You mean languages right?
I do mean languages - I'm using 'tongues' as a technical term to specify the spiritual gift.
Is it true that women appear to be more prone to speaking in tongues than men? I’ve heard this claim, but I cannot verify if it's true or simply an unfounded statement.
Never heard of this before. Women are of course more likely to be Christians in the first place, so in terms of pure numbers one would expect there to be more women with this gift than men. The real question is whether a
higher proportion of Christian women can speak in tongues - and you would need to do a proper survey to find out.
Assuming you are a woman and you believe in the practice of speaking unintelligible utterances, how do you reconcile this with:
But Paul says, "Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church." (1 Cor. 14:34,35)
A lot depends on how you understand this passage, doesn't it! Paul allows women to pray and prophesy in church (I Corinthians 11), so what he's forbidding in chapter 14 isn't participation in the service but idle chatter.
Pentecostal meetings often have multiple people speaking in tongues simultaneously, but Paul instructs that all things should be done "decently and in order" (1 Cor. 14:40). He also states, "If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course..." (1 Cor. 14:27). How do you reconcile this practice with Paul's clear instructions for order and structure in the use of tongues?
F2F
If multiple people are speaking in tongues simultaneously in the expectation of being heard by the entire congregation, that's definitely out of order.
Many Pentecostals (here) consider themselves compelled by the Holy Spirit to "speak in tongues," yet Paul says, "the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets" (1 Cor. 14:32). This implies that the use of spiritual gifts, including speaking in tongues, should be controlled and not dictated by an uncontrolled impulse. How do those who practice this reconcile their experiences with Paul's teaching on order and self-control in the exercise of spiritual gifts?
I feel a gentle urge to speak or pray in tongues (although so far, never during a church service). But the urge isn't uncontrollable.
It is important to note that "glossolalia" (speaking in tongues) also occurs among practitioners of voodoo in Haiti, suggesting that it is not a phenomenon unique to Christianity. This raises the possibility that explanations other than God's Holy Spirit could account for glossolalia. Additionally, glossolalia is now practiced by denominations such as Anglicans and Roman Catholics. Given that Pentecostals view speaking in tongues as an initial sign of Holy Spirit baptism, do they believe these other religious bodies, who practice glossolalia, also hold the truth of the Gospel? This question becomes even more significant when considering the foundational role that speaking in tongues plays in Pentecostal doctrine.
Many other spiritual gifts (healings, miracles, wisdom, and so on) also occur amongst occult practitioners and adherents of other religions. It isn't just tongues. Satan counterfeits the true gifts
(II Thessalonians 2:9) - which is why Paul issues the warning in I Corinthians 12:2,3
"No-one who is speaking by the Spirit of God says, 'Jesus be cursed'". We are required to exercise discernment
(I Thessalonians 5:21), but this seems to be sadly lacking in many charismatic meetings.
Personally, I think that many supposed manifestations of the spiritual gifts today (especially tongues and prophecy) are actually "of the flesh". In other words, people fake them because of social pressure. The teaching that glossolalia
always accompanies Holy Spirit baptism is responsible for a lot of this. It must be very difficult to be a Pentecostal Christian if God doesn't give you the gift of tongues.