From the OP
In a previous topic we explored why the baptized believers in Samaria hadn't received the Holy Spirit.
Why hadn't the baptized believers in Samaria received the Holy Spirit?
The typical response to the question about the initial evidence of the Baptism with the Holy Spirit, is tongues.
But when I read the book of the Acts of the Apostles, I see it is not limited to tongues.
I conclude that any manifestation of the Holy Spirit could be the initial evidence.
Would you limit the initial evidence to speaking in tongues?
Here are the scriptures that led to my conclusions on this.
Acts 10:46 NIV
For they heard them speaking in tongues[a] and praising God. ...
Acts 19:6 NIV
When Paul placed his hands on them, the Holy Spirit came on them,
and they spoke in tongues[a] and prophesied.
/
In a previous topic we explored why the baptized believers in Samaria hadn't received the Holy Spirit.
Why hadn't the baptized believers in Samaria received the Holy Spirit?
The typical response to the question about the initial evidence of the Baptism with the Holy Spirit, is tongues.
But when I read the book of the Acts of the Apostles, I see it is not limited to tongues.
I conclude that any manifestation of the Holy Spirit could be the initial evidence.
Would you limit the initial evidence to speaking in tongues?
Here are the scriptures that led to my conclusions on this.
Acts 10:46 NIV
For they heard them speaking in tongues[a] and praising God. ...
Acts 19:6 NIV
When Paul placed his hands on them, the Holy Spirit came on them,
and they spoke in tongues[a] and prophesied.
/