Marymog
Well-Known Member
- Mar 7, 2017
- 11,946
- 1,795
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
Which post was that in?You have given Scripture that says, Mary was naturally born without sin.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Which post was that in?You have given Scripture that says, Mary was naturally born without sin.
Are you tired of sitting yet?My advice is and has been let no man sit under a harlot .
JESUS was the first New Covenant ProtestantDodge and deflect all you want. When you repeat the words of the Protestant men before you it doesn't matter if you say that what you believe is not based on following the teachings of the Protestant men before you. You ARE following the teachings of the Protestant men before you..........it's that simple!!
Keeping it simple.....Mary
Hmmm.....so when you said in 2 different posts that "Christ’s Church is IN a man" doesn't that man become the Church?
Scripture says that we are to take our differences to the church and that the church is the pillar and foundation of truth. If the church is, according to your theory, in a man that means we are to go to a man to make those verses come true.
So, according to your theory, a man is the pillar and foundation of truth, and we are to take our differences to a man.
Curious Mary
I agree with you. You are not The Church. No man is because no single man is the pillar and foundation of truth and there is no single man we go to so that we can fulfill Matthew 18:17. I am glad we agree your theory is debunked.When are you going to REALLY GET IT…??
What you say FOR ME is NOT YOUR PLACE, NOR YOUR ENTITLEMENT!
The Church IN me, doesn’t MAKE ME THE CHURCH….duh!
It makes me a member of Christ’s Church!
Christ IS the Church.
DUH….it is CHRIST IN the person!
So your answer, is take your differences to the Church…
Scripture says first try to settle trespasses, one on one between men.
And good luck with taking your complaint to the church, when you did not observe or know the trespasser and then what do you do.
And Does the tv / movies portray the Catholic Church rightly… “catholic” men who plot against others, steal, covet, rape, whatever, can simply run to a Priest, tell him his dirty deeds, and the priest assures that man is forgiven….but NOT once asks or is forgiven by the one he Trespassed Against?
Nice dodge, dodgeball. Partially quote part of the passage from Scripture that I referenced. Good job
I ain't playing dodgeball with you. I'm playing hardball. Let's try again dodgeball: How do you fulfil Matthew 18:17?
Patient Mary
That makes no sense.....Jesus didn't protest the old covenant. He was the fulfilment of the new covenant.JESUS was the first New Covenant Protestant
Oh goodness Taken....I am not dragging you into my Church. That makes zero sense.Not a dodge. Was an answer that applies to me.
I deal with trespasses, if they are know, one on one.
You have lodged all kinds of complaints against me….So, why are you not dragging me into your Church to settle our differences?
Eh, might it be you who dodges?
Translation: I don't have Scripture to back up what I said so I'm going to deflect.
Prove it by quoting me or retract your lie.
Oh goodness Taken....I am not dragging you into my Church. That makes zero sense.
I agree with you. You are not The Church. No man is because no single man is the pillar and foundation of truth and there is no single man we go to so that we can fulfill Matthew 18:17. I am glad we agree your theory is debunked.
You have no way to fulfil Scripture (Matthew 18:17)! I do.
Over your headThat makes no sense.....Jesus didn't protest the old covenant. Was the fulfilment of the new covenant.
This is nothing more than an argument that does not effect doctrine and does not effect whether one goes to Heaven or not... so much to do about nothing View attachment 37488
JESUS Would have entered into the vatican just like he did the temple and start overturning some tables .JESUS was the first New Covenant Protestant
Whatever the RCC may have been when it started, it has long since been thoroughly corrupted by Satan.
It is a dog and pony show set up to appeal to the masses -- making them feel that they're "being religious" through the use of pomp, pageantry, ritual and idolatry; none of which have any support in scripture.
Whatever the RCC may have been when it started, it has long since been thoroughly corrupted by Satan.
It is a dog and pony show set up to appeal to the masses -- making them feel that they're "being religious" through the use of pomp, pageantry, ritual and idolatry; none of which have any support in scripture.
That is their approach for they cannot , by scriptures prove you wrong so then the accusation is OH YOU KNOW EVERTHING .The really sad thing (keeping it real mary), is keeping it real to you is revealed by you as making up statements, IMPLYING your statements ARE an other’s thoughts and beliefs …. That you disagree with…. That you can then follow with some snide disapproving remark.
All you are doing is creating a lie, and trying to cunningly pass it off to an other.
My observation has been THAT PLOY seems to occur often with Catholics, when Catholics can not, when asked, PLAINLY to show in Scripture a particular BELIEF, they teach and practice.
Is that something TAUGHT in Catholic schools ? To make up lies, accusations, name call instead of revealing a specific Scripture when asked, that supports a specific Catholic belief / teaching?
Not saying making up lies and accusing is specific to Catholics, anyone can have that talent. Just happen to notice that occurs repeatedly as the norm with particular Catholics on religious forums.
You are one who particularly demonstrates that behavior in nearly every comment you post. So, just saying you ARE qualified to reveal the basis for your behavior…
Taught, or just comes natural to you/