Homosexuality: Wrong or Right?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Arthur81

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2023
721
454
63
82
Tampa, Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Over many years I've arrived at the following understanding, striving to be as objective as possible.

"And it came to pass, when he had made an end of speaking unto Saul, that the soul of Jonathan was knit/H7194 qashar with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved/H157 ahab him as his own soul. And Saul took him that day, and would let him go no more home to his father's house. Then Jonathan and David made a covenant, because he loved/H160 ahabah him as his own soul." (1Sam 18:1-3 KJV)

Two Hebrew words are translated "loved" in these verses, ahab and ahabah. Doing a word study of the Hebrew, you find ahab has a broad meaning of love: father to son, man to his wife, love for a particular food, love of man to God, of a slave to his master, etc. That second Hebrew for loved, ahabah when used of human to human love, it is invariably man to woman and Jonathan's love to David. ahabah is even used of the sexual rape of Tamar by Amnon in 2 Sam. 13:15. From Gen. 29:20 up through 2 Chron. 9:8; the word when used of human to human, is either male to female, or Jonathan's love of David. It is also the Hebrew word used in 2 Sam. 1:26.

That KJV word "knit", which is H7194 qashar is revealing when you study it in a literal Hebrew-English Interlinear OT. In the Hebrew, qashar can be modified by gender, either "she" or "he/him". The word is used 44 times in the OT, and many times modified by "he" or "him" and in context it always refers to males. The Hebrew qashar is modified by "she" only three times in the OT -

Gen. 38:28 used of a midwife here

Josh. 2:21 used of Rahab here

1 Sam. 18:1 used of Jonathan's soul knit to David, modified by "she"

The exact phrase "love of women", is found only in 2 Sam. 1:26; only this one occurrence. It does not read "love of wife/wives", but "women". If David meant a platonic love, he could have said "love of brother/father". In 1 Samuel I find the plural "women" used in similar contexts and it leads me to understand an erotic content in 2 Sam. 1:26. See the following -

"Now Eli was very old; and he heard all that his sons did unto all Israel, and how that they lay with the women that did service at the door of the tent of meeting." (1Sam 2:22 ASV)

David speaking, using the word "women":
"And the priest answered David, and said, There is no common bread under my hand, but there is holy bread; if only the young men have kept themselves from women. And David answered the priest, and said unto him, Of a truth women have been kept from us about these three days; when I came out, the vessels of the young men were holy, though it was but a common journey; how much more then to-day shall their vessels be holy?" (1Sam 21:4-5 ASV)

Trying to be as objective, cautious and detailed as possible, I cannot see any other understanding of Jonathan's love for David than involving sexual content. From my readings in psychological studies about male love to male; this does not seem to be uncommon at all. It may not fit with Sunday School religion or our feelings about it; but the language in scripture seems clear.

BUT, in real life for the Christian, a male of exclusive homosexual orientation would experience a lot of difficulties and problems that may not have any perfect solution among the church family. It's probably not a 'one size fits all' answer, and deep, heartfelt prayers with weeping can consume a family if one takes their eyes off Christ! There is NO biblical answer in the liberal churches, or in the LGBTQ movement, and sadly, I see no true and honest answer among evangelicals and fundamentalists.
 

The Learner

Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2022
4,445
1,272
113
68
Brighton
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Over many years I've arrived at the following understanding, striving to be as objective as possible.

"And it came to pass, when he had made an end of speaking unto Saul, that the soul of Jonathan was knit/H7194 qashar with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved/H157 ahab him as his own soul. And Saul took him that day, and would let him go no more home to his father's house. Then Jonathan and David made a covenant, because he loved/H160 ahabah him as his own soul." (1Sam 18:1-3 KJV)

Two Hebrew words are translated "loved" in these verses, ahab and ahabah. Doing a word study of the Hebrew, you find ahab has a broad meaning of love: father to son, man to his wife, love for a particular food, love of man to God, of a slave to his master, etc. That second Hebrew for loved, ahabah when used of human to human love, it is invariably man to woman and Jonathan's love to David. ahabah is even used of the sexual rape of Tamar by Amnon in 2 Sam. 13:15. From Gen. 29:20 up through 2 Chron. 9:8; the word when used of human to human, is either male to female, or Jonathan's love of David. It is also the Hebrew word used in 2 Sam. 1:26.

That KJV word "knit", which is H7194 qashar is revealing when you study it in a literal Hebrew-English Interlinear OT. In the Hebrew, qashar can be modified by gender, either "she" or "he/him". The word is used 44 times in the OT, and many times modified by "he" or "him" and in context it always refers to males. The Hebrew qashar is modified by "she" only three times in the OT -

Gen. 38:28 used of a midwife here

Josh. 2:21 used of Rahab here

1 Sam. 18:1 used of Jonathan's soul knit to David, modified by "she"

The exact phrase "love of women", is found only in 2 Sam. 1:26; only this one occurrence. It does not read "love of wife/wives", but "women". If David meant a platonic love, he could have said "love of brother/father". In 1 Samuel I find the plural "women" used in similar contexts and it leads me to understand an erotic content in 2 Sam. 1:26. See the following -

"Now Eli was very old; and he heard all that his sons did unto all Israel, and how that they lay with the women that did service at the door of the tent of meeting." (1Sam 2:22 ASV)

David speaking, using the word "women":
"And the priest answered David, and said, There is no common bread under my hand, but there is holy bread; if only the young men have kept themselves from women. And David answered the priest, and said unto him, Of a truth women have been kept from us about these three days; when I came out, the vessels of the young men were holy, though it was but a common journey; how much more then to-day shall their vessels be holy?" (1Sam 21:4-5 ASV)

Trying to be as objective, cautious and detailed as possible, I cannot see any other understanding of Jonathan's love for David than involving sexual content. From my readings in psychological studies about male love to male; this does not seem to be uncommon at all. It may not fit with Sunday School religion or our feelings about it; but the language in scripture seems clear.

BUT, in real life for the Christian, a male of exclusive homosexual orientation would experience a lot of difficulties and problems that may not have any perfect solution among the church family. It's probably not a 'one size fits all' answer, and deep, heartfelt prayers with weeping can consume a family if one takes their eyes off Christ! There is NO biblical answer in the liberal churches, or in the LGBTQ movement, and sadly, I see no true and honest answer among evangelicals and fundamentalists.
The Septuagint often translates 'ahabah as agape.

 

GracePeace

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2021
5,443
1,108
113
Southwest, USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Over many years I've arrived at the following understanding, striving to be as objective as possible.

"And it came to pass, when he had made an end of speaking unto Saul, that the soul of Jonathan was knit/H7194 qashar with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved/H157 ahab him as his own soul. And Saul took him that day, and would let him go no more home to his father's house. Then Jonathan and David made a covenant, because he loved/H160 ahabah him as his own soul." (1Sam 18:1-3 KJV)

Two Hebrew words are translated "loved" in these verses, ahab and ahabah. Doing a word study of the Hebrew, you find ahab has a broad meaning of love: father to son, man to his wife, love for a particular food, love of man to God, of a slave to his master, etc. That second Hebrew for loved, ahabah when used of human to human love, it is invariably man to woman and Jonathan's love to David. ahabah is even used of the sexual rape of Tamar by Amnon in 2 Sam. 13:15. From Gen. 29:20 up through 2 Chron. 9:8; the word when used of human to human, is either male to female, or Jonathan's love of David. It is also the Hebrew word used in 2 Sam. 1:26.

That KJV word "knit", which is H7194 qashar is revealing when you study it in a literal Hebrew-English Interlinear OT. In the Hebrew, qashar can be modified by gender, either "she" or "he/him". The word is used 44 times in the OT, and many times modified by "he" or "him" and in context it always refers to males. The Hebrew qashar is modified by "she" only three times in the OT -

Gen. 38:28 used of a midwife here

Josh. 2:21 used of Rahab here

1 Sam. 18:1 used of Jonathan's soul knit to David, modified by "she"

The exact phrase "love of women", is found only in 2 Sam. 1:26; only this one occurrence. It does not read "love of wife/wives", but "women". If David meant a platonic love, he could have said "love of brother/father". In 1 Samuel I find the plural "women" used in similar contexts and it leads me to understand an erotic content in 2 Sam. 1:26. See the following -

"Now Eli was very old; and he heard all that his sons did unto all Israel, and how that they lay with the women that did service at the door of the tent of meeting." (1Sam 2:22 ASV)

David speaking, using the word "women":
"And the priest answered David, and said, There is no common bread under my hand, but there is holy bread; if only the young men have kept themselves from women. And David answered the priest, and said unto him, Of a truth women have been kept from us about these three days; when I came out, the vessels of the young men were holy, though it was but a common journey; how much more then to-day shall their vessels be holy?" (1Sam 21:4-5 ASV)

Trying to be as objective, cautious and detailed as possible, I cannot see any other understanding of Jonathan's love for David than involving sexual content. From my readings in psychological studies about male love to male; this does not seem to be uncommon at all. It may not fit with Sunday School religion or our feelings about it; but the language in scripture seems clear.

BUT, in real life for the Christian, a male of exclusive homosexual orientation would experience a lot of difficulties and problems that may not have any perfect solution among the church family. It's probably not a 'one size fits all' answer, and deep, heartfelt prayers with weeping can consume a family if one takes their eyes off Christ! There is NO biblical answer in the liberal churches, or in the LGBTQ movement, and sadly, I see no true and honest answer among evangelicals and fundamentalists.
All healthy relationships are fundamentally friendships.
A father and a son are friends.
A wife and a husband are friends.
A brother and a brother are friends.

That is real love.

"You are my friends if you do what ever I tell you."

The friendship of Jonathan and David, to David's surprise, was deeper than the friendship that even a man and a woman could have.

Why? A supernatural act of God had knitted their souls so that there was a love for the other as if they were their own self--"Love your neighbor as yourself".

But filthy people see everything as being as filthy as they themselves are. They are deceivers and they deceive others. Nothing is pure to them because they are impure filth. You deserve what you get for abusing God and God's people this way.
 

Prycejosh1987

Member
May 20, 2024
96
43
18
37
Balsall Heath
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
I will be advocating for the side that homosexuality is inherently wrong, and the promotion of such actions and thoughts are evil. Similar or contrasting views are welcome and gladly accepted. Let us be in constant search for the truth during our discussion.
Hate the sin but love the sinner. Take the perspective that we all have struggles and be less judgemental. Come from a place of concern and willingness to engage rather than be constructively insisting. I am not saying accept the gay lifestyle, but i am saying try to see things from their point of view. While confronting the issue.
 

Arthur81

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2023
721
454
63
82
Tampa, Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
All healthy relationships are fundamentally friendships.
A father and a son are friends.
A wife and a husband are friends.
A brother and a brother are friends.

That is real love.

"You are my friends if you do what ever I tell you."

The friendship of Jonathan and David, to David's surprise, was deeper than the friendship that even a man and a woman could have.

Why? A supernatural act of God had knitted their souls so that there was a love for the other as if they were their own self--"Love your neighbor as yourself".

But filthy people see everything as being as filthy as they themselves are. They are deceivers and they deceive others. Nothing is pure to them because they are impure filth. You deserve what you get for abusing God and God's people this way.
"There are people who are pure in their own estimation, yet are not cleansed of their filth. There are people—how haughty are their looks, how disdainful their glances!—" (Prov 30:12-13 REB)
 
  • Wow
Reactions: The Learner

Peterlag

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2022
3,325
964
113
New York
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
"There are people who are pure in their own estimation, yet are not cleansed of their filth. There are people—how haughty are their looks, how disdainful their glances!—" (Prov 30:12-13 REB)
My teachers say there are people that have the seed of the devil and are literally the devils kids like the guys Jesus told the devil was there father. My teachers say those people believe they are pure and the real chosen ones. It would then make sense if my teachers are correct that many of the gay groups would have been started by the seed folks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Learner

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
4,051
2,610
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
My teachers say there are people that have the seed of the devil and are literally the devils kids like the guys Jesus told the devil was there father. My teachers say those people believe they are pure and the real chosen ones. It would then make sense if my teachers are correct that many of the gay groups would have been started by the seed folks.
I would ask what does the Bible say about pride vs. what LGBTQ teaches about pride
 
  • Love
Reactions: The Learner

Arthur81

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2023
721
454
63
82
Tampa, Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I would ask what does the Bible say about pride vs. what LGBTQ teaches about pride
Eze 16:48-50 KJVA "As I live, saith the Lord GOD, Sodom thy sister hath not done, she nor her daughters, as thou hast done, thou and thy daughters. 49 Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy. 50 And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good."
*Over 40 times Ezekiel mentions "abomination", and overwhelmingly in connection with idolatry.

Isa 3:9 KJVA "The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves." * That sounds like the debauchery exhibited in the pride parades

From the Apocryphal historical record of Jewish understanding:

Sirach 16:8 KJVA "Neither spared he the place where Lot sojourned, but abhorred them for their pride." [Sirach was written approx. 200-175 BC]

Wisdom 19:14-17 KJVA "For the Sodomites did not receive those, whom they knew not when they came: but these brought friends into bondage, that had well deserved of them. 15 And not only so, but peradventure some respect shall be had of those, because they used strangers not friendly: 16 But these very grievously afflicted them, whom they had received with feastings, and were already made partakers of the same laws with them. 17 Therefore even with blindness were these stricken, as those were at the doors of the righteous man: when, being compassed about with horrible great darkness, every one sought the passage of his own doors." [Wisdom was written approx. 50 BC]
 
  • Love
Reactions: The Learner

Behold

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2020
20,334
8,129
113
Netanya or Pensacola
Faith
Christian
Country
Israel
I challenged the erroneous teaching that the Bible condemns any and all forms of gay love with sexual intimacy.

You are teaching that sexual intimacy, as committed by 2 gay males or females, is your idea of "LOVE">

So, as you keep teaching this nonsense, ive concluded that in your head, in your mind.. you see sexual intimacy, as "LOVE".

Gay SEX = LOVE, according to @Arthur81

Well, According to God, you are lying, and id say its because you are extremely confused and deceived..., as you seem to believe that sexual intimacy is "LOVE".
And that is what the world teaches.........because that is Satan's definition of love.

God's definition is ""charity, compassion, and self sacrifice"", and you dont have to have "sexual intimacy" to have that type of REAL Love that is God's Love that the born again are to exist within.
 
  • Love
Reactions: The Learner

Arthur81

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2023
721
454
63
82
Tampa, Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You are teaching that sexual intimacy, as committed by 2 gay males or females, is your idea of "LOVE">

So, as you keep teaching this nonsense, ive concluded that in your head, in your mind.. you see sexual intimacy, as "LOVE".

Gay SEX = LOVE, according to @Arthur81

Well, According to God, you are lying, and id say its because you are extremely confused and deceived..., as you seem to believe that sexual intimacy is "LOVE".
And that is what the world teaches.........because that is Satan's definition of love.

God's definition is ""charity, compassion, and self sacrifice"", and you dont have to have "sexual intimacy" to have that type of REAL Love that is God's Love that the born again are to exist within.
Your reply is typical of your nasty spirit! You attack the doctrines of Augustine, Luther and Calvin in the same perverted manner as you have misrepresented what I have written! I've never equated sexual intimacy in itself as love. Context indicates meaning.

Just as with or similar to your attacks on Calvinists or 'TULIP', you have not demonstrated how or where you think I have distorted or misinterpreted a verse of God. You merely sling about slanderous accusations without giving the evidence or particular instance of your accusations.

As I've thought in the past, trying to have a profitable or edifying discussion with you is a waste of time, but for the benefit of those seriously wishing to consider other views, check the following:

The verse about Amnon's rape of Tamar where two Hebrew words for love are used:

"Then Amnon hated her exceedingly; so that the hatred wherewith he hated her was greater than the love wherewith he had loved(H157) her. And Amnon said unto her, Arise, be gone." (2Sam 13:15 KJV)

Strong's H157 אָהֵב אָהַב ’âhab ’âhêb aw-hab', aw-habe'
A primitive root; to have affection for (sexually or otherwise):—(be-) love (-d, -ly, -r), like, friend.

2 Samuel 13:15 as translated in the Greek Septuagint -

και And εμίσησεν [2 detested αυτήν 3 her Αμνών 1 Amnon] μίσος with an [3 hatred μέγα 2 great σφόδρα 1 exceedingly]; ότι for so μέγα great το was the μίσος hatred ο which εμίσησεν he detested αυτήν her, υπέρ that it was above την the αγάπην love ην which ηγάπησεν he loved αυτήν her. και And είπεν [2 said αυτή 3 to her Αμνών 1 Amnon], ανάστηθι Rise up και and πορεύου go! (2Sam 13:15 ABP)

That first word for love in the Greek is agape and the second is agapao.
 
  • Love
Reactions: The Learner

RLT63

Well-Known Member
Apr 24, 2022
4,051
2,610
113
Montgomery
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Your reply is typical of your nasty spirit! You attack the doctrines of Augustine, Luther and Calvin in the same perverted manner as you have misrepresented what I have written! I've never equated sexual intimacy in itself as love. Context indicates meaning.

Just as with or similar to your attacks on Calvinists or 'TULIP', you have not demonstrated how or where you think I have distorted or misinterpreted a verse of God. You merely sling about slanderous accusations without giving the evidence or particular instance of your accusations.

As I've thought in the past, trying to have a profitable or edifying discussion with you is a waste of time, but for the benefit of those seriously wishing to consider other views, check the following:

The verse about Amnon's rape of Tamar where two Hebrew words for love are used:

"Then Amnon hated her exceedingly; so that the hatred wherewith he hated her was greater than the love wherewith he had loved(H157) her. And Amnon said unto her, Arise, be gone." (2Sam 13:15 KJV)

Strong's H157 אָהֵב אָהַב ’âhab ’âhêb aw-hab', aw-habe'
A primitive root; to have affection for (sexually or otherwise):—(be-) love (-d, -ly, -r), like, friend.

2 Samuel 13:15 as translated in the Greek Septuagint -

και And εμίσησεν [2 detested αυτήν 3 her Αμνών 1 Amnon] μίσος with an [3 hatred μέγα 2 great σφόδρα 1 exceedingly]; ότι for so μέγα great το was the μίσος hatred ο which εμίσησεν he detested αυτήν her, υπέρ that it was above την the αγάπην love ην which ηγάπησεν he loved αυτήν her. και And είπεν [2 said αυτή 3 to her Αμνών 1 Amnon], ανάστηθι Rise up και and πορεύου go! (2Sam 13:15 ABP)

That first word for love in the Greek is agape and the second is agapao.
Where in the Bible do you find that it approves of pre-marital sex or same sex marriage?
Since you say it doesn’t condemn a loving relationship between two adults of the same sex do you mean outside of marriage?
I haven’t read the whole thread so I apologize if you have already answered these questions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Learner

MA2444

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2024
3,840
1,986
113
62
Columbus Ohio
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
No one has ever demonstrated from a close and in depth examination of scripture, where God condemns two males in a loving and sexually intimate relationship.

Isn't it right here?

Leviticus 18:22
22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.../KJV

If you care to read a more modern translation, let look at the same verse in the NLT Bible:

Leviticus 18:22
22 “Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin.../NLT

There's more than this one too. But this is enough to blow your theory out of the water. Seems to be very clear and easy to understand.
 

BlessedPeace

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2023
5,917
4,613
113
Bend
youtube.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You are teaching that its 'mentally" healthy for the Homosexual to continue to have homosexual sex.
Many false teachings here.
God condemns all homosexual sex acts.
Those who claim otherwise could be gay. Though that is no excuse. They approve and or judge pardonable what God judges as abomination.
And God would not approve.
 

BlessedPeace

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2023
5,917
4,613
113
Bend
youtube.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I challenged the erroneous teaching that the Bible condemns any and all forms of gay love with sexual intimacy. ...
The serpent challenged God's command to Adam to not eat of the tree of knowledge.

The serpent knew the commandment. He also knew Adam and Eve were naive and easily misled for lack of knowledge.

However here in this garden forum the serpent meets those who do know the scripture.
And when he claims gay sex is not condemned by God in God's word, we who are in Christ are righteous in calling that serpent a liar.
As he was in the beginning and unto this day.

Leviticus 20:13
If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.

1 Corinthians 6:9-11
Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

Romans 1:26-27
For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.

Jude 1:7Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.
 

BlessedPeace

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2023
5,917
4,613
113
Bend
youtube.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Christians here should be aware by now that gays will attempt to insist they are just fine being in gay sexual relationships.
Remember the one Tin Man that was a vocal LGBTQ proponent?

Gays have websites. And even their own gay Bible.

 
Last edited:

Taken

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2018
27,359
14,803
113
United States
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Fads are nothing new …. From:
Apparel to
Footwear to
Slang to
Gadgets to
Decor to
Toys to
TV programing to
Music to
Entertainment to
Bizarre Behaviors to
On and on….

And sadly from newborn, to toddler, to very young children, to youths…. Their eyes and ears are NOT sheltered or protected from the incredible amount of 24-7 influential utter garbage, and in many cases is laughingly encouraged as “entertainment”, by the same who should Be Protecting them.

And to add to the mix, adults by “age”, but not in maturity or wisdom, mimicking teens and young adults in their faddish crazes…

I don’t see homosexuality, as much different, getting caught up in an acceptable behavior (among their immature peers) and getting stuck there. It has exploded to a loud in your face demand to accept their utter ridiculous nonsense…and supposed mature responsible adults, falling for and pandering to their nonsense, to me, is the phenomenon.