Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yup! And you belaboring the point changes nothing.And yet you wrote that anyone at your door knocking who was not invited is acting rudely?
Sorry but your thinking is speculative and seems like an endless discussion with no use.
Yup! And you belaboring the point changes nothing.
I can see your "thinking" in your post#161.My thinking is that we should listen to the Lord - and that to you is "no use"???
Or perhaps you think it "speculative"?
On occasion, I will ask the question:I liked the post - it does seem like that is how we often treat the Lord!
That’s where you are flat out wrong. People are invited not coerced into the kingdom. ‘believe as I do are you going burn in hell’ is not love but coercion.I can only guess that commandment really bothers you, since it is Him (the Eternal One) talking at the door
Not sure what you mean by a "closed system" since PE is open to reaching out to the world even though not the best approach.As I have said often, "I was raised Protestant evangelical." --- A closed system.
Which had an odd antithetical twist. You can't DO evangelism without talking to the "lost". (those outside the closed system)
And only mature evangelicals were even allowed to do it, for fear you might be talked out of the system.
Evangelism was a "required" activity that involved talking AT the "lost", not talking WITH the "lost".
People became projects. And if the "project" seemed like a waste of time,
you could "shake the dust off your feet" and absolve yourself of any responsibility toward them.
(their blood not being on your hands)
In preparation for talking at the "lost" projects, we were armed with Christian Apologetics. (counter-arguments)
You were bound to encounter resistance to the "message" from the closed system.
The "success" of the evangelist depended on the strength of their counter-arguments.
Much more to say about this. Everyone and everything outside the closed system was held in suspicion.
Which required negative opinions about all of those things, so as to assure keeping a safe distance.
I was wondering, how many others have had similar experiences with church, or Christianity in general?
Or...
Thoughts from those who would defend Christianity, or a church, as a closed system. Seeing value in it.
/
I can see your "thinking" in your post#161.
I wonder why there is so much intolerance here with JWs and disrespectful mockers like yourself are freely posting in the forum with nobody question their behavior and their propagation of anti-Christian ideas.
Are you a sponsor of the website and do you have free rein to make fun of Christians here?
Sorry but your thinking is speculative and seems like an endless discussion with no use.
... or about Christendom in general:If we consider the faith taught by Jesus and his original followers as the body that defines true Christianity, then it may be considered somewhat more "closed", although that does not prevent the group or community that reflects that true Christianity, have an improved understanding of things that they previously interpreted somewhat differently. So in any case, it would never be a system open to outsiders to give their opinion regarding internal matters, nor so closed that it cannot be reviewed by the people who internally have that responsibility.
Matt. 24:45 “Who really is the faithful and discreet slave whom his master appointed over his domestics, to give them their food at the proper time? 46 Happy is that slave if his master on coming finds him doing so! 47 Truly I say to you, he will appoint him over all his belongings."
The community "closed" to the public in a doctrinal sense is the house that the correct steward looks after... not any other outside group fed by someone different . No neighbor has any right or authority over one's family's needs.
It's Ok with me."Christianity" is a very ambiguous term which can refer to many different bodies of doctrines and practices, so it can't be considered a "closed system".
Every topic lists the originator under the title. Nothing automatic about it. Every one handcrafted for our readers.PS: I don't know why I have the impression that most of the threads opened on this forum are automatic and only created to generate traffic.
Endless discussion with no end. You don't know me; Jesus does.
I don't care what you think about me, so don't make the thread something personal.
If you don't like my comment:
... or about Christendom in general:
It's Ok with me.
True Christian INDIVIDUALS, in a closed system or not, always have to be learning, because they can never know everything.
This is my last post in this thread.
PS: I don't know why I have the impression that most of the threads opened on this forum are automatic and only created to generate traffic. The truth is that if any honest Christian is behind this lack of respect for God's affairs, he should consider that more important than money is having God's approval... and to have that we all have to learn to respect Him.
From the OP.
As I have said often, "I was raised Protestant evangelical." --- A closed system.
Which had an odd antithetical twist. You can't DO evangelism without talking to the "lost". (those outside the closed system)
And only mature evangelicals were even allowed to do it, for fear you might be talked out of the system.
Evangelism was a "required" activity that involved talking AT the "lost", not talking WITH the "lost".
People became projects. And if the "project" seemed like a waste of time,
you could "shake the dust off your feet" and absolve yourself of any responsibility toward them.
(their blood not being on your hands)
In preparation for talking at the "lost" projects, we were armed with Christian Apologetics. (counter-arguments)
You were bound to encounter resistance to the "message" from the closed system.
The "success" of the evangelist depended on the strength of their counter-arguments.
Much more to say about this. Everyone and everything outside the closed system was held in suspicion.
Which required negative opinions about all of those things, so as to assure keeping a safe distance.
I was wondering, how many others have had similar experiences
with church, or Christianity in general?
Or...
Thoughts from those who would defend Christianity,
or a church, as a closed system. Seeing value in it.
Theistic Agnosticism - The honesty to admit we don't know everything
This term came up this morning in a discussion over coffee. I thought it worth discussing further. Being raised in the church, I was held in a bubble of "we have all the answers." Now that I am an adult, I realize the reason for that. We DIDN'T have all the questions. I know, I know... (who...www.christianityboard.com
[
Mt 5:48 | Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect (complete) Who among us, within or without, any 'closed system' is already there? That is... as perfect [or complete] as God is? |
Yes.
Mt 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect (complete) Who among us, within or without, any 'closed system' is already there? That is... as perfect [or complete] as God is?
Thoughts from those who would defend Christianity, or a church, as a closed system. Seeing value in it.
This is an extension of a previous topic.
Theistic Agnosticism - The honesty to admit we don't know everything
This term came up this morning in a discussion over coffee. I thought it worth discussing further. Being raised in the church, I was held in a bubble of "we have all the answers." Now that I am an adult, I realize the reason for that. We DIDN'T have all the questions. I know, I know... (who...www.christianityboard.com
As I have said often, "I was raised Protestant evangelical." --- A closed system.
Which had an odd antithetical twist. You can't DO evangelism without talking to the "lost". (those outside the closed system)
And only mature evangelicals were even allowed to do it, for fear you might be talked out of the system.
Evangelism was a "required" activity that involved talking AT the "lost", not talking WITH the "lost".
People became projects. And if the "project" seemed like a waste of time,
you could "shake the dust off your feet" and absolve yourself of any responsibility toward them.
(their blood not being on your hands)
In preparation for talking at the "lost" projects, we were armed with Christian Apologetics. (counter-arguments)
You were bound to encounter resistance to the "message" from the closed system.
The "success" of the evangelist depended on the strength of their counter-arguments.
Much more to say about this. Everyone and everything outside the closed system was held in suspicion.
Which required negative opinions about all of those things, so as to assure keeping a safe distance.
I was wondering, how many others have had similar experiences with church, or Christianity in general?
Or...
Thoughts from those who would defend Christianity, or a church, as a closed system. Seeing value in it.
"Christianity as a Closed System"
Well it certainly doesn't include gays. Jesus said so.