Metaphorically yes. The history of the world is bound up in the destinies of the tale of 2 cities... If you aren't in Jerusalem, you're in Babylon.Are we in Jerusalem?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Metaphorically yes. The history of the world is bound up in the destinies of the tale of 2 cities... If you aren't in Jerusalem, you're in Babylon.Are we in Jerusalem?
Metaphorically yes. The history of the world is bound up in the destinies of the tale of 2 cities... If you aren't in Jerusalem, you're in Babylon.
Why do people want to attack all the time.
Is that what it comes down to? You think we are weaponizing scripture in order to reveal what God intended us to reveal, the identity of the Antichrist and those that support him through becoming deceived by his doctrine... The wine of Babylon? Do you realize there is only one denomination, just one of all the thousands we are told now exists on the earth, just one that answers to every single criteria that scripture gives regarding that identity?The time and place for the use of such weapons is not the forum.
Because we think that if we can draw others eyes to someones elses flaws, false doctrine ect, ect. then they wont look and see ours !
It is deflection, a tactitical maneuver, used as a distraction. It is WRONG in the eyes of the Lord.
Love is supposed to be our standard, our compass but so few show the love of God to the world or even their supposed brethern in Christ.
Ppl think God will just turn a blind eye. Oh no, THERE WILL BE AN ACCOUNTING OF ALL .
I am not advocating that anyone should "attack" anyone. That word "attack", along with other politically correct responses such as homophobia, racist, bigot etc etc has become the standard response to criticism, whether justified or not. It's an automatic self defense mechanism when one doesn't want to face the truth about his behavior, character, worldview, or mindset. This whole thread is about my misgivings regarding the possibility of such attitudes becoming prevalent in this forum. I think there are legitimate ways to discuss heavier issues of denominational backsliding and even apostasy, similar to what the apostles did in writing to the churches of Galatia, even naming them, without being accused of attacking or being insulting. As H2S said, citing scripture, linking web pages as legitimate proof from their own writings, is one way this can be done. I'm still concerned however when it comes to prophecy. Denominationalism comes right to the fore in eschatological musings. Even certain hermeneutics run in denominational lines. I really don't see how we can fully do justice to scripture without being specific about who the beast is... The little horn... Babylon the Great...Do you attack all denominations or just some?
And yet you say things like this....Your right and oddly enough I see it mostly on Christian sites its like a bash free-for-all. Why I haven't clue
Lol you got no documents, anyways your to nasty talking to have a conversation with little girl.
Your far from being mature, your like a child throwing a fit, you speak condescending words cause you think you can upset people in that way your totally ignorant and a child.
Actually I think you completely love the condescending words makes you feel good. You strive to be as rude as you can that's not the virtue of a christian. From want I read you have been doing it for years around here, what is driving your angry has nothing to do with anything on this site.
And yet you say things like this....
Then why was the first word of the title attack and its included in a rule?I am not advocating that anyone should "attack" anyone. That word "attack", along with other politically correct responses such as homophobia, racist, bigot etc etc has become the standard response to criticism, whether justified or not. It's an automatic self defense mechanism when one doesn't want to face the truth about his behavior, character, worldview, or mindset. This whole thread is about my misgivings regarding the possibility of such attitudes becoming prevalent in this forum. I think there are legitimate ways to discuss heavier issues of denominational backsliding and even apostasy, similar to what the apostles did in writing to the churches of Galatia, even naming them, without being accused of attacking or being insulting. As H2S said, citing scripture, linking web pages as legitimate proof from their own writings, is one way this can be done. I'm still concerned however when it comes to prophecy. Denominationalism comes right to the fore in eschatological musings. Even certain hermeneutics run in denominational lines. I really don't see how we can fully do justice to scripture without being specific about who the beast is... The little horn... Babylon the Great...
That was a quote from the actual forum rulesThen why was the first word of the title attack and its included in a rule?
That was a quote from the actual forum rules
Oh dear. I guess nobody thought to correct Martin Luther, on both his vulgarity as well as his attitude toward the Jews. Just another reason to remind ourselves to follow Jesus and not men, no matter who they are. It doesn't sound as though Luther was very well acquainted with Romans 11.Jesus, John, Paul and others didn't allow "grace" to cripple their tongues. We know exactly to whom their stern rebukes were directed. When it comes to the Jews, the pen of inspiration well tells us:
Martin Luther so despised how the Jews treated Jesus and the Gospel that his quill might be referred to as the "pen of evisceration". He wrote sarcastically:
- Jesus called them children "of the devil".
- He called them "hypocrites".
- He called them "white sepulchers full of dead men's bones".
- John the Baptist called them "vipers".
- Paul called them "unworthy of eternal life".
"Did I not tell you earlier that a Jew is such a noble, precious jewel that when he farts, God and all the angels dance?"
I defy any man to criticize as "anti-semitic" and "lacking grace" any of these above, including the intrepid Martin Luther, the champion of the Protestant Reformation to whom we owe a debt of gratitude for having the boldness to stand up against religious tyranny and secure for posterity the religious freedom so enjoyed by us today. Shall we who shed no blood or spent not one cent for this freedom now sacrifice it upon the altar of "Ecumenicalism" with the "strange fire" of political correctness?
Do you accept your plight with grace and love toward those who wronged you and stripped you
of your livelihood?
Valid authority?That's a very good question.
I'd like to think that I have, but certainly not perfectly..
And God, in His goodness, continues to provide as He always has done.
So then, does abuse by those with valid authority over us justify the cry of 'non serviam' ?
What of the rebellion of Korah, that Jude also warns us against?
Pax et Bonum
True. Since time immemorial, Satan has convinced humanity that something they do makes them acceptable to God. Then, Jesus came along and told the truth, so what does Satan do? Convince the church that grace is a License to sin. Both subjective ideas taking the place of God’s plain word.Sucking up to God is none other than trapped subjectivism. That's how all humanity operates by default. It's fruit however is one of hypocrisy which is what Jesus rebuked as 'of your father the devil'
The whole sucking phenomena is the result of the mindset of 'doing' to get God's favour. Its chosen prison is threatened by good news that God neither cares for or wants sucking up too.
Who said it is? It’s used to prove, among other things, that Christians are to be “watchmen on the wall”, the “wall” being God’s law which so many who claim “liberty in Christ” are trying to tear down.That verse isn't use to bash other denominations get a grip
OH MY, SORRY TO BE SO LONGWINDED! Have you read his commentary on Romans 11? The people who occupy the land of ancient Israel have nothing to do with end times prophecy. Romans speaks of individual deliverance through jealous consideration of the blessings which were once theirs but now belong to the church - not a national restoration at all.Oh dear. I guess nobody thought to correct Martin Luther, on both his vulgarity as well as his attitude toward the Jews. Just another reason to remind ourselves to follow Jesus and not men, no matter who they are. It doesn't sound as though Luther was very well acquainted with Romans 11.
Jesus had strong rebukes for the religious leaders, much more than for the common people: "Be ye not many masters....they shall receive the greater condemnation." It's not for us to judge unbelieving Jews who are lost souls but to win them to Christ. Good for us to remember that there but for the grace of God go we. There is none righteous, no not one.
Valid authority?
How is that determined?