If believing is so much more trustworthy when it comes to determining the truth of God, why shouldn't that type of believing be used to determine the truth in the court of law?
Just for the sake of argument:
You have been wrongly accused of a crime that you did not commit (I am 100% sure this does happen) Do you think you can prove to everyone involved that you are innocent, just by telling them to believe you are innocent.
I think not.
Just for the sake of argument:
You have been wrongly accused of a crime that you did not commit (I am 100% sure this does happen) Do you think you can prove to everyone involved that you are innocent, just by telling them to believe you are innocent.
I think not.