The same arguments between preterists and futurists over the correct interpretation of Babylon have been going on since the Jesuits conceived the eschatologies. Let me indulge in a critique of these eschatologies from an older view, the historicists’ view. Historicism rose with Protestantism; Martin Luther interpreted Daniel’s Little Horn as the papacy that rose amongst the Germanic kingdoms that supplanted Rome at its demise. To take the heat off the papacy, two Jesuit priests, Francisco Ribera (1537- 1591) and Luis de Alcazar (1554-c. 1613), concocted futurism and preterism. It’s Alcazar’s invention, preterism, that will be the focus of the thread. Still, futurism is guilty of many of the same misconceptions. This work will expose some of the misconceptions of preterism before it draws conclusions about the identity of Babylon.
To begin, the notion that God sets “up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed” and that “shall not be left to other people” at Christ’s first advent is untenable in light of Daniel’s prophecies,
Daniel 2:
34 Thou sawest till that a stone was cut out without hands, which smote the image upon his feet that were of iron and clay, and brake them to pieces…
42 And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken.
43 And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.
44 And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.
Daniel tells us Christ establishes his kingdom in the days of the feet or the ten toes of the image, or kings/horns, also conveyed in Daniel 7 and Revelation 17, which wasn’t at Christ’s first advent; Christ’s first advent was at the time of the legs of iron. Martin Luther’s interpretation of the little horn conforms to the evidence that it must have risen at the end of the Roman Empire amongst the kingdoms that supplanted it. The head, breast, belly, and legs represented consecutive kingdoms or empires; consequently, Daniel wasn’t talking about Christ’s return and filling the whole earth during the time of the Roman empire but the time of the kingdoms that supplanted Rome and did not embrace one another, but ruled simultaneously. Daniel 2:44 affirms Christ sets up his kingdom with kings that rule concurrently, just like the kings in Revelation 17. There can be no compromise on this issue if we want to interpret Babylon accurately.
Furthermore, the notion that Christ’s mediation has a separate judgment for the Jews is untenable. Christ‘s mediation commenced upon his fulfilling the antitype of the first fruits. The Old Covenant ended when Christ presented himself as the first fruits before his Father (1 Corinthians 15:20), anointing the Most Holy, and commenced his mediation (Daniel 9:24); the Old Covenant didn’t end in 70 AD,
The law foreshadowed the harvest season (Hebrews 10:1), which is illustrated in Christ’s parables of planting and harvesting in Matthew 13. The harvest or gathering of the wheat into God’s barn wasn’t ordained for the close of the Old Covenant but the close of Christ's mediation of the New Covenant at the end of this age. At the close of this age, Christ mediates over the Church, not the Old Covenant. Christ unveiled the harvest, gathering all things that offend “the righteous” and cast them into the furnace, but the tares grew alongside the wheat until that time,
Mathew 13:
41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;
42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
43 Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.
The harvest in Matthew 13 corresponds with the gathering of the elect in the Olivet Discourse,
Matthew 24:
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
Matthew 13 is the same event, merely providing greater detail, just as 2 Peter gives us greater detail to what Christ states in the OD,
Matthew 24:
37 But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
Christ likens “the coming of the Son of man” with the days of Noah, and so does Peter in his epistle to the “elect exiles of the dispersion” (ESV),
2 Peter 3:
3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,
4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.
All things continue as they were from the beginning of creation until the coming of the Son of man. Those things that continue until Christ’s return would be the tares growing alongside the wheat, nation rising against nation, famines, pestilence, earthquakes, the saints being delivered up to be afflicted, killed, hated of all nation for Christ’s sake, betrayed, deceived by false prophets, iniquity abounding, love waxing cold and the “need” of the gospel to be preached to “all the world” before “the coming of the Son of man,”
Matthew 24:
7 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.
8 All these are the beginning of sorrows.
9 Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake.
10 And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another.
11 And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.
12 And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.
13 But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.
14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.
All things considered, the Olivet Discourse follows the same apocalyptic pattern that Daniel followed in the prophecy of the seventy weeks,
Daniel 9:
25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.
Just as Daniel cloaked the distant event of Christ’s first advent in the imminence, within a generation, of “the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem,” Christ cloaked his distant return in the imminent event in which one stone wouldn’t be left upon another at the destruction of the Herod’s temple, which agrees with Daniel’s chapter 2, that in the days of the kings that supplant Rome, he will set up his kingdom.
Revelation reveals the merchant of the earth are made rich from the power of Babylon’s luxurious living,
Revelation 18:
3 For all nations have drunk the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality, and the kings of the earth have committed immorality with her, and the merchants of the earth have grown rich from the power of her luxurious living." ESV
The Romans made the merchants rich during John’s time, not the Jews, which exposes the folly of preterism and futurism. The Jews couldn’t even sit down and eat with the Gentiles, so how could they have committed fornication with the kings of the earth and enriched the merchants before 70 AD? Furthermore, history affirms the Romans invented the “law merchant” to maintain economic hegemony in their empire, which collapsed at the end of their empire, ending the political status of the merchants in the kingdoms that supplanted Rome. With the rise of the papacy, the merchants were relegated to an inferior position in society and kept there until the rise of Protestantism. It was the Protestants that held intercourse with the kings of the earth and established secular societies in the world in which the merchants were enriched, in fulfillment of the prophecy that there would be a great falling away before the Day of the LORD,
2 Thessalonians 2:
3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.KJV
Furthermore, the Romans were pagans and couldn’t fall from moral rectitude; that’s a covenantal issue, which is only applicable to the covenantal people of God. The first-century Jews don’t fit the prophecy in any substantive study, and neither do the Jews in our time; only apostate, liberal Protestantism fits the prophecy of the Mystery of Babylon, and from a Historicist’s hermeneutic, according to Daniel 2.
To begin, the notion that God sets “up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed” and that “shall not be left to other people” at Christ’s first advent is untenable in light of Daniel’s prophecies,
Daniel 2:
34 Thou sawest till that a stone was cut out without hands, which smote the image upon his feet that were of iron and clay, and brake them to pieces…
42 And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken.
43 And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.
44 And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.
Daniel tells us Christ establishes his kingdom in the days of the feet or the ten toes of the image, or kings/horns, also conveyed in Daniel 7 and Revelation 17, which wasn’t at Christ’s first advent; Christ’s first advent was at the time of the legs of iron. Martin Luther’s interpretation of the little horn conforms to the evidence that it must have risen at the end of the Roman Empire amongst the kingdoms that supplanted it. The head, breast, belly, and legs represented consecutive kingdoms or empires; consequently, Daniel wasn’t talking about Christ’s return and filling the whole earth during the time of the Roman empire but the time of the kingdoms that supplanted Rome and did not embrace one another, but ruled simultaneously. Daniel 2:44 affirms Christ sets up his kingdom with kings that rule concurrently, just like the kings in Revelation 17. There can be no compromise on this issue if we want to interpret Babylon accurately.
Furthermore, the notion that Christ’s mediation has a separate judgment for the Jews is untenable. Christ‘s mediation commenced upon his fulfilling the antitype of the first fruits. The Old Covenant ended when Christ presented himself as the first fruits before his Father (1 Corinthians 15:20), anointing the Most Holy, and commenced his mediation (Daniel 9:24); the Old Covenant didn’t end in 70 AD,
The Celebration of Firstfruits is a biblical festival rooted in the agricultural practices of ancient Israel, marking the beginning of the harvest season… The offering of the firstfruits is a demonstration of faith, trusting that God will bless the remainder of the harvest. 1
The law foreshadowed the harvest season (Hebrews 10:1), which is illustrated in Christ’s parables of planting and harvesting in Matthew 13. The harvest or gathering of the wheat into God’s barn wasn’t ordained for the close of the Old Covenant but the close of Christ's mediation of the New Covenant at the end of this age. At the close of this age, Christ mediates over the Church, not the Old Covenant. Christ unveiled the harvest, gathering all things that offend “the righteous” and cast them into the furnace, but the tares grew alongside the wheat until that time,
Mathew 13:
41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;
42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
43 Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.
The harvest in Matthew 13 corresponds with the gathering of the elect in the Olivet Discourse,
Matthew 24:
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
Matthew 13 is the same event, merely providing greater detail, just as 2 Peter gives us greater detail to what Christ states in the OD,
Matthew 24:
37 But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
Christ likens “the coming of the Son of man” with the days of Noah, and so does Peter in his epistle to the “elect exiles of the dispersion” (ESV),
2 Peter 3:
3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,
4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.
All things continue as they were from the beginning of creation until the coming of the Son of man. Those things that continue until Christ’s return would be the tares growing alongside the wheat, nation rising against nation, famines, pestilence, earthquakes, the saints being delivered up to be afflicted, killed, hated of all nation for Christ’s sake, betrayed, deceived by false prophets, iniquity abounding, love waxing cold and the “need” of the gospel to be preached to “all the world” before “the coming of the Son of man,”
Matthew 24:
7 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.
8 All these are the beginning of sorrows.
9 Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake.
10 And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another.
11 And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.
12 And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.
13 But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.
14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.
All things considered, the Olivet Discourse follows the same apocalyptic pattern that Daniel followed in the prophecy of the seventy weeks,
Daniel 9:
25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.
Just as Daniel cloaked the distant event of Christ’s first advent in the imminence, within a generation, of “the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem,” Christ cloaked his distant return in the imminent event in which one stone wouldn’t be left upon another at the destruction of the Herod’s temple, which agrees with Daniel’s chapter 2, that in the days of the kings that supplant Rome, he will set up his kingdom.
Revelation reveals the merchant of the earth are made rich from the power of Babylon’s luxurious living,
Revelation 18:
3 For all nations have drunk the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality, and the kings of the earth have committed immorality with her, and the merchants of the earth have grown rich from the power of her luxurious living." ESV
The Romans made the merchants rich during John’s time, not the Jews, which exposes the folly of preterism and futurism. The Jews couldn’t even sit down and eat with the Gentiles, so how could they have committed fornication with the kings of the earth and enriched the merchants before 70 AD? Furthermore, history affirms the Romans invented the “law merchant” to maintain economic hegemony in their empire, which collapsed at the end of their empire, ending the political status of the merchants in the kingdoms that supplanted Rome. With the rise of the papacy, the merchants were relegated to an inferior position in society and kept there until the rise of Protestantism. It was the Protestants that held intercourse with the kings of the earth and established secular societies in the world in which the merchants were enriched, in fulfillment of the prophecy that there would be a great falling away before the Day of the LORD,
2 Thessalonians 2:
3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.KJV
Furthermore, the Romans were pagans and couldn’t fall from moral rectitude; that’s a covenantal issue, which is only applicable to the covenantal people of God. The first-century Jews don’t fit the prophecy in any substantive study, and neither do the Jews in our time; only apostate, liberal Protestantism fits the prophecy of the Mystery of Babylon, and from a Historicist’s hermeneutic, according to Daniel 2.
Last edited: