God doesn't cast His pearls before swine, He speaks in a way as destroys the pigs.Correct.
Scripture is paradoxical, dialectical, and filled with tension.
J.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
God doesn't cast His pearls before swine, He speaks in a way as destroys the pigs.Correct.
Scripture is paradoxical, dialectical, and filled with tension.
J.
No, I said "IF" it is not also the case you are misled, it's bad enough that you are potentially misleading others.Am I misled? Your rational mind may think so. If the power of sin is the law, it should all make perfect sense.
I think edifices are evidence man believes in erecting their ego under Heaven.Obviously, one truth seems to conflict with another (or else there would be only one Church worldwide with one confession), until you read some more.
Youre going off at a tangent. I know, today, you have not said believers are under law. I don't know why you even mentioned itNo, I said "IF" it is not also the case you are misled, it's bad enough that you are potentially misleading others.
I never said we were under the Law.
The Law produces a righteousness of our own.
We are under Grace.
Grace is God's righteousness at work in us to will and do.
Grace produces conviction in us, revealing God and God's righteousness as we walk in those convictions, inaccurate as they may be.
Irrespectively, the Bible truth must have Bible answer because we bring our suppositions to bear on Scripture--but Scripture must inform and correct us, because Scripture interprets Scripture, and we aren't Scriptural enough at first to understand Scripture.I think edifices are evidence man believes in erecting their ego under Heaven.
I don't believe those egos are able to overshadow God's Spirit of truth. Which exists in all of creation. There is only one truth of and in God. Not many
Ego is what insists there be many. And while there are many of those there is only one God of truth. And God's word does not stutter.
Who said God's D'varim doesn't matter?I think edifices are evidence man believes in erecting their ego under Heaven.
I don't believe those egos are able to overshadow God's Spirit of truth. Which exists in all of creation. There is only one truth of and in God. Not many
Ego is what insists there be many. And while there are many of those there is only one God of truth. And God's word does not stutter.
When you said we were justified by faith alone, I disagreed, saying it was only part of the truth, so I incorporated that idea that faith was always intended to be understood as something that needed to be walked in not only held.Youre going off at a tangent. I know, today, you have not said believers are under law. I don't know why you even mentioned it
If you want to understand Paul's message as to how sin is to be overcome, you would have to accept, he believed we were justified by faith aloneWhen you said we were justified by faith alone, I disagreed, saying it was only part of the truth, and incorporated that idea that faith was always intended to be understood as something that needed to be walked in not only held.
Love this and correct you are-we tend to bring in our own biases and presuppositions especially in the exegesis of Scripture.Irrespectively, the Bible truth must have Bible answer because we bring our suppositions to bear on Scripture--but Scripture must inform and correct us, because Scripture interprets Scripture, and we aren't Scriptural enough at first to understand Scripture.
Not so--Paul was still having to overcome boasting after he was saved, because he continued in walking before/relationship with Christ by faith, and Christ sent a messenger of satan to buffet his body to prevent Paul from boasting. Boasting isn't done away with by "faith alone". Holiness is a process--and it is all by the Law of Faith, walking in faith.If you want to understand Paul's message as to how sin is to be overcome, you would have to accept, he believed we were justified by faith alone
You did?Who said God's D'varim doesn't matter?
J.
If you are referring to 2Cor ch11, he spoke like that for a reason. Nevertheless, Paul's core message hinges on believing you are righteous by faith aloneNot so--Paul was still having to overcome boasting after he was saved, because he continued in relationship with Christ by faith, and Christ sent a messenger of satan to buffet his body to prevent him from boasting. Boasting isn't done away with by "faith alone".
This is where I contend you are only partially correct : the man who believed the Gospel. and was justified by God's righteousness by grace through faith, but does not ALSO WALK in faith is not justified but "condemned" (Ro 14:5, 23) because God is not his righteousness because he isn't in faith.If you are referring to 2Cor ch11, he spoke like that for a reason. Nevertheless, Paul's core message hinges on believing you are righteous by faith alone
This I do agree with:This is where I contend you are only partially correct : the man who believed the Gospel. and was justified by God's righteousness by grace through faith, but does not ALSO WALK in faith is not justified but "condemned" (Ro 14:5, 23) because God is not his righteousness because he isn't in faith.
Hebrews 10:38,39 says nothing but what Romans 14:23 says : if you do things that you doubt are correct, not things you are fully persuaded are correct, you are condemned, because God's [justifying] righteousness is revealed from faith to faith (Ro 1:17), steps of faith (Ro 4:12).
So if a person believes the levitical unclean foods are still unclean and eats them, he is condemned to hell?Hebrews 10:38,39 says nothing but what Romans 14:23 says : if you do things that you doubt are correct, not things you are fully persuaded are correct, you are condemned.
In your book, the guy cannot be condemned, because he has already had faith one time; in my book, I understand that WALKING in faith is what is required, so I can account for how he is condemned for not having God as his righteousness.
Peter came from a Torah background, so, yes, for him, he was bound to that conviction, and he walked by it--however, after a while, God intervened, and introduced greater truth to him, and he understood he was free from that.So if a person believes the levitical unclean foods are still unclean and eats them, he is condemned to hell?
If we disown him,Hebrews 10:38,39 says nothing but what Romans 14:23 says : if you do things that you doubt are correct, not things you are fully persuaded are correct, you are condemned, because God's [justifying] righteousness is revealed from faith to faith (Ro 1:17), steps of faith (Ro 4:12).
In your book, the guy cannot be condemned, because he has already had faith one time; in my book, I understand that WALKING in faith is what is required, so I can account for how he is condemned for not having God as his righteousness.
I didnt mention peter, what is being referred to in the passage you quoted is simply clean/unclean foodsPeter came from a Torah background, so, yes, for him, he was bound to that conviction, and he walked by it--however, after a while, God intervened, and introduced greater truth to him, and he understood he was free from that.
Walking in Faith:Hebrews 10:38,39 says nothing but what Romans 14:23 says : if you do things that you doubt are correct, not things you are fully persuaded are correct, you are condemned, because God's [justifying] righteousness is revealed from faith to faith (Ro 1:17), steps of faith (Ro 4:12).
In your book, the guy cannot be condemned, because he has already had faith one time; in my book, I understand that WALKING in faith is what is required, so I can account for how he is condemned for not having God as his righteousness.