I’m amazed at how many cannot grasp this Truth. The first resurrection of the physically dead is to those who are in Christ.
Notice those who are of the first physical resurrection are called blessed and holy…
No one claims that those who have part in the first resurrection are not in Christ, so you're arguing with a strawman in that sense.
What some of us differ with you premils about is not who has part in the first resurrection, but rather what it means exactly for those who are in Christ to have part in the first resurrection. Do you even make any effort at all to understand amillennialism? It doesn't seem like it.
Revelation 20:4-6 King James Version
4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.
6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.”
Also notice in verse 5 it says “But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished”
This clearly states that not ALL the physically dead are raised at the same time.
The dead in Christ rise FIRST as is written, they are the “blessed and holy” who are of the FIRST resurrection.
John 5:28 Marvel not at this: for
the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, 29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.
In this passage Jesus indicated that all of the dead, including the saved and the lost, will be resurrected in the same hour that will come in the future. You either ignore or change the meaning of this scripture to fit your doctrine instead of finding a way to reconcile them both together.
You are interpreting one scripture passage in a way that contradicts others just like you do with Isaiah 65:17-25. You interpret that passage in such a way that clearly contradicts Revelation 21:1-4.
Scripture teaches that Jesus's resurrection was the first resurrection, so that cannot be ignored when interpreting Revelation 20. There isn't more than one first resurrection.
Acts 26:23 That
Christ should suffer, and that he should be the first that should rise from the dead, and should shew light unto the people, and to the Gentiles.
Once you accept what passages like John 5:28-29 and Acts 26:23 clearly teach then you can start to understand what Revelation 20 is about.
In Revelation 20:4 the Greek word translated as "lived" in verse 4 is "zao", but the Greek word translated as "lived...again" in verse 5 in relation to "the rest of the dead" is "anazao". The word "zao" is a word to describe being alive and living one's life. It is not a word used to refer to someone being resurrected. The word "anazao", however, is a word used to describe someone being resurrected. So, you're missing the difference in the context between the references to the dead in Christ and "the rest of the dead" in Revelation 20. Revelation 20:4 is referring to the souls of the dead in Christ being alive and living and reigning with Christ in heaven while "the rest of the dead" only have their resurrection and judgment to look forward to while they are in hell/hades separated from Christ.
Revelation 20 talks about Christ reigning, so can we not use other scripture to help us determine when He started reigning? Of course.
Matthew 28:16 Then the eleven disciples went away into Galilee, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them. 17 And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted. 18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying,
All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.
Ephesians 1:19 And what is the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward who believe, according to the working of his mighty power, 20 Which
he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places, 21 Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come:
22 And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church, 23 Which is his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all.
Colossians 1:12 Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light: 13
Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son:
These scriptures clearly teach that Jesus began reigning after His resurrection and that we are in His kingdom with Him as our king now. We can't just ignore that when interpreting Revelation 20.
You try to reference the scripture that says "the dead in Christ shall rise first" to support your interpretation of Revelation 20, but you blatantly take that verse out of context.
1 Thessalonians 4:14 For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him. 15 For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that
we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep. 16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and
the dead in Christ shall rise first: 17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
The context of the dead in Christ being resurrected first here is not in the sense of the dead in Christ being raised first and then at a much later times the dead who are not in Christ being resurrected. That is not even close to what Paul is saying here. The context of the dead in Christ being raised first is that they first have to be resurrected before they, along with those who are alive and remain, can be caught up together to meet the Lord in the air. As Paul said, "we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep". The dead in Christ and those who are alive and remain are to be caught up together and that can't happen unless the dead in Christ are resurrected first. That is the context of the dead in Christ being resurrected first and that is very clear. But, you are taking that completely out of context in order to make scripture say what you want it to say.
Another thing that needs to be pointed out is what it indicates in Revelation 20:6 about those who have part in the first resurrection.
Revelation 20:6
Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.
I believe this verse implies that one must have part in the first resurrection in order for the second death to have no power over them. Well, we don't need to die and later be bodily resurrected in order for the second death to not have power over us? The second death, which refers to being cast into the lake of fire (Rev 20:14) has no power over us who are saved right now. What does that suggest about the timing of having part in the first resurrection? To me, it suggests that those of us who are saved have had part in the first resurrection. And we all spiritually have part in Christ's resurrection, as scripture teaches (Col 2:12-13, Eph 2:4-6, Romans 6:9-11).
Surely, in the case of the dead in Christ whose souls are now in heaven, the second death has no power over them. So, they do not need to be bodily resurrected in order for the second death to not have power over them. So, having part in the first resurrection cannot be a reference to the future bodily resurrection of the dead in Christ or else Revelation 20:6 would be saying that we'd all have to die and all have to be bodily resurrected in order for the second death to not have power over us. But, that is not the case. Surely, the second death has no power over anyone who belongs to Christ right now, whether they are physically dead or alive. We need to take that into account when interpreting Revelation 20:6.
Also, it says those who have part in the first resurrection are priests of God and of Christ. We are priests of God and of Christ now, as scriptures like Revelation 1:5-6 and 1 Peter 2:9 teach. That should tell you something about the timing of Revelation 20:6.
Revelation 1:5 And from
Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and
the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood, 6 And
hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
So, I interpret Revelation 20 the way I do because I take ALL of scripture into account. I'm not willing to interpret it in such a way that contradicts any other scripture.