Exploring Trinitarian Logic

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
7,003
3,835
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
So Jesus said, “Are you also still without understanding?
So that cannot apply to you? Read 1 Cor 10:12.

And you might need to ask about the fact that God identifies with humankind....because we were created in his image...he uses human relationships to describe his Fatherhood to his firstborn Son.....and his angels’ sonship as well.....

God speaks as if he were human identifying with our hands and our heart.....as if possessed them...and we do not know if he does in the spirit form he has. “No man has ever seen God” according to the apostle John. (John 1:18)

Why would he present himself as a ‘three in one god’ when we are a singular entity.
Multiple personality disorder is a mental health issue, so why do we not rejoice at being like God when we have this mental illness?

Triads are nothing new in paganism, but unknown to Israel.
Funny how “Christianity” imitates paganism in their beliefs and practices, but the pagans never imitate Christianity in what they do.

As it says....1+1+1=3.

Is The Trinity Pagan? | PPT
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wrangler and TheHC

David in NJ

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2021
11,796
6,232
113
49
Denville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
substituting a 4th century god for the true God is hardly showing love for Yahweh…..and it breaks the first Commandment to have another god in the place of the Father, Yahweh.
"the Word was a god" is not only breaking the First Commandment but also the 9th commandment.
9th - "You shall not bear false witness"

Therefore, Aunty Jane, the jw/watchtower are 'false witnesses'

Run to the Lord Jesus Christ Aunty

JESUS is the only one who can wash away your sins and intercede on your behalf to the FATHER that you may be
filled with the Holy Spirit.
 

David in NJ

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2021
11,796
6,232
113
49
Denville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
So that cannot apply to you? Read 1 Cor 10:12.

And you might need to ask about the fact that God identifies with humankind....because we were created in his image...he uses human relationships to describe his Fatherhood to his firstborn Son.....and his angels’ sonship as well.....

God speaks as if he were human identifying with our hands and our heart.....as if possessed them...and we do not know if he does in the spirit form he has. “No man has ever seen God” according to the apostle John. (John 1:18)

Why would he present himself as a ‘three in one god’ when we are a singular entity.
Multiple personality disorder is a mental health issue, so why do we not rejoice at being like God when we have this mental illness?

Triads are nothing new in paganism, but unknown to Israel.
Funny how “Christianity” imitates paganism in their beliefs and practices, but the pagans never imitate Christianity in what they do.

As it says....1+1+1=3.

Is The Trinity Pagan? | PPT
Why would he present himself as a ‘three in one god’ when we are a singular entity.
Because we were made in the image and likeness of Elohim.

Therefore we were created in three parts = Spirit Soul and Body

Satan KNOWS who the TRIUNE Elohim is Aunty and that is why he counterfeits the TRUE and Living Elohim with pagan gods.

SAME as the RCC, which is a COUNTERFEIT of 'christianity' with pagan statues and pagan practices and religiuos works.

RUN to the Lord Jesus Christ, for HE died for you Aunty that you may LIVE unto YHWH and receive the Holy Spirit
 
  • Like
Reactions: amigo de christo

David in NJ

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2021
11,796
6,232
113
49
Denville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
So that cannot apply to you? Read 1 Cor 10:12.

And you might need to ask about the fact that God identifies with humankind....because we were created in his image...he uses human relationships to describe his Fatherhood to his firstborn Son.....and his angels’ sonship as well.....

God speaks as if he were human identifying with our hands and our heart.....as if possessed them...and we do not know if he does in the spirit form he has. “No man has ever seen God” according to the apostle John. (John 1:18)

Why would he present himself as a ‘three in one god’ when we are a singular entity.
Multiple personality disorder is a mental health issue, so why do we not rejoice at being like God when we have this mental illness?

Triads are nothing new in paganism, but unknown to Israel.
Funny how “Christianity” imitates paganism in their beliefs and practices, but the pagans never imitate Christianity in what they do.

As it says....1+1+1=3.

Is The Trinity Pagan? | PPT
Keep this is in your mind Aunty

Satan knew, thousands of years before the nation Israel was formed, that the FATHER would send the WORD as a man.

Satan had many thosands of years to do his decptive work amongst the nations, including Israel.

1 John 5:19 - "the whole world lies under the sway of the wicked one."
 
Last edited:

RedFan

Well-Known Member
May 15, 2022
2,871
1,257
113
70
New Hampshire
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
So here is David's syllogism:

1. Man was created in God's image.
2. Man is spirit and soul and body (1 Thessalonians 5:23). Therefore,
3. God is spirit and soul and body.

I guess David thinks God had a body at creation, long before the incarnation of the Son. I think otherwise. I guess David thinks John 4:24 was hiding the ball (or two thirds of it). But I think John 4:24 hit the nail on the head. I suppose David will rush to corral as many anthropomorphisms as he can find (like Isaiah 59:1 for God’s “hand” and “ear,” 2 Chronicles 16:9 for God’s “eyes,” Matthew 4:4 for God’s “mouth,” Deuteronomy 33:27 for God's“arms.”). Let's see.
 

Magdala

Active Member
Dec 25, 2024
617
113
43
Pacific Northwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
[...] we should be dealing with your willingness to be ignorant of it - that is more concerning to me

All I've been saying about Gen. 3:22 specifically from the moment that you brought it up, is that it's about God saying, "man is become as one of us, to know good and evil [...]", not how they came to possess the knowledge of evil, or anything else, and that you shouldn't have assumed who I believe the "us" refers to in that verse, and should apologize, for reasons given.

In relation to Genesis 1:26, the plural noun Elohim is sometimes paired with a singular verb and at other times with a plural verb. This variation is significant, as it shows that while Elohim refers to a plurality, united as one, they also have the ability to make independent decisions and take individual actions. However, the power they wield and the glory they display come from One—Yahweh. In Genesis 1:26, the verb is plural, pointing to a plurality of agents.

The word "plural" means "two or more of something". Regarding "Elohim", you say that there's shown to be a plurality, united as one, where they have the ability to make independent decisions and take individual actions, and yet the power they wield and the glory they display come from One—Yahweh. In the same way, the trinitarian belief is the following:

Essence
The being of God, or what God is. The word "essence" comes from the Latin "esse", meaning "to be", so "one essence" means "one being".

Person
The mode of existence of God, or who God is. The term "person" comes from the Latin "persona", which has multiple meanings, including mask, role of an actor, and self-existence.
  • One God: God is one being in Essence

  • Three Persons: God is Three distinct Persons (the Father, the Word (Son), and the Holy Spirit)

  • United as one: The Three Persons are united as one in Essence
The Father, the Word (the Son), and the Holy Spirit are not three separate gods with three different essences, but rather Three distinct Persons, each working differently and yet not working in a contrary fashion, united as one because They are the same Essence: love, and equal in all respects as regards Divinity, Eternity, Immensity, and Omnipotence, but not confused in relation to one another, but, rather, quite distinct, and One is not the Other, and yet there are not three gods, but a single God, Who in and of Himself has given being to the individual Divine Persons in generating the Son and, by that very act, originating the procession of the Holy Spirit.


Obviously, it isn't explicitly said in Gen. 1:26 that God was addressing the angels, so how is it implicitly stated in your belief?
 
Last edited:

MonoBiblical

Active Member
Apr 18, 2024
458
103
43
51
midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
explain this my friend . i never heard of metatron .
The LOGOS angel of Philo who created the world as God's word. Justin Martyr called Jesus as a second god.
"the Word was a god" is not only breaking the First Commandment but also the 9th commandment.
9th - "You shall not bear false witness"

Therefore, Aunty Jane, the jw/watchtower are 'false witnesses'

Run to the Lord Jesus Christ Aunty

JESUS is the only one who can wash away your sins and intercede on your behalf to the FATHER that you may be
filled with the Holy Spirit.
It isn't as bad as saying the invisible God has an image.
 

MonoBiblical

Active Member
Apr 18, 2024
458
103
43
51
midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
So here is David's syllogism:

1. Man was created in God's image.
2. Man is spirit and soul and body (1 Thessalonians 5:23). Therefore,
3. God is spirit and soul and body.

I guess David thinks God had a body at creation, long before the incarnation of the Son. I think otherwise. I guess David thinks John 4:24 was hiding the ball (or two thirds of it). But I think John 4:24 hit the nail on the head. I suppose David will rush to corral as many anthropomorphisms as he can find (like Isaiah 59:1 for God’s “hand” and “ear,” 2 Chronicles 16:9 for God’s “eyes,” Matthew 4:4 for God’s “mouth,” Deuteronomy 33:27 for God's“arms.”). Let's see.
The Father and the HS can't do anything much without Metatron is the rumour.
 

MonoBiblical

Active Member
Apr 18, 2024
458
103
43
51
midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
So that cannot apply to you? Read 1 Cor 10:12.

And you might need to ask about the fact that God identifies with humankind....because we were created in his image...he uses human relationships to describe his Fatherhood to his firstborn Son.....and his angels’ sonship as well.....

God speaks as if he were human identifying with our hands and our heart.....as if possessed them...and we do not know if he does in the spirit form he has. “No man has ever seen God” according to the apostle John. (John 1:18)

Why would he present himself as a ‘three in one god’ when we are a singular entity.
Multiple personality disorder is a mental health issue, so why do we not rejoice at being like God when we have this mental illness?

Triads are nothing new in paganism, but unknown to Israel.
Funny how “Christianity” imitates paganism in their beliefs and practices, but the pagans never imitate Christianity in what they do.

As it says....1+1+1=3.

Is The Trinity Pagan? | PPT
You really need to research Valentinus and the Valentinians.
 

Pierac

Active Member
Nov 15, 2021
919
235
43
62
Phoenix
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
@Pierac - where did you run off to???

Question - is this what you believe??? = "the Word was a god"
Silly child..... You need to be Schooled! You are in need of a Theological Spanking....

John 1:1
I have another train of thought for you think about. Is what you're reading into John 1 mostly church tradition? For almost 400 years, we have a read John 1 through the eyes of the Catholic Church. (reinforcing the Trinity). In the New Testament, “the Word” (Logos) happens to be of the masculine gender. Therefore, it's pronoun -"he" in our English translations - is a matter of interpretation, not translation. Did John write concerning “the word” that “he” was in the beginning with God or did he write concerning “the word” that “it” was in the beginning with God? As already stated, in the NT Greek the logos or word is masculine noun. It is okay in English to use “he” to refer back to his masculine noun if there is good contextual reason to do so. But is there good reason to make “the word” a “he” here?

It is a fact that all English translations from the Greek before the King James version of 1611 actually read this way: (notice Him and He are now “It”).

Tyndale 1534:
Joh 1:1 In the beginnynge was the worde and the worde was with God: and the worde was God. 2 The same was in the beginnynge with God. 3 All thinges were made by it and with out it was made nothinge that was made. 4 In it was lyfe and the lyfe was ye lyght of men

Cranmer 1539
John 1:1 IN the begynnynge was the worde and the worde was wyth God: and God was the worde. 2 The same was in the begynnyng with God. 3 All thynges were made by it and without it, was made nothynge that was made. 4 In it was lyfe and the lyfe was the lyght of men

Bishops 1568:
Joh 1:1 In the begynnyng was the worde, & the worde was with God: and that worde was God. 2 The same was in the begynnyng with God. 3 All thynges were made by it: and without it, was made nothyng that was made. 4 In it was lyfe, and the lyfe was the lyght of men,

Geneva 1587:
Joh 1:1 In the beginning was that Word, and that Word was with God, and that Word was God. 2 This same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by it, and without it was made nothing that was made. 4 In it was life, and that life was the light of men.

And now our modern Concordant Literal Version:
Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the word, and the word was toward God, and God was the word. " 2 This was in the beginning toward God. 3 All came into being through it, and apart from it not even one thing came into being which has come into being." 4 In it was life, and the life was the light of men."


The word logos appears many, many more times in this very Gospel of John. And nowhere else do the translators capitalize it or use the masculine personal pronoun "he" to agree with it !
The rest of the New Testament is the same. Logos is variously translated as "statement" (Luke 20:20), “question" (Matt 21:24), "preaching" (1 Tim 5:17), "command" (Gal 5:14), "message" (Luke 4:32), "matter" (Acts 15:6), "reason" (Acts 10:29), so there is actually no reason
to make John one say that "the Word" is the person Jesus himself, unless of course the translators are wanting to make a point to. In all cases logos is an “it.”

In the light of this background it is far better to read John's prologue to mean that in the beginning God had a plan, a dream, a grand vision for the world, a reason by which He brought all things into being. This word or plan was expressive of who he is.

"The Word" for John is an “it” not a "he." On one occasion, Jesus is given the name "the word of God" and this is in Revelations 19:13. This name has been given to him after his resurrection and ascension, but we will not find it before his birth. It is not until we come to verse 14 of John's prologue that this logos becomes personal and becomes the son of God, Jesus. "And the Word became flesh." A great plan that God had in his heart from before the creation at last is fulfilled. Be very clear that it does not say that God became flesh.

There is even strong evidence suggesting that John himself reacted to those who were already misusing his gospel Like You to mean that Jesus was himself the Word who had personally preexist the world. When later he wrote his introduction to 1 John, he clearly made the point that what was in the beginning was not a “who” he put it this way: "What was from the beginning, what we have heard, what we have seen with our eyes, what we beheld and our hands handled, concerning the word of life…"

Logos - This word is translated in English as "Word". This word has an actual meaning which has been almost completely lost due to the Greek philosophical interpretation of John 1:1-3 & 14.

who testified to the word of God and to the testimony of Jesus Christ, even to all that he saw. (Rev 1:2)

"I also saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their testimony to Jesus and for the word (logos) of God." (Rev 20:4)

Notice that they were beheaded for their testimony to Jesus AND for the logos of God. Jesus and the word of God are not the same thing.

John 12:48 "He who rejects Me and does not receive My sayings, has one (God) who judges him; the word ( logos ) I spoke is what will judge him at the last day.

Again… Jesus spoke the Logos, as He is not the Logos! So who is the Logos? The very next verse tell us!

Joh 12:49 "For I did not speak on My own initiative, but the Father Himself who sent Me has given Me a commandment as to what to say and what to speak.

Jesus is not our Judge, but our savior!

Joh 3:17 "For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him.

Act 17:30 "Therefore having overlooked the times of ignorance, God is now declaring to men that all people everywhere should repent, 31 because He ( God) has fixed a day in which He will judge the world in righteousness through a Man whom He has appointed, having furnished proof to all men by raising Him from the dead."

Word of God in this verse means God's plan of salvation for us (NAB), i.e. the kingdom of God message. So what does "logos" mean?

Logos - 1. Denotes an internal reasoning process, plan, or intention, as well as an external word. 2. The expression of thought. As embodying a conception or idea (New American Bible (footnote) & Vine’s Expository Dictionary).

According to Liddell and Scott Greek Lexicon, it also means: Logos - the inward thought which is expressed in the spoken word.

I will give you a brief paraphrase of John 1:1-3 using the definitions for "logos:"

"In the beginning was God's plan, will, or idea for our salvation. It was present in his mind, and God's plan or will possessed all the attributes of God."


The very Trinitarian Roman Catholic New American Bible has this comment on this verse:

"Lack of a definite article with "God" in Greek signifies predication rather than identification."

Predication -
to affirm as a quality or attribute (Webster's Dictionary).

So how does the Word (logos) become flesh in John 1:14? Let me use an example which most of us can relate to. We are all familiar with the expression, "was this baby planned?" Let's say it was planned. You and your wife had a plan to have a baby. You had a logos, a plan. Your plan (logos) became flesh the day that your baby was born. In the same way, God's plan of salvation for us became a reality, became flesh, when Jesus was born. This verse is probably one of the biggest culprits in the creation of the trinity. The reason being that to someone educated in Greek philosophy such as the early church fathers of the 3rd, 4th, and 5th, centuries, logos had an entirely different meaning. Tertullian who was responsible for much of the creation of the trinity was a Stoic lawyer. The Stoics defined "logos" as the "divine principle of life." Which is basically a definition of God. With this definition you are going to arrive at a completely different interpretation than what John intended. You will interpret it something like this:

"In the beginning was the divine principle of life, and the divine principle of life was with God, and the divine principle of life was God. Then, the divine principle of life became flesh."

With this definition you arrive at the conclusion that the divine principle of life, which is God, became flesh. Now you have God's essence in two places at once. The explanation for this obvious problem came in the form of the Doctrine of the Trinity. Then you have God's essence in flesh, so the description of Jesus becomes that he is fully God and fully man. These concepts come straight out of Greek philosophy. Greek philosophers believed that man was composed of flesh and a divine spark.

John 12:48 "He who rejects Me and does not receive My sayings, has one who judges him; the word ( logos ) I spoke is what will judge him at the last day.

Again… Jesus spoke the Logos, He is not the Logos!

Glad to be of some help
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Wrangler

face2face

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2015
8,243
1,202
113
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Silly child..... You need to be Schooled! You are in need of a Theological Spanking....
Thanks for the funny lfh
John 1:1
I have another train of thought for you think about. Is what you're reading into John 1 mostly church tradition? For almost 400 years, we have a read John 1 through the eyes of the Catholic Church. (reinforcing the Trinity).
Very true!
In the New Testament, “the Word” (Logos) happens to be of the masculine gender. Therefore, it's pronoun -"he" in our English translations - is a matter of interpretation, not translation. Did John write concerning “the word” that “he” was in the beginning with God or did he write concerning “the word” that “it” was in the beginning with God? As already stated, in the NT Greek the logos or word is masculine noun. It is okay in English to use “he” to refer back to his masculine noun if there is good contextual reason to do so. But is there good reason to make “the word” a “he” here?

It is a fact that all English translations from the Greek before the King James version of 1611 actually read this way: (notice Him and He are now “It”).
I use to use this approach, however I still believe a correct understanding of Jesus & Logos can be attained with the personal pronoun.
The word logos appears many, many more times in this very Gospel of John. And nowhere else do the translators capitalize it or use the masculine personal pronoun "he" to agree with it !
The rest of the New Testament is the same. Logos is variously translated as "statement" (Luke 20:20), “question" (Matt 21:24), "preaching" (1 Tim 5:17), "command" (Gal 5:14), "message" (Luke 4:32), "matter" (Acts 15:6), "reason" (Acts 10:29), so there is actually no reason
to make John one say that "the Word" is the person Jesus himself, unless of course the translators are wanting to make a point to. In all cases logos is an “it.”
:gd
In the light of this background it is far better to read John's prologue to mean that in the beginning God had a plan, a dream, a grand vision
Correct:

Paul phrased it awkwardly here:

for all things in heaven and on earth were created by him—all things, whether visible or invisible, whether thrones or dominions, whether principalities or powers—all things were created through him and for him. Col 1:16.

Once a true understanding of Logos is revealed it's use in John 1:1-3 makes the above clear!

"The Word" for John is an “it” not a "he." On one occasion, Jesus is given the name "the word of God" and this is in Revelations 19:13.
Nicely put!
There is even strong evidence suggesting that John himself reacted to those who were already misusing his gospel Like You to mean that Jesus was himself the Word who had personally preexist the world.
Boy I hope @David in NJ is able to absorb this!
Notice that they were beheaded for their testimony to Jesus AND for the logos of God. Jesus and the word of God are not the same thing.
I will come back to this at the end of your post. Some important points to discuss!
Let me use an example which most of us can relate to. We are all familiar with the expression, "was this baby planned?" Let's say it was planned. You and your wife had a plan to have a baby. You had a logos, a plan. Your plan (logos) became flesh the day that your baby was born.
Very good analogy!
In the same way, God's plan of salvation for us became a reality....
Great work, Pierac! This should be pinned in this forum as it provides a key to unlocking many of the hidden truths in Scripture.

You are right to guide David through the various uses of the word "Logos." For instance:

"These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word (Logos) with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so." — Acts 17:11

The Gospel, or "Word," is a message that reveals the knowledge of what the Logos has prepared and planned from the beginning. It represents Yahweh’s Divine Expression of His Will and Purpose for this era of time. Whether that Logos expresses itself in the manifestation of His Character in a man or in the Creative acts of Genesis 1, it all communicates the unfolding of His Mind.

Another example which is of interest and is rather topical like Acts 17:11 is John 8:43

Why do you not understand what I say? It is because you cannot bear to hear my word. Jn 8:43.

The use of "what I say" or "My speech" is the Gk form of expression...unlike Acts 17:11 who are those who received Logos readily in mind these have the problem of "Cannot Hear My Word” - (‘logos’ - inward substance).

Jesus understands their problem, much like how Trinitarians are being shown their own issues. Knowing they "cannot hear his Father's Logos," He provides the answer, as they would not understand it otherwise, as described in Isaiah 6:9-10.

I could go on but I know you know these things.
John 12:48 "He who rejects Me and does not receive My sayings, has one who judges him; the word ( logos ) I spoke is what will judge him at the last day.

Again… Jesus spoke the Logos, He is not the Logos!

Glad to be of some help

Revelation 19:12

His eyes are like a flame of fire, and on his head are many diadems, and he has a name written that no one knows but himself.
Re 19:11–12.

The name given here in verse 13 is "The Logos of God"

Christ is the Word made flesh, the manifestation of Yahweh among humanity (1 Tim. 3:16). Everything that Word requires is revealed through Him; all that it foretold finds its ultimate fulfillment in him. He is the Alpha and Omega of the Divine purpose proclaimed in the Word (see Rom 15:8). Logos, however, means more than just a spoken word; it refers to the thought, intention, and purpose revealed through it. This is why Logos is identified with God in John 1:1. The Word reveals Yahweh to humanity, and as such, has been exalted above all His holy name (Psa. 138:2).

Actually the name is revealed for all to know; but the word "knew" (Gr. oida) signifies more than to read the name: it is to know completely, fully, and Christ alone fully comprehends the significance of the name he bears, though we might know it academically. The use of the Greek oida is illustrated in John 8:55: "Ye have not known Him (ginosko — begun to know), but I know Him (oida — know Him fully)."

He is clothed in a robe dipped in blood, and the name by which he is called is The Word (Logos) of God Re 19:13.

The Lord was, is, and will be the complete manifestation of the Law and Prophets: they find absolute fulfilment in him. It is significant, that whereas in the Gospel the title of The Word or The Logos is absolute (John 1:1), here it is qualified, as of God. @David in NJ

This is the sense in which it can be stated that "the word was God." because it was "of God," and not because the Lord was God in the Trinitarian concept of his status. The title is appropriate to the Lord for he "confirmed the promises made unto the fathers" (Rom. 15:8).

So while Christ is "The Word of God" or the full expression of God in a man, Christ can never be God's Logos as he reserves the right alone to use His Logos as He pleases.

"For he (God) has put all things under his (Christ) feet. But when the scripture says, that all things are put under him (Christ), it is evident that he (God) is excepted, who did put all things under him (Jesus)" 1 Cor 15:27

Yahweh God will always be the originator of Logos, which is why you are correct in saying Jesus is not the Logos of God (ultimate sense) because he will always be subject to it. Although care is required, as the Lord Jesus Christ is the Logos of God for this creative age because in him we find the Mind of God concerning His Plan and Purpose with us.

Thank you for your post and I look forward to reading more in the future, God bless

F2F
 
Last edited:

face2face

Well-Known Member
Jun 22, 2015
8,243
1,202
113
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
@Pierac @David in NJ

As a side I would like to leave these words here which I believe captures the essense of this subject:

“The Lord possessed me at the beginning of his work, the first of his acts of old. 23 Ages ago I was set up, at the first, before the beginning of the earth. 24 When there were no depths I was brought forth, when there were no springs abounding with water. 25 Before the mountains had been shaped, before the hills, I was brought forth, 26 before he had made the earth with its fields, or the first of the dust of the world. 27 When he established the heavens, I was there; when he drew a circle on the face of the deep, 28 when he made firm the skies above, when he established the fountains of the deep, 29 when he assigned to the sea its limit, so that the waters might not transgress his command, when he marked out the foundations of the earth, 30 then I was beside him, like a master workman, and I was daily his delight, rejoicing before him always, 31 rejoicing in his inhabited world and delighting in the children of man. Pr 8:22–31.

“Logos” of God’s intention was revealed BEFORE! It did not unfold in circumstances following creation!
 
Last edited:

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
7,003
3,835
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
So here is David's syllogism:

1. Man was created in God's image.
2. Man is spirit and soul and body (1 Thessalonians 5:23). Therefore,
3. God is spirit and soul and body.
In 1 Thess 5, Paul is addressing the congregation of brothers….
In verses 12-14 he says….”Now we request you, brothers, to show respect for those who are working hard among you and presiding over you in the Lord and admonishing you; 13 and to give them extraordinary consideration in love because of their work. Be peaceable with one another. 14 On the other hand, we urge you, brothers, to warn the disorderly, speak consolingly to those who are depressed, support the weak, be patient toward all.”

This is addressed to the body of Christians, not speaking about the body of individuals…..so when he says….”May the God of peace himself sanctify you completely. And may the spirit and soul and body of you brothers, sound in every respect, be preserved blameless at the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ.”….he speaks about the “spirit, soul and body” of the brotherhood.…..not indicating that individuals have three parts that reflect the trinity…..context clears up these inadequate translations that appear to say what they never did.
I guess David thinks God had a body at creation, long before the incarnation of the Son.
I don’t believe David “thinks” a great deal about anything he is shown that might disagree with his firmly held beliefs. No questions asked of him solicits any answers…..I’m sure he wishes he had some, but ignoring them speaks volumes. Especially because he is still stuck on “the Word was a god”, which is perfectly in keeping with the verse in Greek…..he has obviously done no word studies because he never mentions this important fact…the glaring omission of the definite article, identifying one who is divine or has divine authority, but is not deity…….he doesn’t seem to care about anything that fights with his obsession about the trinity.
I think otherwise. I guess David thinks John 4:24 was hiding the ball (or two thirds of it). But I think John 4:24 hit the nail on the head. I suppose David will rush to corral as many anthropomorphisms as he can find (like Isaiah 59:1 for God’s “hand” and “ear,” 2 Chronicles 16:9 for God’s “eyes,” Matthew 4:4 for God’s “mouth,” Deuteronomy 33:27 for God's“arms.”). Let's see.
I don’t think he is convincing anyone with his dire warnings…..he has even tried emotional blackmail……answering some legitimate questions might help his case, but he doesn’t seem to have any legitimate answers…..what’s to see?
More of the same….:no reply:
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheHC

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
7,003
3,835
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
You really need to research Valentinus and the Valentinians.
I have, but remain unimpressed…..there is a reason why the canon stopped at Revelation….nothing that came after John‘s final contribution to Scripture became part of the Holy Scriptures.
Gnosticism destroyed all the good elements of Christianity and presented Christ’s teaching through a gnostic lens. Jesus was not a gnostic….
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheHC

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
18,228
7,599
113
56
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I guess David thinks God had a body at creation, long before the incarnation of the Son. I think otherwise. I guess David thinks John 4:24 was hiding the ball (or two thirds of it). But I think John 4:24 hit the nail on the head.
I confess; I found this post difficult to understand even after reading it a couple of times.

The Bible is a highly figurative book and it takes discernment to know what to take literally. The ancients thought and wrote much more figuratively than we do today. Many accusations of Biblical error flow from this.

When God takes his ‘right hand’ it does not literally mean so; it means he is proceeding in strength to achieve a goal. This is meant to be stronger than mere Providence where things work out a certain way. Compare: David acting crazy to escape an evil king from God parting the Red Sea.
 

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
18,228
7,599
113
56
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Again… Jesus spoke the Logos, He is not the Logos!
Concisely put.

It’s desperate that Trinitarians have to doctrinally invest in a verse that does not even refer to Jesus. IF their take was correct, it would be reflected in countless others verses. In John’s Gospel alone, they have no answer for:

1. Juxtaposition. 3:16 God, not the Father, so loved the world that he gave Jesus. This ubiquitous offsetting makes no sense if their take on John 1:1 is correct.

2. 17:1-3. If Jesus is God, why would Jesus say his Father is the only true God? Also, it contradicts the notion that the HS is God.

3. Purpose statement. 20:31. Here is John explicitly stating why he wrote his Gospel account. This would be the ideal place to insert the trinitarian formula but all it states is the requirement to believe Jesus is God’s Anointed.

Implied is one does not have to believe in the trinity to be saved.
 

David in NJ

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2021
11,796
6,232
113
49
Denville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
So here is David's syllogism:

1. Man was created in God's image.
2. Man is spirit and soul and body (1 Thessalonians 5:23). Therefore,
3. God is spirit and soul and body.

I guess David thinks God had a body at creation, long before the incarnation of the Son. I think otherwise. I guess David thinks John 4:24 was hiding the ball (or two thirds of it). But I think John 4:24 hit the nail on the head. I suppose David will rush to corral as many anthropomorphisms as he can find (like Isaiah 59:1 for God’s “hand” and “ear,” 2 Chronicles 16:9 for God’s “eyes,” Matthew 4:4 for God’s “mouth,” Deuteronomy 33:27 for God's“arms.”). Let's see.
Good Morning,

Genesis Genesis Genesis
Us Our Our
Elohe Elohe Elohe
Abraham Isaac Jacob
Father Son Holy Spirit
Gospel Gospel Gospel
God Jesus Holy Spirit

At that time the disciples came to Jesus, saying, “Who then is greatest in the kingdom of heaven?”

2Then Jesus called a little child to Him, set him in the midst of them, 3and said, “Assuredly, I say to you, unless you are converted and become as little children, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven. 4Therefore whoever humbles himself as this little child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. 5Whoever receives one little child like this in My name receives Me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amigo de christo

David in NJ

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2021
11,796
6,232
113
49
Denville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The word logos appears many, many more times in this very Gospel of John. And nowhere else do the translators capitalize it or use the masculine personal pronoun "he" to agree with it !
The rest of the New Testament is the same. Logos is variously translated as "statement" (Luke 20:20), “question" (Matt 21:24), "preaching" (1 Tim 5:17), "command" (Gal 5:14), "message" (Luke 4:32), "matter" (Acts 15:6), "reason" (Acts 10:29), so there is actually no reason
to make John one say that "the Word" is the person Jesus himself, unless of course the translators are wanting to make a point to. In all cases logos is an “it.”

In the light of this background it is far better to read John's prologue to mean that in the beginning God had a plan, a dream, a grand vision for the world, a reason by which He brought all things into being. This word or plan was expressive of who he is.

"The Word" for John is an “it” not a "he." On one occasion, Jesus is given the name "the word of God" and this is in Revelations 19:13. This name has been given to him after his resurrection and ascension, but we will not find it before his birth. It is not until we come to verse 14 of John's prologue that this logos becomes personal and becomes the son of God, Jesus. "And the Word became flesh." A great plan that God had in his heart from before the creation at last is fulfilled. Be very clear that it does not say that God became flesh.

There is even strong evidence suggesting that John himself reacted to those who were already misusing his gospel Like You to mean that Jesus was himself the Word who had personally preexist the world. When later he wrote his introduction to 1 John, he clearly made the point that what was in the beginning was not a “who” he put it this way: "What was from the beginning, what we have heard, what we have seen with our eyes, what we beheld and our hands handled, concerning the word of life…"

Logos - This word is translated in English as "Word". This word has an actual meaning which has been almost completely lost due to the Greek philosophical interpretation of John 1:1-3 & 14.

who testified to the word of God and to the testimony of Jesus Christ, even to all that he saw. (Rev 1:2)

"I also saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their testimony to Jesus and for the word (logos) of God." (Rev 20:4)

Notice that they were beheaded for their testimony to Jesus AND for the logos of God. Jesus and the word of God are not the same thing.

John 12:48 "He who rejects Me and does not receive My sayings, has one (God) who judges him; the word ( logos ) I spoke is what will judge him at the last day.

Again… Jesus spoke the Logos, as He is not the Logos! So who is the Logos? The very next verse tell us!

Joh 12:49 "For I did not speak on My own initiative, but the Father Himself who sent Me has given Me a commandment as to what to say and what to speak.

Jesus is not our Judge, but our savior!

Joh 3:17 "For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him.

Act 17:30 "Therefore having overlooked the times of ignorance, God is now declaring to men that all people everywhere should repent, 31 because He ( God) has fixed a day in which He will judge the world in righteousness through a Man whom He has appointed, having furnished proof to all men by raising Him from the dead."

Word of God in this verse means God's plan of salvation for us (NAB), i.e. the kingdom of God message. So what does "logos" mean?

Logos - 1. Denotes an internal reasoning process, plan, or intention, as well as an external word. 2. The expression of thought. As embodying a conception or idea (New American Bible (footnote) & Vine’s Expository Dictionary).

So how does the Word (logos) become flesh in John 1:14? Let me use an example which most of us can relate to. We are all familiar with the expression, "was this baby planned?" Let's say it was planned. You and your wife had a plan to have a baby. You had a logos, a plan. Your plan (logos) became flesh the day that your baby was born. In the same way, God's plan of salvation for us became a reality, became flesh, when Jesus was born. This verse is probably one of the biggest culprits in the creation of the trinity. The reason being that to someone educated in Greek philosophy such as the early church fathers of the 3rd, 4th, and 5th, centuries, logos had an entirely different meaning. Tertullian who was responsible for much of the creation of the trinity was a Stoic lawyer. The Stoics defined "logos" as the "divine principle of life." Which is basically a definition of God. With this definition you are going to arrive at a completely different interpretation than what John intended. You will interpret it something like this:

"In the beginning was the divine principle of life, and the divine principle of life was with God, and the divine principle of life was God. Then, the divine principle of life became flesh."

With this definition you arrive at the conclusion that the divine principle of life, which is God, became flesh. Now you have God's essence in two places at once. The explanation for this obvious problem came in the form of the Doctrine of the Trinity. Then you have God's essence in flesh, so the description of Jesus becomes that he is fully God and fully man. These concepts come straight out of Greek philosophy. Greek philosophers believed that man was composed of flesh and a divine spark.

John 12:48 "He who rejects Me and does not receive My sayings, has one who judges him; the word ( logos ) I spoke is what will judge him at the last day.

Again… Jesus spoke the Logos, He is not the Logos!

Glad to be of some help
Jesus and the word of God are not the same thing.
Ignorance is 'bliss' until you die, leave this earth, and the Judgment, from the Word that was God, will Judge you.

Behold, He is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see Him—even those who pierced Him. And all the tribes of the earth will mourn because of Him. So shall it be! Amen.

“I am the Alpha and the Omega,” says the Lord God, who is and was and is to come—the Almighty.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.