Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
YES!! If we're not careful, we'll try to explain things away that are in the Bible because it doesn't match up with science falsely so called.
1 Timothy 6:20-21
[20]O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
[21]Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen. (The first to Timothy was written from Laodicea, which is the chiefest city of Phrygia Pacatiana.)
Excellent point about Ararat.
The question then becomes, "Where did all that water come from and where did it all go?"
(Interestingly, I just finished reading an article about the following 20 minutes ago)
Well, a recent scientific discovery may just answer that. Scientists have discovered a type of rock in the Earth's mantle known as ringwoodite. This rock layer has an interesting property in that it can store water.
Current estimates are that there is 3x the amount of water that is in all the earth's oceans stored in this layer of rock.
Genesis 7:11 "On the six hundredth year of Noah's life, on the seventeenth day of the second month--on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens were opened.
Coincidence? I think not.
Try that old faithful source of biblical yet information, creation.com.reference?
For me it's a matter of knowing what the Bible says, and then just believing it. In this case, the Bible says all the hills under heaven were covered with water, so I just believe that is true, which tells me it was global.But what happens when people interpret the same word differently? I don’t believe the flood was worldwide, but of course I could be wrong.
The flood was global. Barnes was not there and is writing his opinion while God who was there wrote His opinion. I trust God more than Barnes. Also, the geologic evidence for the global flood is overwhelming.Genesis 6:
Was Noah's flood global?
No, according to Barnes:
Did Noah have marsupial kangaroos in the ark?
No, according to Barnes, it was not a worldwide flood but it looked like one to Noah. As far as Noah could tell, his world died. For all intents and purposes of the redemption story, it was a catastrophic/global event: all humans died except Noah's family. That's the point.
National Center for Science Education gives more detailed calculations:
There is also a parallel Babylonian Story of the Flood written in about 1750 BC. Both stories called for a world-wide flood to destroy mankind.
The flood was global. Barnes was not there and is writing his opinion while God who was there wrote His opinion. I trust God more than Barnes. Also, the geologic evidence for the global flood is overwhelming.
Big Big problem with that thought. the bible declares all the mountains were covered to a depth if fifteen cubits (c. 22 feet). If it was just a local or regional flood, as soon as the waters overtopped the local mountains- it would flow down the other side! You could not cover the mountains in a local flood.It seems to me that the flood of Noah was concentrated on a particular region and land. The land that Adams family resided in.
Not to mention it makes it clear that the ENTIRE POPULATION of the earth was repopulated through NOAHS SONS .Big Big problem with that thought. the bible declares all the mountains were covered to a depth if fifteen cubits (c. 22 feet). If it was just a local or regional flood, as soon as the waters overtopped the local mountains- it would flow down the other side! You could not cover the mountains in a local flood.
reference? Particularly the overwhelming part.Also, the geologic evidence for the global flood is overwhelming.
Dont let it be science nor the reasoning of the worlds wisdom .reference?
Sciencereference? Particularly the overwhelming part.
I refer you to ICR.org. It is a Christian organization of scientists who hold at least a masters in their particular field of expertise. They have enormous amounts of videos and manuscripts as to why the flood was global and how what we see today all points to a global flood.reference? Particularly the overwhelming part.
Hello my friend . I need to warn us all about something .reference? Particularly the overwhelming part.
SOME EVIDENCES THAT ARE EMPIRICALreference? Particularly the overwhelming part.
I say that the flood was all-encompassing; I believe the Bible ~ God, through Moses in this case ~ to be crystal clear on that. Maybe a question to be pondered is, did the land of the earth look like it does today? Or, the same question asked in a different way, were the lands situated upon the earth in the same way in Noah's day (before the time of the Tower of Babel and the result, the LORD's dispersing of the peoples over the face of all the earth [Genesis 11:8-9]) as they are now? :)It seems to me that the flood of Noah was concentrated on a particular region and land. The land that Adams family resided in.
The reason to believe that the Deluge occurred over the whole planet is this: the Bible says it.Right. I even take cues from you and weigh it :) I try to be as objective as possible and listen to reasons.
Do you have a specific reference on the global flood?I refer you to ICR.org.