The Pre-Trib Rapture

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
9,639
629
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
No i do not, and if you read my comment above to @stunnedbygrace you will see I believe the fifth seal was opened with the first Martyr Stephen thus the sixth seal is next (I got that from a very pretribber by the way). What i am saying is we will have to deal with the great tribulation as this precedes the sixth seal.
The 5th Seal is not about the physical act of dying so not opened before the 4th Seal. John was caught up into heaven for these views. Paul was still on earth looking up at heaven for his views. Paul was planning on being raptured. Of course 1900+ years later, we know that did not happen, unless you are preterist, and they think they know it did happen.

You have to see the 5th and 6th Seal is John's view from Paradise of the Second Coming and glorification of the church as complete, not here a little, there a little. There are no martyrs in the GT, not even those beheaded during Satan's 42 months are martyrs. Being a martyr is dying at the hands of heretics who think you are a heretic. Stephen was condemned by religious Jews who were clearly heretical in their doctrines. Those in the 42 months are beheaded as their act of confessing their sins and actually sacrificing this corruptible flesh directly. It is not living by faith, it is dying by faith. Those who have been martyrs under human heretics were living out their faith, even while martyred. They did not literally have to crucify this corruptible flesh to be redeemed. That is the difference.

And no! The Seals were not opened in the first century. The Cross was the physical deal that sealed all the names into the Lamb's book of life. It was sealed at the Cross. Then preserved before Creation. That is what the verse states:

"written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world."

This is the Atonement Covenant, and it was physically enacted in 30AD. But to God it was a done deal before creation. It was sealed up, only to be opened on the Lord's Day. The Lord's Day being the whole period of the Millennium. Not the 2000 years between the Cross and the Second Coming. Revelation 5 is a specific event. It was not some long drawn out phenomenon.

We know that the Seals remove 25% of human life from the earth. The Trumpets remove 33%. The vials at Armageddon remove 100%. The percentage not declared, had to be sealed up would be 50% during the Thunders. We do know that Matthew 13 and the parable of the wheat and tares is a 50% scenario. Either you are one or the other, no sitting on the sidelines. The angels are harvesting, not the church.

Interestingly at this time we are pretty close to 8 billion souls alive on earth. Each percentage of the 4 events equals 2 billion each. The estimated amount of those professing to be Christians, which means they are familiar with Christ and the Cross is about 2 billion. Is that a coincidence? I don't see it as being that exact. I do not see all those making a profession are doing so as a personal choice, and I see many out of Christianity as a religion, who are redeemed, who just do not want to be associated with the religion as a religion. Polls do not make people believers or redeemed. Only individuals know their personal relationship with God.

The point I am trying to make is that during all 4 events those alive, the generation of the fig tree, are part of the opening of the Seals, not those who died over the last 1991 years. The event in Revelation 5 cannot happen until after the fig tree blooms and that generation will have a few people still alive, when the Seals start to open. The 5th and 6th Seal is the same event, the Second Coming and rapture as Paul described from his earthly view.

The first 4 Seals are tied together by the symbolic alliterative 4 different horsemen. Only symbols, not literal humans. They do not even symbolize any humans. Not Jesus, nor an AC. When they are opened only those in Heaven will know, because John is there in person in the Holy Spirit watching it happen. John did not say the Holy Spirit was in him, filling him with visions. There is a difference being in the Holy Spirit and being filled with the Holy Spirit to simply prophecy. Read what it says:

"And I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard, as it were the noise of thunder, one of the four beasts saying, Come and see. And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer. And when he had opened the second seal, I heard the second beast say, Come and see. And there went out another horse that was red: and power was given to him that sat thereon to take peace from the earth, and that they should kill one another: and there was given unto him a great sword. And when he had opened the third seal, I heard the third beast say, Come and see. And I beheld, and lo a black horse; and he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand. And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine. And when he had opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth beast say, Come and see."

These are all indications of John physically moving about the throne, actively participating in the event. Not just describing a future event.

John did not go through time over the course of the first century or later watching the Seals being opened. It was an event that John was physically taken by the Holy Spirit to, and actively participated in. Of course time in Paradise goes by even quicker than the effects being played out on earth.

Peter told us not to ignore that the last 1991 years on earth has been as 2 days in Paradise. John going to Paradise from Patmos would not have aged him, and he could have observed all the way to the NHNE without aging at all. Just because John wrote it all down in symbolic form, did not mean he witnessed it in symbolic form. He was literally writing as it happened. A physical act one cannot do while asleep or having visions. John ate the book while in Paradise, not in a dream.

"And when the seven thunders had uttered their voices, I was about to write: and I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Seal up those things which the seven thunders uttered, and write them not."

John literally saw the worse case of history that could happen, and wrote down the events as they happened. Yet it has not happened yet for us on earth. It is still future for us on earth, and what John wrote in that future John delivered to the seven churches after leaving Patmos. The book of Revelation has always had useful spiritual applications. But it is also an historical account written in symbolic terms, and John was a literal eye witness to that fact. John is not addressing a court room or judge so he did not have to literally declare what he saw. Yet the symbolism declares literal events with literal consequences. What John witnessed, literally physically happened, not just some vision or dream of symbolism.
 
Last edited:

stunnedbygrace

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
12,397
12,057
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I still don’t understand why it would be impossible for God to gather a harvest in stages. I mean, that’s how a literal harvest works, in 3 parts. First sheaf, large harvest, then gleaning.

Why couldn’t “immediately after” refer to a gleaning? And then a complete and total gathering together of all from everywhere they are?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: David H.

David H.

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2020
2,482
1,915
113
56
michigan
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The 5th Seal is not about the physical act of dying so not opened before the 4th Seal. John was caught up into heaven for these views. Paul was still on earth looking up at heaven for his views. Paul was planning on being raptured. Of course 1900+ years later, we know that did not happen, unless you are preterist, and they think they know it did happen.

I Said the first five seals were opened when Christ ascended and have been ongoing since then. This is something I got from a pretribber who believes the sixth seal is the next thing to occur, this is how he deals with Matthew 24:29-31 and he calls the church age the great tribulation. I agree with the first part, but disagree with the second part of his comment. Those seals are continuing on even until now, and that is because there is a number associated with the fifth seal of Martyrs who are to be martyred (saints). Quoting the ESV here since they actually use the word "Number"..

Then they were each given a white robe and told to rest a little longer, until the number of their fellow servants and their brothers[fn] should be complete, who were to be killed as they themselves had been. (Revelation 6:11).

The church has been facing all the first five seals throughout its history and this is the parallel to the birth pangs, but there has always been a divine providential protection from the whole church facing them, which is not the case in the Great tribulation as God allows Satan to make war on the saints and overcome them... So that 42 months is an acceleration of the first five seals against the church, Nicolaitanism, war, famine pestilence and death, and martyrdom have all been a part of church history, but they will be accelerated just like contractions are in child birth when the Great tribulation occurs.

Simply put,
Birth pangs=general tribulation=church age (Revelation 1:9)
Labor and delivery= Great tribulation= 42 months the beast rules= contractions increasing in strength and frequency
Delivery= rapture= receiving our glorified Spiritual bodies= sorrow turning to joy as in child birth (John 16:21)
 
  • Like
Reactions: No Pre-TB

David H.

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2020
2,482
1,915
113
56
michigan
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I still don’t understand why it would be impossible for God to gather a harvest in stages. I mean, that’s how a literal harvest works, in 3 parts. First sheaf, large harvest, then gleaning.

Why couldn’t “immediately after” refer to a gleaning? And then a complete and total gathering together of all from everywhere they are?

I thought this was the case as well until i was shown that revelation is a series of overlapping visions not a linear prophecy.
You ever see that Guy on PBS painting "happy trees", what is his name Bob ross or something like that. first he begins with broad strokes with a large brush or knife then he adds another layer that is more detailed and so on. That is how I read Revelation, It is God painting a picture of the day of the LORD and the events leading up to it. First the broad strokes of the church ages, then the more detailed seals and then the trumpets and then the characters in the scene, and then the conflicts depicted, and then the resolution and millennium. For me Revelation is a master work of art from the great artist.

When you see it this way all the rapture passages align with one another and the chronology of the Olivet discourse fits into the sequence of Revelation. Like you say all the various views have a piece of the truth of God's end time plan, but they all have something missing that fails to allow them to see the whole picture. Part of that is because we "know in part" but when that perfect comes we will know in fulness. (1 Corinthians 13:9-10)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davy

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
13,426
2,789
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
No one interested in this huh? :D

Do you at least see a strange repeat of when He was born? Verses seemed to say He would come from three different places - Bethlehem, Nazareth, Egypt.

Does one of the above numbers sound like pretrib, one sound like midtrib and one sound like post trib? Prophecy, once again, has Him coming from three different places.

The first time He came, it happened exactly as God said to the prophets and He came from all three at different times and on different days/timeframes.

The only Scripture evidence of Christ's future coming is back to the Mount of Olives, on earth, where He ascended into Heaven from. That is written in Acts 1 and in Zechariah 14, for those who care to read it.
 

No Pre-TB

Well-Known Member
Jan 15, 2022
892
365
63
49
North America
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I Said the first five seals were opened when Christ ascended and have been ongoing since then. This is something I got from a pretribber who believes the sixth seal is the next thing to occur, this is how he deals with Matthew 24:29-31 and he calls the church age the great tribulation. I agree with the first part, but disagree with the second part of his comment. Those seals are continuing on even until now, and that is because there is a number associated with the fifth seal of Martyrs who are to be martyred (saints). Quoting the ESV here since they actually use the word "Number"..

Then they were each given a white robe and told to rest a little longer, until the number of their fellow servants and their brothers[fn] should be complete, who were to be killed as they themselves had been. (Revelation 6:11).

The church has been facing all the first five seals throughout its history and this is the parallel to the birth pangs, but there has always been a divine providential protection from the whole church facing them, which is not the case in the Great tribulation as God allows Satan to make war on the saints and overcome them... So that 42 months is an acceleration of the first five seals against the church, Nicolaitanism, war, famine pestilence and death, and martyrdom have all been a part of church history, but they will be accelerated just like contractions are in child birth when the Great tribulation occurs.

Simply put,
Birth pangs=general tribulation=church age (Revelation 1:9)
Labor and delivery= Great tribulation= 42 months the beast rules= contractions increasing in strength and frequency
Delivery= rapture= receiving our glorified Spiritual bodies= sorrow turning to joy as in child birth (John 16:21)
Finally, a logical statement. I was waiting to see if anyone understood why the first 4 or 5 seals were opened when Christ ascended. But, I didn’t see you actually explain scripturally why. I have my own reasons but would love to hear yours. For me, there are at least 3, maybe 4. You have listed one. At least 2 are found in Rev 4 and 5
 

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
9,639
629
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Why are you so afraid of the wrath of the devil, all he can do is kill your body?

As for Daniel 9:27, it can be translated both as midst of the week,(KJV, RSV) and for half of the week (ESV, NLT). Either way is right grammatically with the text.
I am not afraid. I am literally prepared to be killed by Satan.

Daniel 9:27 is not about a half way point.

It can either be a set of days or a set of years depending on context. The context is the Second Coming event. The context is not the time between the Cross and the Second Coming.

Some will argue the whole 7 years was in the first century. Some will argue, none of it has happened yet, but will happen in full in the future.


Both are wrong for the same reason. Jesus is the 70th week, because Gabriel never includes the 70th week as any time frame period.

In fact many seem to be sure that the earthly ministry was 3.5 years from baptism to the Cross based on a 7 year period. Yet they deny that Jesus is the 70th week. One group continues the remainder 3.5 years without Jesus involved on earth at all, but substitute the Holy Spirit. The other group do not involve Jesus at all as the 70th week. They have some AC reigning on earth for 7 years. That is really messed up. Gabriel clearly declared the Messiah the Prince was fully the 70th week, because of the fact Messiah was cut off after the 69th week. Verse 27 cannot be the full week, because John later clarifies what the desolation is about. Verse 27 is not the fulness of the Gentiles, the church age, between the Cross and the Second Coming. That is not desolation, but a harvest of souls for near 2000 years. They may not have known about the 2000 years, or God at least did not have them put that they knew in the NT.

When John gave us the 42 months, handed to Satan, he gave us the interruption of that week of days. So we should never have looked back at any history for such an interruption of desolation. The desolation cannot happen until after Messiah the Prince has finished his 70th week.

If the last 1991 years was Daniel 9:27, we would then have to explain the 42 months of interruption in Revelation 13. That would make 2 interruptions. Some claim it is part of the whole 7 years. It is not, nor ever was. Now if there was a 3.5 year interruption, and Christ as Prince had come back and finished the 7 years in 34AD, it would have been a done deal way before John even wrote the book of Revelation.

In fact the Thessalonians thought it all had happened already, but Paul assured them it was still future. But the fulness of the Gentiles is not the desolation that is mentioned in Daniel 9:27. Paul never declared Daniel 9 a done deal. Yes, Paul pointed out Israel was cut off, which made them a desolation, but not Gabriel's desolation.

Jesus was cut off as Messiah, and the 70th week would not be accomplished until Jesus as Prince would return and Himself finish the 70th week. No other being could possibly finish the 70th week other than Jesus. The Lamb was the only one found worthy to open the 7 Seals which would bring the Lamb to earth for the final harvest to also finish the 70th week and confirm the Atonement Covenant. At the least the confirmation would include the full earthly ministry including the fulness of the Gentiles, but then one would have to explain Satan's 42 months, or just ignore them, or give Satan authority of the last half of the 70th week robbing Christ the Prince of that position.

No! Christ completes all of the 70th week, minus the last 3.5 days. Satan gets 42 months, and then those last 3.5 days are when the 2 witnesses lay dead, and the wrath of God is poured out in the 7 vials, thus ending the 70th week at Armageddon.

If Satan is not granted 42 months, then Daniel 9:27 never happens, the scenario would be thus: There is not 3.5 days of God's wrath, and the 2 witnesses are not even needed. The 7th Trumpet sounds for a week of days, and the 70th week ends with the winepress of Revelation 14. The Millennium starts and chapters 15-19 never happen. The 144k, the sheep, and the wheat still inherit the earth as Jesus taught during His earthly ministry in the Gospels. Jesus still carried out the final harvest. The Second Coming and rapture was still the 5th and 6th Seal. All the redeemed where accounted for, and no one was left after the final harvest who would have chosen to be beheaded.

So the only reason for Satan's 42 months of interruption and desolation, was the need for some humans to choose beheadings. The point of the confirmation itself. The Second Coming would have happened sooner, and the GT would have lasted the whole 3+ years. The first 4 Seals take up some of that 3.5 years. It is shortened for those in the Lamb's book of life sake. Those beheaded chose Christ and were part of the glorified church in Paradise instead of having to choose physical death, by cutting their heads off. "Being saved" was from that physical act itself.

Why is a future 42 months of desolation different than the fulness of the Gentiles and Israel being left desolate? Is not Daniel 9 specifically for Israel? Was not the Cross specifically for Israel as in Messiah was cut off for Israel's sake.

"And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined."

Compared to:

"And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate."

Yes there are differences. Verse 27 is a covenant with many, not Israel specifically. Remember Jacob was called out of Egypt to represent the church, just like the Gentiles are called out of the world to represent the church. Israel being a natural branch, family. The Gentiles being grafted in, an adopted family. But Israel did not become the Gentiles, and the Gentiles did not become Israel. No, both were made the church, one naturally, and one grafted in, but both were changed spiritually so, as individuals. Many of the natural family choosing to reject the church. Just like offspring of Gentiles are not automatically the church, but it has always been by personal choice.

Verse 27 is not specific to Israel, but to all humanity. Neither is the desolation specific to Israel even though Israel rejected their Messiah. Yes the Cross made the sacrifices obsolete, that is true. The fact that the Gentiles were blessed as long as they themselves were not cut off and made desolate, the desolation of the many is still future, where neither Israel or the church can be found on earth. Literally the only ones of faith on earth are the 2 witnesses during those 42 months of desolation.

The fact remains, that those who remain in the Lamb's book of life can only do so, if they end this physical existence by having their heads chopped off. That is why this is a time of great desolation. If they had made that choice before the Second Coming, they would have been part of the glorified church. They did not, so were not in any personal relationship with Christ, prior to the point they decided to have their head chopped off, to avoid the mark. Having the mark would then indicate their names had been removed from the Lamb's book of life, and all physical death would have done, is landed them in the Lake of Fire anyways. So sacrifices being totally eliminated, means one cannot even confess their personal sins each day in a personal relationship with God. No one will seek God. The only choice left is a beheading. The alternative is to receive the mark and be removed from the Lamb's book of life. Literally no more forgiveness of sin, and literally no more personal relationships with God. This is total desolation, not even the fulness of the Gentiles being brought in. The harvest of the living church ended at the 6th Seal. Only the 144k sealed by the angel had any purpose as direct disciples of Christ the Prince during the final harvest. But even that is declared over at the 7th Trumpet.

It is not even an argument of escape. It is the end, period! The only escape is getting one's head chopped off.
 

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
13,426
2,789
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Finally, a logical statement. I was waiting to see if anyone understood why the first 4 or 5 seals were opened when Christ ascended. But, I didn’t see you actually explain scripturally why. I have my own reasons but would love to hear yours. For me, there are at least 3, maybe 4. You have listed one. At least 2 are found in Rev 4 and 5

Both ideas are terribly wrong.

The point Jesus made by His command to learn the parable of the fig tree was so His servants would recognize the final generation that will see His future return. He made that point by marking that final generation by how only they... will be the ones that will 'see' "all these things" (i.e., the Signs He gave there in His Olivet discourse). That absolutely places the events of the Seals in that... last generation, and not in any generation prior.

The Signs Jesus gave in His Olivet discourse are the Seals of Revelation 6. They are for the very end of this world leading up to His future return.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Truth7t7

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
9,639
629
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
By the way @Timtofly the latter would be in line with the olivet discourse which says the end begins with the abomination of desolation (verse 14) as well as 2 Thessalonians 2 which says the falling away and the revealing of the man of sin occur before the rapture.
I agree the end is the AoD. The fig tree begins the end. Some of that generation will have not died until Armageddon.
 

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
11,972
3,757
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Both ideas are terribly wrong.

The point Jesus made by His command to learn the parable of the fig tree was so His servants would recognize the final generation that will see His future return. He made that point by marking that final generation by how only they... will be the ones that will 'see' "all these things" (i.e., the Signs He gave there in His Olivet discourse). That absolutely places the events of the Seals in that... last generation, and not in any generation prior.

The Signs Jesus gave in His Olivet discourse are the Seals of Revelation 6. They are for the very end of this world leading up to His future return.
Amen, I Agree 200%

The future generation that will be eyewitnesses of the "Future" events of the 6th seal

Of course these events didnt take place in 70AD as Preterism claims, the 6th seal represents future events unfulfilled

What is near, even at the doors,(The Lords Return)

What is the day and hour no man knows (The Lords Return)

A Future Generation That Will Be Eye Witnesses Of The 6th Seal Events And The Lords Return

Matthew 24:32-36KJV
32 Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh:
33 So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.
34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
35 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.
 

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
9,639
629
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The question you asked him was ridiculous - are you pro-beheadings? It’s a ridiculous question to ask a Christian.
At that point in time it will be ridiculous to ask people if they accepted Christ.

Since the Second Coming can happen any day, those who find themselves still on earth are going to have to reconsider what is ridiculous or not at that point.
 

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
9,639
629
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
not at all as there is no statement saying, "immediately after the tribulation of those days" before the parables as to put them in the chronology of the Olivet discourse. The simple chronology of the Olivet discourse is the birth of a child. Birth pangs followed by labor and delivery (Great tribulation) followed by sorrow turning to Joy of birth (Rapture/second coming), which mirrors the fall feasts of the Hebrews. The 40 days of teshuvah culminate in the 10days of awe, and the day of atonement, followed by the ingathering which is the feast of the sorrow of atonement turning to joy.
You have verses referring to this child bearing process?

The AoD is the conception?
 

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
11,972
3,757
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
At that point in time it will be ridiculous to ask people if they accepted Christ.

Since the Second Coming can happen any day, those who find themselves still on earth are going to have to reconsider what is ridiculous or not at that point.
No such thing as a pre-trib rapture as you suggest

The two witnesses of Revelation 11 will rule the 3.5 year tribulation through plagues, a remake of Moses/Aaron against Pharaoh of Egypt
 

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
9,639
629
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I still don’t understand why it would be impossible for God to gather a harvest in stages. I mean, that’s how a literal harvest works, in 3 parts. First sheaf, large harvest, then gleaning.

Why couldn’t “immediately after” refer to a gleaning? And then a complete and total gathering together of all from everywhere they are?
The harvest started when Israel came out of Egypt. The OT was the first stage.

At the Cross, the NT church age was the second stage. Called the fulness of the Gentiles.

The final harvest is restored Israel, and more during the Thunders of all nations, the tares and the wheat.

The gleanings are the final 42 months, before Armageddon.

So the OT was an average harvest. The last 1991 years a full harvest. Yet there are currently around 8 billion souls to harvest, in short order. Not having any gleanings, is preferred.
 

Truth7t7

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2014
11,972
3,757
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The harvest started when Israel came out of Egypt. The OT was the first stage.

At the Cross, the NT church age was the second stage. Called the fulness of the Gentiles.

The final harvest is restored Israel, and more during the Thunders of all nations, the tares and the wheat.

The gleanings are the final 42 months, before Armageddon.

So the OT was an average harvest. The last 1991 years a full harvest. Yet there are currently around 8 billion souls to harvest, in short order. Not having any gleanings, is preferred.
The eschatology mentioned isnt found in scripture

In Love,Jesus Is The Lord
 

No Pre-TB

Well-Known Member
Jan 15, 2022
892
365
63
49
North America
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Both ideas are terribly wrong.

The point Jesus made by His command to learn the parable of the fig tree was so His servants would recognize the final generation that will see His future return. He made that point by marking that final generation by how only they... will be the ones that will 'see' "all these things" (i.e., the Signs He gave there in His Olivet discourse). That absolutely places the events of the Seals in that... last generation, and not in any generation prior.

The Signs Jesus gave in His Olivet discourse are the Seals of Revelation 6. They are for the very end of this world leading up to His future return.
When you started off with, your ideas are wrong, there’s no point reading anything else you write.

For one, you did not approach gracefully but instead through pride lifted yourself up. I did not even mention the scripture, and instead of inquiring, you try to silence anyone with a different view and then explain why you have the only right answer.

My response to him was that I’d like to see why he suggested that as I have scriptural reasons to agree.
 

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
13,426
2,789
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
When you started off with, your ideas are wrong, there’s no point reading anything else you write.

For one, you did not approach gracefully but instead through pride lifted yourself up. I did not even mention the scripture, and instead of inquiring, you try to silence anyone with a different view and then explain why you have the only right answer.

My response to him was that I’d like to see why he suggested that as I have scriptural reasons to agree.

Go fill yourself up with men's false pre-trib rapture theory, for you are spiritually drunk if you heed that false doctrine of men instead of Christ's Word.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Truth7t7

Titus

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2022
2,212
659
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The great tribulation is God's wrath against this sinful God rejecting world not His church(born-again believers)
1 Thessalonians 5:9
“For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ,”
Luke 21:36
Jesus says===“Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man.”
Hello, I'm new here. Will you say hello to me so I know you are receiving this post?