I didn't notice, all is well!!I also wish to apologise most sincerely that l was rather short a few times yesterday. Sorry.
Much love!
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I didn't notice, all is well!!I also wish to apologise most sincerely that l was rather short a few times yesterday. Sorry.
Calling it entire sanctification, l think that we fall back to being sanctified. That is to say that we can not sin deliberately but unable to avoid unintentional sin.Is this at the first instance of Theosis? What happens that Theosis ends? How is it one can be in and out then in to Theosis?
Much love!
I think now that it was the stage of being discipled after being called by God. The EFF call it Purgation, the period when we are trained in holiness or obedienceI'm more interesting in knowing what you call it, what you think was happening, where the Bible describes it, like that.
Much love!
This idea of not being able to stay in it till maturity is the stage before we become pillars in the temple of going in and out no more. Sorry no ref till l get my pc back tomorrow hopefully. And thanks for prayers, the vertigo has gone!Calling it entire sanctification, l think that we fall back to being sanctified. That is to say that we can not sin deliberately but unable to avoid unintentional sin.
I think now that it was the stage of being discipled after being called by God. The EFF call it Purgation, the period when we are trained in holiness or obedience
To be clear, when you say Entire Sanctification, you mean the same thing as when you say, Theosis, is that correct?This idea of not being able to stay in it till maturity is the stage before we become pillars in the temple of going in and out no more. Sorry no ref till l get my pc back tomorrow hopefully. And thanks for prayers, the vertigo has gone!
If what you said was true, then there would not be thousands of denominations. I agree that scripture interprets scripture, but the theology we are drawn to has a huge impact on us. I saw that so clearly when my theology did a flip when seeing Calvinism was ignoring so many texts. We become blind to those scriptures that do not serve us. The early church would not accept anyone who was not in Theosis and having a clear lens in which to interpret.I believe that other source is always the Bible itself.
Paul wrote that after he was gone wolves would come in. I don't think we can look to early - or recent - commentary as though it can settle Scriptural disagreements. I think an open and receptive and prayerful reading of the Bible, and comparing with other passages, settles the matter for us.
I'm very strong on this. The Bible interprets the Bible, and so far I haven't found anything that doesn't work out this way.
Praying for you!!
Much love!
Well sort of. As brother Johann has pointed out the early church had an understanding about sharing in the energies of God. Being partakers of the divine nature, not expected in western doctors of theology.To be clear, when you say Entire Sanctification, you mean the same thing as when you say, Theosis, is that correct?
Much love!
Not necessarily. People have many different reasons for coming to different conclusions.If what you said was true, then there would not be thousands of denominations.
That's assuming we all have a cognitive bias. What if I'm not drawn to a particular theology? What if I'm simply drawn to truth? If I don't care what it is, so long as it's the truth?I agree that scripture interprets scripture, but the theology we are drawn to has a huge impact on us
I never was Calvinist. I've always seen that such teachings are not true to Scripture.. I saw that so clearly when my theology did a flip when seeing Calvinism was ignoring so many texts. We become blind to those scriptures that do not serve us. The early church would not accept anyone who was not in Theosis and having a clear lens in which to interpret.
Partakers of Christ, Partakers of the divine nature, these I recognize, I understand. Sharing in the energies of God, this phrase has no meaning for me. It reminds me more of that we are working out what He is working - ergon - into us.Well sort of. As brother Johann has pointed out the early church had an understanding about sharing in the energies of God. Being partakers of the divine nature, not expected in western doctors of theology.
No theology is perfect, they all have inconsistencies say theologians, at varying degrees, but l believe that if we do a pick and mix, which is what many do these days and may l say without offending, the method you lay out, we are using ourselves as the authority, which is what Protestantism is about ie the boy on the plough with a Bible in his hand. We also often fail to see our own inconsistencies.Not necessarily. People have many different reasons for coming to different conclusions.
That's assuming we all have a cognitive bias. What if I'm not drawn to a particular theology? What if I'm simply drawn to truth? If I don't care what it is, so long as it's the truth?
I never was Calvinist. I've always seen that such teachings are not true to Scripture.
Many are blind to many things for many reasons. But I still come back to, Does the Bible say this or not? I believe the teachings are there, or they are not, and commentary from someone - anyone - won't make a doctrine appear in the Bible if it doesn't. So I'm all about the Bible.
Much love!
A lot of the early writings were apologetics, to keep out the heresies that were forcing themselves into the church. We have to remember this. So they had to use non biblical terminology at times to differentiate the ideas disputed. They made clear that the energies of God were separate from His essence. You cannot understand them without keeping this in mind.Partakers of Christ, Partakers of the divine nature, these I recognize, I understand. Sharing in the energies of God, this phrase has no meaning for me. It reminds me more of that we are working out what He is working - ergon - into us.
That's my complaint about non-biblical terminology, we have to know what is being said. Theosis that ends, is it still theosis? The Energies of God, is that His working in you personally? Is it that you somehow have a stronger spirit being plugged into the power supply?
Partakers of the divine nature . . . I share in His nature, the properties of being that make Him Who He is. I don't become Him, or God, but I share in his nature, so I have inclinations and values and abilities that become like His, patterned after Him, this I can understand, and there is much Scripture that speaks this way.
Much love!
Partakers of the divine nature . . . I share in His nature, the properties of being that make Him Who He is. I don't become Him, or God, but I share in his nature, so I have inclinations and values and abilities that become like His, patterned after Him, this I can understand, and there is much Scripture that speaks this way.
How then would you describe the energies of God using Biblical language?They made clear that the energies of God
Yes, I agree, however, I think the Bible in it's straightfoward reading settles that question. And I'm not sure that it's a different interpretation of born again, but rather when it happens, and how the person is affected by their rebirth. I think different ideas of what is "corrupt flesh" have much to do with our disagreements.We have just seen how two interpretations of born again can change everything.
That which transforms man so that he can partake in the nature of God. I will give it more thought but that's off the top of my head. In my understanding the transformation is the reception of the new nature not a gradual moral improvement. How do you explain the difference between the average believer today and those in the NT?How then would you describe the energies of God using Biblical language?
Much love!
Christ in you is your hope of glory, that is, Christ being in you is why you expect glory.That which transforms man so that he can partake in the nature of God. I will give it more thought but that's off the top of my head. In my understanding the transformation is the reception of the new nature not a gradual moral improvement. How do you explain the difference between the average believer today and those in the NT?
I've come a long way since my Calvinist days
A simple and pure faith. We've had century after century to dissect and debate and defuse doctrine after doctrine until the most common question seems, "Is that what it really says?"That which transforms man so that he can partake in the nature of God. I will give it more thought but that's off the top of my head. In my understanding the transformation is the reception of the new nature not a gradual moral improvement. How do you explain the difference between the average believer today and those in the NT?
I'm posting some passages relating to our transformation. If there are others you think of please post them, so we can look at them.That which transforms man so that he can partake in the nature of God. I will give it more thought but that's off the top of my head. In my understanding the transformation is the reception of the new nature not a gradual moral improvement.
Could it be the unveiling of the new nature that is within us....? and that would seem to fit with Christ in us the hope of glory....? Tearing down/putting to death the old man so that the new man is revealed? Why our corn of wheat must die to produce a crop. The daystar arising in our hearts?That which transforms man so that he can partake in the nature of God. I will give it more thought but that's off the top of my head. In my understanding the transformation is the reception of the new nature not a gradual moral improvement. How do you explain the difference between the average believer today and those in the NT?
Romans 6:3-7 KJVCould it be the unveiling of the new nature that is within us....? and that would seem to fit with Christ in us the hope of glory....? Tearing down/putting to death the old man so that the new man is revealed? Why our corn of wheat must die to produce a crop. The daystar arising in our hearts?