Rather, I thought you combine Israel and the Church, that they are all one. Is that not right?you thought that I was saying the Church took the place of Israel and that God was done with Israel.
Much love!
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Rather, I thought you combine Israel and the Church, that they are all one. Is that not right?you thought that I was saying the Church took the place of Israel and that God was done with Israel.
well to be a true synergistic then you would have to accept all it says.Synergist is the more squirrely term, it covers from "you have to ask for forgiveness" to "you have to make yourself holy".
Much love!
Unbelieving Israel is off on its own. It's one of the "goyim" right now. It's not His people. Just like any other unbelieving nation. Before, all nations were "goyim", because they were "Not My People". Now, they, too, are "Not My People". They have been "cut off from among their people", as the Torah states "cut off from among his people".Rather, I thought you combine Israel and the Church, that they are all one. Is that not right?
Much love!
It’s taken the Holy Spirit many yrs to open up my heart and mind, /spiritual eyes and ears ,in understanding his word....there is so much I don’t understand, ..I never put any pressure on myself on trying to understand either.It's the natural man. We think the things of God are foolishness. And continue to do so unless,until,God's Holy Spirit enters in and opens our consciousness to understand God's words.
1 Corinthians 2:14,Romans 8:5-10
I think the bottom line of "Synergism" is an emphasis on the idea that we must do what God says--God can work in us, but without us doing those things, God will not do them, and we can fall away if we do not continue in faith and in good works; "Monergism" emphasizes God's side of things.well to be a true synergistic then you would have to accept all it says.
So I am neither mon or syn,,, Just like I am neither calvin or arminian
sounds like the same argument
If we can fall away, then predestination is useless.. We can not be predestined to anything period..I think the bottom line of "Synergism" is an emphasis on the idea that we must do what God says--God can work in us, but without us doing those things, God will not do them, and we can fall away if we do not continue in faith and in good works; "Monergism" emphasizes God's side of things.
I'm saying I do not know what "predestined" means in Paul's writings--and Paul doesn't treat "predestined" as you treat it, because he, in the same book, says those who have believed can be cut off for unbelief (Ro 11:17+). I'm collecting opinions on it to have a better understanding of it.If we can fall away, then predestination is useless.. We can not be predestined to anything period..
Nevertheless, it's tangential, and I don't want to open that can of worms--I was just helping you understand why I said "Monergist 'types'" answer the OP with ease, whereas "Synergist 'types'" come in defensively accusing me of holding to the "Monergist" view of "predestined".If we can fall away, then predestination is useless.. We can not be predestined to anything period..
you have romans 11 all wrongI'm saying I do not know what "predestined" means in Paul's writings--and Paul doesn't treat "predestined" as you treat it, because he, in the same book, says those who have believed can be cut off for unbelief (Ro 11:17+). I'm collecting opinions on it to have a better understanding of it.
I couldn't agree with this more than I do!As individual believers and as the Church we have an intimate relationship with Christ. This is a relationship that is closer than an earthly husband and wife relationship.
LOL I don't want to get into it. I was merely explaining the bottom line difference between Synergist and Monergist.you have romans 11 all wrong
And paul meant what he said, the Bible can not contradict
We have been predestined to be transformed.. There is no denying this.
In your view. paul lied. Period
Very true!! If God has pre-limited us to be conformed to the image of Christ, no other outcome is possible.If we can fall away, then predestination is useless.. We can not be predestined to anything period..
Addendum: Paul refers to "the Israel of God" (over and against the "Israel" the Judaizers boast about being a part of--to which they are stringing the Gentiles along to make them join, lest the Gentiles should be "lessers"), and it is to this "Israel" that even the Gentile believers (also Jewish believers) belong. He had already called them "Isaac", and called the unbelieving Jews "Ishmael" (merely "issue" of Abraham's loins, but not of the line of promise), and said there is a "heavenly Jerusalem", as opposed to the earthly, so I don't believe he means this rhetorically. Christ said His kingdom is not of this world. You can say that Gentile believers are "part of the Commonwealth of Israel", or you can put it in what ever terms you want. Not that I've given it a massive amount of thought, but I think there are two Israels--a spiritual and a physical.Rather, I thought you combine Israel and the Church, that they are all one. Is that not right?
Much love!
So, are there people who are predestined, making sure they reach their door, so that they have the opportunity to go through it, who DO NOT use that opportunity to go through the door?It's the difference between making sure you reach the door, so that you have the opportunity to go through it, compared to just setting you down on the other side, nothing to do with you.
Much love!
I think the bottom line of "Synergism" is an emphasis on the idea that we must do what God says--God can work in us, but without us doing those things, God will not do them, and we can fall away if we do not continue in faith and in good works; "Monergism" emphasizes God's side of things.
I was merely explaining the differences between the two--ie, that, contrary to what he was saying, he didn't have to subscribe to a "system" to qualify as a "Synergist type"--I didn't want to get in to that discussion. I'm aware there are different views on the topic--and no Synergist would say "strive in the flesh", they would say "work with God's grace".The only religion on earth where man doesn't work his way into heaven is ours. Ours is the only one, and it's because of Christ.
Every other religion works their way in, if they are good enough God will go ahead and forgive them... But there's no certainty.
Striving in the flesh goes no where.
I was merely explaining the differences between the two--ie, that, contrary to what he was saying, he didn't have to subscribe to a "system" to qualify as a "Synergist type"--I didn't want to get in to that discussion. I'm aware there are different views on the topic--and no Synergist would say "strive in the flesh", they would say "work with God's grace".
Understandable! lolAhh... I don't talk to them often. I got into a few of those merry go rounds early on after I was saved, shocked they were even occuring and scratched my head and walked away from all that. Lol ..
It's a difference in emphasis, I think--but, obviously, that emphasis is a conclusion that is reached through precipitating theology, and those precipitating theologies also emphasize different truths, and there are many cases where neither side has satisfactory answers for the others' theological challenges, and are satisfied with either knowingly lying about others' views, or are satisfied with what are obviously unsatisfactory answers, or else don't care to have an answer at all.Ahh... I don't talk to them often. I got into a few of those merry go rounds early on after I was saved, shocked they were even occuring and scratched my head and walked away from all that. Lol ..
It's a difference in emphasis, I think--but, obviously, that emphasis is a conclusion that is reached through precipitating theology, and those precipitating theologies also emphasize different truths, and there are many cases where neither side has satisfactory answers for the others' theological challenges.