of Israel. But Israel remains as the dead body surrounded by vultures, waiting for the fulfillment of Ezekiel 37:1-14.
What evidence do you have to indicate that God was behind what happened in 1948? In past times when God brought Israel back, such as from their captivity in Babylon, it was after they had repented and were ready to be together as God's people again. What evidence is there that something similar happened in 1948, considering that most of them reject Christ? I see no evidence that God had anything to do with what happened in 1948.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WPM

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,810
4,478
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
If the text speaks for itself, why did you write an entire page explanation filled with colors and bold lettering?
To those with spiritual discernment, the text speaks for itself and is very straightforward. There was a prophecy David made about God RAISING UP Christ to sit on David's throne and in that prophecy he spoke of God RAISING UP Christ from the dead. That is what Peter plainly said. But, those without spiritual discernment need help to see what the text says. They need help to see that Peter was speaking plainly and straightforwardly and that they should not read anything into what Peter was saying because of doctrinal bias.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WPM

Scott Downey

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2021
8,262
5,148
113
65
St. Thomas
Faith
Christian
Country
Virgin Islands, U.S.
What evidence do you have to indicate that God was behind what happened in 1948? In past times when God brought Israel back, such as from their captivity in Babylon, it was after they had repented and were ready to be together as God's people again. What evidence is there that something similar happened in 1948, considering that most of them reject Christ? I see no evidence that God had anything to do with what happened in 1948.
Agree,
But there is this in the broad sense of things about the nations and it applies to all of the nations, pointing to God at work.

Acts 17

TO THE UNKNOWN GOD.

Therefore, the One whom you worship without knowing, Him I proclaim to you: 24 God, who made the world and everything in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands. 25 Nor is He worshiped with men’s hands, as though He needed anything, since He gives to all life, breath, and all things.

26 And He has made from one [j]blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, and has determined their preappointed times and the boundaries of their dwellings, 27 so that they should seek the Lord, in the hope that they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us; 28 for in Him we live and move and have our being, as also some of your own poets have said, ‘For we are also His offspring.’ 29 Therefore, since we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Divine Nature is like gold or silver or stone, something shaped by art and man’s devising. 30 Truly, these times of ignorance God overlooked, but now commands all men everywhere to repent, 31 because He has appointed a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by the Man whom He has ordained. He has given assurance of this to all by raising Him from the dead.”

******************

And v24 also proves their wont be a 1000 year reign in the flesh on this earth, as a temple made on this earth is made with hands

God, who made the world and everything in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands.
 

Scott Downey

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2021
8,262
5,148
113
65
St. Thomas
Faith
Christian
Country
Virgin Islands, U.S.
Course some do not believe in Christ as God come in the flesh, they might believe the Son of God would dwell in temples made with hands, but of course they are wrong

The Humbled and Exalted Christ​

5 Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, 6 who, being in the form of God, did not consider it [b]robbery to be equal with God, 7 but [c]made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men. 8 And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross. 9 Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the name which is above every name, 10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth, 11 and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Light Bearers​

12 Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling; 13 for it is God who works in you both to will and to do for His good pleasure.

14 Do all things without [d]complaining and disputing,[e] 15 that you may become blameless and [f]harmless, children of God without fault in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation, among whom you shine as lights in the world, 16 holding fast the word of life, so that I may rejoice in the day of Christ that I have not run in vain or labored in vain.

17 Yes, and if I am being poured out as a drink offering on the sacrifice and service of your faith, I am glad and rejoice with you all. 18 For the same reason you also be glad and rejoice with me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WPM

WPM

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2022
8,578
4,215
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
If the text speaks for itself, why did you write an entire page explanation filled with colors and bold lettering?
Lol. Because I am dealing with people like you who constantly explain the way the truth.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,810
4,478
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Agree,
But there is this in the broad sense of things about the nations and it applies to all of the nations, pointing to God at work.

Acts 17

TO THE UNKNOWN GOD.

Therefore, the One whom you worship without knowing, Him I proclaim to you: 24 God, who made the world and everything in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands. 25 Nor is He worshiped with men’s hands, as though He needed anything, since He gives to all life, breath, and all things.

26 And He has made from one [j]blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, and has determined their preappointed times and the boundaries of their dwellings, 27 so that they should seek the Lord, in the hope that they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us; 28 for in Him we live and move and have our being, as also some of your own poets have said, ‘For we are also His offspring.’ 29 Therefore, since we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Divine Nature is like gold or silver or stone, something shaped by art and man’s devising. 30 Truly, these times of ignorance God overlooked, but now commands all men everywhere to repent, 31 because He has appointed a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by the Man whom He has ordained. He has given assurance of this to all by raising Him from the dead.”

******************
Right. I was obviously speaking in a different sense than what is written about here.

And v24 also proves their wont be a 1000 year reign in the flesh on this earth, as a temple made on this earth is made with hands
Right. Not all Premills believe Jesus will reign for a new physical temple at that time, but that verse definitely refutes that belief.

God, who made the world and everything in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands.
Why some ignore this is beyond me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scott Downey

CadyandZoe

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2020
7,679
2,628
113
Phoenix
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I wanted to be sure of what you believe before making my point so that I didn't waste time making a straw man argument. I'm sure you can appreciate that?
Yes. I very much appreciate your thoughtful answers. This is how I learn.
At that time I'm sure that the disciples would have assumed that His second coming would coincide with the destruction of the temple buildings, but it did not.
I wouldn’t take that as a given. The disciples' unease stemmed from Jesus' alarming proclamation about the imminent destruction of the temple. Their distress was rooted in an unspoken belief that Jesus was destined to assume the role of the King of Israel in the future. They were left pondering a critical question: how could Jesus make his grand ceremonial entry if the temple, a symbol of their faith and religious center, was to be laid to ruin?

In Roman culture, "the Parousia" referred to the ceremonial arrival of an emperor or high-ranking official to a city. This event was marked by grand celebrations, including processions, speeches, and public festivities, symbolizing the ruler's authority and connection with the people.

As Jesus foretold the destruction of the temple, his followers were filled with curiosity and anxiety. They sought clarity about the nature of the upcoming celebration, particularly because his remarks implied that the prophets’ traditional views on this significant event might be flawed. This left them pondering how the celebration would unfold in light of such profound predictions.


In the Olivet Discourse, Jesus referenced both His coming and the end of the age in terms of His coming occurring at the end of the age rather than the end of the age coming 1,000+ years later after His second coming as you believe.
How does the Olivet discourse rule out my perspective?
I assume you would agree with me that what He said in the following passage relates to things that happen just before His second coming?
I don't see it that way. Jesus is describing the ending of the age, which includes the Jewish wars of AD70, other wars and rumors of wars, the tribulation period, the rebirth of the nation, the sign of the son of man, changes in the celestial bodies, persecution and destruction of Israel, and finally the Parousia of the Lord.

Would you agree that Jesus was relating "the end" to His second coming there? Would you agree that He was saying that once the gospel is preached in the whole world then He will come again and that will mark the end of the age?
No, quite the opposite. Jesus gently corrects his disciples, steering them away from the misconception that his second coming, or Parousia, would occur simultaneously with the world's end. He cautions them against their eagerness for him to seize power without delay, stressing with great emphasis that his return would not happen anytime soon. He forewarns of tumultuous times ahead—wars would rage, the sacred temple would face destruction, and a protracted period of tribulation would unfold before his glorious return.

If so, then read this passage again in that light...

Matthew 13:40 “As the weeds are pulled up and burned in the fire, so it will be at the end of the age. 41 The Son of Man will send out his angels, and they will weed out of his kingdom everything that causes sin and all who do evil. 42 They will throw them into the blazing furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. 43 Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Whoever has ears, let them hear.

Jesus was saying here that at the end of the age, which is when He will return "Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father". Which means when He comes that is when He will hand over the kingdom to the Father as Paul wrote about in 1 Corinthians 15:22-24.
In the Gospel of Matthew, specifically in chapter 13, Jesus discusses a significant time known elsewhere as the Millennial period, which is also referred to as the "day of the Lord." This extraordinary era marks the reign of God as King over the entire earth, a rule established through His Son, Jesus Christ. The initiation of this divine period begins with a profound judgment directed at Israel. During this time, the Lord unleashes His fiery armies, who will sweep across the land, igniting everything in their path. The only exception to this devastation is the city of Jerusalem, which stands intact amidst the chaos, serving as a beacon of God's presence and authority during the unfolding of this monumental chapter in history.
 

covenantee

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2022
6,397
2,733
113
73
Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
That is an error. Peter's letter is addressed to churches in Asia, whose congregations are comprised of Jacob's descendants living outside the country.

Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ,
To those who reside as aliens, scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, who are chosen according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, by the sanctifying work of the Spirit, to obey Jesus Christ and be sprinkled with His blood: May grace and peace be yours in the fullest measure.
The Greek term underlying the word "aliens" is diaspora. These are the remnants of the original Ten Tribes who found homes in Asia and Europe, living among these nations as "aliens", people who maintain their culture and ethnicity. Peter, being the Apostle to the Jews, has reached out to his kinsmen of the flesh who obey Jesus Christ.
1 Peter 1:1 Greek

3927 [e]
parepidēmois
παρεπιδήμοις
sojourners
Adj-DMP

"one who sojourns on earth: so of Christians, 1 Peter 1:1"

I'm confident that Strong's Greek is better than yours. :laughing: