John’s primary audience was Jews not Gentiles so we have to keep this in mind when reading Revelation.
How can that be since the Revelation of Jesus Christ was to be sent specifically to seven Churches, not to Israel of Old.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
John’s primary audience was Jews not Gentiles so we have to keep this in mind when reading Revelation.
Yes, I realize some Amill think salvation ends when the thousand years ends and that would be consistent with the idea of Satan being bound from allowing the gospel to spread or do its work, but as you point out that idea creates other problems that are left unsolved.
It will end, be brought to a close, when God completes His construction of Israel ~ bringing all Gentile elect in and then removing the partial hardening that is on Israel at present; in this way all Israel will be saved (as Paul says in Romans 11:25-26). This is the one millennium.
For what it's worth, I do grasp why you conclude what you do. Yet, you don't deal with other issues that this causes, such as the camp of the saints being surrounded after the thousand years. Obviously, if they are alive after the thousand years, they are alive during it as well. Except you have them still reigning a thousand years when the thousand years have already expired. Which then contradicts that it after the thousand years expire, that that is when the camp of the saints are attacked. Try looking at it like this. 2023 equals the thousand years. The beginning of 2024 equals satan's little season. How can they still be reigning in 2023 when it is now 2024 instead? When it is 2024, 2023 is in the past. Or maybe a better example might be this. In the US a President can only serve two 4 year terms at most. Once these 8 years are finished, how is it that this person can still be serving as President? In the same way, this thousand years equals an era of time, and once it is fulfilled, it is in the past at that point, not just for some, but for everyone.
Romans 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.
Well the power of the gospel is the power of God unto salvation. Yet once the strong man is loosed the gospel can no longer spoil his house, it won’t have the power to save any longer.
Yes, I agree that it’s the ungodly that deny the power and I also agree that the gospel never loses its power.
How is it then that the strong man’s house can no longer be spoiled once Satan is loosed? Believers would still be reigning with Christ and going into all the world preaching the gospel.
But you just contradicted yourself twice
You said
"Saints won't be able to reign with Christ AFTER this symbolic time is over"
Then you said
"but we still reign with Him during Satan's little season as long as we are alive on the earth."
and then you said
"but during Satan's little season saints reign with Christ until we are caught up to meet the Lord in the air."
You just admitted that saints will reign with Jesus after satan is released so they reign with Jesus after satans binding
Exactly! And that's the way we Premils reason that as well, that what ever the biding caused to happen, assuming it's pertaining to this age, those things are reversed once satan is loosed.
Regardless what Revelation 20:1 actually looks like when it is being fulfilled, doesn't what I have underlined in Revelation 12 adequately explain why this angel has to come down from heaven to bind satan, because that is where he has been cast unto, meaning the earth below? If nothing else, this at least tells us that he can't be bound until he has been cast to the earth first. The question then is, were does Revelation 20:1 fit within Revelation 12? The only place I can see it logically fitting is after verse 17 has been fulfilled. Obviously, it makes zero sense that while he is bound, that this is when he is having great wrath.
Revelation 20:1 And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.
2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,
3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled : and after that he must be loosed a little season.
Seriously, does it sound like what I have underlined fits this---for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time?
If the gospel can only save a finite number of people then its power is limited, the gospel would be powerless to save a Gentile after the full number of Gentiles have been saved.
Which begs the question, what about animals on the new earth? If this entire planet literally goes up in flames, as a lot of Amils insist literally happens, well there goes the entire animal kingdom then. But if there are indeed animals on the new earth, how do they get there? Because even you admit---"God is making all things new, not "making all new things."---where I at least agree with you about that. It makes no sense to me that in the beginning God found animals to be relevant, but don't find them to still be relevant on the new earth.
Speaking of the new earth, how does one explain the following since it looks like death is still happening to me, at least pertaining to the fish they will be catching?
Ezekiel 47:7 Now when I had returned, behold, at the bank of the river were very many trees on the one side and on the other.
8 Then said he unto me, These waters issue out toward the east country, and go down into the desert, and go into the sea: which being brought forth into the sea, the waters shall be healed.
9 And it shall come to pass, that every thing that liveth, which moveth, whithersoever the rivers shall come, shall live: and there shall be a very great multitude of fish, because these waters shall come thither: for they shall be healed; and every thing shall live whither the river cometh.
10 And it shall come to pass, that the fishers shall stand upon it from Engedi even unto Eneglaim; they shall be a place to spread forth nets; their fish shall be according to their kinds, as the fish of the great sea, exceeding many.
11 But the miry places thereof and the marishes thereof shall not be healed; they shall be given to salt.
12 And by the river upon the bank thereof, on this side and on that side, shall grow all trees for meat, whose leaf shall not fade, neither shall the fruit thereof be consumed: it shall bring forth new fruit according to his months, because their waters they issued out of the sanctuary: and the fruit thereof shall be for meat, and the leaf thereof for medicine.
Amill Guy_that’s too bad Bob, in just a little season you’re gonna get burned up.
Bob_I thought faith came by hearing and hearing by the word of God, can you just tell me a little bit about Gods word?
Amill Guy_that used to be the way it was but now since Satan is loosed he’s going to prevent you from hearing the word.
Bob_so you’re not going to talk to me about the Bible?
Amill Guy_nope, there’s no hope for you Bob.
Can you see yourself doing something like this? I would hope not but that’s where your line of thinking leads to.
So then what about a verse such as Amos 3:7?
Amos 3:7 Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets.
Are you saying believers won’t be able to recognize Satan being loosed when it was very obvious and easy to discern when he was bound?
I’m going to tell you what happened to me quite a few years ago. I don’t know if you’ve heard of a guy named Harold Camping or not but he was Amill and thought that Satan had been loosed and that the end was soon to come. He also thought that no one else was being saved at that time and that we should just hold fast to the faith we had.
He had a laundry list of reasons why Satan was loosed and he said things like he was just warning everyone so that their blood wouldn’t be on his hands. I listened to him on the radio, this was the first time in my life I heard about election vs free will, eschatology, and other types of theology. He was very convincing with his Amill view but his prediction of Jesus returning in 2011 was false.
I got back to studying the Bible about 5 years ago and the bottom line for me is that I now have to analyze all these different views and they have to make sense. I went down the Amill road once and I’m just very skeptical of it, and not only Amill but all the different views.
LOL! Oh yeah, I've heard of him; he was quite the character. :)I’m going to tell you what happened to me quite a few years ago. I don’t know if you’ve heard of a guy named Harold Camping or not...
Yes, he had a number of... ideas...but he was Amill and thought that Satan had been loosed and that the end was soon to come. He also thought that no one else was being saved at that time and that we should just hold fast to the faith we had.
He had a laundry list of reasons why Satan was loosed and he said things like he was just warning everyone so that their blood wouldn’t be on his hands.
Right; date-setting was always a bad idea. :) He actually left the Christian Reformed Church back in the 1980s and, having been Calvinist, departed from that also. And he taught annihilationism and a number of other things that were just terribly wrong, and, well, he was just a very interesting character.I listened to him on the radio, this was the first time in my life I heard about election vs free will, eschatology, and other types of theology. He was very convincing with his Amill view but his prediction of Jesus returning in 2011 was false.
Understood; that's fair. There are a lot of good people that fall into each of the millennial "camps," if you will, and generally speaking, they all "make sense." But that's certainly not to say that they are all right. So yeah, study away. I would recommend the following to you:I got back to studying the Bible about 5 years ago and the bottom line for me is that I now have to analyze all these different views and they have to make sense. I went down the Amill road once and I’m just very skeptical of it, and not only Amill but all the different views.
Where in that passage can we find the hardening in part shall be lifted from ethnic Israel once the last of the Gentiles have come in?
Okay, then we disagree.Paul tells us that all Israel is saved through the Gentiles being grafted in with them, but he does not say the partial hardening of Israel in unbelief shall then be lifted.
I'm not sure I follow your stream of thought here, RWB.What would be the point, since the end of the thousand years, is when the seventh angel shall begin to sound that time shall be no longer? (Rev 10:5-7)
Do you have any evidence that the agreement made in Galatians 2:9 was ever rescinded? If not then we should be using this information as profitable for doctrine, reproof, correction, and instruction in righteousness.How can you say the primary audience was Jews? The church is more than just an ethnicity. Saying that John went only to the circumcised Jews is meaningless, in regards to the Revelation of Jesus Christ, since Revelation was to the church, not to an ethnicity.
Unless you have a verse confirming this "hour of temptation", you can make stuff up all day long. I am sure someone somewhere will agree with you.
Acts 8:1 And Saul was consenting unto his death. And at that time there was a great persecution against the church which was at Jerusalem; and they were all scattered abroad throughout the regions of Judaea and Samaria, except the apostles.How can that be since the Revelation of Jesus Christ was to be sent specifically to seven Churches, not to Israel of Old.
If the preaching of the gospel ends when Satan is loosed and believers continue to reign then you must conclude that preaching has nothing to do with reigning.Once proclaiming of the Gospel of the Kingdom of God has completed the task of bringing the last Gentile into the spiritual Kingdom of God there won't be any more need for sending out the Gospel.
I’ll admit I’m not completely certain but I think the two witnesses represented the law and the prophets, of which I think John the Baptist symbolized.In your opinion, what do you believe John means when he writes the two witnesses have been killed?
IMO, I believe Christians will know, and won't be surprised as others who are not looking and waiting for the Lord to come again. I believe we shall know because Satan and his minions will have silenced (spiritually killed) the two witnesses through lawfare, which I believe is the Word of God preached through the two witnesses. That means the Gospel of the Kingdom of God will have no purpose for being proclaimed, and will bring physical death and persecution through lawfare. IOW it will become written law for any faithful Christian desiring to share the Gospel of the Kingdom of God, and like it or not Christians are to obey those who have authority over them.
I don’t try to paint the whole Amill group with the same brush, I actually think Amill has many points that are valid that I agree with but when it comes to Satan being loosed I think Amill is incorrect.Just because Harold Camping erred greatly (I am familiar with his doctrine) greatly, you do greatly err also if you put all Amils with the same brush with his erroneous doctrine.