The Coming Global Mandates of Evildoers - Ready for the Harvest?!

[APAK]

Musk has claimed the machine could make implanting Neuralink's electrodes as easy as LASIK eye surgery. While this is a bold claim, neuroscientists previously told Insider in 2019 that the machine has some very promising features.

Andrew Hires, a neurologist at the University of Southern California, highlighted a feature, which would automatically adjust the needle to compensate for the movement of a patient's brain, as the brain moves during surgery along with a person's breathing and heartbeat.

The robot as it currently stands is eight feet tall, and while Neuralink is developing its underlying technology its Woke Studios crafted its design.

In 2020, Neuralink showed off one of its chips embedded in a pig named Gertrude.​

The Neuralink device in Gertrude's brain transmitted live data during the demo as she snuffled around. Neuralink/YouTube

The demonstration was proof of concept and showed how the chip was able to accurately predict the positioning of Gertrude's limbs when she was walking on a treadmill, as well as recording neural activity when the pig snuffled about for food. Musk said the pig had been living with the chip embedded in her skull for two months.


"In terms of their technology, 1,024 channels is not that impressive these days, but the electronics to relay them wirelessly is state-of-the-art, and the robotic implantation is nice," Andrew Jackson, an expert in neural interfaces at Newcastle University, said.
"This is solid engineering, but mediocre neuroscience," he said.

Jackson told Insider following the 2020 presentation that the wireless relay from the Neuralink chip could potentially have a big impact on the welfare of animal test subjects in science, as most neural interfaces currently in use on test animals involve wires poking out through the skin.

"Even if the technology doesn't do anything more than we're able to do at the moment — in terms of number of channels or whatever — just from a welfare aspect for the animals, I think if you can do experiments with something that doesn't involve wires coming through the skin, that's going to improve the welfare of animals," he said.

Neuralink went a step further with its animal demos in April 2021, when it showed off a monkey playing video games with its mind.​

Neuralink released video of a macaque monkey named Pager playing video games such as "Pong" for banana-smoothie rewards.

Pager played the games using a joystick that was disconnected from the games console, meaning he was controlling the cursor using his brain signals as his arm moved.

Elon Musk likes to boast Neuralink can let monkeys control computers with their brain signals, but neuroscientists don't see this as a big deal.​

Elon Musk monkey Vachira Vachira/NurPhoto via Getty Images/Pool/Getty Images

------------------------continued below--------------

 

[APAK]

Elon Musk excitedly announced in a 2019 presentation that Neuralink had successfully implanted its chip into a monkey. "A monkey has been able to control a computer with its brain, just FYI," he said, which appeared to take Neuralink president Max Hodak by surprise. "I didn't realize we were running that result today, but there it goes," said Hodak.

Musk reiterated the claim in February 2021, two months ahead of the video demonstration.
Neuroscientists speaking to Insider in 2019 said that while the claim might grab the attention of readers, they did not find it surprising or even particularly impressive.

"The monkey is not surfing the internet. The monkey is probably moving a cursor to move a little ball to try to match a target,"said Professor Andrew Hires, an assistant professor of neurobiology at the University of California, said.

Implanting primates with neural-brain interfaces that let them control objects on screens has been done before. Professor Andrew Jackson of the University of Newcastle told Insider in April 2021 that researchers first pioneered this kind of tech in 2002 — but arguably its origins go all the way back to the 1960s.

An animal-rights group filed a complaint against Neuralink in February 2022 over the treatment of the monkeys used in its research.​

Neuralink used rhesus macaque monkeys (not pictured). EAN-FRANCOIS MONIER/AFP/Getty Images

In February 2022, animal-rights group the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine said it had submitted a complaint to the US Department of Agriculture after obtaining more than 700 pages of documents relating to monkeys used in Neuralink research at the University of California at Davis between 2017 and 2020.

The group obtained the documents, which included veterinary records and necropsy reports, via a public records request. It said they indicated 23 monkeys had experienced "extreme suffering as a result of inadequate animal care and the highly invasive experimental head implants during the experiments."

A UC Davis spokesperson told Insider that during its research collaboration with Neuralink, "research protocols were thoroughly reviewed and approved by the campus's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee."

The spokesperson said the collaboration between Neuralink and UC Davis ended in 2020.

"We strive to provide the best possible care to animals in our charge. Animal research is strictly regulated and UC Davis follows all applicable laws and regulations including those of the US Department of Agriculture," they said.

Neuralink refuted accusations from an animal-rights group that its test monkeys were mistreated.​

"At Neuralink, we are absolutely committed to working with animals in the most humane and ethical way possible," Neuralink said in a blog post.

Neuralink said it had kept its monkeys at UC Davis while it built its own animal housing facility.

"While the facilities and care at UC Davis did and continue to meet federally mandated standards, we absolutely wanted to improve upon these standards as we transitioned animals to our in-house facilities," Neuralink said.

It said it opened a 6,000 square-feet vivarium for its monkeys and "farm animals" in 2020. It said its animal enclosures contain "environmental enrichments" including pools, swings, and treehouses.

Although none of the tech Neuralink has showcased so far has been particularly groundbreaking, neuroscientists are impressed with how well it's been able to bundle up existing technologies.​

Elon Musk presenting during the 2020 demo. Neuralink YouTube

"All the technology that he showed has been already developed in some way or form, [...] Essentially what they've done is just package it into a nice little form that then sends data wirelessly," Dr. Jason Shepherd, an associate professor of neurobiology at the University of Utah, told Insider following the company's 2020 demonstration.

"If you just watched this presentation, you would think that it's coming out of nowhere, that Musk is doing this magic, but in reality, he's really copied and pasted a lot of work from many, many labs that have been working on this," he added.

---------------continued below------​

 

[APAK]

Elon Musk said Neuralink hopes to start implanting its chips in humans in 2022 — two years later than he'd originally envisaged.​

Britta Pedersen-Pool/Getty Images

Speaking at The Wall Street Journal CEO Council Summit on December 6, 2021, Musk said Neuralink hoped to start human testing the following year pending Food and Drug Administration approval.

He repeated the claim on Twitter.

"Progress will accelerate when we have devices in humans (hard to have nuanced conversations with monkeys) next year," Musk tweeted.
This isn't the first time Musk has set a timeline for getting Neuralink's chips into humans.

Musk said during an appearance on "The Joe Rogan Experience" podcast in May 2020 that Neuralink could begin testing on human subjects within a year. He made the same claim during an interview on Clubhouse in February 2021.

In 2019, Musk said the company hoped to get a chip into a human patient by the end of 2020.

Experts voiced doubt about this timeline at the time, as part of safety testing a neural interface device involves implanting it in an animal test subject (normally a primate) and leaving it there for an extended amount of time to test its longevity — as any chip would have to stay in a human patient's brain for a lifetime.

"You can't accelerate that process. You just have to wait — and see how long the electrodes last. And if the goal is for these to last decades, it's hard to imagine how you're going to be able to test this without waiting long periods of time to see how well the devices perform," Jacob Robinson, a neuroengineer at Rice University, told STAT News in 2019.

Neuralink cofounder and president Max Hodak left the company in April 2021. In February 2022 he revealed he'd invested in a rival.​

Hodak announced on May 1, 2021, that he'd left Neuralink a few weeks previously, tweeting that he remained a "huge cheerleader" for the company.

In February 2022, Hodak published a blog post saying he'd been serving as an advisor to Synchron, a rival biotech company that beat Neuralink to human trials with its own neural interface technology.

Hodak also announced he'd invested in Synchron and told Bloomberg in an email: "I really don't want this to be construed as a knock on Neuralink."

"I'm sure they will also get into humans soon too," Hodak told Bloomberg.

In November 2021 Musk had twins with Neuralink director of operations and special projects Shivon ZIlis.​

Insider obtained court documents which showed Musk and Zillis had petitioned to change the childrens' names to "have their father's last name and contain their mother's last name as part of their middle name."

Zillis previously worked at Tesla as a project director on the company's autopilot and chip design teams, and was on Forbes' 30 Under 30 list in 2015.

Musk has nine known children including his twins with Zillis.

-----------continued below---------

 

[APAK]

In the near-term, a chip in someone's brain could help treat neurological disorders like Parkinson's.​

Close-up footage of the needle on Neuralink's brain surgery robot. Neuralink

Improved neural interface technology like Neuralink's could help better study and treat severe neurological conditions such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's.

Professor Andrew Hires said another application could be allowing people to control robotic prostheses with their minds.

"The first application you can imagine is better mental control for a robotic arm for someone who's paralyzed," Hires said in a 2019 interview with Insider, adding that the electrodes in a patient's brain could potentially reproduce the sensation of touch, allowing the patient to exert finer motor control over a prosthetic limb.

Neuralink hinted its chip's first real-world application would be giving quadriplegic people the ability to control phones and laptops.​

Neuralink announced it had raised a $205 million series C funding round from investors including Google's GV (formerly Google Ventures) on July 29, 2021.

As part of its announcement, the company said its chip's first commercial application could be to help quadriplegic people. Quadriplegia is partial or full paralysis in all four limbs.

"The first indication this device is intended for is to help quadriplegics regain their digital freedom by allowing users to interact with their computers or phones in a high bandwidth and naturalistic way. The funds from the round will be used to take Neuralink's first product to market and accelerate the research and development of future products," Neuralink said in a blog post.

During The Wall Street Journal CEO Council Summit in December 2021, Musk said the first humans into whom Neuralink hopes to implant its devices are people who: "have severe spinal cord injuries like tetraplegics, quadriplegics."
Tetraplegia is another term for quadriplegia.

Elon Musk also says that in the long term, Neuralink's chip could be used to meld human consciousness with artificial intelligence — though experts are skeptical of this.​

Yasin Ozturk/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

Although Musk has touted the near-term applications of Neuralink, he often links the company up with his fears about artificial intelligence. Musk has said that he thinks humanity will be able to achieve "symbiosis with artificial intelligence" using technology developed by Neuralink.

Musk told "Artificial Intelligence" podcast host Lex Fridman in 2019 that Neuralink was "intended to address the existential risk associated with digital superintelligence."

"We will not be able to be smarter than a digital supercomputer, so, therefore, if you cannot beat 'em, join 'em," Musk added.
Musk has made lots of fanciful claims about the enhanced abilities Neuralink could confer. In 2020 Musk said people would "save and replay memories" like in "Black Mirror," or telepathically summon their car.

Experts have expressed doubts about these claims.

"Not to say that that won't happen, but I think that the underlying neuroscience is much more shaky. We understand much less about how those processes work in the brain, and just because you can predict the position of the pig's leg when it's walking on a treadmill, that doesn't then automatically mean you'll be able to read thoughts," Prof. Andrew Jackson told Insider in 2020.

In 2019 Prof. Andrew Hires said Musk's claims about merging with AI is where he goes off into "aspirational fantasy land."

Musk's also made dubious claims about the medical applications of Neuralink's tech. At one point he claimed the technology could "solve autism."​

During an appearance on the "Artificial Intelligence" podcast with Lex Fridman in November 2019, Elon Musk said Neuralink could in future "solve a lot of brain-related diseases," and named autism and schizophrenia as examples.

Autism is classified as a developmental disorder, not a disease, and the World Health Organization describes schizophrenia as a mental disorder.

One neuroscientist told Insider there are big ethical problems with the idea of performing brain surgery for anything other than essential treatment.​

Dr. Rylie Green of Imperial College London told Insider in 2019 that the notion of performing brain surgery on a healthy person is deeply troubling.

"To get any of these devices into your brain [...] is very, very high-risk surgery," she said. "People do it because they have severe limitations and there is a potential there to improve their life. Doing it for fun is not a great idea," she added.

In January 2024, Musk claimed Neuralink's first human patient received one of the company's brain implants.​

Elon Musk cofounded Neuralink in 2016. NurPhoto

In a post on X, Musk claimed that the first human patient received a Neuralink brain implant.

Musk said the patient was "recovering well," and early results "show promising neuron spike detection."

He said in a follow-up post the first product was called Telepathy, adding that the device "enables control of your phone or computer, and through them almost any device, just by thinking. Initial users will be those who have lost the use of their limbs."

 

[mailmandan]

New Hampshire Town Alarmed Due to the Opening of a New "Diaper Spa" Where Adults Wear Diapers and Pretend to be Babies | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

A controversial business has recently opened its doors in Atkinson, New Hampshire, igniting a mix of curiosity and concern among the town’s residents.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Things just keep getting weirder and weirder.

 

[APAK]

 

[APAK]

Racket News​

Financial Big Brother is Watching You​

A brief note on an overlooked nightmare.​

MATT TAIBBI
FEB 7, 2024




The U.S. Treasury might be the state’s next major surveillance player.

A few weeks ago, Ohio congressman and Judiciary Committee chairman Jim Jordan’s office released a letter to Noah Bishoff, the former director of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, an arm of the Treasury Department. Jordan’s team was asking Bishoff for answers about why FinCEN had “distributed slides, prepared by a financial institution,” detailing how other private companies might use MCC transaction codes to “detect customers whose transactions may reflect ‘potential active shooters.’” The slide suggested the “financial company” was sorting for terms like “Trump” and “MAGA,” and watching for purchases of small arms and sporting goods, or purchases in places like pawn shops or Cabela’s, to identify financial threats.
Jordan’s letter to Bishoff went on:

According to this analysis, FinCEN warned financial institutions of “extremism” indicators that include “transportation charges, such as bus tickets, rental cars, or plane tickets, for travel to areas with no apparent purpose,” or “the purchase of books (including religious texts) and subscriptions to other media containing extremist views.”

During the Twitter Files, we searched for snapshots of the company’s denylist algorithms, i.e. whatever rules the platform was using to deamplify or remove users. We knew they had them, because they were alluded to often in documents (a report on the denylist is_Russian, which included Jill Stein and Julian Assange, was one example). However, we never found anything like the snapshot Jordan’s team just published:


The highlighted portion shows how algorithmic analysis works in financial surveillance. First compile a list of naughty behaviors, in the form of MCC codes for guns, sporting goods, and pawn shops. Then, create rules: $2,500 worth of transactions in the forbidden codes, or a number showing that more than 50% of the customer’s transactions are the wrong kind, might trigger a response.

The Committee wasn’t able to specify what the responses were in this instance, but from previous experience covering anti-money-laundering (AML) techniques at banks like HSBC, a good guess would be generation of something like Suspcious Activity Reports, which can lead to a customer being debanked.

If Facebook, Twitter, and Google have already shown a tendency toward wide-scale monitoring of speech and the use of subtle levers to apply pressure on attitudes, financial companies can use records of transactions to penetrate individual behaviors far more deeply. Especially if enhanced by AI, a financial history can give almost any institution an immediate, unpleasantly accurate outline of anyone’s life, habits, and secrets. Worse, they can couple that picture with a powerful disciplinary lever, in the form of the threat of closed accounts or reduced access to payment services or credit. Jordan’s slide is a picture of the birth of the political credit score.
There’s more coming on this, and other articles forthcoming (readers who’ve noticed it’s been quiet around here will soon find out why). While the world falls to pieces over Tucker, Putin, and Ukraine, don’t overlook this horror movie. If banks and the Treasury are playing the same domestic spy game that Twitter and Facebook have been playing with the FBI, tales like the frozen finances of protesting Canadian truckers won’t be novelties for long. As is the case with speech, where huge populations have learned to internalize censorship rules almost overnight, we may soon have to learn the hard way that even though some behaviors aren’t illegal, they can still be punished with great effectiveness, in a Terminator-like world where computers won’t miss anything that moves.

What a crazy time we live in! See you from the Nevada caucus, and watch this space for other news soon.

 

[APAK]

Bizarre: Woman Claims She’s Victim of MKUltra-Style Ritual Sex Abuse, Torture in Viral X Post​

by Adan Salazar
February 13th 2024, 1:51 pm

'From birth to 11 years old I was involved in Mkultra-type programs,' alleges woman in intriguing X post.


A female X user alleges she suffered MK Ultra-style ritual sex abuse and torture at the hands of her father, who she claims trafficked her to pedophile groups throughout the country.

In a viral X post viewed over 1.6 million times, a woman who says she’s Hollywood actress Mena Suvari’s ex-stepsister (@StellarFox16) accuses her father of trafficking her to pedophiles in Alabama, Disneyland, Las Vegas, Long Beach, and Hollywood.
The woman also names people in California who allegedly took part in her sex trafficking as a teen.
While it’s impossible for Infowars to corroborate these claims, the woman’s testimony is intriguing and sheds light on the hidden shadow society illegally participating in ritual sex abuse of children behind closed doors.
Read a transcript of @StellarFox16’s post below:

I’ve been beating around the bush with the things I went through, so here is a breakdown. Deep breath.
From birth to 11 years old I was involved in Mkultra type programs. I was never told the names, but the programs weren’t all the same and fit under the general mind-control experiment umbrella.

My father used human behavior modification, SA, torture, and ritual abuse on me that he either learned elsewhere or studied on his own. By himself and sometimes with groups.

I was trafficked to child “video” groups and other places, including Disneyland/Disneyland Hotel, Las Vegas, the marina in Long Beach, museums, and mansion parties.

I am an “experiencer”

At the age of 11, everything changed when my father met and married a celebrity’s mother. Things slowed down and she moved in.
They eventually moved to Alabama and their marriage fell apart when he started trying to kill her.

I was trafficked by other groups after he moved to Alabama. He liked to remind me it was legal to get married there at 14 with parent permission.
My mother had a Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy – mental illness style type thing going on, so my life was very isolating on all sides.
I had people in “Hollywood” involved in my personal life and in my trafficking. People in the entertainment industry.

I’m posting about this not for sympathy or attention, but to expose it. I’m just a person who went through a crazy amount of things. I have little proof – and that’s by design. The way they want it. But I’m going to tell it. #Mkultra #Occult.

In a follow-up post, @StellarFox16 detailed her relationship to Mena Suvari and named people reportedly involved in her sex trafficking.

The CIA carried out the clandestine human experimentation program known as MKUltra from the 1950s to the 1970s, testing mind-altering and brainwashing substances on unwitting mental patients.

The primary goals of the MKUltra experiments were to test the effects of drugs, namely hallucinogens, and other forms of psychotherapy – including electroshock therapy – on humans, and to research and perfect methods of torture which could best be used to create Manchurian candidates, or mind-controlled persons, who could be programmed to carry out any number of harmful acts.

More on this as it develops…

@TLHKAJ I though of you when I found this news article

 

[TLHKAJ]

The CIA carried out the clandestine human experimentation program known as MKUltra from the 1950s to the 1970s, testing mind-altering and brainwashing substances on unwitting mental patients.

The primary goals of the MKUltra experiments were to test the effects of drugs, namely hallucinogens, and other forms of psychotherapy – including electroshock therapy – on humans, and to research and perfect methods of torture which could best be used to create Manchurian candidates, or mind-controlled persons, who could be programmed to carry out any number of harmful acts.

This is about the extent of what they always write about MK Ultra... but it was much more than that. It certainly carried on past the 1970's. Although the names of the programs have changed, governmental trauma-based mind control continues to this day.

I believe this woman ....but the further she walks through her trauma memories and deprogramming, the more she'll discover that it didn't end when she was 11 years old. It doesn't end by moving to a new location, or the death of a parent, etc. It continues (and their programmed alters will remain cult-active) until that person deprograms. And it takes a deep relationship with Christ to gain freedom.

 

[TLHKAJ]

@TLHKAJ I though of you when I found this news article

I appreciate the tag. Thank you.

 

[APAK]

 

[APAK]

Regarding Australia. Say no.

Australia Plots Digital ID Launch For This Year

The Australian government is planning a nationwide digital ID launch, which is tentatively set for this year.

While it could be delayed for logistical reasons, it's clear that the government is fully intent on pushing a new digital ID agenda in the country.

Having first entered Parliament last year, the Digital ID Bill in Australia finished its final stage at the end of January, garnering input from business and finance groups. The country's authorities are currently communicating with the individual states.

An announcement from the Department of Finance revealed that the novel system would empower users to select their preferred digital ID provider for the accessibility of both government and private services. Private entities can apply for accreditation to provide digital ID services under the Trusted Digital Identity Framework (TDIF), which is the government's recognition framework.

As stated by an official spokesperson, the legislative step will set in motion the enlargement of the Australian Government Digital ID System to encompass state, territory and private sector organizations opting to participate.

The national digital ID will essentially serve as a comprehensive version of MyGovID that Australians currently utilize for the Australian Taxation Office, Centrelink and Medicare access. The strategy to retain other digital IDs issued by other state governments.

 

[APAK]

 

[APAK]

Sandy Hook Hoax.. recall some facts that have faded away....


1) No blood, no bodies, no surveillance video.

Any of one of these three alone is a tipoff that something unreal is taking place. When you get all three together, you're definitely looking at a fake shooting.

"But they can't show blood! They can't show bodies!" Sure they can. When Nicole Brown was murdered we saw bloody corpses. At the Columbine shooting, we saw bloody corpses. We see pictures all the time of blood-ridden children killed by drone and missile attacks in Syria, Yemen, and Palestine. We see Palestinian fathers cradling their dead and bloody, bullet-ridden daughters. The only place we never see any blood or bodies is at a fake shooting.

We never see any surveillance video either. We saw it at Columbine, but we never see it from a fake shooting. Surveillance video would be the easiest way to prove these shootings are real, yet we never see it. You know why? Because the average American is so braindead stupid, they can be fooled without it.

2) Fake parents played by crisis actors.

Your five-year-daughter was murdered two days ago, so what do you do? If you're a parent at one of these fake shootings, you immediately go on television, laughing and smiling. Perfectly normal behavior, right? We see it every single time.

When asked about their pain, they distort their face and pretend to cry, but not a single tear ever comes from their eyes. They sniffle repeatedly, but not a single drop of snot drips from their nose. And, of course, they must - absolutely must - get in the most important line of their script: "Can't we do something about these assault weapons?"

This is one of the most telltale signs of a fake shooting. You don't have to be an actor to spot the fakery, although it helps. Just pay attention to the false emotion; the endless emoting. Then take a look at people suffering real grief. The differences will astound you.

3) Go Fund Me accounts set up within 24 hours of the event and sometimes before the event even takes place.

You hear a knock at the door. Outside stands a grim-faced police officer who tells you your five-year-old daughter was just killed in a school shooting. What would your first reaction be?

Well, if your a parent of a child at a fake shooting, you will immediately set up a Go Fund Me account so people can send you money. You know, to help alleviate your pain.

You say you would never do such a thing? I believe you. No sane parent would. But at every fake shooting that is exactly what happens. In some cases, the Go Fund Me account is set up before the "shooting" takes place.

This is one of the ways the actors get paid.

4) Actors playing multiple roles at the same or different events.

Another telltale sign of a hoax. Good crisis actors are hard to find. That's why you often see them playing multiple roles. The "parent" of a slain child will double as a member of a swat team, like we saw at Sandy Crook. The "mother" of a slain person will play the "mother" of another slain person. Mix and match.

One woman has appeared at no less than five fake events. If you see her, run like hell, because another fake shooting is about to take place.

5) Non-stop media coverage.

Non-stop media coverage of a "shooting" is almost always a tipoff that it's a hoax. You never see non-stop news coverage of real shootings, do you? Speaking of which . . .

6) Anderson Cooper is sent out to interview the fake parents.

You never see Anderson Cooper in Chicago after a weekend of gun violence, do you? No, he doesn't have time for that. In fact, he never interviews the parents of any child that was actually killed. But every time there's a fake shooting, he pops up immediately to interview the fake parents and get them to wail about gun control.

7) Evidence immediately destroyed.

Immediately after a fake shooting, there will be calls to destroy the building where it took place. Why what they do that, you ask? To destroy evidence, that's why. This includes real events as well as fake ones and goes back to 9/11 and even before then. Evidence must be destroyed to protect the guilty.

8) "Evidence" left behind at the scene.

Remember the parked car with copies of the Quran inside that were found after 9/11? Remember the pristine passport that floated down miraculously from the sky to be found among the rubble of the three World Trade Center Towers that came down that day? Remember when every self-respecting assassin carried a copy of The Catcher in the Rye in his back pocket? Today there's no need for such things when all that's necessary is a fake manifesto.

Who writes a manifesto? Nobody, that's who. Only fake shooters at fake events. Along with the destruction of evidence, this also occurs at both real and fake events.

9) Drills taking place at the same time or just before the event.

From 9/11, to Sandy Crook, to the latest event in Texas, we always have drills occurring either simultaneous to the event or shortly before. What are the odds that a drill involving planes crashing into the World Trade Center towers would be occurring at the exact same time that the real thing is alleged to have occurred? What are the odds of a live shooter drill happening at Parkland, or at Texas, or of a bomb drill happening at the Boston Bombing, or at the London train bombing at the exact same time that the real thing allegedly occurred?

Like the lack of bodies and surveillance video, it's not necessary to explain to the public why drills are occurring simultaneously to real events, because the average American is so mush-brained stupid they will believe whatever they're told.

10) The alleged perpetrator immediately caught or killed.

Within minutes of a fake event - and some real ones too - the entire crime is solved and the entire life history of the alleged perpetrator is written up and splashed across the mainstream media. Details that would take days, or even weeks, to uncover are instantly at hand and fed to the public. Gee, it's as if the articles were written days beforehand.

11) Multiple shooters at every event.

At every fake shooting, eye witnesses report seeing multiple shooters. But then, within a matter of hours, statements from those witnesses are scrubbed from the internet and never brought up again. Meanwhile, the other "shooters" are never found and the entire crime is said to have been done a "lone gunman."

At Sandy Crook there was even video footage of a "second shooter" running into the woods and getting arrested. That person was never identified or heard from again.

12) Principles involved are former or current actors.

This is another statistical anomaly. If these fake shootings were happening in Los Angeles or New York then it might make sense that some of the people involved were actors. But the events aren't taking place in those cities.

Why is it that almost everyone involved with Sandy Crook was a current or former actor? Why are the two principles of the Pulse Nightclub event an actor and a game show contestant? Why is the fake Pizzagate shooter an actor? Why is the main face of the Parkland hoax a person who worked on air for CNN?

By the way, it's not just the lib-tarded left pushing these fake shootings. So-called conservatives are just as bad. Any time you hear someone from the Republican Party talking about these events as if they're real, be aware that you're talking to a gatekeeper, a disinformationist, or a brainwashed fool.
-------

 

[APAK]

 

[APAK]

COLLUDING TO BANKRUPT GUN COMPANIES​

February 17, 2024



By Mr. Pink

On January 22, 2024, a three-judge panel in Boston, led by Obama appointee Judge William J. Kayatta Jr., overruled a lower court opinion when it said that Mexico can continue with a $10 billion lawsuit against U.S.-based firearm manufacturers Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Glock, Barrett and Beretta.

The lawsuit, of course, is a win-win for the current U.S. and Mexican governments who are clearly colluding against the gun industry. For Mexico, it’s a quick money grab that comes with snazzy headlines suggesting that its inept government is fighting for the safety of its people. For anti-gun U.S. leaders who cannot overcome the rights or will of the American people legally, it’s simply a scheme they hope leads to the bankruptcy of these upstanding companies—even if the companies are ultimately cleared of any wrongdoing.

I find the ruling, and the timing of it, rather ironic when you consider that currently 12,000 illegal and unvetted aliens per day are pouring across our southern border and onto the welcome mat that was hand-placed by our own treasonous government and funded by us, the taxpayers. Meanwhile, Mexican cartels are having a heyday exploiting the Biden Administration’s asinine policies by trafficking record amounts of sex slaves and Chinese-made fentanyl into our homeland; the former is destroying the most precious of lives while the latter is killing Americans to the tune of 70,000 per year.

I’m not sure what’s more egregious: Mexico having the balls to sue U.S. gun manufacturers who they claim are purposely killing Mexicans with their products…or radical left-wing courts who are allowing a foreign nation to wreck job-providing companies. It’s unconscionable…and illegal on its face.

Congressionally passed “lawsuit preemption” laws are in place that are designed to protect American companies from exactly this type of activist, tort-based bullshit. Under U.S. law, if a gun is defective, the company can be sued and damages recovered—but gun companies cannot be sued if a person uses its non-defective gun in a criminal or negligent capacity. Allowing such action would quickly bankrupt every industry in the country, including automobile manufacturers, baseball bat companies, 5-gallon bucket molders—hell, even padlock and sock designers. Still, such laws seemingly don’t apply to liberal courts who take the Saul Alinksy any-means-to-an-end approach in destroying the things they clearly fear more than the MS-13 gang members who they routinely set free: guns and capitalism.

Rest assured this isn’t the first time such a government-sanctioned, legal end-around shenanigan has been tried. You may remember back in 2010 when our own government initiated “Operation Fast & Furious” that provided over 2,000 weapons (costing over $1 million) to the cartels under the eventual claim that the ATF would track the weapons to uncover Mexico’s illicit firearm dealer networks. Of course the scheme resulted in no meaningful cartel arrests, the death of Border Patrol agent Brian Terry, an ignored contempt of Congress charge against U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and the use of executive privilege by Obama to bury all the documents pertaining to it. What was the purpose of the operation? It was twofold: If the DOJ discovered some information on the cartels, great, but either way it could trumpet to the media that U.S. gun manufacturers and registered U.S. gun dealers were responsible for killing people on both sides of the border, therefore bolstering the case for banning “assault” weapons.

But back to the point of this story…

Allowing Mexico to sue U.S. gun manufacturers out of existence for the criminal use of legal, non-defective products—products that should be used to protect our borders from the very terrorists they are allowing in—is an assault on the U.S. Constitution and American liberty itself.

How do we combat it? We vote compromised Joe Biden and his socialist, anti-gun, anti-American cohorts out of office at every chance we get.

Oh, and I have one more suggestion: Perhaps Mexico should focus on outing its corrupt leaders who are paid by the cartels to ensure the cartels remain in power. Just Google the name Garcia Luna if you need proof. In this way, maybe Mexico itself wouldn’t be such a third-world shithole that robs from its neighbor to the North at every chance it gets. But that will never happen. And you know what else will never happen? Mexico’s leaders will never allow its good citizens to legally own guns for personal protection. You know why? These “leaders” know there’s a better than good chance they’d be rounded up at gunpoint and dealt with in the plaza.

 

[TLHKAJ]

This is one of the most telltale signs of a fake shooting. You don't have to be an actor to spot the fakery, although it helps. Just pay attention to the false emotion; the endless emoting. Then take a look at people suffering real grief. The differences will astound you.

As a mother who has lost children, I can attest to this. You don't just get over it and go on a mission with an agenda against guns or drunk driving, etc. I see these commercials a lot and I skip them or click off as soon as I see them bc I know these "parents" are fakes, paid actors. Grief is HEAVY and GUT WRENCHING. Years later, I still cry .... nearly daily. I have to pray through layers of grief daily. I have to pray through all the things my mind tries to do ....the "what ifs" or maybe if I did this or that differently ....and daily, I have to ask God's grace and healing ....and "How do I do this, Father? Where do I go from here? I trust You. I know You are good!"

 

[APAK]

As a mother who has lost children, I can attest to this. You don't just get over it and go on a mission with an agenda against guns or drunk driving, etc. I see these commercials a lot and I skip them or click off as soon as I see them bc I know these "parents" are fakes, paid actors. Grief is HEAVY and GUT WRENCHING. Years later, I still cry .... nearly daily. I have to pray through layers of grief daily. I have to pray through all the things my mind tries to do ....the "what ifs" or maybe if I did this or that differently ....and daily, I have to ask God's grace and healing ....and "How do I do this, Father? Where do I go from here? I trust You. I know You are good!"

I'm sorry for your loss, truly. And yes I'm convinced without any doubt that this event was staged from start to finish. I even have a more current picture of these (most) children who were supposedly slain. They are living today. And I have more compelling facts that show this to be a hoax. I hope one day Alex Jones with get his true and fitting justice done in this matter. They deliberately made him bankrupt for a political agenda.

A mother with the loss of a real child is very devasting indeed.

Bless you AJ

 

[mailmandan]

WHAT COULD GO WRONG? Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Suggests 'Non-Police Response' to Emergencies (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Mike LaChance

The city of Chicago is discontinuing the use of a gunshot detection technology service called ‘ShotSpotter’ this year.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Only someone with a criminal mindset would suggest such a ludicrous idea.

 

[APAK]

WHAT COULD GO WRONG? Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Suggests 'Non-Police Response' to Emergencies (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Mike LaChance

The city of Chicago is discontinuing the use of a gunshot detection technology service called ‘ShotSpotter’ this year.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Only someone with a criminal mindset would suggest such a ludicrous idea.

I will go further and say he has a criminal demonic mindset. Outrageous and he's way out-of-control. No civility or concern for people in his 'care.'