Trying. :)"So this thread is for that purpose, that we may all consider what we believe, why we believe it, by some searching, studying, thinking and praying."
Okay, so you were explicit! lol.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Trying. :)"So this thread is for that purpose, that we may all consider what we believe, why we believe it, by some searching, studying, thinking and praying."
Okay, so you were explicit! lol.
Yes, now look at the text in plain English:
Joh 21:15 So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my lambs.
Joh 21:16 He saith to him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my sheep.
Joh 21:17 He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep.
Notice the highlighted words, carefully and think about it in the context of 'agape', 'phileo' and what you just acknowledged, "... He said it [agape] TWO times and the last time, he used phileo ..." (which is why I asked you previously)." Therefore, where is the "third time", unless both "agape" and "phileo" are equal as synonyms, like unto "jump", "leap", "hop", "bound", or "create", "make", "formed", etc. I can point to many other examples, even in the same text. Look at the word "feed".
Ok, "feed", John 21:15-17Since you know Koine Greek...why don't you just tell me what you mean by "feed"? And, are you saying that the same sacrificial word for love-"agape" was being used all three times? This also of course, brings to mind when Peter denied Him 3 x.
Ok, "feed", John 21:15-17
The word "feed" in vs 15 is G1006 (bosko; βοσκε).
The word "feed" in vs 16 is G4165 (poimaino; ποιμαινε).
The word "feed" in vs 17 is G1006 (bosko; βοσκε).
So, is one a deep intimate selfless feeding and the other a friendly brotherly feeding, or do they just mean "feed" and are synonyms in koine Greek, even as we have in English? Can God use synonyms in differing languages?
No, Jesus used agape two times, phileo once (in asking; therefore what did Jesus ask three times, being the "third time"), and Peter used phileo in replying three times.
Yes, Jesus was restoring Peter in the eyes of all, by giving him the chance to voice and demonstrate his love after being converted, and having denied him three times before being converted.
Yes. Demonstrated by the text itself ("third time"), even as many other examples can be given, for instance:... Are you saying that Jesus used synonyms with the word "feed" as well as "love"?
The koine Greek of "brotherly love" is "philadelphos" (φιλαδελφιας), not "phileo" ("love")., and a synonymous statement is "αγαπαν αλληλους" (agape allelon)brotherly love
Hi Nancy. I don't think anyone expects you to take in everything in one sitting. Like I said in my post, I spent several months studying just one aspect of Adventist teaching (the Sabbath) before coming to a conclusion. It took me 5 further years studying other aspects, like the sanctuary, before I joined the actual church, although I was fellowshiping with Adventists throughout that time.Very good, and important words BL,
I will say that I was convicted several times throughout your post. Doctrine is very important and we certainly should know why we believe what we do. But to sit there and watch some guy talking to me in a 55 minute video, not to mention some really long posts to decipher...one could get overwhelmed (at least, I do) would have to dedicate more time than one might have or perhaps someone like myself, I just plain don't understand all those charts and letters in Koine Greek or Hebrew. But, concerning the OP, if somebody replies to it, and gives their 4 beliefs, shouldn't that be enough? If what they wrote or read had made them think about things, that's a good thing. Just way too much content in my book. The poor thread took off pretty well, IMHO, but took a nasty turn somewhere.![]()
The correct term is 'Dispensationalist" and Dispensationlists allow the Scriptures to speak for themselves. They do not allegorize and spiritualize away Bible truth. One of the key results is that they see the Church and redeemed and restored Israel as two distinct entities, and that is clearly revealed in Romans 11 (and throughout the Bible).Have you always been a 'dispensational'? Could that position be incorrect?
Hi Nancy. I don't think anyone expects you to take in everything in one sitting. Like I said in my post, I spent several months studying just one aspect of Adventist teaching (the Sabbath) before coming to a conclusion. It took me 5 further years studying other aspects, like the sanctuary, before I joined the actual church, although I was fellowshiping with Adventists throughout that time.
Just a little at a time as God leads, and as you feel able to digest. The importance though is to be willing to allow God free reign to lead you where He wills. And no, limiting ourselves to just four is limiting God's power to enlighten. The video I posted above, just a half hour, I believe is perfectly pertinent to our conversation. I think you will enjoy. Ty Gibson is one of our leading Adventist teachers today, and offers deep profound perspectives, yet in terms the most simple I believe can understand...perfect for me.
We did this already:The correct term is 'Dispensationalist" and Dispensationlists allow the Scriptures to speak for themselves. They do not allegorize and spiritualize away Bible truth. One of the key results is that they see the Church and redeemed and restored Israel as two distinct entities, and that is clearly revealed in Romans 11 (and throughout the Bible).
That is false theology. So there would be no point in looking at anything else. Jesus CANNOT be a nation for the simple reason that He is God. He rules over the nations, including Israel in the future.Jesus is Israel
Look to Him? How do I identify Him? There are many which present themselves as 'Jesus', even 'Messiah' and 'Christ' these days.
For instance, you mention a 'prayer language', that you refuse to type here, for others to translate, and yet I do not see Jesus, my example in the Christian life and prayer life, doing anything like that in all of the OT or NT. So, do I follow the Jesus and His example, that scripture identifies, or another?
Yes. Demonstrated by the text itself ("third time"), even as many other examples can be given, for instance:
Isa 43:7 Even every one that is called by my name: for I have created him for my glory, I have formed him; yea, I have made him.
There is an Adventist teaching we derive from scripture, different from dispensational teachings, that shows that at the time of the resurrectionand the second coming all the redeemed go with Jesus to heaven for the 1000 years...there we will see God face to face. The declaration of Jesus that the meek shall inherit the earth apples to when all of us return to the earth at the end of the millennium at which time the earth and the heavens are made new. We come down in the new city Jerusalem and the earth becomes the capital of the universeand where the Father and His children dwell forever.I enjoyed Ty's teaching. The face of God, cannot see and then we will see :) ...do you think that we will see His face (Rev. 22:4) and live, only in our new glorious bodies? There can be no other way that I can think of.
A lot of the things he said are continual prayers for His will and for His Spirit to shine the light in my heart...it hurts...I've always realized that but, it is so needed...let it hurt to see our own sin. Let it convict us and move us to repent in these areas! The more I pray that His Spirit shine His light into my darkness, the more He shows me and it is not pretty. The sin that I thought would never leave me have turned out to be the easiest, through His grace. But, oh boy when He shines into your darkness
I loved the quote by Paul Laurence Dunbar, esp. "With torn and bleeding hearts, we smile" Been there and am still somewhat but, nothing like it used to be. How pretentious was I!!! Yes, "fear of rejection"...so happy to see Him work after years of asking Him these things! For as for myself, to be "self conscience" is BAD but to be Christ conscience is all that is needed.
"Psychic tension" Oh yeah, that knee jerk reaction...
"brings out the beast of Rev. 13 <--- lol.
Okay, just rambling here but, thanks for the video, he is a good teacher.
:)
How can the time of the resurrection of the saints also be the time of the Second Coming? Do you see a resurrection of the saints here, or the exact OPPOSITE?There is an Adventist teaching we derive from scripture, different from dispensational teachings, that shows that at the time of the resurrection and the second coming all the redeemed go with Jesus to heaven for the 1000 years.
Some of us have bigger mouths than others. :) so my mouthfuls may sometimes not be others. Sorry my spoon is too large. :) My cup runneth over, and plate filled with abundance, and gifts pouring down from heaven in torrents of blessing. I do try Helen. Really.I have to confess , that now you are writing in bite sized mouthfuls ..I can understand what you are saying much clearer.
How is it false, according to the texts I cited? They are clear. Wherein the text cited have I erred in what they teach?That is false theology. So there would be no point in looking at anything else. Jesus CANNOT be a nation for the simple reason that He is God. He rules over the nations, including Israel in the future.
Good question, these videos and texts may be of assistance to you:How can the time of the resurrection of the saints also be the time of the Second Coming?